387 pts ยท December 13, 2016
MD hasn't voted for a republican pres since 1980s and is 70-30 leaning democratic in pres elections. We do have republican governors but they are a watered down version of other states republicans.
But not likely in Iraq though. Also gwb neutered many govt agencies like the epa during office, cut corp taxes creating large deficit
I accidentally clicked on your name and saw your profile. Dear Lord those pictures.
I thought it was to bring the 600 to 2000. Wasn't that always the case.
I agree people looking past her faults are just like the people who looked past Trump's faults
Corrupt DA willing to keep innocent people in prison so long as it protects her reputation
Lol I left the party because of Pallin. Left the Dem after 2016 due to them not being progressive enough. Independent since voting Dem still
That was due to overwhelming support from the MA legislature and MR proposed a weaker plan and tried to veto parts that benefit poor people
Moved to PA from MD which is 70-30 democrat leaning. Never felt my vote mattered more to a Presidential race than this election.
13th explicitly excludes "...except as a punishment for a crime..."
To be fair Sokka vouched for them big time so he thought they were allies to help with the invasion.
Legally PA doesn't have battery. Just assault.
It should be clear federally as well. Title vii has a numerosity requirement so the couple will be exempt from being considered an employer
I work in contracts and I know there are places that still do handshakes or verbal. They can fire him for sex, gender, race or religion
That wouldn't allow parents to terminate for covenenice without notice. If not it would be a breach of contract not discrimination 2/2
State laws typically mirror title vii and also has a numerosity requirement. Also for nanny arrangements I doubt if there was a contract 1/2
Yes, from my understanding of employment law in regards to the op bringing a claim of discrimination in this situation.
Under discrimination laws. He'd be more of an independent contractor if maybe he was contracted under an agency or something like that. 2/2
Based on the post I'd say he'd probably be more likely an employee but the couple would not be classified as an "employer" 1/2
You can for for any reason in this situation. The couple isn't classified as an "employer" under the law. Title vii wouldn't apply here
Yes, the couple isn't considered an "employer" under the law. You can pick whoever you want to work for you for this type of job.
A couple looking for a nanny isn't an "employer" which has a specific legal definition under the law. 2/2
Discrimination such as this can't be sued under title vii or any state statute I'm aware of. 1/2
Employer is specifically defined in discrimination statutes
Which turned the public against her and she lost her job and had to move due to death threats 2/2
The civil suit settled and Kobe admitted that it wasn't consensual and his defense team released false details about the rape 1/2
That is incorrect based on the jurisdiction of where this occurred, somewhere in the UK
The legal advice for this situation is correct based on the jurisdiction.
MD hasn't voted for a republican pres since 1980s and is 70-30 leaning democratic in pres elections. We do have republican governors but they are a watered down version of other states republicans.
But not likely in Iraq though. Also gwb neutered many govt agencies like the epa during office, cut corp taxes creating large deficit
I accidentally clicked on your name and saw your profile. Dear Lord those pictures.
I thought it was to bring the 600 to 2000. Wasn't that always the case.
I agree people looking past her faults are just like the people who looked past Trump's faults
Corrupt DA willing to keep innocent people in prison so long as it protects her reputation
Lol I left the party because of Pallin. Left the Dem after 2016 due to them not being progressive enough. Independent since voting Dem still
That was due to overwhelming support from the MA legislature and MR proposed a weaker plan and tried to veto parts that benefit poor people
Moved to PA from MD which is 70-30 democrat leaning. Never felt my vote mattered more to a Presidential race than this election.
13th explicitly excludes "...except as a punishment for a crime..."
To be fair Sokka vouched for them big time so he thought they were allies to help with the invasion.
Legally PA doesn't have battery. Just assault.
It should be clear federally as well. Title vii has a numerosity requirement so the couple will be exempt from being considered an employer
I work in contracts and I know there are places that still do handshakes or verbal. They can fire him for sex, gender, race or religion
That wouldn't allow parents to terminate for covenenice without notice. If not it would be a breach of contract not discrimination 2/2
State laws typically mirror title vii and also has a numerosity requirement. Also for nanny arrangements I doubt if there was a contract 1/2
Yes, from my understanding of employment law in regards to the op bringing a claim of discrimination in this situation.
Under discrimination laws. He'd be more of an independent contractor if maybe he was contracted under an agency or something like that. 2/2
Based on the post I'd say he'd probably be more likely an employee but the couple would not be classified as an "employer" 1/2
You can for for any reason in this situation. The couple isn't classified as an "employer" under the law. Title vii wouldn't apply here
Yes, the couple isn't considered an "employer" under the law. You can pick whoever you want to work for you for this type of job.
A couple looking for a nanny isn't an "employer" which has a specific legal definition under the law. 2/2
Discrimination such as this can't be sued under title vii or any state statute I'm aware of. 1/2
Employer is specifically defined in discrimination statutes
Which turned the public against her and she lost her job and had to move due to death threats 2/2
The civil suit settled and Kobe admitted that it wasn't consensual and his defense team released false details about the rape 1/2
That is incorrect based on the jurisdiction of where this occurred, somewhere in the UK
The legal advice for this situation is correct based on the jurisdiction.