5982 pts ยท September 19, 2011
Inbox me your nudes. Or don't, I'm just a bio page.
Respectfully: How did you and how can I
This is wild. Could have used the voice lines from Graphic Audio.
How do you keep the sagging bricks on the blue house looking like that?
They've been deluded into thinking that last one is what raises their point-of-service prices, when really it's the other ones.
It's the character who thinks she'll never be loved so she loves the main character and constantly tells him that he shouldn't love her because she's not worth it.
Yeah, it's a fetishized version of low self esteem
It works if you assume the entire thing is sarcastic
How about you read "What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy" by Louise Richardson instead.
What kind of backwards as fuck logic is that?
http://feminist.org/nomoreexcuses/rapeisrape.asp
isaislol pointed out the British side, but in America it actually is rape now, thanks to the Feminist Majority Foundation's campaigning.
I took that from the FBI's website. Rape is penetration without the victim's consent (even if the penetration is done by the victim)
or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. "
"Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object,
"Well now he'll be harassed" doesn't change the fact that the application of the law was unfair and ridiculously biased in his favour.
The entire point of this album is that he isn't in jail. He also had sex with an unconscious woman. That is rape. The law failed.
The people wishing death upon him also doesn't change the rape apologist narrative that the media has been spinning.
The fact that Imgur and other places are upset over this doesn't change the fact that the legal system failed here.
I'm saying the comments here that I have made explaining rape culture. Also, he raped a woman. He basically got away with it.
Nevermind that the media at large is downplaying what he did and treating him like a victim. "think about his future!"
It shouldn't be up to the fucking internet to punish people because the justice system gives them a slap on the wrist for heinous crimes.
How about when this same thing happens to a black guy? They make a ~youthful indiscretion~ and their life is fucking over. Brock's won't be.
It's not about whether he can have a "normal future", he was literally fucking released from prison.
"He's getting demonized on the internet [even though the media is treating him like a victim], so his life is ruined, that means justice!"
Nevermind that as I have REPEATEDLY POINTED OUT, much of the time the evidence GOES COMPLETELY UNTESTED
Reasonable doubt should not be "the victim brought it on herself", it should be "the defendant didn't do it". Guess which usually happens?
"You were asking for it, you're just a slut, you were wearing revealing clothes" is putting the victim on trial. That's not how it should be
Specific groups like... the judge that let Brock go, the news calling him a swimmer instead of a convicted rapist, etcetera etcetera...?
Except... I'm properly using the definition of the word, while you're trying to redefine it to deny it exists in our country.
Such as street harassment or similar behaviors. Even the way that we judge worth based on sexual experience (more for men, less for women).
Respectfully: How did you and how can I
This is wild. Could have used the voice lines from Graphic Audio.
How do you keep the sagging bricks on the blue house looking like that?
They've been deluded into thinking that last one is what raises their point-of-service prices, when really it's the other ones.
It's the character who thinks she'll never be loved so she loves the main character and constantly tells him that he shouldn't love her because she's not worth it.
Yeah, it's a fetishized version of low self esteem
It works if you assume the entire thing is sarcastic
How about you read "What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy" by Louise Richardson instead.
What kind of backwards as fuck logic is that?
http://feminist.org/nomoreexcuses/rapeisrape.asp
isaislol pointed out the British side, but in America it actually is rape now, thanks to the Feminist Majority Foundation's campaigning.
I took that from the FBI's website. Rape is penetration without the victim's consent (even if the penetration is done by the victim)
or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. "
"Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object,
"Well now he'll be harassed" doesn't change the fact that the application of the law was unfair and ridiculously biased in his favour.
The entire point of this album is that he isn't in jail. He also had sex with an unconscious woman. That is rape. The law failed.
The people wishing death upon him also doesn't change the rape apologist narrative that the media has been spinning.
The fact that Imgur and other places are upset over this doesn't change the fact that the legal system failed here.
I'm saying the comments here that I have made explaining rape culture. Also, he raped a woman. He basically got away with it.
Nevermind that the media at large is downplaying what he did and treating him like a victim. "think about his future!"
It shouldn't be up to the fucking internet to punish people because the justice system gives them a slap on the wrist for heinous crimes.
How about when this same thing happens to a black guy? They make a ~youthful indiscretion~ and their life is fucking over. Brock's won't be.
It's not about whether he can have a "normal future", he was literally fucking released from prison.
"He's getting demonized on the internet [even though the media is treating him like a victim], so his life is ruined, that means justice!"
Nevermind that as I have REPEATEDLY POINTED OUT, much of the time the evidence GOES COMPLETELY UNTESTED
Reasonable doubt should not be "the victim brought it on herself", it should be "the defendant didn't do it". Guess which usually happens?
"You were asking for it, you're just a slut, you were wearing revealing clothes" is putting the victim on trial. That's not how it should be
Specific groups like... the judge that let Brock go, the news calling him a swimmer instead of a convicted rapist, etcetera etcetera...?
Except... I'm properly using the definition of the word, while you're trying to redefine it to deny it exists in our country.
Such as street harassment or similar behaviors. Even the way that we judge worth based on sexual experience (more for men, less for women).