Trump's Propaganda

Mar 6, 2025 3:29 AM

Let's actually go through and debunk each claim specifically:

1) https://reporter.nih.gov/search/hoBw75PFIkKKVxS6lCvtCA/project-details/10748892

"we will develop a mouse model of XHT that recapitulates clinical hormone therapy for male-to-female transition in humans. We hypothesize that mice and humans share sets of immune-related genes that are impacted by a feminizing hormone regimen, and that mice undergoing XHT will exhibit altered immune responses to a HIV vaccine compared to control male mice"

Or, to translate, they're investigating the impact of a HIV vaccine as it is modulated by HRT.

Goal: "Should this study reveal an immunoregulatory effect of feminizing hormone therapy on HIV vaccine responsiveness in mice, it will provide a new platform for assessing the effects of sex hormones on vaccine responses. Moreover, this animal model could then be used to test various vaccination parameters (adjuvant, dose, interval, etc.) for sex hormone-dependent effects, with the ultimate goal of designing an HIV vaccine that maximizes efficacy but minimizes adverse outcomes"

Better vaccines.

2) "Our long-term goal is to provide the necessary data for evidence-based fertility counseling of transgender men. Clarifying the effects and reversibility of cross-sex T therapy on the reproductive tract could lead to future paradigm shifts in clinical fertility care of transgender men."

https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10619517

Obviously they hate this one, it's meant to help transgender men.

3) Now I get lazy because I have a migraine. This study examining breast cancer in transmen, but "Our proposal will gain new insights about breast cancer risk as well as develop new approaches to improve cancer outcome in both the underserved transmasculine community and the cisgender population." Less cancer for everyone, yaaaay!

https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10912193

4) https://reporter.nih.gov/search/-NkoAnjCB0uKdDs0r_5qxw/project-details/10944419

"This project will determine the contribution of the gut microbiome to the effects of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in mice. Our study will provide information on whether GAHT exerts effects on skeletal maturation, and the mechanisms whereby the gut microbiome mediates the skeletal effects of GAHT. The project is important because the skeletal effects of GAHT in humans is a critical medical concern in transgender medicine."

Well of COURSE they hate this one! It could disprove their biggest lie about bone-mass! This one is just checking if the gut bacterial biology impacts hormone treatments. This ultimately helps anyone taking hormone treatments, I'd guess.

5) "This proposal will utilize cutting edge molecular, genetic, and physiological techniques coupled with experiments in both genetic mouse models and human transgender subjects to delineate the specific cell targets and physiological mechanisms by which androgens can impact normal female reproductive hormone secretion and will improve understanding of androgen inhibition of neuroendocrine reproductive dysfunction."

https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/11000334

This study will *checks notes* potentially identify a target for which ciswomen with high androgen can get fertility treatments. It also helps transmen so I guess into the garbage it goes even if it can help ciswomen!

6) https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10891526

"Our studies will be the first to characterize estrogen-mediated mechanisms of inflammation in asthma phenotypes in the male and female lung, contributing to the characterization of sex- and gender-specific factors accounting for inter-individual differences, as well as the effects of feminizing hormone therapy in lung pathobiology. We expect that our studies would serve to develop potential sex- and gender-specific treatments and recommendations for dosage of therapeutic agents to treat and prevent asthma in cis and transgender women."

IT'LL POTENTIALLY HELP TREAT ASTHMA FOR EVERYONE.

"Here, we investigate the mechanisms by which estrogen triggers inflammation in the male and female asthmatic lung. Our findings will determine the molecular basis of hormonal triggers of asthma exacerbations in cis and transgender women and lead to the future development of better personalized therapeutic options for lung disease."

Somethingsomething TRANSMICE

And a complete disgrace of an official government, WHITE HOUSE, webpage.

mildly_interesting

current_events

If those red hats could read, they would be just as hateful as they always are... they only have one setting.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 177 Dislikes 2

They know what they are saying, but everything they say is a lie, not a mistake or confusion, it's a deliberate attempt to deceive. Lies upon lies. Nothing but lies.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At this point it doesn't matter what Dumpindrawers says. His base will take it as gospel no matter how much it can be proven wrong.

He says the stupid shit he says to rile everybody up and draw attention away from the real nefarious shit he's doing.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've seen people commenting "at least now we're not paying for animal cruelty". As if they ever cared and refused to take madication developed thanks to animal testing

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I’m not trying to troll here, but each one of those specifically uses trans terms in the names and descriptions. Yes, they also help cis folks, but this isn’t “They confused transgender with transgenic,” when the title of the procedure actually says it’s targeting transgender.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They'll stop busses and trains because that's TRANSportation. They'll stop the economy because it deals with TRANSactions.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Dude... (and yes, I'm from so. cal. so I use it for everyone regardless...), you joke, but sadly this is already what has been happening. Have any one of a number of the magic "DEI" words in your grant, and POOF! It's been canceled.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's almost like transgender people are people first, and should be treated as such, because helping them helps everyone. But I wouldn't expect a fascist Republican to know any of that.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We truly live in the dumbest fucking timeline.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just like that mom who got upset when she heard her son was taught about Homo Sapiens at school... It should be Hetero Sapiens!

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is not that much money compared to what Americans use on their projects.
People dont realize how some of these are 5 year projects and contain payrolls for dozens of people that will do the research

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fucking morons

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, apart from anything else, $8.2 million isn't even down-the-back-of-the-couch money for the Federal Govt. It's "change that I accidentally scooped onto the hall table when I took my keys out of my pocket" money.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And further that grants for scientific studies, EVEN IF they had no clear or practical end goal, are how we advance knowledge and medicine.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much has been spent on golfing in the last month?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some funding is in fact for experiments involving transgender mice, to test the effects of gender affirming care on the efficacy of certain medicines in humans. And that's fine. Do people who have had gender affirming care not deserve treatments for medical conditions? Trump doesn't think certain people deserve access to vaccines and medicines, that's the important story here, and some news outlets apparently whiffed that in favor of reporting what they mistakenly thought was a sensational gaff.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Gender, as used in the term 'transgender' is a human social construct; there is no such thing as a transgender mouse.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That's a good point, and using it to refer to mice the way trump did further mocks and trivializes transgender people. But the first study on the list does propose to test 'the immune responses of “cis” vs. “trans” mice to a HIV vaccine.' I haven't read the others.

The most important story is that trump wants to defund these programs because they have to do with helping people he doesn't think deserve it, and that story has been lost in the noise about a gaff that didn't happen.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's an understandable takeaway from the phrasing, and yes, this conversation we're having ultimately matters very little, but 'cis' and 'trans' are prefixes that can be applied to many things, or, if there's not a good word to describe something like "mice who have had their genes altered to mimic being the opposite sex", just left alone to indicate one of the two states; we don't need to assume 'gender' should follow or apply.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, well said. And I didn't mean to sound so dismissive of the importance of the language. Trump was using the word in a demeaning way as always and that is destructive and dangerous. Some reporting and memery that followed the event didn't focus on the distinction you're pointing out, and instead denied there were experiments involving trans mice, which is mistaken and distracts both from your point, and from the fact that those experiments are necessary and denying funding is homicidal.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Clarification, if I may: none of those experiments look transgenic, so transgender/transgenic doesn't really seem to be the misunderstanding. All of the experiments appear to be models using sex hormones.

Sex hormones do a lot of things besides just determining sexual phenotype. There's a lot of study on how hormone receptors effect immunology and cancer development, infertility. But they seem to think "hormones only determine if boy or girl". Still sad.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8.3m is so small I wonder how anyone even bothers about it. That's like 8 miles or road, I wonder how many unnecessary miles of road was build...

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It probably cost more money than that digging up this stuff and adding it to the government websites.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It probably doesn't matter to most of Trump's supporters, since as Nazi death cultists they are against both being decent people and helping cure illnesses. So complaining about either interpretation checks at least one box on their list of "ways to be an asshole today".

1 year ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 2

None of these directly help straight white men so they are all waste in the right's eyes.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone knows that curing cancer gives you autism! /s

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Facts and reality have never mattered to them. The only things they care about is having their preconceived notions validated, and being given free reign to lash out in anger and with violence at anything and everything that challenges said notions. You will literally go blue in the face and die of oxygen starvation before you can convince them to change their mind.

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Again. They are Nazi death cultists. Causing as much suffering and death as possible is their whole goal. Doesn't matter to them who suffers/dies (even if it's themselves or their own loved ones) just as long as there is as much suffering and death as possible. Many of them believe by doing this they can usher in the End of Days and be Raptured up to Heaven just because they say they accept Jesus (despite their own scriptures saying they will burn for what they are doing).

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

there's a pretty good chance that there was a republican in the chamber that was turned on when they heard "transgender mice".

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some of my best friends are transgender mice.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

is this a Bard? or a Rogue?

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

it's AI is what it is.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The shading and lighting seems consistent to me but i'm not smart enough to look for a deeper element as a sign

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well the lack of an artist's signature is generally a good hint.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the belts, buckles, and straps make no sense, nor do the piercings. Tail doesn't look like a mouse's tail. Generic anime-style hair on an otherwise more grounded image. No real sense of the artist's style, very generic. All this felt, IDK, fishy, so I put it through an AI detector and it gave me a 94.something% likelihood of it being AI.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They just read 'trans' and thought transgender, I would say it doesn't look good for public transport but then again which public transport.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And you apparently didn't read at all because it actually IS about "transgender", not "transgenic".

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"The fake news losers" sounds like something that a 10 year old would say.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Everyone is so quick to defend the Biden administration's actual resarch, but the original critical post is literally BEGGING THE QUESTION that transgender research in mice is bad.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not bad, though.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, that's what "begging the question" means when it comes to logical fallacies in an argument.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a novel called A Canticle for Leibowitz that provides 3 snapshots of human progress ~500, 1000, and 1500 years after a nuclear war devastates the USA. The bombs were bad but the book posits that the bigger problem was that survivors killed the educated for knowing things they didn't know. This post is about that.

1 year ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

That's a wonderful book. Truly stands the test of time. Published 1959, won the Hugo award in 1961. It's never been out of print.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

real-life 20th century history to back that up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Don't those study costs look kinda.. cheap? Like the labor costs alone for any type of medical research is gonna be high, not to mention the equipment, material cost, and time involved.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, grad students have a $30-35k stipend (and may actually be paid by working as a teaching assistant) and postdocs have a $50-60k salary. These numbers are sometimes higher in cities with the highest cost of living, but regardless academia relies upon cheap labor.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's grants, so the scientists doing the work are underpaid.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

looks like Felon Musk's team did a search for trans, found transgenic, jumped to conclusions, freaked out about nothing.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, it looks like imgurians can't read, because the claim that it's about "transgenic" mice is bullshit, and the research in question is very explicitly transgender-related.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So, they removes transgenic... then enola gay, then inclusion? and each time, it wasn't even the thing they were looking for? Looks like a pattern.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really sad that this Twitter-tier garbage is on a fucking .gov site.

How in the world did the scheming, power-hungry GOP fail to source a serious candidate for their coup?

This whole administration is an 80s cartoon villain organization. Maybe we should be fighting back with one-liners and post-episode PSAs.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Coup? You mean like Kamilla did to Biden? If the Dims wouldn't have targeted their own candidates and then anointing Harris as the nominee without a public vote. Harris was a terrible choice

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 19

Do you understand what words mean?

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Words are hard.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You either forgot the /s, need to repeat the 4th grade, or are currently having a stroke.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Oh, well, I guess everything is okay then since Harris was a bad choice who didn't win a proper primary. I will now sit quietly as Vladimir Putin's friends further dismantle the strength and capabilities of a world superpower and divide the pieces among themselves.

It is exactly like Biden and Harris. Yes.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Trensgender vs. Transgenic, and they're too dumb to know the difference. So many f*cking idiots in the USA. This administration spewing out misinformation daily, and Fox "news" quickly helping to spread it to the MAGA red hats, who take it as Gospel without fact checking it. Bring the FCC Fairness Doctrine back, please. Reagan got rid of it in the 80's, and it's been all downhill since.

1 year ago | Likes 275 Dislikes 6

They're hitting Ctrl F and canceling anything with the word "trans" in it.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean I didn't even know the word "transgenic" before this post, but I'm also not so stupid to think anything with "trans" in it is "liberal woke garbage".

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I unfortunately know a guy who'd probably believe that, and I could rip my hair out about trying to explain stuff to him.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You just know they got there by just ctrl-f searching a budget document for the word "Trans" and just started blathering about everything that came up.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They probably used AI to flag "trans" in anything they could find; they are as lazy as they are stupid.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The entire population of America is still female by Trump’s own executive order right? So I’m assuming that Trump and all of the men in his administration are just trans masc?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It'll take decades to change the culture of ignorance

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only nice thing I can say is that these studies were mostly, or all, targeting cross-sex hormone stuff, "XHT" as some referred to it, so their bigotry was appropriately aimed per their goals of harming cis people in their rush to hurt trans people.

1 year ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

Apparently they're smarter than you, because if you actually read it, it clearly IS transgender-related research.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Did you read the part at the end where it stated the ulitimate goal was to improve HIV treatment

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is a point where your common sense at pointing out that the study uses words like "gender affirming" or "hormone replacement" ultimately makes this harder for you to understand.
The science they are doing is at the perimeter of human understanding, side note thats how ppl get a doctorate degree, and the science shows that genes are expressed differently and therefore drugs interact differently based on what genes are expressed. check out thalidomide, or dont actually its terrible.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Transgenic, transatlantic, transport, transaction. What has Biden done!

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about trans fats too!

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Trans' is as far as their search algorithm had to go before it flagged it, and one of Elongated Muskrat's little Doge Klansmen marked it in the 'Win' column. In Republican eyes, *anything* with Trans in it is bad.

Just wait for a family member have problems with their vehicles 'transmission'. Full on meltdown at the auto shop.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're not dumb. They know. They want a reaction, a distraction, keep everyone on their toes so they can keep doing what they're doing. One outrage after the other with absolute bullshit to keep us busy spewing out counter arguments and facts. Until we are exhausted and all bamboozled into submission.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

2 conservatives were complaining about non-binary people to me, and somehow they jumped into complaining about kids pretending to be animals in school? I was like bruh, pretending to be an animal isn't a gender thing, this has nothing to do with people being non-binary, what the hell are you guys on about, etc.

I did not dare to say that kids constantly pretending to be animals might just be future furries.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well. There is a thing going on were kids like preteen age are calling themselves Therians. My neice has gotten waaaaaay into it claiming they were a cat in their past life. Its gotten to the point she meow/hisses at people in school, public. Even change her name and wear cat tails. Poor kid is going through a rough divorce and her dad is a maga ass. We think it's her pushing boundaries. But. Big but it is a huge deal in her age group. So much so kids are bullying nontherians. She is 13.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A) Yes kids have imaginations and sure, whatever. They're kids.
B) They had some bullshit going around a few years back about there being litterboxes for these children that "identified as animals". Someone directly brought this up in conversation with me, I simply asked them "If this was true why are there not photos of these things all over the internet? The majority of high schoolers have cell phones now - there is no way this could exist without photo evidence. Sounds made up to me."

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

None of these are "transgender animal experiments" because there's no such thing as a transgender animal.

1 year ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 13

Almost all amphibians can change their gender "at will" based on populations. This is especially prevalent in frogs. I'm not sure if that counters what you were saying, or supports it?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Generally speaking, you should be correct in what you say before you bother saying it. I'm dismayed people are upvoting you...

Clownfish, people. Fucking Clownfish. Just for starters.

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

There is another one, the Kobudai. If the breeding male dies, than the largest female will switch to male.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are multiple species that change their sex, or change their roles from what the typically does to what the female typically does (and vice versa). But people are going to just beat the drum that "gender is a social construct", and then move the goalpost of the conversation.

Also, humans are animals, if we're just going to do the nitpicking thing.

And then there are others that are going to say animals can't understand the concept of gender, so can't possibly be transgender...Etc.*shrug*

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

TransGENDER, as a term, is difficult to apply to any non human animal because Gender, as used in the context of the term transgender, is a Human Social Construct. We can't accurately apply it to other animals without understanding their own social constructs around Biological sex and its presentations.

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

And while it's DIFFICULT to apply, it's not impossible to apply. Humanity just decides to declare it a _HUMAN_ social construct, instead of a social construct as if there's no social structure anywhere else in the animal kingdom.

But at least you offer enough nuance to suppose it _may_ apply, which is better than the absolutists that say it cannot, does not, and never will apply.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Until the animals chime in with their take on gender, it cannot, does not, and never will apply.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So go watch some of the male and female examples of species that go through transitions into sexes other than what they were at birth, and how their role changes along with it. Despite the arugments that happen here, there are academic and scientific studies of sex and gender roles in non-human animals. I suppose they COULD be researching a thing that doesn't exist, but I like to think most research trends toward useful work.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

We have a very limited view of how other species view any of their social constructs. I am not saying that they don't **exist**. I'm saying the human-definitions intrinsically require the human lens. I'm sure such analyses DO exist for non-human species, but since we cannot directly communicate these concepts with the species in question, it's still inherently flawed. And definitely irrelevant to the OP

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Clownfish would be transitioning their sex, not becoming transgender. Gender is a social construct, in order for an animal to be (arguably) transgender they'd have to display characteristics of one sex while being another. For example, some female lions grow manes. This is still not considered "transgender" though as animals aren't seen as being capable of comprehending gender as a social construct.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Gender and sex were interchangeable until recently. Which is why most ppl still use gender when referring to one's sex.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That does not change the fact that animals have never been referred to as transgender in scientific terms.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You've redefined transgender to suit your talking points. Let's go back and re-redefine transgender to what the word actually means:

Transgender, adjective:
: of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity differs from the sex the person was identified as having at birth
especially : of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity is opposite the sex the person was identified as having at birth

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Admittedly, the dictionary definition does specify PERSON, but I argue that if an entity transitions between sex states, and takes on the behavior of the sex not assigned at birth, then... Well. If a post-op, HRT-treated person is the gender they've transitioned to, that's also true of animals that don't need to go through such an ordeal.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

...........

Buddy....

Both of those definitions have "a person" right at the forefront....

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yes, and I acknowledged that. Well done, bravo, you cracked the case.

But at least maybe you've reset your definition of the word, rather than continuing on with the one you created in your own head.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Actually, there's at least one species of fish with the ability to change it's sex/gender back and forth as needed.

It would be more accurate to say that nobody is performing sex change operations on lab animals.

1 year ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

There's around 500 species of fish that can their sex.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Which is "at least one".

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are lots of species of lots of animals that change sex during their lifetimes. There are even insects that periodically pretend to be male or female to dissuade sexual competition.

1 year ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Some bugs want to be a dad so bad they'll take a dick to make sure it happens.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Dude, honeybee drones want to be dads so bad they will penetrate a "virgin queen" (beekeeping term) in midflight and then explode OFF their own dicks with a popping noise loud enough that humans can hear it.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've been that horny before. I get it.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think what OP means is that there are no transgender animals bc animals don't have a gender; they have sexes. They can be transsexual, shifting between different physical expressions of sexual organs, but gender is a human social thing separate from, though related to, physical expression. Gender ≠ Sex.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Humans love inventing boxes to restrsin ourselves with, instead of just yknow... being alive and doing whatever non-violent thing makes us happy.

We literally associated a colour which occurs in nature, with men then reversed it years later because women started using it, its ridiculous and funny how many of our own problems we cause.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I really think we cause nearly 100% of our own problems. We're a very weird animal.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See some other comments below in the chain. "Gender", as used in this context, is a human social construct, NOT equivalent to biological sex. So we can't really apply it to another species without understanding THEIR social constructs on the topic.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I think most animals probably just do what they want without so much concern for expectations and fitting in as we place on those things.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So if we can blame Biden for everything that happened while he was president, we can do that same for Trump right? Right?

1 year ago | Likes 448 Dislikes 2

Oh you sweet summer child. Thst's not how it works (for MAGAs and the GOP)... :(

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, all bad things are because of Biden and Obama, any negative effects of the tariffs are their fault, obviously... (/s)

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks Obama!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump tells you to look out the window while he shits on the table and walks out the room. Biden walks into the room and everyone is appalled when they see the massive shit he left on the table.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Generous of you to assume there will be a president after trump

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure... but the cultists don't care.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can blame him for most of the bad stuff that happened during Biden too, and you'll be right.

1 year ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 1

Wow Thanks Biden. My wife used to be faithful

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Of course not! Biden's bad financial decisions just happened to take an effect the same exact moment this orange clown rolled in tariffs!

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

NOTHING BAD HAPPENED AT ALL WHILE MOST HOLY TRUMP WAS PRESIDENT-KING

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes. It's literally that simple. Policies and executive orders and judicial rulings affect the governments in which they occur which in turn affect their populace. Sometimes it takes time for the effects to be fully felt, sometimes enforcement is near instantaneous.

We don't have to let some of those things affect us as much though, not everything a government does is necessarily right for the people. We don't have to fight hard, but every bit of resistance helps, no matter what form.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In 30 years people will be connecting the dots between problems of the time and trump like we do with Reagan today.

1 year ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

*3 years

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People are already doing that in real time. It's just that most people are too apathetic to listen or do anything about. It won't be until the next generation is reeling from all the ramifications and blaming the generations of today for not doing enough to stop Trump that more people will finally start listening. But even then it will mostly be in the capacity of saying, "hindsight is 20/20. We had no idea it would cause all these problems at the time, so don't blame us."

1 year ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

WHY is apathy an American tradition? WHY?! It drives me fucking crazy!

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Because that is a trait that was deliberately instilled in the lower classes in America. Apathetic workers are less likely to rise up against the elite. And in the instances where they DO rise up, they tend to do an extremely half assed job of it, meaning the elites don't have to do much to appease them. Like how one of these recent "big" protests where nobody was supposed to work or shop took place on a WEEKEND, where most of the participants wouldn't have been doing either anyways.

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Also, often it's not so much "apathy" as "exhaustion". The working poor are constantly teetering on desperation, one hospital visit away from financial disaster. Tons of people have to work multiple jobs to make ends meet, even with one or more being full-time.

Another thing that's by design; body and mind require rest. So if you keep people on the brink, their bodies will force them to rest and they can't read up on all the ways you're fucking them.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1