A MF’n ninja missile.

May 4, 2020 1:39 AM

Baldeagle33

Views

104813

Likes

882

Dislikes

27

Why not just throwing a piano on them? Coyote knows.....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So its a rocket powered turkey guillotine. I spprove.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's called the Hellfire R9X (AGM-114R9X) & it has a "kinetic warhead". It's basically a rocket powered bullet with pop-out blades.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Fly me closer, I want to hit it with SIX SWORDS!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In my day we fired lasers at our enemies and we considered ourselves lucky to even have lasers.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"I like rockets, but they don't have enough blades!" -Ratheon employee, probably

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember when Buster found out the video game he was so good at was actually flying drones for the army?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

hmm?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"What if we just dropped a bunch of fucking knives on the terrorists?"

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

You mean anti-personell weapons like in the good old days? Flechettes for everyone?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks like it hit and destroyed only the intended target. That is a good thing.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

I like how we put blades on it. You know, in case getting hit by a telephone pole traveling faster than sound didn't do the trick

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

They actually tend to poke rather neat holes into things, if you're not in the direct path you have a reasonable chance of survival.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's not a missile. The Rod From God (Orbital Kinetic Kill Weapon) is a hypersonic telephone pole with the destructive radius of a 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

conventional nuclear device, and none of the radioactive fallout. It is not an anti-personnel weapon.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They're probably there to mitigate the last foot or two of miss chance.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Everything is better with blades on it - some guy developing rockets probably

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone looking in the car. Ohhhhhh that's going to leave a mark...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, a rocket powered shuriken?

5 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 0

the rocket catapults it towards its target.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rocket powered lawn mower blade

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More like a larger-than-average broadhead arrow.

5 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

Pineapple slicer.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Weapons grade slap-chop.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reaper drone fires a ninja missile. Fucking nerds.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eliminated the target... and the rest of the family in the car...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dats a lotta damage!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fascinating new take on the old Hellfire missile. That said I strongly suspect those things end up creating more terrorists than they kill.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Meanwhile I just want to go to the hospital

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When blowing up a mothafucka is just not enough.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Explosives were too boring for them?

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 5

For ever person you catch in that explosion that's a family member or friend potentially radicalized. This is by far a better outcome.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Explosives are too cliche. Now attaching massive knives to a fucking jet engine? Thats a level of excitement only seen on cartoons.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It really is cartoon level isn't it. Wow.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Explosives kill too many random people. This thing F's up just the people in 1 car.

5 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

Provided you get the right car

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

I've seem a drone launch a hellfire missile into the wrong country

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, even if you get the wrong car it still just kills the people in one car.

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Again. Still far better than getting the wrong car and killing everyone in a 50ft radius around that wrong car.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Deadly precision that minimises collateral damage no good enough for you?

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

Some people have to make up first world problems because they don't understand that evil exists and some people kill them I guess. I think

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's great that we aren't making mass enemies of vengeance because we accidentally killed someone's whole (actually) peaceful family group

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

While we try to smoke check the one asshole over there executing a member of their family to gain compliance via fear from said peacefuls.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or using their family as literal human shields to keep their asses safe.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I require earth shattering kabooms!

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I'm suspecting we have a Martian around here... ;)

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Smart! Less collateral damage. what will they think of next? A projectile that kills only 1 person shot from some kind of personal device?

5 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

Smartphone explosive battery, yeah !

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but where'd you fire it from? your arm?

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Removal of ones arm to fire it is cool, but impractical in most cases. Perhaps a handheld projector of some sort.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If they make something that easy to use I want one!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

what if you can't see well that far? how about a sharp object that slightly extends your arm length?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is fictional, but it's terrified me pretty thoroughly since I saw it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlO2gcs1YvM

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm here far too long. I knew it was the drones ad before opening the link ?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The big lie of that video is the lack of countermeasures. There's no such thing as a perfect weapon, there'd be drones that shoot drones.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait so it doesn't explode?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

only the target does

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine the gore.... Christ. Is this even Geneva compliant? I get that blowing up isn't any neater, but this somehow feels more barbaric

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably under the same rules as the M1028 120 mm anti-personnel canister cartridge.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, think of it in terms of collateral and it's suddenly less "barbaric" than explosives

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It extends SIX blades moments before smashing into the target.

5 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 2

I mean, it sounds like a lot, but if the missile isn't hitting them directly, 60° sounds like a survivable gap.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Somewhere, an engineer desperately wants to suggest giving it a speaker system that screams, "AHH, GENERAL KENOBI!" before impact.

5 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Sex blades? Sounds hot

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Picture is from the SHITRAG that is the Daily Mail. This one of the standard ways that the Daily Mail makes EVERY story more DRAMATIC.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Amazed they didn't reference Diana somehow

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HOW MANY?!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So does it just like...blend them up?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There. Are. FOUR. Blades!

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Shall we begin again? How many blades are there?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you want TWELVE?

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

Well, kinda

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I hope Gillete don't read this comment.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I would have thought they would spin would have made it a lot cooler

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YOU CAN’T HANDLE TWELVE!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because that's how you get TWELVE!

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Next will be the "Rods from God". Kinetic energy weapons of just a 15 pound rod pushed out of a satellite.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

imagine a satellite pooping on you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those are NOT surgical weapons. The explosion would be comparable to a ground penetrating nuke, minus radioactive fallout.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, try nearly 10,000 kg rod. Project Thor didn't fuck around with 15lb bullshit.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So a rail gun?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean a 24 inch rod made out of, say, tungsten carbide?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If I recall, it was supposed to be 20 cubic feet of it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember - we're trying to destroy an individual - not large areas. The original plan was telephone pole sized rods. Too crude.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, if you're talking about rods of god, that's what we're taking about. But anything down from orbit is too destructive. At that speed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even just plain impact is explosive in nature.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The other issue is that it costs $10k usd per pound to put a payload in orbit, and these only work because they're super dense.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Artillery is cheaper, and I don't think any nation wants to start weaponizing space. OTOH, wouldn't be surprised if there's a ton of crap

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

lying in a DARPA warehouse just waiting for when that day comes. Unfortunately, with Trump running things, likely that all NATO future tech

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

has been compromised.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This is something we've already researched, and would be simple, if expensive, to implement. I think it's Project Thor. The explosion would

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Be on par with a ground-penetrating nuclear weapon, without the radioactive fallout.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The big problem is that getting them into orbit would cost around 230 million per rod, not counting any other costs.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, last I saw, tungsten rods at terminal velocity would yield a kiloton range explosion. I'm wondering, though, is there any point.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think several nations WANT to start weaponizing space, they just know if they actually open that door, everyone else will walk through too

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you sure about that? US had the star wars program...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And there are rumors/theory's that Russia has killer satellites designed to get close to and destroy nato satellites since 60-80s..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was just to scare the Ruskies. Current treaties prevent deploying Chemical, Biological, or nuclear weapons in orbit, for the US.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nothing about kinetic weapons though, and I would be willing to bet various countries have ordinace up there as 'communication satellites'

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Needs to end on a single sharp point, just for the chance to impale a motherfucker.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rockets have to be pointy.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah but this one is too soft of a point. It needs to be more sharp! Like a lawn dart.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a great project for the kids, arduino laser guided lawn dart.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just mount a knife at the front of a drone and pilot the sucker right into a motherfucker's eyeball! BOOM! Headshot!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Better than murdering every civilian in a 50 foot radius

5 years ago | Likes 396 Dislikes 5

We don't murder every civilian in a 50 foot radius unless we intend to. Trust me, I used to work in that field.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Now they'll just cut the pies at civilist weddings, instead of blowing 'em away.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh it does that as well. #muricafuckyeah

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What, you mean taking out a couple families in the immediate vicinity only helped the terrorists cause?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But then You have to tear down and rebuild infrastructure. Might as well get step one done and over with

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hellfire missile kill radius is like 8 ft. Seen dudes get launched from a motorbike when it missed and they ran away.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean 500

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you trying to tell me you have never in your life, not even once, wanted to murder everyone within a 50 ft radius of you?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I work in retail. Let's make it 200.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did it accidentally once after a trip to Arby's and 2 double beefs and cheeses

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Happens all the time to me, normally there are no other people other than me within 50 ft so that makes it easy

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is now years after I got out of the biz but we would fire various types of AGM114s and they had totally different effects based on the

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Variant and target type (enclosed building, open space, etc). I've watched guys get hit 10 feet away..stumble and run off..other times it

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Was crowds of people in a small walled area...all dead.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

I guess it's a good thing that we can be that specific.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If we are going to have to kill people...yea, I'd highly prefer it be specific

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Damn

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Also just caught your username. *raises glass of rainwater and grain alcohol*

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Beautiful

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The physics of blast waves are the real cunts of munitions

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

1 guy survived both Atomic bombs, the Australian Army had a Chieftain Tank survive a nuke test it was repaired and it served in Vietnam!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tune in next week for "How 1 grenade can hit you 5 times" or "I like my salsa extra chunky"

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This looks like a big improvement by reducing unintended injuries. Lot less shrapnel.

5 years ago | Likes 466 Dislikes 2

I remember reading that someone noticed that practice bombs are filled with concrete, & drop the same. Now we have laser-guided rocks

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the family of the deceased can come together lather and puzzle their relatives. It's a benefit for the whole family!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was thinking "why would you want less boom", and then I read your comment and realized my brain was in Michael Bay mode.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Even Michael bay mode is a lot less boom then WWII mode. Humans used to blow up the whole city to get a target.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The smartest bomb is only as smart as the intelligence behind it though.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Still less collateral damage regardless if the target is correct or not.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We've advanced weapons technology so far we've gone back around to swords.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Technically, it's more a precision guided javelin. Or with the aero surfaces, maybe a boomerang.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But these are rocket powered swords.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Terrorist leaders often travel with their families in close proximity. ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi was killed while hugging his 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 4

12 year old son and wearing a suicide vest, thinking it would prevent him from being shot.

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 5

So he was using a child as a human shield?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then F that guy and the parents that let this happen to the kid. Good news! same person.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He detonated the vest after a military dog named Conan was sent after him, dog was fine, he was not.

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Well... was he shot?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

A military dog was sent after him and he detonated the vest. The dog was okay.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

You can be shot and survive. You can be mortally wounded and not currently dead.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

The US military says he killed himself. Nobody else was present to contradict that story.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

A military dog named Conan was sent after him when he fled into a tunnel, he detonated a suicide vest.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It amazes me you're getting up votes. He died when he detonated his vest.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

It amazes me you didn’t notice him saying that literally right after making the comment you’re replying to

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And...? That doesn't make my point about terrorists using civilians as human shields incorrect.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

You never expressed that concept to make a point. You did make a false statement though.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 10

I.dont know if.youre attempting to.be pedantic, or just stupid.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It amazes me you're so stubborn you're arguing a null point.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Candidly, the story is told by only one side so it's inherently suspect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Not saying the story's bunk, but it's a single data point from a single source (US military) and their data portrays them in a good light.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The alternate is he was shot and killed and someone else detonated the vest. Not impossible but unlikely.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Looks like a precision guided application of the old Lazy Dog projectiles.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Quick fox projectiles

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... what? No, these were basically shopping bags full of cast iron slugs that they'd drop over enemy positions. each was about 1.5oz

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and they'd scatter and tear apart pretty much any soft target, going through humans longways.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

haha I thought I made the name up... quick red fox jumps over the lazy brown dog

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This isn't current events. Read about it a year ago already.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

How old are you that a year ago isn't current events? It was used to cause a major uproar in January and many people hadn't heard it then

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude, it says 2017 in the picture, nobody claimed it was recent

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well President Trump told me about it before it happened. He let me fly the drone. v

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I remember puzzling over these cuts for ages trying to work out what had hit the car of Abu Khayr al-Masri, deputy leader of Al-Qaeda -

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Turns out it was a Hellfire missle with fucking swords attached to it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How did they not just see it next to the car? Like where does it go when it's done if no boom?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kinetic energy would have destroyed it. Much like an armor piercing tank shell has no explosive charge.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh I thought the body would be solid not sure why....

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some of us were watching Tiger King & getting laid, so excuse the fuck out of me if I didn’t see that one article from last year.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Being cooped up for too long is making you edgy, isn’t it? Gees… lighten up.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Did your getting laid include straight men and meth?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So...we are getting aroused about the best way for killing men again. Great.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Or women. Equal op and all.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is not for killing men. This is for killing monsters.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Ah yes, dehumanize your enemies. Now, where have i heard that one before...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Brave of you to defend literal terrorist leaders who murder innocent people.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

There's that dehumanization again

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It came out that they counted every male fighting aged victim as "combatant". Talk about killing innocents.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

So does that make the US terrorists? Because we’ve droned an absolute fuckton of innocent people? One of the reasons we are having issues

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

With the various terrorist groups is that we are great for their recruiting. Turns out blowing up people’s families for the crime of being

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Maybe a court would be a civilized answer to that, instead of extrajudicial killings. But US actively blocks international Court 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Tell you what, you go try and arrest these guys. See how that works out.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But that's none of my... Wait, it's everyone's fucking business!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

you do know extrajudicial killings are done with legal input from military law experts right? there is very good proof things //

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They just have to keep the stuff secret because the evidence they have can point to ways/means of collection (ie data hacking/informents/etc

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The ICC is signed onto by nations. We did not sign nor do we recognize it. No international treaty may override the US Constitution, Bill/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/ of Rights, or US federal law, so there's no way it could be signed by us. So as the ICC lacks jurisdiction over Americans, end of story.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The same constitution grants EVERYBODY a fair trial. I guess it applies only when convenient.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3