1090 pts ยท January 31, 2013
#7 Technically it can be washed off by other molecules of dihydrigen monoxide
Blebbing?
Gen chem, Orgo, p chem, a chem, inorganic. This is what they have been and always will be called
Yea think of sin/cos as operators, they act on an input and generate an output, no need to have units
Congrats! You should post about your work : )
What are you graduating?
It's a computer generated model
You should add Emmy Noether, I think her work was phenomenal
It's all relative really, it may be that evolution could have adorned us better, but the way things fell, we are still at the top
You also can't explain why the laws of physics or chemistry or biology are the way they are, you couldn't even begin to broach that
The point is, life isn't as ubiquitous as one might imagine given the expanse of the universe
Yea but we haven't discovered it and that's the point, research the Fermi paradox if you'd like to know what the possibilities are
Not all like that really (3/3)
Im thinking you're one of those people who has had bad experiences with religious people and that's why you have such animosity but it's 2/3
Yes well if being the only detectable life forms in a universe as vast as ours doesn't impart significance to you, Im not sure what would
I'd like for you to propose the field of science that is going to answer the question what is humanity's purpose
Yea i agree, tho not for the reason you say. Simply put you can't apply the scientific method/inductive reasoning to philosophy
If the question is of understanding, do you think a child understands the science they are taught? Religion addresses what science cannot
What about in private schools? What about in homeschooling?
Yes it's a very delicate balance which is what makes it so tricky to fight
It's almost as if the player became the bullet
Mostly, but still partakes in some very important chemistry in the atmosphere and whatnot so not entirely so
It was meant to be joke s/p our gun violence epidemic and the prevalence of firearms here, I.e. We call everything a holster, pew pew
Not in America
if phage exist that target specific bacteria and you believe endosymbiotic t then i guess it follows that virus should target mt, v cool
Not quite, he theorized and documented his theory but provided no experimental evidence, which is the real challenge
Good post! I enjoyed it
Not really, it uses the bacterial 'immune system' to remove or change portions of a DNA sequence
Considering the scale, probably molecular energetics, it's likely not evolutionarily advantageous
Holy moly is that Pete mackovicky! I've worked with him before, super cool dude!
#7 Technically it can be washed off by other molecules of dihydrigen monoxide
Blebbing?
Gen chem, Orgo, p chem, a chem, inorganic. This is what they have been and always will be called
Yea think of sin/cos as operators, they act on an input and generate an output, no need to have units
Congrats! You should post about your work : )
What are you graduating?
It's a computer generated model
You should add Emmy Noether, I think her work was phenomenal
It's all relative really, it may be that evolution could have adorned us better, but the way things fell, we are still at the top
You also can't explain why the laws of physics or chemistry or biology are the way they are, you couldn't even begin to broach that
The point is, life isn't as ubiquitous as one might imagine given the expanse of the universe
Yea but we haven't discovered it and that's the point, research the Fermi paradox if you'd like to know what the possibilities are
Not all like that really (3/3)
Im thinking you're one of those people who has had bad experiences with religious people and that's why you have such animosity but it's 2/3
Yes well if being the only detectable life forms in a universe as vast as ours doesn't impart significance to you, Im not sure what would
I'd like for you to propose the field of science that is going to answer the question what is humanity's purpose
Yea i agree, tho not for the reason you say. Simply put you can't apply the scientific method/inductive reasoning to philosophy
If the question is of understanding, do you think a child understands the science they are taught? Religion addresses what science cannot
What about in private schools? What about in homeschooling?
Yes it's a very delicate balance which is what makes it so tricky to fight
It's almost as if the player became the bullet
Mostly, but still partakes in some very important chemistry in the atmosphere and whatnot so not entirely so
It was meant to be joke s/p our gun violence epidemic and the prevalence of firearms here, I.e. We call everything a holster, pew pew
Not in America
if phage exist that target specific bacteria and you believe endosymbiotic t then i guess it follows that virus should target mt, v cool
Not quite, he theorized and documented his theory but provided no experimental evidence, which is the real challenge
Good post! I enjoyed it
Not really, it uses the bacterial 'immune system' to remove or change portions of a DNA sequence
Considering the scale, probably molecular energetics, it's likely not evolutionarily advantageous
Holy moly is that Pete mackovicky! I've worked with him before, super cool dude!