12878 pts ยท October 22, 2014
Always feeling a little contrary. Member of the FrontPage Club. 3/3/2016
Because the Navy hired those people just to shot the missiles, and doesn't pay for salaries and maintentaince/fuel year round anyway
The bastion of Conservatism that is the NYT disagrees with you: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html?_r=3
http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/e93b5041-aee9-4289-acd2-ee46822c402e/06.14.16-doj-nsd-list.pdf
There have been dozens of convictions for terrorism from people coming from banned countries, check for yourself:
4/4 http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/e93b5041-aee9-4289-acd2-ee46822c402e/06.14.16-doj-nsd-list.pdf
3/4 That's a staggering ratio when you consider population levels. Don't believe me? Search the following doc for the countries banned:
2/4 If you actually track convictions there have been roughly 100 convictions from the banned countries, out of 580 terrorist convictions
1/xIt only shows terrorist MURDER, not convictions. Convictions is a far more useful metric because Cops/the FBI are good at catching people
It had Cocaine, but it wasn't added, it was a byproduct of using Coca leaves.
Having been to Bolivia, I can assure you the Bolivian government is in fact incompetent.
The difference is statistically meaningless, P=0.097
They have a no first use policy, so all they need is a deterrent from being hit in a first strike, this doesn't require as many missiles
3/x an attack that wipes out some of your cache. Finally, there are a lot of targets out there that would be worth a strike in total war
2/x In practice, even with MIRVs, this means tons of missiles. You may also need to double tap, so you need to have enough nukes to survive
1/x You won't achieve a 100% hit rate, or anywhere near it, even in practice. Your missiles will fail, get knocked out by interceptors, etc
4/X The SC says that CU can advertise the film because the FEC statute is unconstitutional under the first amendment.
3/X CU says this is infringing their right to free speech, they battle it out through local courts with the FEc until the Supreme Court (SC)
2/X they want to advertise it, but FEC laws say Corps can't do this within X days of an election because of the political nature.
1/X For those who don't know: Citizens United (CU), a nonprofit corporation, wants to air an anti-Hillary film during 2008 primaries
drugs yourself, and turning a blind eye to some undesirable activities of your partners in a corrupt part of the world
I never said they didn't smuggle, and both those articles are stretching the truth, take the NYT, there's a big difference between funelling
The report found evidence of the coverup, but no evidence of connections to the drug dealers central to his story, two different things
No, the investigation said there was a coverup , but that his allegations about the direct ties to the specific drug dealers were false
Perfectly plausible, people have this image, thanks Hollywood, of one shot kills, in reality the human body is remarkably resilient
Ala, SNCOs with 2nd LTs.
False, terrorists commit actions against civilians and general targets, freedom fighters only target legitimate government/military targets
You mean The Selective Editing News Network and the Media Arm of the DNC right?
Don't forget "Ghost Gun" Leon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJmFEv6BHM0
he doesn't watch the debates, something well-informed people wouldn't skip for Ninetendo
Because the Navy hired those people just to shot the missiles, and doesn't pay for salaries and maintentaince/fuel year round anyway
The bastion of Conservatism that is the NYT disagrees with you: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10Section2b.t-4.html?_r=3
http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/e93b5041-aee9-4289-acd2-ee46822c402e/06.14.16-doj-nsd-list.pdf
There have been dozens of convictions for terrorism from people coming from banned countries, check for yourself:
4/4 http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/e93b5041-aee9-4289-acd2-ee46822c402e/06.14.16-doj-nsd-list.pdf
3/4 That's a staggering ratio when you consider population levels. Don't believe me? Search the following doc for the countries banned:
2/4 If you actually track convictions there have been roughly 100 convictions from the banned countries, out of 580 terrorist convictions
1/xIt only shows terrorist MURDER, not convictions. Convictions is a far more useful metric because Cops/the FBI are good at catching people
It had Cocaine, but it wasn't added, it was a byproduct of using Coca leaves.
Having been to Bolivia, I can assure you the Bolivian government is in fact incompetent.
The difference is statistically meaningless, P=0.097
They have a no first use policy, so all they need is a deterrent from being hit in a first strike, this doesn't require as many missiles
3/x an attack that wipes out some of your cache. Finally, there are a lot of targets out there that would be worth a strike in total war
2/x In practice, even with MIRVs, this means tons of missiles. You may also need to double tap, so you need to have enough nukes to survive
1/x You won't achieve a 100% hit rate, or anywhere near it, even in practice. Your missiles will fail, get knocked out by interceptors, etc
4/X The SC says that CU can advertise the film because the FEC statute is unconstitutional under the first amendment.
3/X CU says this is infringing their right to free speech, they battle it out through local courts with the FEc until the Supreme Court (SC)
2/X they want to advertise it, but FEC laws say Corps can't do this within X days of an election because of the political nature.
1/X For those who don't know: Citizens United (CU), a nonprofit corporation, wants to air an anti-Hillary film during 2008 primaries
drugs yourself, and turning a blind eye to some undesirable activities of your partners in a corrupt part of the world
I never said they didn't smuggle, and both those articles are stretching the truth, take the NYT, there's a big difference between funelling
The report found evidence of the coverup, but no evidence of connections to the drug dealers central to his story, two different things
No, the investigation said there was a coverup , but that his allegations about the direct ties to the specific drug dealers were false
Perfectly plausible, people have this image, thanks Hollywood, of one shot kills, in reality the human body is remarkably resilient
Ala, SNCOs with 2nd LTs.
False, terrorists commit actions against civilians and general targets, freedom fighters only target legitimate government/military targets
You mean The Selective Editing News Network and the Media Arm of the DNC right?
Don't forget "Ghost Gun" Leon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJmFEv6BHM0
he doesn't watch the debates, something well-informed people wouldn't skip for Ninetendo