40% of the city's budget

May 25, 2022 6:20 AM

Medellei

Views

3154

Likes

113

Dislikes

15

https://twitter.com/NeeNeinNyetNo/status/1529220708601151491

this is not comforting

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Groan

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Instead of providing free college education, give 18 year olds AR15s on their birthdays & spend the rest on cops in schools. Genius /s.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

They did somethin with the money... Pocketed it and got their pretend army stuff so they can feel special.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just for context, the department has 7 people covering 8 schools. At least one school doesn't have someone there at all times.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cowards

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

The pigs are nothing more than the biggest gang in the USA, doing the dirty work of old rich white men.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#1 no shit. Throwing money at policing doesn't work at all. Militarization doesn't work. Claw back funding

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reform, not abolish.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Half a mill for GOLF? Is the mayor a relative of trump or some shit?

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Upkeep on municipal golf courses. Not saying it's a good use of funding, but at least it kinda goes back to the public

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s more important than emergency services

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean, that's kind of how it works, it's not like they're in your head monitoring for violent intent. Unless you have concrete evidence 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

that something is going to happen, and who's going to do it, stopping a crime before it happens is basically impossible 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Addendum: Even with both flavours of proof, stopping it before it happens can still be a nightmare of bureaucracy.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The whole SCOTUS ruling about police not having an obligation to protect you is based on a woman telling LEOs she was under direct threat -

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

- from someone she has a restraining order against. The police did nothing when presented with direct evidence of potential crime.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's the point. They're promising to the public that bigger popo budgets = more safety, and that's just wrong.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

die and the problem runs so much deeper than that but that doesn't mean reducing overall presence and crimefighting capacity is the play 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Police presence deters a lot of petty crime; it won't affect mass shootings because mass shooters usually go in expecting or planning to 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You'd think so of course, wouldn't you

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But then again, I come from the civilized world, so maybe I lack perspective because I grew up with fire and tornado drills instead 2.5/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The civilized world?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0