DNG2016

8071 pts ยท April 22, 2013


16 year olds shouldn't be facing the difficult situation when somebody gets pregnant & having sex (even protected) increases those odds.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 18

You pay through taxes then. Nothing's free. So i guess you're just getting your moneys worth lmao

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

If you can't afford the potential consequences of something, then it is not the smartest decision to be doing it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It's kind of harsh but if you can't afford a kid you shouldn't be having one. It's selfish to do so just because you want one :(.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Yep definitely an idiot for saying people shouldn't have sex until they are financially stable enough to handle the potential consequences.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Yep there are definitely strong urges, but as people we can resist our urges and make intelligent rational decisions.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

I have no problem with protection or learning about it, its the fact that at 16 ur not prepared to face the potential consequences of sex.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 20

We're in control of our decisions and it's absolutely fine to have that drive. Doesn't mean you should act on it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Using condoms is way better than not using them, but they shouldn't be having sex in the first place.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Using protection is better than not, but it's not as effective as not having sex. In my opinion that's the most responsible choice is all.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

encourage people to make smarter and more responsible decisions 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

SOME kids will have sex regardless (there will always be people who make bad decisions), doesn't mean everyone does or that we shouldn't 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

It is risking getting pregnant which is a situation 16 year olds should not be facing.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

Having sex can lead to becoming pregnant which shouldn't be a situation faced at 16. A good age is whenever you're financially stable.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

While it is better to have protected sex vs unprotected that doesn't mean you should be doing it in the first place.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 22

Just because a kid can decide to be a shitty doesn't mean you shouldn't try to guide them to make the best decisions

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

Not having sex is even more effective. They shouldn't be doing it. Doing something for fun that can have serious consequences is stupid

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 34

Puts you in a tough situation if one of them wants to keep it. Costs $300-$800. Some girls find it traumatic emotionally as well.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 18

When you are still dependent on your parents you cannot afford to have a child. Having sex at that age is irresponsible and stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 31

He really shouldn't be praised. 16 year olds shouldn't be having sex.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 70

He shouldn't be praised at all. 16 year olds shouldn't be having sex.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 62

I disagree. as he should be punished. Every time you have sex there's a chance of pregnancy and 16 year olds cannot afford that risk.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 64

Eh that one is always used but I believe if i remember correctly the guy was a lap behind so it only looked like he overtook him,

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When your main strategy is to overpower players, youre injury prone, advocate for more warning for drug tests, & threaten a linejudge...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Id be SHOCKED if they werent. They came out of nowhere w/ no real junior careers, want more notice for drug tests, and are injury prone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

5/5 Teachers should do their best but if an individual doesn't think the rewards of education outweigh the effort then thats their choice.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4/? and better jobs then they just arent putting thought into their life decisions so they can't weigh the tradeoffs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/?) You only were interested in science and having that is good. But its on individuals not seeing value in their education. Its your life

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/? if anybody wants to not get an education thats their choice but if people dont see that pursuing education leads to more scholarships,

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea thats on you not realizing that the more education you gain the more qualified you become and then you have more options for what you do

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1