4638 pts ยท September 6, 2014
At 35, I'm downvoting you because even if he wasn't on the phone, it can be understandable that he would not realize someone immediately followed him in while focused on going through the steps of opening the store (and the aggressiveness/assumptions/insults).I have been followed by my kid without noticing until I turn around and walk into them, and have also scared the shit out of family when they happen to end up in front of me without me ever crossing their line of sight. It happens.
Well, I would say some OF creators definitely also do it for fun (but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to).I agree with you, just amused with the thought and wanted to share it.
For sure it is related to too much pressure, I just jokingly meant things along the lines of I'm not sure how she can use that much pressure and not have ground her teeth away/find it comfortable/not destroy her gums and the like. I don't get how she can manage it.
Used one for almost a year at one point with only a loss of color on the bristles being the change in its look. My teeth feel the same as after a cleaning at the dentist (who tell me they have no complaints from what they can see). You don't need to grind the back plate of the brush into your teeth for it to work.(GF's brush does look like that after about a week+, though).
I don't know how, but GF's brush looks about the same after a week of use. I've used one for almost a year (I know, supposed to change them every so often), and the most that had changed in looks was a loss of color on the bristles.
My issue when swapping to electric brush was trying to treat it like an electric brush (changing the way I brushed, letting it do the work). Once I noticed how much of a difference there was after having used a manual brush again on a trip, I started using the electric basically the same as a manual, with it just putting in extra work. Now I seem to be better off than ever.
Are we sure that is the "soft tissue" previous poster is talking about and they aren't meaning "impressions" of soft tissue, such as can be seen with some fish fossils, or the impressions of feathers?This is how I'm reading it when they said visible soft tissue (visible remnants of how the soft tissue was), rather than the cross-linking stuff that you are referring to.
Would that not make their beliefs the standards that they have? Whether you disagree with them, they are unreasonable, or any other potential issue there might be with them, that is still a standard.
Perhaps. There is a question presented, and I am often misunderstood (the way I express things isn't always "normal"), so I tend to give the benefit of the doubt and read things as favorably as possible. Worst case, they are still an ass and I lose nothing from trying (for conversation purposes).
Outside of knowing, and my OCD focusing on the details when I'm close to it, it actually looks nice from a distance. Way better than plain white, for sure.
I would disagree. They are literally asking why that solution isn't a solution/isn't implemented. This is a reasonable thing to do when you have a question about something that you feel you are missing info on.Now if they had just stated it as a "just do this, idiots" without any kind of question, absolutely. This is not what we are seeing, though (also potential depending on response to getting an answer, but epitome is only statements, no seeking information).
People who see something and ask questions about why things are done the way they are done vote? Good. We want people that ask questions and seek factual answers explained in easy to understand language. That's how they learn.
It's all about expressing it (when and how) and willingness to receive new information and update that opinion.Expressing it to ask questions about it, holding it when it's not needed, changing it when you get information that proves it wrong.
After reading the article, it's not "remotely," it's "automatically." Planned to (maybe) be based on current tech used in driver monitoring that already exists in some vehicles for features, and stated to be entirely in vehicle based (no remote connection). Concern was expressed that it could POTENTIALLY be used remotely, as there are many things that do involve remote connections, already.Not currently existing as a tech, and def not an "all new vehicles in America are" situation.
The proper response is almost always don't touch animals if you don't know anything about them/their potential dangers.
Do you think the people know what it is besides a fish they've likely never seen before? Do they know if it's got venomous spines that may be easy to visibly miss? If it will try to bite? If there are toxins coating it as a defense mechanism? Any number of other reasons that could make it a very bad idea to even try and touch it?Unknown creature/knowingly limited knowledge = don't touch is the proper response.
I would say that's owning it (admitting he did wrong, knows it, supposedly accepting of the consequences), but definitely not apologizing.
After seeing another comment, I retract my previous response. Lion explicitly states elsewhere "kneed him in the head full speed first." I tried giving the benefit of the doubt with a reasonable read of the comment.
I think he meant goalie's knee going into blue shirt's face.Blue goes for open ball, goalie jumps on ball, blue hits/rolls over goalie ("He didn't even hit the guy that hard, he just rolled on top of him"), goalie gets up and tackles blue before getting on top of him and knee goes into blue's face ("getting kneed in the face deserves some reciprocal hits").
Washing their mouth out with soap for using dirty language (those are soap brands).
Lop off the balls. While we're at it, add a new sex hole. Maybe give them some more chest for holding on to.
And a sign that guarantees to stop everyone from forgetting something is back there and thinking there isn't, right? (video itself has a statement that it was forgotten about)
And at one point they weren't. They still evolved to the way the are before being frozen. Some things interact, some things don't. We are immune to some diseases that affect other animals, not because we evolved along side them to have resistance, but because we evolved separately and they didn't evolve to interact with our systems. The separation can lead to non effective interactions with differences in how the two work, thus resistant.
As was mentioned, it's not logs; It tends to be a gaseous liquid mix (something caused the waste to go through your system a bit faster than usual, so it didn't absorb enough of the water). Think of any time you may have had diarrhea and some gas causes it to shotgun spray the bowl with the liquid excrement. Often also called a wet fart, it doesn't need to be much liquid at the door, hence not noticing it's there, and it feels like pressure from just gas.
As far as I'm aware, "no more tears" is tears from the eyes ("for no more teary eyes," "won't sting your baby's eyes"). It was J&J's campaign all about not making the eyes sting and, therefore, being good for kids and babies.As for the main point, yes, same word, different meaning.
Answering as a serious question: "Soil" is meaning "soiled," or dirty.Answering as a joke question: So it's clean enough to eat off of, duh.
That was my understanding for processors, with the "black" variant CPUs (at least for one brand) being the best of the wafers, and most suitable for overclocking.
Straight guy who's been going to the gym regularly for about half a year now and I have watched both men and women doing exercises (looking at exercises, form, counts, breaks, etc. in order to learn new/different methods). Talked to a couple people, helped spot one guy that was struggling on a last rep of some lifts, and other other such interactions.Yes, I absolutely do think he might have. This is before considering the facts that he could be gay/ace and that he continued the exercise alone.
FAFO (but in a good way).
It also ignores the more important number, which is the likelihood of and amount of future victims. It's not just "they did a bad," it's a "they will continue doing bads."
At 35, I'm downvoting you because even if he wasn't on the phone, it can be understandable that he would not realize someone immediately followed him in while focused on going through the steps of opening the store (and the aggressiveness/assumptions/insults).
I have been followed by my kid without noticing until I turn around and walk into them, and have also scared the shit out of family when they happen to end up in front of me without me ever crossing their line of sight. It happens.
Well, I would say some OF creators definitely also do it for fun (but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to).
I agree with you, just amused with the thought and wanted to share it.
For sure it is related to too much pressure, I just jokingly meant things along the lines of I'm not sure how she can use that much pressure and not have ground her teeth away/find it comfortable/not destroy her gums and the like. I don't get how she can manage it.
Used one for almost a year at one point with only a loss of color on the bristles being the change in its look. My teeth feel the same as after a cleaning at the dentist (who tell me they have no complaints from what they can see). You don't need to grind the back plate of the brush into your teeth for it to work.
(GF's brush does look like that after about a week+, though).
I don't know how, but GF's brush looks about the same after a week of use. I've used one for almost a year (I know, supposed to change them every so often), and the most that had changed in looks was a loss of color on the bristles.
My issue when swapping to electric brush was trying to treat it like an electric brush (changing the way I brushed, letting it do the work). Once I noticed how much of a difference there was after having used a manual brush again on a trip, I started using the electric basically the same as a manual, with it just putting in extra work. Now I seem to be better off than ever.
Are we sure that is the "soft tissue" previous poster is talking about and they aren't meaning "impressions" of soft tissue, such as can be seen with some fish fossils, or the impressions of feathers?
This is how I'm reading it when they said visible soft tissue (visible remnants of how the soft tissue was), rather than the cross-linking stuff that you are referring to.
Would that not make their beliefs the standards that they have? Whether you disagree with them, they are unreasonable, or any other potential issue there might be with them, that is still a standard.
Perhaps. There is a question presented, and I am often misunderstood (the way I express things isn't always "normal"), so I tend to give the benefit of the doubt and read things as favorably as possible. Worst case, they are still an ass and I lose nothing from trying (for conversation purposes).
Outside of knowing, and my OCD focusing on the details when I'm close to it, it actually looks nice from a distance. Way better than plain white, for sure.
I would disagree. They are literally asking why that solution isn't a solution/isn't implemented. This is a reasonable thing to do when you have a question about something that you feel you are missing info on.
Now if they had just stated it as a "just do this, idiots" without any kind of question, absolutely. This is not what we are seeing, though (also potential depending on response to getting an answer, but epitome is only statements, no seeking information).
People who see something and ask questions about why things are done the way they are done vote? Good. We want people that ask questions and seek factual answers explained in easy to understand language. That's how they learn.
It's all about expressing it (when and how) and willingness to receive new information and update that opinion.
Expressing it to ask questions about it, holding it when it's not needed, changing it when you get information that proves it wrong.
After reading the article, it's not "remotely," it's "automatically." Planned to (maybe) be based on current tech used in driver monitoring that already exists in some vehicles for features, and stated to be entirely in vehicle based (no remote connection). Concern was expressed that it could POTENTIALLY be used remotely, as there are many things that do involve remote connections, already.
Not currently existing as a tech, and def not an "all new vehicles in America are" situation.
The proper response is almost always don't touch animals if you don't know anything about them/their potential dangers.
Do you think the people know what it is besides a fish they've likely never seen before? Do they know if it's got venomous spines that may be easy to visibly miss? If it will try to bite? If there are toxins coating it as a defense mechanism? Any number of other reasons that could make it a very bad idea to even try and touch it?
Unknown creature/knowingly limited knowledge = don't touch is the proper response.
I would say that's owning it (admitting he did wrong, knows it, supposedly accepting of the consequences), but definitely not apologizing.
After seeing another comment, I retract my previous response. Lion explicitly states elsewhere "kneed him in the head full speed first." I tried giving the benefit of the doubt with a reasonable read of the comment.
I think he meant goalie's knee going into blue shirt's face.
Blue goes for open ball, goalie jumps on ball, blue hits/rolls over goalie ("He didn't even hit the guy that hard, he just rolled on top of him"), goalie gets up and tackles blue before getting on top of him and knee goes into blue's face ("getting kneed in the face deserves some reciprocal hits").
Washing their mouth out with soap for using dirty language (those are soap brands).
Lop off the balls. While we're at it, add a new sex hole. Maybe give them some more chest for holding on to.
And a sign that guarantees to stop everyone from forgetting something is back there and thinking there isn't, right? (video itself has a statement that it was forgotten about)
And at one point they weren't. They still evolved to the way the are before being frozen.
Some things interact, some things don't. We are immune to some diseases that affect other animals, not because we evolved along side them to have resistance, but because we evolved separately and they didn't evolve to interact with our systems. The separation can lead to non effective interactions with differences in how the two work, thus resistant.
As was mentioned, it's not logs; It tends to be a gaseous liquid mix (something caused the waste to go through your system a bit faster than usual, so it didn't absorb enough of the water). Think of any time you may have had diarrhea and some gas causes it to shotgun spray the bowl with the liquid excrement. Often also called a wet fart, it doesn't need to be much liquid at the door, hence not noticing it's there, and it feels like pressure from just gas.
As far as I'm aware, "no more tears" is tears from the eyes ("for no more teary eyes," "won't sting your baby's eyes"). It was J&J's campaign all about not making the eyes sting and, therefore, being good for kids and babies.
As for the main point, yes, same word, different meaning.
Answering as a serious question: "Soil" is meaning "soiled," or dirty.
Answering as a joke question: So it's clean enough to eat off of, duh.
That was my understanding for processors, with the "black" variant CPUs (at least for one brand) being the best of the wafers, and most suitable for overclocking.
Straight guy who's been going to the gym regularly for about half a year now and I have watched both men and women doing exercises (looking at exercises, form, counts, breaks, etc. in order to learn new/different methods). Talked to a couple people, helped spot one guy that was struggling on a last rep of some lifts, and other other such interactions.
Yes, I absolutely do think he might have. This is before considering the facts that he could be gay/ace and that he continued the exercise alone.
FAFO (but in a good way).
It also ignores the more important number, which is the likelihood of and amount of future victims. It's not just "they did a bad," it's a "they will continue doing bads."