372 pts ยท April 18, 2013
So the soldiers who invaded Iraq are also pieces of shit? Just seeing how far this goes.
The treaty breaking is an act of treason. Treason is a crime and more importantly, betraying your ally makes you their enemy.
Say that to all of the dead people the west has accused of being affiliated with terrorism.
Denial again? What is your source that no treaty was broken and the Muslims were merely power hungry?
Will you ever stop justifying Banu Qurayzah's attempts to commit genocide?
The behavior of IS is more like the tribe: treacherous and evil-minded. The fact that you keep dodging my point solidifies it.
If you don't see my comment as anything less than strategic, you definitely missed the point.
So it's okay to kill thousands or millions of innocents but not okay to wipe out traitors and willing combatants. Good to know.
So was Hiroshima, but the historians keep saying it was justified.
And more importantly, you're judging it while ignoring other facts and rejecting some as speculation.
I did not say that. You infered it. I said you're judging the circumstances of a desert city in 600 AD as being the same in modern times.
2 You have a very contrived sense of morality
So again, a bomb dropped on 100,000 people isn't as bad as executing 600 people on the basis of population rather than number?
You are a genocide justifier as well, since not once have you held the tribe accountable for their plans.
You sure have a strange sense of morality since you keep excusing that the tribe betrayed the Muslims and would have slaughtered them.
Are you saying these groups never massacred anyone or that they did? I lost your point.
Calling me a genocide lover over and over doesn't mean I'll ever agree punishing traitors is genocide.
You're using a strawman again. Capital punishment is as much a punishment as it is deterrence.
Who were these great empires?
2 and as a deterrent to any other tribe considering breaking their treaty.
Sure. The Muslims felt the need to treat the utmost treason with the utmost punishment. Both as vengeance for what it cost them
What a comeback.
You have no knowledge to judge 600 ad warfare
And guess what the tribe would have done? They were willing to wipe all Muslims out
Yeah I'm sure your moral code also extends to the creator of the universe. Crushed any ants lately? Weeped for any?
They weren't sold. They were taken by the Muslims. It's in Ibn Ishaqs book of Seerah.
Except there is no such thing in any of the tafsir books. You're making things up again.
God is the Judge of you and me.
Capital punishment: executing criminals.
So the soldiers who invaded Iraq are also pieces of shit? Just seeing how far this goes.
The treaty breaking is an act of treason. Treason is a crime and more importantly, betraying your ally makes you their enemy.
Say that to all of the dead people the west has accused of being affiliated with terrorism.
Denial again? What is your source that no treaty was broken and the Muslims were merely power hungry?
Will you ever stop justifying Banu Qurayzah's attempts to commit genocide?
The behavior of IS is more like the tribe: treacherous and evil-minded. The fact that you keep dodging my point solidifies it.
The behavior of IS is more like the tribe: treacherous and evil-minded. The fact that you keep dodging my point solidifies it.
If you don't see my comment as anything less than strategic, you definitely missed the point.
So it's okay to kill thousands or millions of innocents but not okay to wipe out traitors and willing combatants. Good to know.
So was Hiroshima, but the historians keep saying it was justified.
And more importantly, you're judging it while ignoring other facts and rejecting some as speculation.
I did not say that. You infered it. I said you're judging the circumstances of a desert city in 600 AD as being the same in modern times.
2 You have a very contrived sense of morality
So again, a bomb dropped on 100,000 people isn't as bad as executing 600 people on the basis of population rather than number?
You are a genocide justifier as well, since not once have you held the tribe accountable for their plans.
You sure have a strange sense of morality since you keep excusing that the tribe betrayed the Muslims and would have slaughtered them.
Are you saying these groups never massacred anyone or that they did? I lost your point.
Calling me a genocide lover over and over doesn't mean I'll ever agree punishing traitors is genocide.
You're using a strawman again. Capital punishment is as much a punishment as it is deterrence.
Who were these great empires?
2 and as a deterrent to any other tribe considering breaking their treaty.
Sure. The Muslims felt the need to treat the utmost treason with the utmost punishment. Both as vengeance for what it cost them
What a comeback.
You have no knowledge to judge 600 ad warfare
And guess what the tribe would have done? They were willing to wipe all Muslims out
Yeah I'm sure your moral code also extends to the creator of the universe. Crushed any ants lately? Weeped for any?
They weren't sold. They were taken by the Muslims. It's in Ibn Ishaqs book of Seerah.
Except there is no such thing in any of the tafsir books. You're making things up again.
God is the Judge of you and me.
Capital punishment: executing criminals.