Red pilling is that a thing?

Oct 6, 2022 4:52 PM

newcirclehero

Views

196311

Likes

3946

Dislikes

76

https://twitter.com/keeltyc/status/1577844622642012162?s=46&t=XIictg_tk_C9AhkaWp8n-w

Perhaps also of note is the British court who found no room for slavery in common law, in 1772.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Anybody got legit sources for this? Not doubting. I'd love to get more details than a Twitter post

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I feel like a lot of this is revisionist and requires a LOT more citations than this tweet provides.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Jesus fuck this is a really problematically oversimplified take. Guys go read books, not Twitter.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

This is, predictably, bull shit in the core premise. These “shocking fact” exposés always need to be taken with a boulder of salt.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

The Townshend Duties increased taxes on tea consumers. The Tea Act dropped the tax owed by the British E India Co. It didn’t benefit America

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

doesnt really take away from the fact that the crown was taxing taxes away from the colonies and not providing anything in return

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Upvote for "Elon Musk can eat my poo"

3 years ago | Likes 585 Dislikes 9

Noooo upvote for blowing my mind and thanks to OP point to something worthwhile

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I love the he/him because it almost reads like it's driving the point home - *he* can eat my poo and my poo can be eaten by *him*, lol

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

fuckmusk.com

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I was glad it showed what the p stood for at the end.

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Same here!!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So we live in a country that has always been controlled at a social level by oligarchs and rich men with a financial stake in power.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Steal from a store, you’re a thief. Steal from workers, you’re a CEO.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Think another thing many overlook is that many of them founding fathers were 20 and 30 year olds.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Is this true?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what you're saying is nascar is literally part of the American heritage due to it being founded on smuggling.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think I speak for all humanity when I say "shut the fuck up Elon".

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I love how history taught me that England was the boogeyman and how some rough and tumble good guys saved us all.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

I'd expected some strong sources to support a claim this big and black-and-white. I'd have expected that competition between colonial and

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

british vendors or the failed parliamentary representation bid to be factors.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because they were. This is pretty trash 140 character history.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Exactly. It makes no mention of the forced monopoly the crown awarded the East India company.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also no mention that a lot of the actions/reactions at the time were started by a major credit crisis that had just happened.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is... complete horseshit :) https://kids.britannica.com/students/article/Tea-Act/630405

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Thanks for the sauce. Don’t really understand why everyone is immediately jumping to believe this based on a tweet…

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sources are for those that read far down the comment chain. Everything else is for views and likes.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The whole reason the US was created was to avoid taxes for a large military.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Thats quite ironic

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It absolutely isn't. The size of the American army after the revolution is tiny because the founders were terrified of standing armies.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So would you describe a tiny army as a large military?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. That's the point. The US military was quite small by 18th century standards after the revolution, hence all the shit about militia.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, exactly, the US didn't want to pay the bills for the British military after the 7 year war.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, my bad..I thought you were saying the US WANTED a big military.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

War is almost always the poor dying to resolve the conflicts of the rich

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

Washington spent the winter of valley forge in a fucking tent with his men dude. The tent is literally in a museum in Philly.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Honestly, Washington might be one of the few founding fathers truly worthy of respect. He died repenting of slavery. He fought in the front.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He died repenting of slavery but only freed his slaves contingent upon his wife's death, keeping them enslaved for more years.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That being said, he did some extremely courageous and inspiring things in his life. I was in awe of his achievements after watching >

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a docuseries called Washington. Jeff Daniels narrates it. It's a good watch.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hancock made his fortune smuggling molasses; it was the Sugar Act that soured him on the crown.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I was about to say, wasn't it the tax on molasses that caused it? Because we wanted to keep the molasses so we threw the tea in the harbor?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Bonus Army is just another sad American tradition of screwing soldiers over after using them to secure their personal financial interest

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yes and no. The bonuses were supposed to be paid in 1945, they wanted them 13 years early. What was done to them was a crime, but they...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... weren't in the right to demand them 13 years early.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on who supposed the 13 year delay of payment. In this case it wasn't the Vets, it was congress as a cheap last minute workaround to

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Maintain a moral high ground after allowing yet again the looting of the country in favor of a few. Hungry today 13 years doesn't matter muc

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wasn't justifying what happened to them, but this is pretty normal for how the US treats veterans generally. I am surprised they...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The best part is that some guy confirmed this by checking insurance records against cargo manifests from the time

3 years ago | Likes 1297 Dislikes 8

Red Pilling - am I doing it right?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Every state leader is a tyrant. Those are the rules of the game. You can not climb that ladder without being one. Others will outcompete you

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Which is why the founding fathers had the foresight to limit the gov’t’s power. They had first hand knowledge of how the powerful can lie.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Imagine you live in Guam, North Korea bombed you, and Amazon has conquered India but nearly gone bankrupt. You're now being taxed +20% 1/3

3 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 3

.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

on all shipping to pay off Amazon's debts. Oh and Amazon doesn't pay the taxes, but is buying out all your businesses, and the US troops 2/3

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

The Americans were in the wrong in the rev war. Sometimes the bad guys win.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And sometimes in war, neither side is in the right. Casus Belli doesn't ever have to be "right" it was only ever legal justification.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

answer to Amazon. That was the Colonies, but with the East India Company and England post French-American War.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

…but it’s where America’s day begins!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

History is uh, written by the victor.

3 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

I happen to live in a small town famous for a person who challenged the founding father theory...Charles A. Beard...quaker

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not always. The US won the Civil War but the history was largely written by confederate sympathizers, that's why it became known as the

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

War of Northern Aggression and people act like the treasonous fucks somehow had a chance to win the war.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is what happens when you don't listen when Uncle Billy tells you to kill all the traitors after the war!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

History is not written by the victor. History is written by the writers. That's why its the "fall of rome" and not "rise of the goths"

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Plenty have been written about big tiddies Goth chics

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not enough. I should know, just spent the last 11 months reading all about them. there should be more scholars in that field.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus, more far left bullshit propaganda. Don't we have enough far right bullshit propaganda? It imposed taxes on American resellers

3 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 16

Let me ask were those two smugglers yes or no? Did they have profits to lose due to the lower taxes, yes or no?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

while allowing British resellers to avoid the taxes including rebating the East India Company. The Townsend Acts were the first direct

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

The Stamp Act created the first direct taxes in British N. America. The Townshend -- not "Townsend" -- duties were imposed after its repeal.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tax on the colonists. But the colonists had no representation in parliament. Taxation w/o representation ring a bell?

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Weren't they offered representation but denied it?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yes.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

So, the UK acceded to every demand and they still revolted.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

No. They were offered 'virtual representation.' Meaning that already seated British PMs would speak for the colonies.No new representatives

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

TIL!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

were offered. British Lords were afraid that a combination of American and anti-noble British commoners would dilute their power. William

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

In school I learned Bacon's rebellion was a great pivotal time in our revolution. Later learned the guy was just pissed the British 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

wouldn't let him murder and drive Native Americans out of Virginia, so rebelled. Our history is pretty damn shameful but painted in gold 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Wait until you learn why half of y'all sailed out there in the first place.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Bacon's rebellion, while it is part of a trend of dudes wanting to take native land, occured 100 years before the revolution.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Damn that Sam Adams and his tepid devil's water

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Also, people shouldn't forget the heavy lifting against England was done by the french navy, eager to piss off the english

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

I mean, TBH, UK foreign policy for the past 400 years is a destabilized Europe. The End. End of statement.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The first half of the war was carried by the US alone convincing France they were worthy of support. The first attempt by the french to 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Support American troops directly with soldiers and sailors at the siege of Newport faceplanted hard. Yorktown/the capes are their big W.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

America wouldn't have won without the French though, there would not have been a second half

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is like diminishing Ukraine because they got Western arms. Those dudes still did the fuckin leg work.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only battle that was decided by the presence of french troops was that battle of the capes/Yorktown. All of Greene and Morgan's 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Victories in the south, Monmouth, Stony point, involved some french arms and equipment, but Americans did the fighting and dying. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's more to fighting wars than footsoldiers? I'm not an expert but this was what some university experts said to me.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Take us back!! At least New England

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

As an Old Englander... Sure

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm not sure I want to be under the thumb of such an auspicious monarch as Charles. One was executed for treason,& the other let London burn

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'd be more concerned about being under the thumb a PM like of Liz Truss, and auspices never enter into the matter...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Id be way more concerned about the Tories than a powerless figurehead?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, the Queen's dead and the new guy is grosser. Can Norway take us instead?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BS. Taxes were lowered for British merchants not American ones. This was to corner the American market for England at a time when America①

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

had the capacity to build ships to do our own trade. The "smugglers" were angry because taxing American merchants but not British ones②

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

forced to to become smugglers rather than letting a free market decide who would be successful (remember Europe was against free market③

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

capitalism at this time with a few exceptions). The idea the Whiskey Rebellion was started by businessmen is ridiculous. Whiskey was used④

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as money by many rural communities, so all of a sudden everyone had to pay what amounted to an income tax that people in the cities who ⑤

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

used paper currency or coinage didn't have to pay. This was at a time when the main method of taxation was meant to be import duties.⑥

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, this is a gross overstatement of all these elements. Read and understand at least the Wikipedia article rather than hot takes. >

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

"The [Tea Act's] hidden purpose was to force the colonists to pay a tax of 3 pennies on every pound of tea."

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Also, we would have single payer healthcare now.

3 years ago | Likes 411 Dislikes 15

And slavery would have been abolished 32 years earlier.

3 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 3

Nah there just would have been another revolution in 1833.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the Southern state would have revolted against Britain instead of the Union.Chances are they'd have been slapped down twice as hard

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's weird that people bring that up but ignore the way the British created and dominated the slave trade prior. It's nice when nations

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

grow but I don't think that absolved the empire any more than casino rights washed away the American native genocide.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Please read the reply you got, he’s correct.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course there is no denying that Britain started the slave trade and pretty much forced slaves on the colonies at the beginning. But by...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the time of the revolutionary war, British forces already freed slaves to bolster their ranks. And there is no denying that slavery would...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Single payer is nowhere near the most popular universal system.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 86

I love how this 100% true statement just gets hammered by the ignorant dipshits who think single payer and universal healthcare are the same

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Kicks the shit out of our bullshit for profit system, though.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Every universal system is better than the mess the Republicans have made of the ACA. Works great in states that try to make it work though.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

BTW, America has fallen out of the top 50 for life expectancy. Guess what every of the other 50 countries above us have?

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Not single payer but god forbid anybody ever learn anything about the various universal healthcare systems.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Most common is the Bismark model (basically a universal version of what the US uses), then Beveridge nationalized provision (like UK), and..

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

finally Single Payer (as in Canada). The particulars each have pluses & minuses, the only real important distinction is universal or not.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It's only in countries where there's low crime, low poverty, high attainable education, high life expectancy, plentiful healthy food.... you

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Actually it's only in a few countries period, since other forms of universal health care are much more common.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Know, not shitty countries we constantly here horrible things about.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So whats the most popular?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bismarck, a hybrid universal system where insurance costs are shared by employers and the state, guaranteed issue, community rating.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Basically what the ACA was written to do before the Republicans ratfucked it and the Roberts court lawlessly re-wrote it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Everyone its Mardukkur let's see what Tucker Carlson taught him this week!

3 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 2

LOL the odds of you having any politics to my left are basically nil. To the topic, GB is state-owned provision, zero payer.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 44

So no one pays? That defines single payer. Give your head a shake

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Look I’m sorry you’re completely ignorant about the various universal healthcare systems but you could try educating yourself.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 18

"Zero payer"? So the doctors are all volunteers, I take it? Is it a "B-Y-O-Bandages" situation, or do "zero people" pay for those, too?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There is no pay-for-service in Beveridge model systems, as the providers are employees or direct contractors of the state. Thus zero payer.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

GB has single payer AND the state owned NHS.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No it does not. GB has private insurance and private clinics, and then also has universal care provided directly by the state.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5