18929 pts ยท August 29, 2015
There is a random C.C in this Me! Me! Me! Dump
There is a Mexican dude in the pictures
I was referring to the whole host of Liberals that try to defend the neo-nazi groups for expressing those ideas.
Liberal logic: I don't agree with ethnic cleansing, but I will fight to the death for your right to organize and recruit for it.
Human rights didn't spawn without ancestors. The idea that there is a law and rights beyond government, like HR, comes from religion (2/2)
Yeah, in modernity. But the base for them was the natural law that had been worked on by theologians by centuries (1/2)
Which gave birth to the whole concept of human rights we have right now (2/2)
Yeah, but religion sprouted the whole concept of Natural Law, the idea that certain righta are inherent by virtue of human nature (1/2)
Religion is one of the earliest ideologies that has tried to unify humanity, so I would not link it to racism.
I don't want to be a dick, but that picture was staged for propaganda purposes.
It's a comment of reddit, probably from r/t_d. This person is serious, unfortunately.
Ah, a fellow Map staring expert
*Swede and Dane Jimmies rustling in the distance*
Agreed, but the father should have a part of the responsability.
So what? fuck the kid, it's his mother's responsibility. It does not matter if he can live with dignity. No matter the circumstances.
Removing that net hurts a lot of people that are not at fault, that have circumstances that forced them to be in this position (3/3)
that is designed to account for most as possible. Most of the cases don't have a good/bad side, they are not that simple. (1/3)
Yeah, but all cases have different circumstances. You are taking the "selfish woman case" and trying to change a system (1/?)
getting shunned by her family? is this fair? shouldn't there be a net so both of them live with dignity? (4/4)
by her family to have a baby she can't afford? what if she is a 16-17-year-old girl that was forced to chose between an abortion or (3/?)
Beside's, there are not only selfish women out there. What about a girl that grew up in a religious household and is basically forced (2/?)
It shouldn't. You can't force someone to not have a child. That is why we need to support it, so it does not suffer. (1/?)
Same line of thought. "Those that don't have the money don't have the right".
What is there to stop someone from saying "those who can't sustain themselves should not be allowed to go to school"? (2/2)
That is a very dangerous line of thought. It implies that only those with money have rights and liberty. In a world like that (1/2)
regarding the abortion, and not removing child care and hurting the future kid. (2/2)
She shouldn't. The system needs to be inproved. But, in my opinion, it shoudl move towards giving men more angency (1/2)
Mother's mistake
There is a random C.C in this Me! Me! Me! Dump
There is a Mexican dude in the pictures
I was referring to the whole host of Liberals that try to defend the neo-nazi groups for expressing those ideas.
Liberal logic: I don't agree with ethnic cleansing, but I will fight to the death for your right to organize and recruit for it.
Human rights didn't spawn without ancestors. The idea that there is a law and rights beyond government, like HR, comes from religion (2/2)
Yeah, in modernity. But the base for them was the natural law that had been worked on by theologians by centuries (1/2)
Which gave birth to the whole concept of human rights we have right now (2/2)
Yeah, but religion sprouted the whole concept of Natural Law, the idea that certain righta are inherent by virtue of human nature (1/2)
Religion is one of the earliest ideologies that has tried to unify humanity, so I would not link it to racism.
I don't want to be a dick, but that picture was staged for propaganda purposes.
It's a comment of reddit, probably from r/t_d. This person is serious, unfortunately.
Ah, a fellow Map staring expert
*Swede and Dane Jimmies rustling in the distance*
Agreed, but the father should have a part of the responsability.
So what? fuck the kid, it's his mother's responsibility. It does not matter if he can live with dignity. No matter the circumstances.
Removing that net hurts a lot of people that are not at fault, that have circumstances that forced them to be in this position (3/3)
that is designed to account for most as possible. Most of the cases don't have a good/bad side, they are not that simple. (1/3)
Yeah, but all cases have different circumstances. You are taking the "selfish woman case" and trying to change a system (1/?)
getting shunned by her family? is this fair? shouldn't there be a net so both of them live with dignity? (4/4)
by her family to have a baby she can't afford? what if she is a 16-17-year-old girl that was forced to chose between an abortion or (3/?)
Beside's, there are not only selfish women out there. What about a girl that grew up in a religious household and is basically forced (2/?)
It shouldn't. You can't force someone to not have a child. That is why we need to support it, so it does not suffer. (1/?)
Same line of thought. "Those that don't have the money don't have the right".
What is there to stop someone from saying "those who can't sustain themselves should not be allowed to go to school"? (2/2)
That is a very dangerous line of thought. It implies that only those with money have rights and liberty. In a world like that (1/2)
regarding the abortion, and not removing child care and hurting the future kid. (2/2)
She shouldn't. The system needs to be inproved. But, in my opinion, it shoudl move towards giving men more angency (1/2)
Mother's mistake
Mother's mistake