204136 pts ยท May 25, 2015
hello friend
is this another brits vs france thing?
same way setting up a fire alarm is gonna extinguish a building
that's literally what democracy means, comes from the greek words "demos", meaning people, and "kratos", meaning to rule
(Bill Greene of Texas) voted for Pence too for VP, and he was supposed to vote for him in the first place.
On the other hand, all seven of the faithless electors voted for candidates other than Trump and Hillary, and only one of them >
They did work in Maine, Minnesota, and Colorado last election, although they did not manage to change any votes in Hawaii and Washington. >
faithless electors to win, 37 if Georgia goes blue, from IL, GA, PA, NY, NJ, RI, and NH, of a total of 117. That's a lot of dems to corrupt.
That's why a bunch of states have faithless elector laws, and more of them are blue than red this time around. Trump would need 21 >
He'd have to run from prison. Not unheard of, but would be hella ironic if the "law and order" party still voted for a convicted criminal.
No, not every single one. Contrary to popular belief, not every republican is a moron
his cult is largely herded by media empires which aren't yet going directly against him, but they are covering their asses now
Aren't electors chosen by the parties in advance?
sort of yeah, these days
higher number of electors because it starts from 3 and only then distributed by population)
the same number of electors, which scales roughly by the population of the state but also not entirely (smaller states have proportionally >
is "won" or "lost" by a single party, so if you win three states at 51-49 you get all their votes, or you can win 70-30 and still just get >
that if they arrive to DC and figure out that something's not right they can be informed. The drawback of this whole thing is each state >
Because the US has an archaic as fuck system where they vote for electors, and electors vote for the real president, with the idea being >
so an alex jones copycat?
even better, it's opaque initially, but it's one of those white cloths that get see-through when they get wet as she drools on it
Shady is the name of the game for employment anywhere besides a small number of civilized countries
group running this whole site
Imgur, we'd just like some honesty about what's going on between one of the most important members of this supposed community and the >
That's a very different power dynamic though. Cops assume guilt to control you, but in this whole scandal no one is trying to control >
you'd be surprised how much shit goes on in the world, aside from a few civilized countries in Europe the US is the sane one by comparison
There are usually administrative fees, but rarely anything at this level
Nestle values their business by killing children in Africa, shareholder value doesn't exactly make everything moral. I just want the truth.
I do agree with that, but if they don't care about us why should we care about their bottom line?
That perspective only protects one thing, the bottom line of both parties -- or, most likely in this specific case, only Imgur's.
Anything that can be destroyed by the truth deserves to be destroyed by it, Mr. Puckett included. But he's not the one avoiding the truth.
is this another brits vs france thing?
same way setting up a fire alarm is gonna extinguish a building
that's literally what democracy means, comes from the greek words "demos", meaning people, and "kratos", meaning to rule
(Bill Greene of Texas) voted for Pence too for VP, and he was supposed to vote for him in the first place.
On the other hand, all seven of the faithless electors voted for candidates other than Trump and Hillary, and only one of them >
They did work in Maine, Minnesota, and Colorado last election, although they did not manage to change any votes in Hawaii and Washington. >
faithless electors to win, 37 if Georgia goes blue, from IL, GA, PA, NY, NJ, RI, and NH, of a total of 117. That's a lot of dems to corrupt.
That's why a bunch of states have faithless elector laws, and more of them are blue than red this time around. Trump would need 21 >
He'd have to run from prison. Not unheard of, but would be hella ironic if the "law and order" party still voted for a convicted criminal.
No, not every single one. Contrary to popular belief, not every republican is a moron
his cult is largely herded by media empires which aren't yet going directly against him, but they are covering their asses now
Aren't electors chosen by the parties in advance?
sort of yeah, these days
higher number of electors because it starts from 3 and only then distributed by population)
the same number of electors, which scales roughly by the population of the state but also not entirely (smaller states have proportionally >
is "won" or "lost" by a single party, so if you win three states at 51-49 you get all their votes, or you can win 70-30 and still just get >
that if they arrive to DC and figure out that something's not right they can be informed. The drawback of this whole thing is each state >
Because the US has an archaic as fuck system where they vote for electors, and electors vote for the real president, with the idea being >
so an alex jones copycat?
even better, it's opaque initially, but it's one of those white cloths that get see-through when they get wet as she drools on it
Shady is the name of the game for employment anywhere besides a small number of civilized countries
group running this whole site
Imgur, we'd just like some honesty about what's going on between one of the most important members of this supposed community and the >
That's a very different power dynamic though. Cops assume guilt to control you, but in this whole scandal no one is trying to control >
you'd be surprised how much shit goes on in the world, aside from a few civilized countries in Europe the US is the sane one by comparison
There are usually administrative fees, but rarely anything at this level
Nestle values their business by killing children in Africa, shareholder value doesn't exactly make everything moral. I just want the truth.
I do agree with that, but if they don't care about us why should we care about their bottom line?
That perspective only protects one thing, the bottom line of both parties -- or, most likely in this specific case, only Imgur's.
Anything that can be destroyed by the truth deserves to be destroyed by it, Mr. Puckett included. But he's not the one avoiding the truth.