5908 pts ยท August 7, 2017
Circa their legitimately large drop in viewership consistent with the kneeling. Because football is entertainment not politics.
Except the rule was put into place, because the people who actually watch the NFL called the protest stupid, and started boycotting it
There are still millions who likely don't know that was a lie, and it might bury his career, for the remainder of his life.
But when something as minimal as pissing outside can get you laid on the sex offender registry, but this kind of shit can't?
At Morgan Freeman; who is currently demanding CNN give as much publicity to proof the allegations on him were false, as they did to opposite
No, actually it isn't complicated. Presumed innocent, until proven guilty. There is leeway with children, on the burden of proof; but look-
My grandpa build his house in the 70's; he put a folding corner door, with a 2 story circular rotating shelf in it
If they're smart enough not to know what happens, they're smart enough to suffer the consequences man
The grooming case was dropped over the potential that the UK Gov't might be branded racist. They didn't like the optics cuz not brown
Becomes less joke, and more uncomfortable reality
and frankly the more I watch James Comey, the more the Inspectors general start sending out criminal referrals, the more Trumps deep state-
I didn't start on the right; here. I was a Sanders man myself. But as facts, and actual things happen you have to ask which side they fit-
You have to understand, I'm arguing with you from a position where 3 months ago I'd have made the same arguments against someone as you
Except that everything I've said was fact, so it's a lot less conspiracy theory, and a lot more blatant comspiracy
That the basis for which you have instated the special counsel is invalid; because it was opened by now known criminals at the top FBI
No I think when the same director and dep. director who helped prevent you from going to jail, then leak classified info to start the S.C.
the judgement of corrupt people factually being referred for prosecution, as fact to say that a person you can't prove is actually corrupt.
All of those some people who conspired are the sources for Trumps Corruption info, but they are already corrupt. So how can you trust -
Just in the last week. The evidence shows a long conspiracy dating back at least 4 years between them in political and legal cahoots
It really isn't. The FBI Director the deputy director, and the head of counter intelligence have all been punished for helping Clinton
I'm telling you these people are being referred to for criminal prosecution, and you still want to say that they were right about Trump
No it isn't and no they don't because the people that spread that 'knowledge' were compromised by the Clintons. Which undercuts the claim
criminal investigation, and indictment by the office of the Inspectors General
To conduct with a political opponent they have supported with factually less than honorable means that are resulting in their referrals for
Why is conspiracy to attempt to frame the president with intelligence means such a far stretch for a corrupt head of domestic intelligence
Who also paid them money, and who they helped get exonerated. They lied to FISA court, they lied to America, they've leaked classified info.
Funded by the political opponents of the target of the dossier in seeking that warrant, for which that dossier was received by Clinton
Plus, they used the Dossier in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Apparatus Court, to obtain a domestic spy warrant, while omitting it was-
So if they are corrupt and facing charges for aiding Clinton. They use corrupt means to start an investigation on Trump. How is the SC not?
Excuse me the political opponent of the *candidate they helped* exonerate
Circa their legitimately large drop in viewership consistent with the kneeling. Because football is entertainment not politics.
Except the rule was put into place, because the people who actually watch the NFL called the protest stupid, and started boycotting it
There are still millions who likely don't know that was a lie, and it might bury his career, for the remainder of his life.
But when something as minimal as pissing outside can get you laid on the sex offender registry, but this kind of shit can't?
At Morgan Freeman; who is currently demanding CNN give as much publicity to proof the allegations on him were false, as they did to opposite
No, actually it isn't complicated. Presumed innocent, until proven guilty. There is leeway with children, on the burden of proof; but look-
My grandpa build his house in the 70's; he put a folding corner door, with a 2 story circular rotating shelf in it
If they're smart enough not to know what happens, they're smart enough to suffer the consequences man
The grooming case was dropped over the potential that the UK Gov't might be branded racist. They didn't like the optics cuz not brown
Becomes less joke, and more uncomfortable reality
and frankly the more I watch James Comey, the more the Inspectors general start sending out criminal referrals, the more Trumps deep state-
I didn't start on the right; here. I was a Sanders man myself. But as facts, and actual things happen you have to ask which side they fit-
You have to understand, I'm arguing with you from a position where 3 months ago I'd have made the same arguments against someone as you
Except that everything I've said was fact, so it's a lot less conspiracy theory, and a lot more blatant comspiracy
That the basis for which you have instated the special counsel is invalid; because it was opened by now known criminals at the top FBI
No I think when the same director and dep. director who helped prevent you from going to jail, then leak classified info to start the S.C.
the judgement of corrupt people factually being referred for prosecution, as fact to say that a person you can't prove is actually corrupt.
All of those some people who conspired are the sources for Trumps Corruption info, but they are already corrupt. So how can you trust -
Just in the last week. The evidence shows a long conspiracy dating back at least 4 years between them in political and legal cahoots
It really isn't. The FBI Director the deputy director, and the head of counter intelligence have all been punished for helping Clinton
I'm telling you these people are being referred to for criminal prosecution, and you still want to say that they were right about Trump
No it isn't and no they don't because the people that spread that 'knowledge' were compromised by the Clintons. Which undercuts the claim
criminal investigation, and indictment by the office of the Inspectors General
To conduct with a political opponent they have supported with factually less than honorable means that are resulting in their referrals for
Why is conspiracy to attempt to frame the president with intelligence means such a far stretch for a corrupt head of domestic intelligence
Who also paid them money, and who they helped get exonerated. They lied to FISA court, they lied to America, they've leaked classified info.
Funded by the political opponents of the target of the dossier in seeking that warrant, for which that dossier was received by Clinton
Plus, they used the Dossier in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Apparatus Court, to obtain a domestic spy warrant, while omitting it was-
So if they are corrupt and facing charges for aiding Clinton. They use corrupt means to start an investigation on Trump. How is the SC not?
Excuse me the political opponent of the *candidate they helped* exonerate