23504 pts ยท February 22, 2016
After some time, things are so old that most people forget about them. That's when I repost them.
"Move the furniture out of the way, so that people aren't interrupted in their work"
And one of the first thing he said was that there was quite some differences in different conflicts... No, they didn't read it.
There are democratic governments that were overthrown by the CIA. Says more about the USA than about communism...
I was thinking the same thing, it doesn't feel like you're trying to understand, but just fight. Cheers.
Good enough to not qualify for the award for a bad performance anymore. It doesn't help to see it black and white good/bad.
with "not bad".
Oh sorry there was only one comment when I looked at it and it made sense on its own. But yeah, 140 character limit sucks. Replace "good"
performance. Plus saying "you can not get this award because you suffer from *disease*" is uncomfortable for other reasons.
never what you made up there - my point was it's an award for a bad performance, and a bad performance because *reasons* is still a bad
Can the irony be any bigger than making a straw man argument about me and then posting the link explainin straw man arguments? My point was
Yes, my bad. Replace "movie" with "actor's performance".
Seems a bit weird to me though. Watch a movie, think it's bad, then someone tells you "no it's actually good because they had this disease"?
I can assure you that even people who don't know who that is have imagined his voice
You do that, they do this, let's see who had the smarter idea
one tampon costs a buck, then someone just made use of your non-smartness for personal gains. I pay 4 bucks for a pack with more than 10.
hearing aids 7. If you think that the 19% is a deliberate attack on women, that's not very smart. But if you go ahead and buy a "book" where
So? Potatoes have 7%, sweet potatoes have 19. Frog legs and quail eggs have 7 while apple juice has 19. Glasses (for seeing) have 19%, but
education less.
It was written a bit abrasive to point out the hypocrisy. 19% as just the standard VAT. They're not charging women more, they're charging
Plus it's not like tampons for men had the lower tax rate. This ain't no pink tax, this is just valuing education.
On the contrary, the ones on the opposite side, te ding towards "wamen don't show ankle" are usually the ones with the lowest morals.
It looks tasty, but to call it "burger" seems a bit ridiculous. Closer to a Kebap, and even that is still off
They are currently baring them, at least - see "Cold Response".
in a war - if you'd CORRECTLY estimated it to be done completely after 2 weeks - isn't nearly as big as the threats they're making now.
Ukraine isn't really that big though. I mean, that's what everybody thought before they showed how much fight they have in them. Succeeding
"Move the furniture out of the way, so that people aren't interrupted in their work"
And one of the first thing he said was that there was quite some differences in different conflicts... No, they didn't read it.
There are democratic governments that were overthrown by the CIA. Says more about the USA than about communism...
I was thinking the same thing, it doesn't feel like you're trying to understand, but just fight. Cheers.
Good enough to not qualify for the award for a bad performance anymore. It doesn't help to see it black and white good/bad.
with "not bad".
Oh sorry there was only one comment when I looked at it and it made sense on its own. But yeah, 140 character limit sucks. Replace "good"
performance. Plus saying "you can not get this award because you suffer from *disease*" is uncomfortable for other reasons.
never what you made up there - my point was it's an award for a bad performance, and a bad performance because *reasons* is still a bad
Can the irony be any bigger than making a straw man argument about me and then posting the link explainin straw man arguments? My point was
Yes, my bad. Replace "movie" with "actor's performance".
Seems a bit weird to me though. Watch a movie, think it's bad, then someone tells you "no it's actually good because they had this disease"?
I can assure you that even people who don't know who that is have imagined his voice
You do that, they do this, let's see who had the smarter idea
one tampon costs a buck, then someone just made use of your non-smartness for personal gains. I pay 4 bucks for a pack with more than 10.
hearing aids 7. If you think that the 19% is a deliberate attack on women, that's not very smart. But if you go ahead and buy a "book" where
So? Potatoes have 7%, sweet potatoes have 19. Frog legs and quail eggs have 7 while apple juice has 19. Glasses (for seeing) have 19%, but
education less.
It was written a bit abrasive to point out the hypocrisy. 19% as just the standard VAT. They're not charging women more, they're charging
Plus it's not like tampons for men had the lower tax rate. This ain't no pink tax, this is just valuing education.
On the contrary, the ones on the opposite side, te ding towards "wamen don't show ankle" are usually the ones with the lowest morals.
It looks tasty, but to call it "burger" seems a bit ridiculous. Closer to a Kebap, and even that is still off
They are currently baring them, at least - see "Cold Response".
in a war - if you'd CORRECTLY estimated it to be done completely after 2 weeks - isn't nearly as big as the threats they're making now.
Ukraine isn't really that big though. I mean, that's what everybody thought before they showed how much fight they have in them. Succeeding