Some restrictions may apply.

Aug 7, 2017 5:00 PM

Visuddha

Views

253655

Likes

6014

Dislikes

383

The whole world had a war about this. Eventually and reluctantly we were forced to become involved.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when your family tree has no branches.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why do people (re)post this? You can be a nazi and proud American. You can be whatever the fuck you want in America.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Free speech isn't a one way street

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

There was an American Nazi party.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same for the Confederacy, actually.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

You expect logic from these people? Their hatred blinds them.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I feel the same way about assholes who fly both American and Confederate flags.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ignoring this kind of contradiction is easy when you've had years of training flying the Confederate flag and feeling like proud Americans.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Something I will never understand.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We have the same thing in Poland. How fucking thick are they...

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I still feel bad for what happened to Poland - invaded by Nazis and Russians at the same. No hope.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

We literally had a lot of wars defending this exact situation

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Huh?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Free speech no matter what. Hate speech is still free speech, and free speech isn't a one way street. That's fundamentally American.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't understand why you're saying that to me. I'm trying to figure out what wars Loompafoo is referring to.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh okay I thought that you meant something else.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

US wars are ostensibly to protect the freedom of its citizens, including freedom of speech and personal beliefs/thoughts.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pull the other one; it has bells on.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everyone has the right to speak their mind no matter how much we disagree with them. Its a shame only the most extreme take the opportunity

8 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 11

Be fair, "Its a nice day" illicits less of a response than a Milo Yiannopoulos diatribe on the value and delight of catamites.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It's more that certain people know how to shout louder than others. And sadly these people are usually extremists in one way or another.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plenty of people take the opportunity. But hate and extremism sells ads.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Agree, and this pic shows "actual hate" unlike the "prescribed hate" by SJW snowflakes to those who have idea disagreement through discourse

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

Speak? Or shout and wave guns?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

All three. The line comes just before hurting people with said guns.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We also had a civil war about keeping an entire race as slaves, and yet they still name streets after confederate generals and statues

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 22, 2017 3:34 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

There allowed to do this and I'm allowed to call them goat-fuckers. First amendment rules

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

America is free you have the right to belive in stupid stuff.

8 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 12

Well I for one believe in you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yep, and people also have the right to point fingers at your stupid belief.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's American to endorse such rights but unamerican to espouse such views.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I am kinda glad that we make it easy to spot the stupid ones.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

This is why there should be no "hate speech laws" just let it air out under the sun where they can be mocked and disproven.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hate speech laws were ruled unconstitutional in the US IIRC. We still have the idiotic hate crime shit though.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thats not the point though. Noone is saying they can't fly Nazi flags, they're pointing out the contradiction in flying both at the same tim

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

-e(fucking hell why imgur? 256 characters is too many?)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did you respond to the wrong post?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who's Tim?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Presumably the fuckwad who coded imgur's 40 character limit /s

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They shouldnt be able to fly them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Why not? Preventing them from doing so is censorship.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

All across europe there are laws against it as well. Its not free speech its intolerance and legal racism

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It can still be free speech while also being intolerance and racism. The two are not mutually exclusive. They are also not illegal in (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You guys so worried about the first ammendmemt you dont realise what it costs, even canada has laws against it. Its preaching hate

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not American, and it's not illegal in Canada. It is however legal for the police to intervene if it is used to communicate hatred (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nazis and Neo-Confederates. Aka: People who suck at war.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Like the communists?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hitler was pretty damned good at war. If he had decided toward the end to stop spending so many resources on the death camps he would (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2/2) probably have won. They knew that. They decided to spend more resources instead. That should tell you all you need to know about them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(1/n) Nah, the Nazis could only have won if they defeated the Soviet Union really quickly. They were gonna lose after Stalingrad in 1943

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/n) They could not come close to matching either America and the Soviet Union in industrial capacity. See Tooze's Wages of Destruction.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(3/n) "In 1941 the US produced 19k aircraft, more than either Britain or Germany. In 1942 the US produced 48k. In 1943 the US produced 85k."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They would have nuked us both into oblivion.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe, but they sure have a cuckhold on your goverment and its policies.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Fun Fact: the largest number of Nei-Nazis IN THE WORLD are in Russia. You know, the country which suffered 10-12million casualties in WW2?

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 5

And in Ukraine they even get to be in the government...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

To be fair a lot of that was because of the Russian government

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

in total 20-27 million soviets died 6-7 million due to war related famines, and 8,6-11,4 million military deaths. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But sure the Soviet government was the real murderer here (sarcasm may apply) 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nei-Nazi? Is that a pony thing?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That would be "neigh Nazis"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's anti-communist backlash. Some went to the other extreme.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Present days Russia is not communist at all though.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

"Went" is past tense.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tell that to the hammersickles adorning every goddamn building and metro stop. They want their empire back, doesn't matter what symbol.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Those groups (right-wing nationalists ) were encouraged by Putin for support of his new, Not-So-Cold War.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

getting downvoted for that ? Downvoters, care to explain how I'm wrong here, or is that asking too much ?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"This is IMGUR!!!" *kicks you into the well*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Russia is much rather the carrier of a behavior than an ideology. They have nazis who have nostalgia for the soviet union. "Nazbols"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope. Communism fell in 1989. Member? These groups sprang up since Putin took over.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are his Praetorian Guard. And we know how that will turn out...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Went" is past tense. We are seeing the effects of that, due to our linear perception of time. Funny how nature do that.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

??? Yes, I'm aware of the use of "tense" in the English language. But thanks....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that's just military. 20-30 million civilian deaths at least. Yep, neo-Nazi in Russia - makes sense to me!

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

No. Civilian deaths : around 16 millions, not 20-30. Also, there has always been nazis in Russia, there was even more during WW2 than now.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes. Soviets never released reliable stats, figures range from 20 - 50 depending on historian and how casualties are calculated.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would really like to see your sources for these numbers please.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, while you provide none for yours. Do your own homework.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Didn't we have nazi orgs during ww2?

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Yuuuuup. Antisemitism was experiencing a rise in popularity, too.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

orcs*

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. The most prominent being the silver shirts, an american branch of the nazi party that built hitler a compound in california.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

That's kinda neat actually, in a horrible way. Like these guys in your enemy's country made a place for you to stay if you wanted.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hate to be that guy, but they do have that right. That's kind of what being an American is about.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Stop apologizing.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well they're still waiving the Confederate flag, and the same rules apply. It's safe to say sense is not their strong suit.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

I think it's telling that they're flying side by side. Heritage my ass

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I definitely don't think the actual Nazis are using the "heritage not hate" argument. They clearly hate

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Right, I meant the Confederate can't claim it either if they're standing next to literal nazis

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You'd think so, but i bet you could find someone to argue that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well the rest of the world had a war about this and you eventually decided to show up

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i hate illinois nazis

8 years ago | Likes 1338 Dislikes 21

FINs

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

German here, I hate Nazis from everywhere.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Such a fucking great movie.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Apparently Michigan has the most, I never even knew they were right around me... Everywhere... Lurking, with flags.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

HUT HUT HUT HUT HUT HUT HUT HUT

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

I hate nazis

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Why Illinois?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

because The Blues Brothers was set in Chicago.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Okay. Idk why my comment got downvoted but ok

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 271 Dislikes 0

Yet another duty of their mission from god

8 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

"Illinoisan"? here... it's pronounced guaad. You're welcome.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Holy shit that Nazi looks just like Jeff Sessions!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's what I was thinking

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorce?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The Blues Brothers

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Blues Brothers

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Film: The Blues Brothers (1980). Excellent movie, highly recommend watching when you get the chance!

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The cops never chased them for that, if I recall correctly.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

No crime was committed.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Technically, attempted vehicular man slaughter. Morally, the right fucking thing to do.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're here on a mission from god.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 18

*We're on a mission from God.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Didn't the United States deny the Jews safe Haven?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Most countries did. Canada, France, UK etc.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nazis suck. That is why I ignore them completely.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Some people did ignore the Nazis. Other people did not have that same luxury. They need to be opposed by everyone, at every turn.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You act like you did nazi them and walk right past em.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Ayo!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's dangerous. One needs to keep an eye on them, just in case they try something. Same as with all other extremists.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Does this logic also apply to the Cold War/Communism? Asking for a friend...

8 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 21

No, that's stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 45

Why?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, what about being a nazi American then?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Like Henry Ford?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

So I guess both are fine. Sounds good to me

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

or Grampa Bush!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I mean the supreme court says yes. Actions by executive government say no.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We totally defeated Russian totalitarianism.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Might depend on the definition of "communism" and "American".

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 26

3/3 For the record, I am not Communist, and I am not convinced it could work in a large country.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm puzzled why I was so heavily downvoted. I just meant that of we define by American citizenship, yes. If we define by traditional 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here we go...

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

2/3 values, maybe not. I think it also makes a difference if we mean Stalin-esque support of the USSR or a political belief about economics.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're a genuine communist then you won't be proud to be American. You won't be proud to be anything, antinationalism is a thing.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Yes except instead of killing them we financially sabotage them.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

And then kill 10x more of them.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. You cannot be a communist and an American. McCarthy was right.

8 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 26

Apples and oranges? Political beliefs and national origin are not mutually exclusive...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Communism isn't evil... just stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

meh. You could make the argument it's pretty debasing and evil

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Welp, come cuff me boys, I'm officially an illegal immigrant.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

I swear to god, what the hell is the point of a relevant username if everyone just ignores it and downvotes me anyway...

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Imgur likes relevant usernames. Trust me.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My first comment in this thread was getting downvoted until I commented again, this happens a lot.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 3

Better dead then red

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Democracy is non-negotiable!

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

why is Gort in this image?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Gort! Klaatu barada nikto!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's Liberty Prime. Like Gort but he throws nukes like footballs and yells anticommunist propaganda.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Nice! :D

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They try to say its about preserving their European heritage, the Nazi regime actively destroyed european culture as much as it could.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Which culture is that? Europe was already dying, the de-colonizing and ww1 killed it. Ww2 from Hitlers part was Europes last stand...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Nazis destroyed art, forbade dancing, destroyed cultural artifacts, museums,etc. Artists, scientists, engineers, educators fled to the US

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Downvote for the truth I see. But search it. They were an authoritarian dictatorship, and there's no place for flourishing there.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

..To preserve european centre of the civilization, if germany would lose, Europe would die. Look at us now... demographical exchange.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

I see it, and it's fucking fantastic compared to the tyrannical shitshow Nazi Europe would be.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

bullshit

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

European is more palatable than "people with light skin". Even they know enough to know judgement via pigmintation sounds and looks ridic

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually, for a very long time, Eugenics was all the rage in the US.

8 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 16

USA is funded entirely on genocide.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I mean yeah, but then that caused the whole Wrath of Kahn thing, then we had to Search for Spock.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Eugenics in the rest of the world never went to killing the living though. The worst was sterilization.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Now that's just not true...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It is disturbing that some morons have agreed.... I guess Cambodia and the entire continent of Africa don't exist......

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Holy shit...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When used correctly there's nothing wrong with Eugenics. Unfortunately, it's really, really easy to use it incorrectly because humans suck.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

... Right. Before we had a whole war about it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not only that, but our treatment of the natives was an inspiration to Hitler. Hitler had an odd fascination with America.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And at the time we respected him, some people think America's reluctance to declare war partially stemmed from our admiration.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Pretty sure there were nazi sympathizers in most of the worlds governments at the time.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

World War I was the reason for reluctance. No admiration existed for an invading country or its leader.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Still is, in some ways.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep! Even Teddy Roosevelt was a supporter, though not nearly to the extent of the Nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Almost nobody was a supporter to the extent of the Nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

There was a program of forced, often secret, sterilisation in America of the poor and the uneducated in the past.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And it still happens here and there. To poor black and latino women, mostly.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Bloody hell.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Longer than it was in Germany too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of curiosity, why is "eugenics" capitalized?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

After its inventor, Eugene.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

because I capitalize random things, not sure why. Infuriates me.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it's awesome, of course.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Because its the important bit ?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what capitalization is for? Shit, I've had it wrong, for years.If I see my first grade teacher, I'm going to give her a p of my mind!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*piece

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I didnt think you were gonna pee on her. But yeah. American education is not known for quality.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

get out of here with your book smarts

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but so was using cocaine for toothaches. Just because flat Earth theory seemed reasonable 3000 years ago doesn't mean it aint dumb now

8 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 4

Greeks, Chinese, and Sumerians all proved the Earth and moon were round 3000 years ago. Thus the base 60 system.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No one said it wasnt dumb. But its not inherently unamerican.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The earths flat!! No stars just angels!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok, go touch one.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wait cocaine for tooth aches sounds awesome

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

you sure it wasn't heroin tho? makes more sense

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Eugenics isn't dumb, it's just inhumane.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Depends on how you apply it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A wide and diverse genetic pool allows greater adaptability to catastrophic changes. Eugenics is an incomplete understanding of evolution

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Yes, but some people are obviously unfit to be parents. It would make sense they not be able to reproduce. Who gets to make that decision?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If you fuck kids, that ones easy. You shouldn't breed. Diseases, crimes, years on welfare. It's too murky to try to control.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Negative eugenics is inhumane. Positive eugenics is just fine.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Less effective however.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That's debatable, and dependent on your goal. If your goal is to get rid of hereditary diseases for example, then positive can do just fine.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Technically, you do.

8 years ago | Likes 319 Dislikes 32

While it's patriotic to protect such a right, I think to actively partake isn't.

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 10

I suppose I'd rather have them identify themselves. They are free to do it, but not free from the social consequences.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

People seem to forget that America's involvement in WW2 was far more economical than idealogical.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

this gets posted at least once a week and only a few learn

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 26

You can also be ISIS and American too.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

Why is this getting downvoted? You can literally be american and an isis sympathizer - just like you can be a nazi sympathizer

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Because double standards

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I believe we actually had a movement here for them. Band of Brothers you find one American that answered the call...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why the hell should I protect someones free speech when if they had the power to do so, would take mine and probably kill me?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Because until they actively do something to you they are innocent and entitled to their rights. That's how this thing works.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Because you're better than them.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

What does that get me? Non-violence and free speech are nice concepts, but in practice only work in situations where their opponent 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

has gripes about genocide and oppression. Imagine if the allied forces refused to war with Hitler because they wanted to be non-violent 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

We didn't go to war over their speech, we went to war because of there actions. There is a difference and it's important.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm confused. How did we make the leap from free speech to being cool with the Holocaust?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't get to decide that someone else doesn't eat free speech because you assume yours will be suppressed.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's literally in their manifesto to oppress those different then them. They want us to die, and I refuse to protect their right to try.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

As much as hate them, they do have the right.

8 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 16

So why does imgur bitch so much about the existence of BLM then?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Because it doesn't matter how you feel about black people; if you don't support the BLM organization, then you're "Racist". It's not right.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Nice pun.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

Yeah. It's a *Confederate* that you don't get to be at the same time as being a proud American. That's the thing we literally had a about.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 17

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Aug 8, 2017 6:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The United States of America -- the country we're talking about being proud of -- is the place the Confederates seceded.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Aug 8, 2017 5:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The Union *is* the "United States(OF)America".

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Wrong again, keep trying tho.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's literally in the name: Confederate States of America...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

America the continent not our america they were literally separatists from the USA

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I guess they have the right, it just doesn't make any sense

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

That why this country is, and was, great. Because they get that right, whether it makes sense to anyone else or not.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I mean we banned communism. And ignored the supreme court saying we can't. So were not entirely great.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

We were actively at war with them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Uh you do know the cold war was a name given because it wasn't actually a war?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Why do you wanna take away their FREEDOM? ;P

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 13

Never take ones freedom until they take someone else's first. Plus their idiocy is often humorous

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

When freedom is actually infringed like in issues like abortion (as an ex.), nothing happens. Their "idiocy" affects policy for the worse

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why do you wanna take away Al-Queda's FREEDOM?

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Yea, it's crazy, right? xD

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

because it's Life first, _then_ Liberty. …following that, the pursuit of happiness.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

when someone's actions in the second and third infringe on the first, they are in the wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sati man, thank you to Ram Mohan Roy for his Socio-Religious reformation movement. One of my favourite historical figures.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So much for the tolerant left

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

Why should people tolerate threats to their lives and freedom? You know, the prerogative of the right for a long while now?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This, also how they have hijacked political issues, making people who agree with those issues more extreme. This works both ways tho.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

why aren't you attacking an american statement supported by a British colonialism? i strawmanned it up here, at least give it some thought.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You lost me

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

* -a

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0