Phonebloks

Sep 12, 2013 12:44 PM

SadBrontosaurus

Views

228154

Likes

6845

Dislikes

182

The Problem

A phone only lasts a couple of years before it breaks or becomes obsolete. Although it's often just one part which killed it, we throw everything away since it's almost impossible to repair or upgrade.

The Solution

How about a phone that lets you swap out just one piece at a time? Replace your broken screen or upgrade your 1GB of RAM to 2 or 4GB.

Designed to Last

Phonebloks is made of detachable bloks. The bloks are connected to the base which locks everything together into a solid phone. If a blok breaks you can easily replace it, if it's getting old just upgrade.

Blokstore

It's like an app store for hardware. In the store you buy your bloks, read reviews and sell old bloks. Small and big companies develop and sell their bloks. you can buy a pre-assembled phone or assemble it yourself by selecting the brands you want to support. Bloks can be developed for specific needs. Solar powered batteries, sensitive screen for blind people, lightweight for travelers etc. The choice is yours.

Customize your phone the way you want it.

You don't need 16GB of storage. Replace your storage blok with an extended life battery.

Grandma doesn't need Bluetooth or a gyroscope

Give her a bigger speaker and a better battery. Replace her touch screen with one that has mechanical buttons.

Instead of tearing apart your old DVD player...

Just swap out for a better camera. Choose the brand you like, prefer the sharp nikon, the fast canon or support a small start-up, the choice is yours.

Help make Phonebloks a reality!

http://www.phonebloks.com/
https://www.thunderclap.it/en/projects/2931-phonebloks

Most of those bits need a shitload more pins than what's there. Can't even simplify the signals through fewer pins.

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

So it's a bulky, impractical, and ugly design concept. It's a nice idea, but the idea and the reality are miles apart.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah, no, electronic signals don't work like that.

12 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

A great idea that is impossible to make. Connectors don't have anywhere near enough pins and this phone would be MASSIVE. Like 2x the size.

12 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

you live in a fantasy world

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I am very doubtful about this. Same hardware interface for power and memory? lets just go and insert our SSD's into our mobo 24pin power

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a computer engineer, if you transmit Ghz speeds over those frictionless input pins, your gonna have a bad time.

12 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Didn't we already debunk this? It is like saying a hoverboard is a great idea. Of course it is, but it just isn't ready to be made.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY

12 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

it would be a disaster for app developers. Droid devs already fight with like 4 flavors of melonberry crunch or whatever it's called.

12 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

You just need to get everyone together too form a standard interface and stick to it (in your dreams).

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet PC land gets along just fine.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mobile devices are a different beast. A standard platform makes software creation far easier.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

LEGO!

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So sockets need to be able to handle 101 different types of modules AND provide the correct voltage? Nope.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when you let a marketing zombie spitball hardware. They have NO CLUE just how integrated modern electronics have to be.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just download more ram. duhh

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You don't understand how companies make money, do you?

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is actually really cool. But I have to be honest, the big selling point for me is that it looks like an old school Nintendo.

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Why do you think people buy Apple products?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Welcome back to Engineering with Photoshop. Up next: extension cords wrapped up in your walls.

12 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Day after day we see technology evolve.This doesn't seem like much of a stretch from our current technology. I'm optimistic!

12 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 28

As an ecologist/software developer, I really think the solution here is better recycling/buyback programs.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Look at how long computers have been around, you still cant swap around parts as you like, one component evolving is usually dependent (1/2

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

) on another, making everything modular like this would cripple development and set everything back

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

imho this is an idea only someone at design & marketing can get. "speed" proves they have 0 idea of how things work.

12 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

more like naive

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

OK, but this would be "devolving". Making tech harder instead of simpler and more convenient. Also, not new.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Top two issues with phone development are "making it fit" and "heat". This wastes a lot of space, and locks you in arbitrary dimensions.

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

you should take some engineering classes.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would be difficult to make it aesthetically pleasing, and in a reasonable size range. I personally would not buy the phone pictured.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have to agree, unfortunately. I like modular device concepts but they are hard to make work.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most phones are a screen, a battery, a SoC (silicon chip), and a plastic bezel with an embedded antenna. You could reduce it to 3 parts.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This is a great point too. Most of the pieces shown here are on one chip. And by 'one chip' I mean 'one brand of chip' (Broadcom)

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the wifi/bluetooth is generally another chip, and any decent amount of RAM is also another chip. but in essence you're correct.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can fit a fully functional GSM phone (minus the keyboard or screen) into a 1x1 inch chip with a battery included.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cool idea, but it would be heavier, larger, more expensive, more susceptible to the elements, and a massive pain to code for.

12 years ago | Likes 241 Dislikes 4

Larger isnt really a problem, anymore. Less expensive in the long run, since it will have more functional life. Elements issue = case.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to mention more likely to break. Which seems to be counter intuitive.

12 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

If only there could be some sort of protective covering perhaps... Maybe someone should make something like a case? Does that exist yet?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not talking just the dirt getting in between the pieces issue, I'm talking about modular systems in general. They don't last as long.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not really, would mostly likely run Android or ubuntu phone (on top of android), size wise maybe, price wise no. Look at building a PC e.g.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Unless many phones adopted that hardware, prices would be high. As for coding, drivers would be a pain, and apps couldn't target the phone.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it would be standard ARM architecture, drivers would be written by hardware manufacturers iphone/android fragmentation would be just as bad

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think you misunderstand the driver problem, its getting them to work after installing new hardware, the majority of a modern OS is drivers

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never have issues with drivers for modern OSs

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would be the same as installing new drivers on a PC.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am an electrical engineer, and this is the most unfeasible idea I've ever seen.

12 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 3

I love people that start their sentences with '' I am an ''***'' engineer and....blablabla full of bullshit know nothing still engineer FU.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 21

You lose...also us engineers take pride in our degrees because 1. They are difficult, and 2. They are valuable.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And 3. They are fucking difficult.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a biologist and this is the most useless reply in the entire comment section.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

10 months later and Project Ara says otherwise.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How to make it happen: Step 1: Invent magic. Step 2: Why the fuck do we need phones any more now that we have magic?

12 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

I believe it's Step 1: let Google do it, Step 2: profit (not money of course, that's Google's job)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best. Comment. Ever.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You win the Internets!

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Look at data interfaces and their sizes. The normal user could end up damaging them like that, just like CPU and sockets of old.

12 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 2

If the grid thingie runs on a smart interface were some subchip determine's what all the parts are reguarless of where they are, would work

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That's not happening free of charge (cost or battery). I feel this is the part that will age the fastest as well.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The board itself would likely have to be bigger than a normal smartphone. And just as unrepairable and unupgradable. Same price too.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Marketing, this is why engineering makes fun of you.

12 years ago | Likes 287 Dislikes 6

There are 2 types of engineers: Some laugh at new ideas and some say "let's figure it out". The system is the brief not the solution.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Basically this.

12 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Just commenting so I can keep this... this is exactly what I think about those perfect concepts.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But this will work! You just have to compromise on the "smart" part of smartphone. And probably the "phone" part too.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You need more upvotes.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

people have said the same thing about science fiction for decades. dreamers exist to give engineers stuff to invent.

12 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

yes!

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Dreamers who seem to have almost no understanding of electronics

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Eh. I feel like sometimes the wilder long-term stuff (which is EXPECTED to be long term) is more feasible than stuff like this, expected NOW

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I gotta get me some more "Speed"

12 years ago | Likes 406 Dislikes 0

Fucking speed, how does it work?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i was minorly insulted about how they dumbed that down

12 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 0

you can download more RAM from the internet

12 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

I feel the need. THE NEED FOR SPEED.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Heh. CPU is probably the word they were looking for.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think it's supposed to be aggregate CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

this phone will not be made ever. it's too good compared to other phones

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thirty speed?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, you replied to a 2 year old comment!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oops.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah I thought that was hilarious.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know a guy who can sell you an eight-ball.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Do we really need eight balls?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do think this is an awesome idea in theory, but realistically I think the probability of this succeeding is like -82%

12 years ago | Likes 1021 Dislikes 18

[deleted]

[deleted]

12 years ago (deleted May 10, 2014 3:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

-12% then, still going to be an uphill battle

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

12 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

When an idea is first conceived, that concept often has flaws that are quickly noticed once you start down the path. Let them start.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a coincidence, I was JUST looking at your nipples! Small world, am I right? So... what are you wearing?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I agree with you. There's no way a company would pick this up... There's no money to be made from it, unless the parts are stupid expensive.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah I was just thinking this. I would imagine it would cost the company money and that they'd much prefer you have to buy a new one.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm still staring at your tits

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll allow it

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It already exists, but don't expect an iphone killer: http://www.instructables.com/id/ArduinoPhone/

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes but this looks like shit compared to the phoneblok

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It favors the consumer and negates planned obsolescence. We'll see lifetime charged AAA batteries before this, unfortunately.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh how it is fun to have a username that is the name of a celebrity... I too, once knew this feeling... Then...it happened...

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

not sure if sarcasm...

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I used to have the username "JKRowling". Now look at mine.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i dont believe you. What do you even know about technology, Jennifer?

12 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 2

Someone better get this mother fuckin aniston off this mother fuckin website

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll have you know she had a guide for Windows 95. http://imgur.com/0zRLfpn?tags

12 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Rachel, her name is rachel!

12 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

They were on a breeeeeak!

12 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I understood this reference.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This idea is mostly the opposite of what every company does.  Ever heard of "planned obsolescence"?

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah I don't think it would work. Companies love the fact that you have to buy a whole new phone. Why would they mess with a good thing?

12 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

It will happen if a new business is built around this, and the phone companies have to compete with it.

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

probably the only thing not in favour of this awesome idea. so. effing. sad.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look at Southwest Airlines - they messed with "a good thing," did a bunch of stuff differently, and now they're a top airline.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Not only that, but comoanies like Apple love making proprietary parts so that you HAVE to buy their shit.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I support your estimationing prowess.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the reason is more about looks then functionality

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh Jennifer, it's a good thing you're pretty...

12 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

apparently not pretty enough for brad :( hold me imgur

12 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Maybe Angelina just puts out more?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YOU'RE MORE THAN GOOD ENOUGH FOR US, JENNIFER

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you get a friends complete series dvd box set

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aaaaahhhhh I knew you were my favorite for a reason!!!!

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This would never happen. Initial cost would be too high and parts would have a huge premium and still all need regular replacement.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, electronics just don't work like this. You can't plug a battery in where a CPU used to be and expect it to work.

12 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

there are ways this could be handled. multilayer pcbs fixed points for certain modules. I've pondered on this for years.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How do you plan on cooling multilayer circuitry like this?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two words: Ice cream. I guess my point is that the technical barriers could be met. the real challenge would be changing the OEMs approach.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cooling is why our processors still reside on 2D wafers, Intel and AMD are both trying to figure out how to get 3D, but cooling is a bitch.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You know, it's funny.. and maybe I just don't understand it.. but current technology limitations exist, IMO, because we -put- them there. ->

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It needs to be "prettied up" because consumers are whores and only want nice, shiny things...

12 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Some of the blogs were gold, silver, shiny, etc

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bloks*. It should also have better autocorrect than iphone

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a consumer I can confirm this.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

yeah, I spoke from experience, lol

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because nice things are bad! Bad nice things! We must all have grey squares... WHORES

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I kinda dig the look of it. I'm sure it will come in different colors

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Each block could have a selection of colours as decided by the designer so you could have matching or mix and match :)

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats what i was picturing. With injection molding, its not hard to just shoot a different color plastic

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can we get an electrical engineer in here to explain how this is a really unfeasible idea? The middle board itself would have to be [1/2]

12 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

A lot of this possible, but some things require a very wide data bus. Some peripherals work fine with 4 or 5 pins. Some need 32.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

As a software engineer, I'll point out that Android still has fragmentation issues with a finite set of hardware options. This has infinite.

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

What, like a PC?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really. If the modules have only 4 pins, the data could be serialized. The middle board could have some FPGAs in it, which is (1/2)

12 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

huge just to incorporate the logic gates for dynamic block placement. This may be possible when nanotech is real and affordable.

12 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

basically programmable hardware. I'm an EE and it doesn't seem that hard to make (2/2)

12 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

FPGAs and high rate serial are very power-hungry and inefficient. Also, the connectors would need to support several GHz of bandwidth.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4) SoCs in cell phones tend to integrate several blocks like audio input/output, and power management functions.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

7) Antenna positioning is critical. The antennas interact with each other in unusual ways.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6) Trace lengths are very sensitive for things like RAM (they also require crazy pin counts.)

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3) Components such as power management systems would need to be replicated in each block raising cost and reducing efficiency.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2) The connectors would be the dominant cost and failure point of the product. They require other means of mechanical support.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1) The backplane would need to have 20+ layers and blind/burried vias. It would cost $5,000+ per unit.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can you reprogram the FPGAs on the fly or have it done dynamically by the hardware? serious question, this is the first I've heard of FPGAs

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah, you can reconfigure FPGAs whenever you want to.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5) It's common to do chip-on-chip packages where the ram attaches to the top of the CPU package.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You must be a shitty EE, because good luck sending a 3 ghz clock signal over those pins.

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

Why would you have to do that? You're looking for ways to make things fail, which is a very anti-engineer mindset.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Actually it isn't. They are called constraints, and are major building blocks for what is engineering....

12 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 2

No. Skills and technologies are building blocks. Constraints are obstacles. I'm glad you don't work on my team, because you say no too fast.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is cute and all but we can't even get people to build their own PCs, this isn't going to work in this braindead society.

12 years ago | Likes 215 Dislikes 27

I think it's an awesome idea and the option should be made available, but to me it's ugly and wouldn't fit in my stupid girl pockets

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Tons of people build their own PCs for this exact reason.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hey Negative Nancy. Yeah, I'm talkin' to you.....FUCK YOU

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I've built two computers and this looks much more simple. This looks as though you are just putting together Lego pieces.

12 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 2

people build their own computers all the time. i've built several for myself and friends.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes as have I, way to miss the point of what I said. People in general cannot complete even basic tasks.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

this product wouldn't be for the general pop. who would want to customize their own shit though, is it? ppl also don't build their own cars

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You mean like ours?

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It's not like a pc. It's easy and trendy, and highly customizable. The public should love it.

12 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

It would need an apple logo for some people to even consider it

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is like the complete polar opposite of Apple. Which i like. I really dislike Apple

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I would like to replace the battery on my iph... oh.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol. "I want more memory! better start deleting things!"

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what I told my girlfriend when she showed me this. Nobody is going to get on board because it's not flashy or cool ect.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I think it's cool.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's definitely trendy and neat and "wow cool," as evidenced by everyone on imgur getting on board with it (besides the people pointing out

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

what's wrong with the idea)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That of course leaves out that companies like Apple would never go for this and find some way to shit it up.

12 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

They could try but we've seen how well Android has done. 64% market share in smartphones.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the opposite of Apple's proprietary "everything is stuck and soon not obsolete just not the newest" business model.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As an Apple user, I agree. And +1 for "shit it up"

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Pretty much any phone company wouldn't like this

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can you guys stop it with this shit?This is utopia,if an electronics manufacturer did this,they would go out of business in under 2 years1/2

12 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 17

Not necessarily. It would be a niche phone for geeks most likely. Think of how often people buy new parts to "tune" a car. Could be +Rev.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, because they would obviously charge you for the replacements. They wouldn't just throw them at you, would they?

12 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Google planned obsolescence,it will explain things better than i can do with 140 characters

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They would only sell the broken part,instead of selling an entire unit,you know how much that reduces revenues?This idea is great,but 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

it's naive as fuck.Unless you change the whole monetary system,this will never be implemented 2/2

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It probably never will, but it's incredibly short sighted of the industry. This model could work and be profitable in a good economy.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Actually, it's the opposite. In a good economy, people have more disposable income, so they'll scrap an entire phone over replace parts.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Oh, and I'm aware that Wakanda is the only country on the planet with a good economy right now.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Companies need products to eventually malfunction,so they can sell new ones.Take this example,there was a heavy machinery german 2/3

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

manufacturer in the 70 who made so good machines,they almost never broke down,or could be easily fixed,you know what happened?It went bust

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

If that had been my company I would have been sad to have to start over, but proud as fuck that my doors closed due to awesome.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Planned Obsolescence - Corporate Profit. It's a shame, because i like the concept of this 'bloks' thing, too.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You know what's really utopian bullshit? The idea that without deliberately designing it in technology never becomes obsolete.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One decent marketing campaign about how awful planned obsolescence is for the consumer and appropriately more expensive products designed

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for easy repair and modular upgrades, coupled with purchase on credit and long service agreements (think cars) become a viable business

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not that I don't believe you, but what was that company's name?

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

can't remember actually,it was a big ass machine designed for SMD,i know the story from one of the few people in the world that could 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

service it,he used to come to our factory every year,those machines we're impossible to break,everything was easily changeable 2/2

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I fucking knew that's how it worked!!

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You sound like one of those really dumb YouTube commenters.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

You sound like one of those ignorant idiots,who has no idea how the real world works.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I think the person was referring to the asshol-ish way in which you presented your completely valid points.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Way to be a complete jackass, miss my point, AND reinforce it. You win the hat trick.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What you fail to understand is that one company would have the monopoly on the removable blocks, thus perpetuating income on new parts.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You fail to understand how easy it is for another company to copy your product w/o legal issues.Come on,internet intellectual,i worked 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

at Schurter for 8 years,teach me electronic manufacturing,i challenge you. 2/2

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I'm not sure that pin system would be sufficient considering the amount of wiring and circuitry in a modern ribbon cable. Nice concept.

12 years ago | Likes 871 Dislikes 7

If you look at the video, it looks like they have a prototype - quite possibly a working one. Besides, as cousteau pointed out, serial could

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

why? your usb cable only has 4 wires, and 2 are for power, if those parts can operate though a usb cable, they can work though 4 pins.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't it very likely that at some point in the near future we will have technology capable of doing this feasibly?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The bandwidth on each of the pins would have to be over sized for most needs. A Processor needs more bandwidth than a volume rocker button.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow, you guys must be great at parties.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I think it'd be theoretically sorta possible. I'd fucking LOVE to be an CpE hired for this project. It's intriguing. How to am be hired?

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

That's all this is, a concept. This is by no means anything like what it would probably look like. As in its not even at prototype.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is tons of room for improvement, and it would be extremely easy to fit hundreds of small connections on a block.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

meh it's a nice idea but they're built how they are now specifically so people will pay for new phones

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What really might be interesting, would be to see a new bus developed that could allow this sort of modularity in the small form factor.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Everyone in this section of the thread should help these guys make this. Seriously. I love the idea.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Plot twist: Everything's wireless.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That is a fantastic idea (for most parts): use the board for power, pair using NFC, then communicate over bluetooth. (1/2)

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Each part has it's own CPU/MCU, so you don't need a central one...

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Serialize ALL the things!  Dunno, maybe USB 2.0 is fast enough; it only uses 4 wires; but I don't think so.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Most of these things don't need huge data transfers. BT is relatively slow, and sensor periphs don't need to be polled that often.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cameras, on the other hand . . .

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, and maybe wifi. There are USB versions of both, but they're not quite fast.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am pretty sure it's impossible to have a slot that you can plug a CPU, a RAM plank, a battery or a cam into and have it just work.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

isn't it always cheaper to make things disposable?

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

i still dont' really understand what any of you are saying...

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its cheaper for the company because if every model can easily be whiped off the assembly line, then sure its easy to replace a phone..(cont)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

..though the consumer still pays lots for a whole new phone. The issue is the amount of e-waste we are making, so maybe recycling..(cont)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

..'broken' phones would work as a better system opposed to throwing them out, and the engineering nightmare to design the one in the post.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice thought if you don't want the planet to live for your children...

12 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Find a way to make them biodegradable

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Disposable can also be recyclable!

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1. Cheaper for whom? 2. Cheaper in long/short/medium term?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

not for the consumer

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ribbon cables are extremely outdated. Most cables only use two pairs (four total) wires: pos/neg voltage, pos/neg data transfer.

12 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Molex just got bought the other day for almost 7 billion bucks by some guys who think FFC components are going to make them piles of cash.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

have you taken apart a phone lately?

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

tell that to the sata cables, the ram sticks, the processors... all of them excluding the sata cables have more than 100 connections.

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Two inputs and outputs each.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

tbh I'm not sure why I commented that lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

speaking in terms of PCs. smart phones aren't any different however.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Like I said. Two pairs.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

(2) or a WiFi upgrade, it'd be sufficient. CPU upgrades could involve getting a new backpanel and snapping your old components into it.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The wifi block would be as big as 1x1 on the blok grid. Let's say the cpu block is 6 times bigger, you have 6x4 pins.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(1) And also, RAM and Processors send terabytes of data instantaneously - that's why there's that many pins. For a simple BT module

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You might notice the concept suggests CPU, RAM and battery blocks are to use the same plugs as the rest of the stuff.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I'd love to see something like this, but all the different pins from dozens of buses that have to match? Modularity is unrealistic.

12 years ago | Likes 135 Dislikes 2

Who said it would be difficult to add dozens of connections? As for where they go, it's as simple as labelling them.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the interfaces are still going to be fixed. The video pins are going to stay video pins even when you pull the screen off.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just curious since it has a central board between the screen and blocks could that not run the wiring ect. or is it unrealistic to fit it?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It could run the wiring, but that wiring would be fixed - the pins for the ram are going to still be ram pins when you pull the block away.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL that there are a lot of electrical engineers on imgur

12 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

Hooray! There are lots of us, apparently.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we might not all be electrical engineers, but we know how technology be. i'd still put my money towards developing a system like this.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or just use serial, like every block was a USB dongle. The only issue is you need more bandwidth to drive the screen.

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

140 characters is not enough to really go into this, but suffice it to say that not all serial interfaces are the same. Bad for modularity.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

USB did a good job of it. If you're making custom hardware for this, then go ahead and standardize/choose a serial interface too.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The overhead for USB makes it impractical for a lot of these interfaces, though. Every peripheral uses a different interface for a reason...

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The CPU and GPU really need insane amounts of bandwidth to be useful.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The CPU and GPU would probably both be in the "Processing" block, in my design. And would be special-cased for screen bandwidth.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You would have to add the ram to that too, at which point your just taking this modular design and getting back to the monolithic design

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Serial buses really are quite fast, look at USB3. There's no reason this couldn't be possible...

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

End of the day, its just like a PC but smaller.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

USB3 really isn't that fast compared to things like a PCIe port.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, no. Each of those serial interfaces (UART, I2C, SPI) would still be incompatible with each other. The only way I think this could (1)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

work would be if the 600+ SOC that was the processor of this monstrosity would need an ungodly amount of pinmuxing, to the point of being (2

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

unwieldly. Seriously. If you haven't ever looked at a cell phone SOC, stop saying that this should be easy. The different interfaces (3)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0