1974 pts ยท January 28, 2013
probably a racist scumbag, but that doesn't make him a murderer, which is what you're arguing for.
him to be a murderer so of course you'll look at everything in the worst possible light. I think Rittenhouse is a fucking moron and
point, but it's conveniently missing. I think everything you've provided points nowhere near his intent being to kill people, but you want
You can make any speculation about his intent, but that's all it is in my opinion. There's a key piece of evidence that would prove your
stuff about him potentially being a racist and a gun nut. I'm not arguing against those points, I'm arguing against him being a murderer.
And btw I didn't see anything in your articles that contradict what he said he was going to do, which is protect property. Just a bunch of
you were able to see it. And there's no trace of it anywhere and I can't even find anything refrencing it.
I just find it hard to believe that something that your argument kinda hinges on has completely disappeared off the internet, but not before
And btw, calling me a facist just because I won't falsely accuse Rittenhouse even though I don't agree with his actions is ironic.
haven't provided. I just want the social media post where he said he's gonna kill people, where is it?
for murder. 2 I think it's insane that you assume I consider him a hero just because I want proof for his intent to murder, which you
1 I've not even once defended him here, I've just stated facts. I think there's a pretty good case against him even with the facts, just not
I can't find any reference to them? Drop the attitude and provide any evidence for your argument please.
I'm just saying that I've never seen these posts and they don't seem to exist anywhere. You claim they exist but also seem kinda biased imo.
Well the posts weren't admitted as evidence in the court case, can't I find any mention of them anywhere. You'd think it would be everywhere
Wisconsin is an open carry state
As fucked as it is, it's his right to do so in america, right? If I went into a potentially dangerous situation I'd bring protection too.
I think that's speculation. But even if it was true, should he just roll over and die when attacked?
Yes I agree the US is a thirld world country.
Can you link a source for the social media post?
Yes but it's not like he shot people who were destroying propetry, he was attacked. Wether you think that was justified or not, it's a fact.
Didn't he use deadly force to protect himself from attackers? Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought he was attacked by three people.
probably a racist scumbag, but that doesn't make him a murderer, which is what you're arguing for.
him to be a murderer so of course you'll look at everything in the worst possible light. I think Rittenhouse is a fucking moron and
point, but it's conveniently missing. I think everything you've provided points nowhere near his intent being to kill people, but you want
You can make any speculation about his intent, but that's all it is in my opinion. There's a key piece of evidence that would prove your
stuff about him potentially being a racist and a gun nut. I'm not arguing against those points, I'm arguing against him being a murderer.
And btw I didn't see anything in your articles that contradict what he said he was going to do, which is protect property. Just a bunch of
you were able to see it. And there's no trace of it anywhere and I can't even find anything refrencing it.
I just find it hard to believe that something that your argument kinda hinges on has completely disappeared off the internet, but not before
And btw, calling me a facist just because I won't falsely accuse Rittenhouse even though I don't agree with his actions is ironic.
haven't provided. I just want the social media post where he said he's gonna kill people, where is it?
for murder. 2 I think it's insane that you assume I consider him a hero just because I want proof for his intent to murder, which you
1 I've not even once defended him here, I've just stated facts. I think there's a pretty good case against him even with the facts, just not
I can't find any reference to them? Drop the attitude and provide any evidence for your argument please.
I'm just saying that I've never seen these posts and they don't seem to exist anywhere. You claim they exist but also seem kinda biased imo.
Well the posts weren't admitted as evidence in the court case, can't I find any mention of them anywhere. You'd think it would be everywhere
Wisconsin is an open carry state
As fucked as it is, it's his right to do so in america, right? If I went into a potentially dangerous situation I'd bring protection too.
I think that's speculation. But even if it was true, should he just roll over and die when attacked?
Yes I agree the US is a thirld world country.
Can you link a source for the social media post?
Yes but it's not like he shot people who were destroying propetry, he was attacked. Wether you think that was justified or not, it's a fact.
Didn't he use deadly force to protect himself from attackers? Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought he was attacked by three people.