16897 pts · May 31, 2015
Reverse image search? Good luck since that’s my Original photo and has only ever been posted here
It’s a hidden post. I never leave it indefinitely accessible.
No it wasn’t. Something a small amount of knowledge of where I received my degree from would instantly remedy. But you’re an idiot
Pretend? /a/seVPD remind me again where your doctorate is?
This isn’t my word /a/seVPD remind me about the doctorate you don’t have?
Read it entirely you lazy POS. Stop pretending to have any knowledge on a matter entirely covered by a seminal volume you’ve never read
I do have a doctorate, you don’t, yet you pretend to know anything about proper scholarship all while dodging the source you’ve been given
The point is people who don’t follow the teachings of Christ aren’t Christians.
And you still refuse to read the historical treatise all about the black people who lived all around Europe. Go waste your parents time
Dude, get an education and stop pretending your ignorance equals my experience and expertise. The only projector is you, and your ignorance
The study is available from the authors... there’s no paywall http://iacweb.ethz.ch/staff/fischer/download/etc/fischer_knutti_15.pdf
It’s not behind a paywall... http://iacweb.ethz.ch/staff/fischer/download/etc/fischer_knutti_15.pdf
“It is the most rare and extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic” this refers to everything greater than “moderate”
“It is the most rare and extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic” 2/2
Excludes heatwaves? No they show that greater than moderate events are MORE due to human impacts 1/
How do you get that from “ Likewise, today about 75% of the moderate daily hot extremes over land are attributable to warming.”?
“extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic, and that contribution increases nonlinearly with further warming.” 3/3
“ today about 75% of the moderate daily hot extremes over land are attributable to warming. It is the most rare and extreme...” 2/3
They find presently 18% of heavy rain events are due to warming, and 75% of moderate heat extremes being caused by it.
The studies linked cover the globe. Again for example http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n6/full/nclimate2617.html
Here’s just one such study linked in my above link http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n6/full/nclimate2617.html
The studies exist proving the relationship between warming and occurrence of record breaking extremes. Several are cited in my above link
Legitimate degrees above the bachelor level list the degree not the sub field
Here’s a US example http://www.climatesignals.org/data/record-high-temps-vs-record-low-temps
/a/s8JB0 gesture is for verification, not personal insult. We’ve observed a change in strength even since the 90’s
That’s not a correlation statement, it’s an attribution of higher temperatures to the overall warming trend
You’re confusing not observing an increase in frequency (aka. Activity) with not observing an increase in strength...
I’m a Ph.D climatologist, I’m telling you this is the case (it’s occurred over the post-industrial period).
“ The pattern of above average temperatures over land and in the oceans reflects the background warming trend” read for comprehension
This is the 21st century... it is observed
Reverse image search? Good luck since that’s my Original photo and has only ever been posted here
It’s a hidden post. I never leave it indefinitely accessible.
No it wasn’t. Something a small amount of knowledge of where I received my degree from would instantly remedy. But you’re an idiot
Pretend? /a/seVPD remind me again where your doctorate is?
This isn’t my word /a/seVPD remind me about the doctorate you don’t have?
Read it entirely you lazy POS. Stop pretending to have any knowledge on a matter entirely covered by a seminal volume you’ve never read
I do have a doctorate, you don’t, yet you pretend to know anything about proper scholarship all while dodging the source you’ve been given
The point is people who don’t follow the teachings of Christ aren’t Christians.
And you still refuse to read the historical treatise all about the black people who lived all around Europe. Go waste your parents time
Dude, get an education and stop pretending your ignorance equals my experience and expertise. The only projector is you, and your ignorance
The study is available from the authors... there’s no paywall http://iacweb.ethz.ch/staff/fischer/download/etc/fischer_knutti_15.pdf
It’s not behind a paywall... http://iacweb.ethz.ch/staff/fischer/download/etc/fischer_knutti_15.pdf
“It is the most rare and extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic” this refers to everything greater than “moderate”
“It is the most rare and extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic” 2/2
Excludes heatwaves? No they show that greater than moderate events are MORE due to human impacts 1/
How do you get that from “ Likewise, today about 75% of the moderate daily hot extremes over land are attributable to warming.”?
“extreme events for which the largest fraction is anthropogenic, and that contribution increases nonlinearly with further warming.” 3/3
“ today about 75% of the moderate daily hot extremes over land are attributable to warming. It is the most rare and extreme...” 2/3
They find presently 18% of heavy rain events are due to warming, and 75% of moderate heat extremes being caused by it.
The studies linked cover the globe. Again for example http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n6/full/nclimate2617.html
Here’s just one such study linked in my above link http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n6/full/nclimate2617.html
The studies exist proving the relationship between warming and occurrence of record breaking extremes. Several are cited in my above link
Legitimate degrees above the bachelor level list the degree not the sub field
Here’s a US example http://www.climatesignals.org/data/record-high-temps-vs-record-low-temps
/a/s8JB0 gesture is for verification, not personal insult. We’ve observed a change in strength even since the 90’s
That’s not a correlation statement, it’s an attribution of higher temperatures to the overall warming trend
You’re confusing not observing an increase in frequency (aka. Activity) with not observing an increase in strength...
I’m a Ph.D climatologist, I’m telling you this is the case (it’s occurred over the post-industrial period).
“ The pattern of above average temperatures over land and in the oceans reflects the background warming trend” read for comprehension
This is the 21st century... it is observed