Interesting perspective

Apr 13, 2018 2:17 AM

Entartika

Views

147612

Likes

2767

Dislikes

44

86k people moved to Seattle between February 2016-17. I am not at all surprised.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's almost as if those are expanded suburbs around giant metropolitan areas...

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I'm surprised I don't live in one of those dots (Las Vegas)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Because Las Vegas has a large transient population, and Clark county covers a large area.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why Donald Trump's beloved map is so red.

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 13

And a misrepresentation of the country.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

That's funny, almost all murders happen in the dark shaded area.....

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

and this is why we have the electoral college

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

Great. Just great. Now the North Koreans know where we are.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 8

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

lol my county is that one by itself in the middle of Michigan... Grand Rapids ftw

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks! Was wondering where I'd live if I ever moved to the US. I know which counties to avoid :)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Des Moines Iowa isn’t that big. Map is a lie.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

this just in! areas with high population densities have lots of people living there

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Meanwhile here in the UK

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People like to settle near the water

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I see that I do in fact live in one of the shaded areas.

8 years ago | Likes 698 Dislikes 5

Haha! My county is just outside the shaded area! Look for the mini Minnesota inside Minnesota.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ditto (Lake Co., IN).

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That means you're shady

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same. Direct sunlight is overrated.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Oh damn, I can to laugh at you all and I'm currently sitting in one :/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Me too!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hmmm, I apparently don't. Go Asheville!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About to move out of a shaded area and couldn't be happier.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

50/50 chance

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same! Tampa, FL. No wonder it takes me so long to get to work.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Or getting to the beaches on that end, oof. From usf to clear water with traffic was AWFUL

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Same, even in Utah

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

:(

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Me too! St Louis surrounding area

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can I zoom in and see you? What color shirt are you wearing? Can you wave?

8 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 2

My shirt is purple, like everyone else's in this photo.

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

My shirt is white because I live directly on a state border

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

May I point out that most of the shady areas are next to water and that the US has just pulled out of the climate accord?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes you may.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m so screwed- New Orleans

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oy, it used to be a massive coral reef where i live now and ive bought property that will be waterfront in a few thousand years. Long game.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How old is this map?

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Whats with the random counties?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s... statistical

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No Im saying that in New Mexico there are no where near as many people as in California is it random shading?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No wander I hate where I live too many goddamn people

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even some of those are misleading. Most of the shaded counties in Colorado are rural outside of the Denver area.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Hell, a good portion of Denver's Land area is DIA, because it's in the city/county limits.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How is Phoenix not shaded? It undoubtedly has a larger population than Minneapolis which is shaded. Something sketch about this map

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Sketchy as hell.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the counties add up to 50%, it's not just a map of the most populated counties in the country.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

East to west the counties become larger and fewer. They must have just said fuck it on the move westward.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

More land being owned by fewer people 100 years ago means larger counties.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Makes sense

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How did Omaha make it but not Colo. Springs?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Could be done on population density, not absolute population of each county. Not saying it is, just that it could be a viable explanation

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the map creator was going for 50% of the population, not most populous cities.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

How did Omaha of Douglas county make it, but not Lincoln in Lancaster? Sarpy county has half the population of Lancaster.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are a bunch of major cities missing. No Phoenix or Las Vegas for example.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

People who live in Nebraska are naturally more dense. Denser. They are the denserest.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

you can buy a nice house with a yard and gigabit internet for well under 200k though. even in the city.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not in all of Lincoln, but we're working on that. Thanks, Allo!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it weren't for the elec col, a politician would only need to campaign and spend in 4 -5 of those areas. THIS is why we have the elec col.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 8

That's a myth. It takes the top like 85 cities to make a good portion. If you're really curious I'll look it up when I can have sound

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Instead they focus only on swing states

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

If 85% of people are city people then they get to govern, unless owning large land makes you more enlighted for some reason.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Since you continue to make uneducated rants - The law is setup to protect the rights of the individual, not the masses. If a majority of 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

people voted to lynch you and hang you from a tree, should they be able to because they are a majority?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Where's Hope County? I swear that place has half the country's population, and they keep dying.

8 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 0

That even holds true to the very end!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right? Fucking Soviet army didn't throw away their lives the way that fucking cult does.

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

Even the Soviet Army didn't seem to have as many people as this cult.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Or the weapons. Thousands of machine guns, hundreds of helicopter gunships and light bombers...

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

WHICH THEY KEEP CRASHING.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Swear to god when I first started it took me like 30 minutes to get off the road because trucks kept coming from both directions..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Florida?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

False: there are no counties in Louisiana

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 10

Because Louisiana never got the French beaten out of it like it should have. Jefferson should be ashamed.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We should sell Louisiana to Quebec and they can be a soveriegn french abomination together

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We could sell it for like a penny an acre and make a profit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Toe-may-toe poe-tah-toe.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Parish the thought!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is why we still have the electoral college

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 16

No it isn't.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

no. its why the EC needs a SERIOUS update. while it is important that everyone see representation, one MUST admit that such representation 1

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

WROOOOOONG. The electoral college isnt an exact representation of population. it is meant to give each state a voice in how it is goverened

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

should, at least to a certain degree, reflect population density, and not by giving areas with less people more power than those with more

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Most of those states have the most electoral votes anyways what are you talking about

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Try telling that to middle America haha

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

oh i know. the worst part is, im not in one of the shaded areas either. but come on. why should 10 people get 1 representative cause 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they live rural aqnd only for that reason, when 1000 city folk are forced to share that same single representative? its insanity!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn’t that mean half the population gets way less than half the vote?

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

No, it means that this country is a union of states who each get a vote in how they are governed. Instead of 1-2 cities deciding for all

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except that voting districts are based off of population, so, not really.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yes, but then the leadership country isn't selected by and policy only written for, people who only live in densely packed urban centers.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

It'd be more a case of equal representation. That is, if people in the country are 15% of the population, they get 15% of the seats.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So the leadership is selected by and policy is written for people who live in less densely packed areas. As though that's better.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. It gives the little counties a fighting chance

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 16

So we're tossing the idea of equality out the window here? Country folks are worth more than city folks?

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 10

As opposed to city folks are all that matter because there are more of them? 4 wolves and a sheep voting on dinner isn't fair either.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 13

Yeah but you keep acting like if city people's votes counted evenly there'd be tyranny but if rural people's votes count more it's fair.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, it's more like 3 sheep at a dinner table and two are in agreement that grass is for dinner while 3 is clutching a shotgun and the

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

I'm surprised Phoenix doesnt get a shaded area, it's in the top 10 largest cities in the nation.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Not sure what’s going on in northern Utah either. I don’t think it even matches up with SLC

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The shaded counties are Salt Lake county and Davis county.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah you’re right.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it might be because Maricopa County is very large (also Clarke County for Vegas) and author wanted to show smallest area possible.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thank gerrymandering, its split up into numerous less populous counties.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The whole metropolis is in the Maricopa county.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

AZ or NV doesn’t have a dark county but NM does.. NM.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Right, and apparently El Paso Texas... bollocks.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And apparently somebody doesnt like that we are thinking critically.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I’m guessing it would tip over 150%, so the map creator decided what stayed and what didn’t. Interesting choices though.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There was certainly some picking and choosing with this map, which is weird, it's a sound idea but poor execution.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

it's from the US census bureau so I don't think so

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This isn't a map of the most popular counties in the US, just a selection of counties until population = 50%

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's almost like the electoral college exists to make sure everyone across the board is represented as fairly as possible

8 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 36

thats just blasphemy.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Then it does a shit job.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Quite the opposite actually...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Fair representation is one man - one vote. Not give extra power to a regional minority.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Why does empty land get to vote

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

Cause it ain't empty.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

Thank you for understanding

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 12

This is why Hilary lost

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

...well there's a LOT of reasons why she lost

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Isn’t that the main one, though? She got the majority vote and still lost.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

but the president represents every American, no matter where you live, unlike congressmen or senators. The el. college kinda fucks that up.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 11

The president represents the nation, not the people, that's what the legislative branch is for.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

okay, you could look at it that way. Again, the nation as a whole, not subdivisions of electoral colleges.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You do see the rationale behind electing a congressman based on districts vs a president that everyone votes for, yes? Congressmen...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

...represent their voters from their district, while the president represents us all. It shouldn't matter if you're in a city or not.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That's actually a pretty decent spread 85% of people live in urban areas down here in Aus and we really only have a city every 1000km's

8 years ago | Likes 833 Dislikes 6

Yeah sounds the same as the UK really. Maybe every 1500km

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Damn son, that's 1 megameter

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's cuz you barely have shade.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One day will reclaim the land we lost to the emus and reunify our country

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish the us used metric because I'm tired of being confused when others use it

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Well, you can still travel to Liberia and Burma/Myanmar unfortunately though the rest of the world went French instead of Roman.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Get off the drugs....there are multiple cities within 200 kms in rural areas...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Town Vs City. I like Albury and Orange but they're not exactly full fledged cities.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Based on the definition of them being a City, I guess they are, and they beat living in the shithole that is Sydney, speaking from exp.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I've just got my ties here in Sydney and the SO doesn't want to move. Country town living doesn't mean everything is correspondence.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its a shithole. I flew down for work and its stinks, like literally reeks. Dirty, filthy shithole. Everywhere except the CBD is a dump.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I love Orange, it’s got everything you need to live a simple yet comfortable life.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can we get a map like this for aus?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There totally is one! I don’t have it on me, so aren’t really helping you at all, but I promise it exists!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But there animals try to kill you, in murica people try to kill you

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

"try"... he says...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And bears, bobcats and cougars. Australia is really bad due to our spiders and snakes but getting mauled to death bar crocs is REALLY rare.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The heck are km's that some new gen x thing

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

fucking americans

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

A kilometre. 1km = about 0.62 miles

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's also interesting that around 43% of this 50% that lives In the blue areas are progressives rather than conservative while only a measly

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

11% of the rest of the American population that lives in rural areas are progressives. I wonder why this is? Could it be because people who

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Live in cities are more exposed to different cultures, races, and ideas while people In rural America are secluded In small communities that

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have not statistically changed In customs, race, and religion for over 50 years?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WTF is a km?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

1000 m

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That thing that the rest of the world uses

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Killer mammals.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kim Meters are The Peoples Measurement.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A kilometre. 1km = about 0.62 miles

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

WTF is a metre?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

100 centimeters

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ill take 10

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He is either a retard or a troll. No need to answer him either way...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nah, it's just jibbing these guys are used to measuring things in cubits and fleece measurements the new fangled stuff they ridicule.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My car gets 4 rods to a hogs head, and that's the way I likes it!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats because everything in your country is trying to kill you. You have to huddle together for safety.

8 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 9

are you literally brain dead?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Well, brown snakes are more deadly here than anywhere else but I'd also say it's because the majority of Aus is desert.

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Box jellies, bull sharks, funnel web spiders, eastern browns, crocs, taipans, death adders...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i heard driving on roads is pretty dangerous too... /s

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't forget vegemite sandiches

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the desert surprise surprise is relatively unhabitable. Northern Territory manages to go well but that's about it.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Tell that to the aboriginals amirite?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was waiting for a comment like this....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

unhabitable

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Let’s start a poll. Who all lives in the shaded area?

8 years ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 8

I didn't, and still don't. I fucking bailed on that dumpster fire of a nation.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I used to live in one and then I moved to another

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yup. SF Bay Area here.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not me

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Indianapolis

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Johnson county here

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Threads like this is why I fucking love this site..

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

bottom left corner here

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I would live in one of the shaded areas if the map was of Germany.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Tampa here

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I dont even live in that country

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Nope. Up in the not-represented-nearly-to-scale Alaska.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Texas for the win v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do. LA.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LA or L.A.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Los Angeles.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone who lives in the US lives in one shaded area or the other. The map is bs cause they used NJ. NJ isn't that big

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I actually live in one of the rare shaded areas that went red in 2016.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope, Swedish

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I always upvote swedes. Dansk her!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

shaded area, shaded area~ I happened to read it in the melody of Yellow Submarine, works perfectly.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

... Many more of them... Live next door...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont know how to gif.....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just wonder how Albuquerque got a shaded area when Tucson and Las Vegas didn't o_O.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Apr 13, 2018 8:25 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's the most densely-populated state, so yeah it's gonna show up on this list.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I would say Las Vegas is more tourist-focused, aka not as many legal full-time residents?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Las Vegas, IIRC is divided into multiple counties. Tucson may be as well, while Albuquerque may be all one county

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tucson is just pima county

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Surprisingly, I never have

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yo

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Montana. Absolutely not.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No thanks Russia ;)

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Y'all are way lose with your personal info. Didn't your parents teach you not to talk too strangers let alone tell them where you live.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Theres atleast a few million in each of those areas good luck finding them

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I do not thankfully

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

SPONGEBOB SQUAREPANTS

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do not, but I live right next to one.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Me too. Makes for a long commute.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't. I'm Dutch.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Los Angeles here

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do. Omaha.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live in northwest South Carolina. It is shaded , but not heavily populated

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live 20 minutes north of the Bronx...so probably

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do not. Which is weird, because I live in a relatively big city

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our metro area is somewhere around 425k last time I checked. Our area is shaded. What is your metro population?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2.2 million. I'm in Las Vegas

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well damn. Census Bureau slipped! :(

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

about tree fiddy

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm laughing a lot harder than I should be

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who lives in one of those shaded areas, we musn't forget there's life outside our "progressive" bubble.

8 years ago | Likes 298 Dislikes 60

v

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I’m in one of the shaded areas and it seems all the people around me only live in a bubble and refuse to come out.

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 5

Lol my shaded area is conservative. I hate this place.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I've lived in towns with less than 500 people and in large west coast cities, and places in between. Some viewpoints are just ill-informed.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*most viewpoints

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm a dark purple and it's definitely not progressive here lmao

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Who lives in a bubble, the guy who lives in a city with a million other people or the guy that talks to the same five people every week?

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 15

Don't be rediculous, a place where everyone is the same is obviously the best nursery for new and interesting ideas.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Probably both, because size doesn't effect how he's defining "bubble"?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The guy with the five people probably actually interacts with them other than just living in the same place as them.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

They’re both bubbles. Silicon Valley here speaking from a rural upbringing

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Implying a million people telling you you’re right somehow makes you less biased than 5.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

A million people in a single city agreeing perfectly on politics? Lmafo.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

95% of Washington D.C. votes were blue. 4,556,124 people voted blue in NYC. 96% of Mesa Arizona votes red. People agree all the time.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The place with all the port cities and other cultures doesn't seem like a bubble, place with only one culture would be a bubble

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What bubble? Most of the country's population, educated folk, and economic output is in the cities, but we get the least say in elections.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah enjoy your echo chamber leading you down to despair due to bad governance, and silly liberal ideologies.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 50

Like proper standard education and healthcare right? Your right we just need armed under payed unsupported teachers and less billy on bob.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Hah, that’s a bold statement.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

This needs to work both ways, though. I'm tired of being told that the people in cities are "libtards" who aren't "real Americans."

8 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 16

Except liberals dominate the media.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 16

Not sure why this is downvoted. A vast majority of reporters SELF identify as liberal.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Merely calling someone unAmerican because they dont share your views is actually unAmerican.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Agree completely. I pay taxes, I vote, and fuck anyone who says I'm less "American" than them because I live and work in the city.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

So you wear a pink hat and yell "no blood for oil" but also "trump needs to bomb Assad"?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

And our votes actually being worth less so that GOP keeps control of seats even when they get less votes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well don't be retarded. Theres plenty of great smart compelling people in every party and plenty of absolute idiots

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Yeah but one party elected one of those idiots to be the President. It's not fucking equal.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Youre right someone won an election. But America saw greater incomptetence and corruption with Hillary than Trump, period. You gotta accept

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well HRC was never president so... ??? Also Trump and his cabinet have embroiled by corruption scandals since day 1 of his administration.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Moreover, Trump appears to be using the powers of the presidency to go after personal enemies, like Jeff Bezos... so no, man, I don't agree

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trump himself uses the presidency to promote his own businesses and enrich himself (see the rent the gov't pays in Trump Tower & Mar a Lago)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That. Before u give me that Hillary was a persecuted woman crap read "How I Lost" by Hillary Clinton, annotated & edited by a left wing

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

His cabinet appointees take bribes from industry in exchange for relaxed regulations; they abuse public funds for personal expenses, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem comes if/when liberals living in cities outnumber conservatives in the rest of the state and therefor dominate every vote. 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 17

That's called one man - one vote, aka democracy.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Each state sends two Senators to represent their state in the U.S. Senate." We have systems where "one man - one vote" isnt followed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t see a problem here.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Let me guess, if it was a conservative city dominating a liberal rural area then you would have a huge problem with it?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Nope. Majority rules mate. Texas is predominately conservative and cities like Austin are liberal. The knife cuts both ways.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whoever gets the most votes should win, regards of where the votes come from. Gerrymandering is cheating, and how GOP maintains control.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A city should not be able to vote a sheriff in for a city 60 miles away though. Nor should they be able to vote in laws for that other city.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Im not talking about a governor, or a president. I'm talking about laws within specific counties which can get overwritten. /end

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Your poor grasp of how democracy functions is frightening.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's not a problem, that's democracy. Majority rule.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Thats a dismal way of thinking of things. Im sure racists in early america said that to people who were against slavery all the time.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

But I digress, majority where? If we just talked about rural areas then Majority would rule completely differently.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Uh, no. Representative parliamentary democracy should actually represent the makeup of the whole population, not just the majority.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Obviously. Proportional representation is the only way democracy can work.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The needs of rural folk differ wildly from those of city folk. Letting one control the other 24/7 is absurd; there's no universal solution.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

The solution is proportional representation.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

And I can see smaller liberal cities being overvoted by the rest of the state being rural conservatives but that happens less often. 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Anyone who lives in Texas as a Liberal can say this is true

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seems to happen a lot. Happened in PA, OH, and FL this past election.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I think a lot of those cities in PA and OH had dead or dying industries and high unemployement and went R ...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And this is where I point to the later half of my comment chain, where this is a complicated issue. Thanks for bringing up examples!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something like "the city makes 90% of the tax, but uses 98% of the tax money" sort of thing is more likely to happen an piss off rurals 3/?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

and I agree, melting it down to "those damn libtards" simplifies a very complex issue that needs to be talked about. 4/4

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

No, cities generate far more in revenue than rural areas, generally. And account for less public spending. You have it backwards.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How could we forget them? We subsidize them so much!

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 39

That’s because taxes are intrinsically higher in blue areas.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Do you enjoy going to the grocery store? I live out of a shaded area and am left, but it isn’t lost on me that we rely heavily on farmers.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

I never said anything about farmers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of our food comes from corporate owned farms just FYI, not too many family farms making a lot of money these days.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't belittle farmers, they play a big part to play in the biggest economy in the world.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 9

Where did I say anything about farmers?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What other industry in rural areas is subsidized?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not just industries. Tax revenue from the shaded areas goes to fund government programs in the non-shaded areas.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mining, tourism in national parks, certain other energy related extraction (oil wells, fracking, etc.). A lot of it is subsidized.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why Trump won.

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 20

Exactly this, I've spent my years outside the gentrified enclaves to have seen it coming since dubya's 2nd term!

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Almost replied all mad till I realized it was a bit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m sure that’s the entirety of the situation

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Obvs it was a fully complete political analysis and not a comment on liberal elitism. Way to show me by talking down to me about politics.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fuck the electoral college. It's crazy that the least educated people have the votes that are the most powerful.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, or there's just as equally a "Trump bubble" of mostly rural, talk radio listening, Fox News watching Americans. They're disconnected too

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gerrymandering and superior election strategy is why Trump won. Headcount matters more than square footage.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

The right headcount, apparently

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I’m sure it had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton being one of the most unelectable dems in years. once again discount rural areas... folly

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Hillary told rural areas they'd have to retrain for new jobs. Trump told them he'd bring back the coal mines. Guess what they'd rather hear?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but gerrymandering isn't a thing in the electoral college, as its a statewide popular vote for most states.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Nope. the Electroral college has OTHER major issues

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Most indeededly. https://youtu.be/7wC42HgLA4k

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that was an "indeed nope" not a "deny nope"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You ain’t wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not per se. If the Constitution didn't make imaginary lines have more voting power than voters themselves, Clinton would have won.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 17

Guys, I was being snide, not suggesting that we should do whatever California wants.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Correct, because we are not a democracy and never were meant to be. The United States is a constitutional republic

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

If one person equaled one vote, we would still be a constitutional republic due to elected officials voting on actual policy.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They equal 1, when it comes to electing legislatures, just not the President.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Progressive folks not remembering life existed outside cities in some way forced folks in the country to vote for a bigoted asshole?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

The majority of people are bigots. Go educate yourself before you toss around buzzwords.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Someone who says there's fine people on "both sides" of a conflict where one side is Neo-Nazis seems to earn the title.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can Neo-Nazis be be misunderstood? Or does that only apply to feminists?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Whereas people in the city were perfectly fine to vote for someone equally corrupt in different ways.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

She wasn't, there really is a lesser evil here, but... That wasn't really my question. In what way were people forced to vote for Trump?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Obviously people weren’t forced to vote for him, many voted him because they felt victimized by liberals. Agree or disagree that’s true.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

There's life in the regressive bubble alright, but not so much brain activity.

8 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 113

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

It seems fitting that your upvote/downvote is 50 50. UK here.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In th U.S. a lot of vote counts come down to a razor thin margin near the 50/50 line.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know, but not alot of votes on Imgur do.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Here's a jokefor you: what do you get when, for decades, one group labels itself as the intellectual superior group, continually belittles

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 28

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So they voted for Trump because their feelings were hurt? (And yes, I read your other comments)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Here's a joke for you: what do you get when, for decades, one group labels itself as the morally superior group, continually belittles

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 14

the other group as being weak, poor, immoral, and lazy? A Cheeto in the White House.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

See how that goes? At best, the right is as guilty of that sin as the left.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

But the group that did this--blue-collar white people--voted democrat up until recently. Your point doesn't stand.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the other group as being dumb, poor, uneducated, and lazy? A Cheeto in the White House. Now, me, personally, I'd rather not have to go

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 25

I mean, when that group continually forces bronze age morality on others at the expense of constitutional rights, I dont know why it would

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

expect anything but disdain.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

through another four years of this guy, plus however many more terms they give to someone who DOESN'T belittle them at every fucking turn,

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 15

so maybe, just goddamn maybe, we could all cool it with the holier-than-thou attitude, and build some fatherfucking bridges instead of

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 10

So if you call people dumb and uneducated, they end up proving you right and then blaming you for it?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5