On most topics i'm pretty mainstream. Vaccinations are good, flat earth is LOL. Not buying carbon credits, due to man made ghg. Normal.
On most topics i'm pretty mainstream. Vaccinations are good, flat earth is LOL. Not buying carbon credits, due to man made ghg. Normal.
so beautiful
Used to?
i hate that your right :\
doesn't feel like car windscreen, feels fake
yes - that's the comment i was looking for .. yes , that man .. yes!
MFW you find an atmospheric scientist who thinks man made ghg is causing global warming ? ( not a politician or general newsreader ).
On most topics i'm pretty mainstream. Vaccinations are good, flat earth is LOL. Not buying carbon credits, due to man made ghg. Normal.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/sorry-global-warmists-the-97-percent-consensus-is-complete-fiction
"president of the American Association of State Climatologists" , wow that turned out better than i thought..
Patrick J. Michaels ? ( quickly googles to make sure he's not also copy & paste same research to two differant groups and getting paid x2)
oh yes, i dont doubt it. Having the unpopular opinion shuns you to a minority group.
For a second there I thought you posted a paper on climate change, was almost shocked. Turns out nope, Prof Salby double dipping his income?
This isn't the place for a massive debate, suffice to say this 97% is pure nonsense. lots of info on the google, have at it.
Of 3146 responses received, only 79 responses were considered for one question, and only 77 for the other.
of 10,257 Earth Scientists, of whom 3146 responded.
The "97% consensus" claim was first made in a January, 2009 article by Peter T. Doran about an April, 2008 survey by Margaret R.K. Zimmerman
So have 100s of others, & posted peer reviewed papers, but they are shunned by the press.
He's in the same group as atmospheric scientists then, sounds like a smart chap. Pay attention to what he says.
^ and they would be totally correct. Did they study atmospheric science ?
Yes, but the question is 'why'. Also if it can be stopped, should we ? Do we have the right ? Do we have any idea of things at this scale?
I skimmed 100s of pages by Prof. Murry Salby while doing a piece for Uni, the bottom line? It's not 'man made', we have little to no effect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ROw_cDKwc0
call me crazy, but it looks like some one shopped out a tattoo down the left side, ( zoom in ) makes the tree fake, eye liner pencil?
There's something not right about this picture, Photoshop artifacts down the left side ?
It's the where's waldo of 2017...
so bad... I love it.
"My Name Is Earl" (ended in 2009 or there abouts )
only 7 ? You got lucky.