5971 pts ยท November 21, 2014
Are you victim blaming?
He acted in self defence. The lies spread about him are numerous and evident by you calling him a bastard.
He only took the lives of people who attacked him. Grosskreutz had a gun pointed at Kyle, was disarmed (heh) and no more shots fired at him.
4/4 I am done with you. You're as thick as a brick and there's no reason to continue this discourse. Good day, I won't reply to you anymore.
3/? To point out how ridiculous it is what YOU are saying. You are a complete moron if you don't understand that.
2/? With scum saying that when a woman is assaulted they'd argue that "She was asking for it" because of the clothes she's wearing.
1/? I have no words. You're an idiot. What I did was an equivocation of your argument of, "He was asking for it" with...
2/2 As a personal note, I'll shed no tear for the death of a child molester, a wife beater, and the maiming of a felon.
1./2 The jury also concluded that with all the available evidence. The multitude of videos also perfectly show this.
The fact of the matter is Kyle was acting in self-defence. He was getting attacked and used lethal force to stop the threats coming his way.
I can't believe I need to explain this. I am taking your own conclusion and applying it to a different situation. I am mocking you.
However, I am indeed mocking you for your idiotic reasoning.
It's not an argument, it's a statement, since you already concluded Kyle deserved bad things to happen to him because he was asking for it.
Be sure to tell women to then no longer wear short skirts and walk in dark alleys. As the arbiter of "You were asking for it" has spoken.
Women shouldn't wear those short skirts anymore then. Especially not whilst carrying a gun for protection, as they're not allowed to use it.
So you're saying he was asking for it?
He was the only one getting chased by a mentally unstable child molester, then chased and attacked while he was trying to FLEE TO POLICE.
2/2 And Gaige, when he had his hands up was not shot. Only when Gaige then ran towards Kyle and pointed his gun at Kyle did Kyle shoot.
1/2 And stick to the facts of the matter, the only people he shot were a direct threat to his life. Getting kicked and beaten.
Oh you mean that instance when he then calmly called police and left?
And dude, calm down. Seriously.
The rioters had nefarious business, so Kyle's reasons were better as he was there to help and to protect. I don't think it was smart though.
Your question is nonsensical so you receive a dismissive answer back. Simple fact is that he had as much right to be there as anyone else.
I don't know, ask the rioters.
A quick reminder to you that his firearm saved his life.
He had as much business being there as the rioters and his attackers. Technicality meaning just the law, as it wasn't a short-barreled rifle
Because of that lie he's no longer allowed to self-defense? Is that your point? Since Rosenbaum chased and attacked Rittenhouse first.
Yes it's not true, he's not an EMT, he got basic training. So? What does this prove exactly? He still offered to help people in need.
But the word "victim" is extremely loaded, it implies innocence, and these attackers certainly weren't. They attacked Rittenhouse. 5/5
Furthermore, if the defense can show they were rioters, then they can use the word is what the judge said, but it cannot be baseless. 4/?
Are you victim blaming?
He acted in self defence. The lies spread about him are numerous and evident by you calling him a bastard.
He only took the lives of people who attacked him. Grosskreutz had a gun pointed at Kyle, was disarmed (heh) and no more shots fired at him.
4/4 I am done with you. You're as thick as a brick and there's no reason to continue this discourse. Good day, I won't reply to you anymore.
3/? To point out how ridiculous it is what YOU are saying. You are a complete moron if you don't understand that.
2/? With scum saying that when a woman is assaulted they'd argue that "She was asking for it" because of the clothes she's wearing.
1/? I have no words. You're an idiot. What I did was an equivocation of your argument of, "He was asking for it" with...
2/2 As a personal note, I'll shed no tear for the death of a child molester, a wife beater, and the maiming of a felon.
1./2 The jury also concluded that with all the available evidence. The multitude of videos also perfectly show this.
The fact of the matter is Kyle was acting in self-defence. He was getting attacked and used lethal force to stop the threats coming his way.
I can't believe I need to explain this. I am taking your own conclusion and applying it to a different situation. I am mocking you.
However, I am indeed mocking you for your idiotic reasoning.
It's not an argument, it's a statement, since you already concluded Kyle deserved bad things to happen to him because he was asking for it.
Be sure to tell women to then no longer wear short skirts and walk in dark alleys. As the arbiter of "You were asking for it" has spoken.
Women shouldn't wear those short skirts anymore then. Especially not whilst carrying a gun for protection, as they're not allowed to use it.
So you're saying he was asking for it?
He was the only one getting chased by a mentally unstable child molester, then chased and attacked while he was trying to FLEE TO POLICE.
2/2 And Gaige, when he had his hands up was not shot. Only when Gaige then ran towards Kyle and pointed his gun at Kyle did Kyle shoot.
1/2 And stick to the facts of the matter, the only people he shot were a direct threat to his life. Getting kicked and beaten.
Oh you mean that instance when he then calmly called police and left?
And dude, calm down. Seriously.
The rioters had nefarious business, so Kyle's reasons were better as he was there to help and to protect. I don't think it was smart though.
Your question is nonsensical so you receive a dismissive answer back. Simple fact is that he had as much right to be there as anyone else.
I don't know, ask the rioters.
A quick reminder to you that his firearm saved his life.
He had as much business being there as the rioters and his attackers. Technicality meaning just the law, as it wasn't a short-barreled rifle
Because of that lie he's no longer allowed to self-defense? Is that your point? Since Rosenbaum chased and attacked Rittenhouse first.
Yes it's not true, he's not an EMT, he got basic training. So? What does this prove exactly? He still offered to help people in need.
But the word "victim" is extremely loaded, it implies innocence, and these attackers certainly weren't. They attacked Rittenhouse. 5/5
Furthermore, if the defense can show they were rioters, then they can use the word is what the judge said, but it cannot be baseless. 4/?