Why kids learn to hate math

Feb 3, 2016 3:21 AM

meadowgreene

Views

109674

Likes

4179

Dislikes

160

Why kids learn to hate math

I fear for our future

The assignment isn't even correct English. "Tell" needs an indirect object.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's about teaching the kids to complete one number to 10 so that the addition is easier. It's just really badly written.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

There is a correct answer: use base 13.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Serious- my math tutor taught me this in 4th grade. It has been beneficial my whole life.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The point is to aid in addition. If you have 7+3+9, you're obviously gonna add the 7 and 3 to get 10, then 10 + 9 is cake.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It quite clearly stated 8+5. Not 8+2. Not 8+(5-3). 8 plus fucking 5. If you want to get 10 in that case, convert the answer to base 13.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm kinda shocked that this has to be taught. Started doing this on my own in grade school.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Standing on the shoulders of giants and whatnot. I figured this out too, but many kids won't on their own, and it's a damn good method.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's how I do large number basic math in my head. 4234x754 is 4000x100x7 to start out, etc. But this question is VERY poorly worded

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even with all the explanations being given, this is still a stupid-ass way of teaching addition. count up 5 more from 8, kid.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Fuck that. Nothing irritates me more than watching grown ass adults counting on their fingers to do addition.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Common core actually has a lot of empirical evidence to back it up but it's so different from the way most people were taught that it (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

scares them (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Funny thing is, growing up in the 90s, I could never do basic math well. and the the way I do math in my head is essentially Common Core.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like many things in life, it seems wrong when taken out of context. The question is perfectly appropriate for a 4rd grader learning to add.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 16

Perfectly appropriate =/= Efficient.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4rd? Aside from that typo you are absolutely correct.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Common core strikes again!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Bullshit, it's poorly and ambiguously worded and does nothing to further their math skills.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

Read any number of comments above

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Fird grader

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Bloody fourd graders..

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is how I taught myself to do math, people who dislike it tend to be the types that only memorized math and have no real understanding.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Guys you're over reacting a bit. Yes the education system is shit but what if the teacher is just stupid?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck that teacher.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You asked a question wrong...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The plus kinda fucks it up. If you have 8 apples and there is a pile of 5 apples, how do you get 10 apples

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I learned this method in Russian school 13 years ago. It's pretty useful and makes calculations easier.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

I don't understand what you did before. I don't recall primary school but I've always did this automatically. What other way is there?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was a little kid and did nothing. They just told me "look, you can calculate that way" and that's it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You must mean "take 2 from 5 and add it to 8 and then add 3" years. Now I understand.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think you mean 10 years ago

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Wow I can't believe this comment has ten whole points

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bravo!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

From UK. And the way my kids are getting taught math is just as bad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as a recent college graduate, our whole education system in the United States needs to be made over

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 15

It was and this is the result.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Tear the whole thing down and start over

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

This is actually how people tend to do math in their head. It doesn't make sense at first because people don't see the method's explanation

10 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 10

People are weird, this is nothing like how i do math in my head. not for small or big numbers o_O

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If you want to add 85 to 99 you don't do 85+9=94+90=184?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes, but i dont do 99 + 1 = 100 leaves 85 - 1 to be 84 100+84 = 184 which would be how example above wants it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it had 8+5 or 8+2= 10+3=13

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What, incorrectly? Because 8+5 isn't 10.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Its a different way of teaching math that provides greater flexibility. You have to be taught young though. We're raising Guild Navigators.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah that's exactly how I do it. I hadn't thought about it till now but that's the way I've always done it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I have done this for as long as I can remember. It allows you to add or subtract fairly quickly with little error. However, I don't (1)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

believe this is the way it should be taught and is only beneficial after a solid foundation with math is established. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I had a teacher cross out one of my words as a spelling mistake. I had mis-spelled 'dial' (which she insisted was dail). This was IT class.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an Eastern European, how are you being thought addition in the USA? Is it all memory? Cause this is pre-school level math...

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

No wonder you lost the Cold War.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of Americans have a difficulty telling 10 from 13, "your" from "you're" and other basic things.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My guess is the answer is 8+5=10+3 but the question is still ridiculous.

10 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 1

I get the whole tens table method and use it regularly but that is not what this is. Learning table is done with sheets held over one anther

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A sane response. +1

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

99+10=100+9

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where would this apply in life? JOHNSON! GET IN HERE!.. TAKE THIS PROBLEM AND GIVE ME THE SAME PROBLEM... BUT DIFFERENT.. OR YOU'RE FIRED!!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fun fact, I've worked in corporate america for the last five years...haven't met a single person named Johnson. I feel lied to.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What!?! THAT'S IT! I'm hiring the first Johnson I meet... once I own a company and get out of student loa- I'm never hiring anyone am I? :(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed, unless there's a heck of a lot of context cut out...and as long as we don't dramatically overinterpret it for political reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No way! All the context we need is here in this small photo, and the internet would never ever politicize something like this!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You... I like you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Making 10s" is about place values. 8+5 makes 10 and 3, so you write 1 in the 10s place and 3 in the units. Math teachers aren't insane.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Thats what I thought too. The problem seems to be geared towards teaching kids how to break up a more difficult equation and make it easier

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but the question is still poorly worded. Also students learn to add using 5s and 10s, ex. another answer could have been 5+5=10+3=13.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so that a 1st grade question then

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But in colloquial English for math, "make" equals... well, "equal". The terminology should be "USE 10s to solve this problem", not "make".

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

"Making 10's" is the phrase used for this method, not "using 10's". It is confusing if you haven't worked with this method.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"make 10" is the the phrase.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

wouldn't "how many units of 10 are in 8+5" have been the best way to ask this question? I mean thats how i learned this methord as a kid.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, unless the students had learned about "making 10" as a technique.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The question doesn't even use correct grammar for fucks sake.

10 years ago | Likes 892 Dislikes 14

My math teachers always hated English and vice versa

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

That's because teachers are just idiots in general

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

For the sake of fuck, therefore for fuck's sake. Grammar's fun.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And so's my nan.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*fuck's

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's okay they can just use MyMathLab...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why I gave up on being an Astronaut

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The question is ambiguous but would actually make sense if worded better. It's teaching how to add numbers greater than single digits.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it's not.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 2

No it's not.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No it's not.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

ITS NOT HOW I LEARNED AS A KID ITS SCARY! /sarcasm. This is literally how I taught myself. It WORKS. It prepares you for more complex stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 10

I don't need the exact number, I just need a reasonable estimate to work with. -common core.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Never seen anything in common core that doesn't get the exact answer, it teaches concepts that makes math make sense instead of memorization

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It doesn't work because it's objectively wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The redundancy of the question is what gets to people. Math has rules, and to bend those rules in a contrived way isn't helping anybody.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no redundancy. Its asking how to "make 10" and I guarantee make 10 is a method they learned. You make 10, then add the remainder.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I can see how the question would have no redundancy to a kid without grasp on counting, but to a smarter kid it's entirely redundant.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get it, 10's in the process. 8+1+1(=10)+1+1+1=13 but is it really that important? Just add 5 to 8. 13. 3 away from 10. The kid gets that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its teaching a method to doing math. We all do it. It feels pointless with small numbers, but 5593+2939=5600+2932=6000+2532=8532 much faster

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's contrived, thus redundant to finding the answer. The question has no point. 8+5=?+3 would have worked better to actually teaching math.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its teaching a method to doing math. We all do it. It feels pointless with small numbers, but 5593+2939=5600+2932=6000+2532=8532 much faster

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or 5593+2939=5592+2940=5532+3000=8532. By learning the METHOD on something easier, they can extend it later. Its building a foundation.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hi! First grade teacher here. SO the idea behind this is that it makes double digit numbers easier for younger students. Making a group of

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 10

Thank you so much! I'm omw to becoming a teacher and I had a psych major challenge me on the methods used in math today, song there's only 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 first and then add in the remaining balance. This is only a part of the way it is taught and it makes sense to kids at this developmental

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

The idea is good in essence but it's applied horribly. I teach maths too at GCSE level and I recommend reviewing this exercise.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

its probably an assessment where they have to check for understanding.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

They told a 7 year old to solve it that way? Why make it so weird for a young child? (Only added to by the poor wording)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Again, I think its an assessment. I agree, the wording is odd. Also, remember, kids are just learning how to add, they are a fresh slate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There should be classes on just maths tricks.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

stage. In addition to this kids can use ten stick and circles, counting up, groups of 10, etc. All of these things lead to the idea of

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

This is how I taught myself to do math in my head but a lot of people don't learn this way. Unfortunately I think it's not for everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

HOW ELSE DO PEOPLE ADD SHIT IM LOSING MY MIND?!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is how a lot of people do math, often without realizing it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

number sense. Ones, tens, hundreds, etc. At the end of the day, adding 10+5 is easier than 8+7.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

Of course learning 10 +5 is easier than 8+7, yet it still dumbs the children down. Why can't they be taught the straight forward way?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Kids should learn the different styles and see what works for them, we are required however, to make sure that they are learning both.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

oh and in my mind, I would rather have a process that I understand rather than worry about remembering math facts. so chunk thinks

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

things* so that they make sense, rather than remember 8+7=15 8+6= 14... Now if you dont like this you'll really hate, doubles +/- 1.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Another way to approach 8+7 is to do 8+8=16-1= 15. All of this is done in the hopes that a kid finds out their best learning method.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They are taught both. In a class of 25 6yo's you have people that learn differently. So you teach a variety of styles.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

1) That makes sense, I think the question was just worded in an unusual way. My brother is working part time as a substitute teacher and he

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) told me that he was subbing for a 1st grade class that had a strange method where they would draw circles in order to do simple addition

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So in order to teach number placement you might use circles for ones and lines for tens. 52 would be IIIII oo. It helps differentiate and

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so you would start at 7 and then draw ooo and just count them up. 7,8,9,10.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

52-10 goes from IIIII oo to IIII oo oh its 42. All of this is done so that kids can prove that 52 - 10 = 42. Another might be 7 + 3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

give value to things in the ones place and things in the tens place. Also if you want to subtract ten you would just erase 1 I and recount.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The question is not "8+5=10". It is simply asking how to get the 10 out of 8+5. You do that by taking 2 away from 5, leaving 3 leftover.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 11

Or you can take 3 from 8; take 1 from 5; then add the 1 or the original equation and there you have it! 10! Then add the rem 3 and divide!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering the student couldn't spell "with" correctly I doubt they would have caught that bit. Kids can be incredibly literal.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Ain't no "leftovers" in addition.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In the traditional sense, no. Again, its just a different way of solving 8+5. But that wasn't what the test question was anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You add the 2 to the 8 to get 10 (the answer). Then add the leftover 3 to 10 and you have the answer, which is 13.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

why couldn't the question be this?? it makes no sense to have a question that requires a half-way math answer!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It technically is. "Tell me how to make 10 when adding 8+5". 5-3=2. 2+8=10. We're not used to seeing it this way, but my brain so gets this.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Its halfway because it is only to help teach one particular step.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I grew up in Eastern Europe and that's how we were always thought. Find the closest round number and add the rest

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its just a different way of thinking. It took me a good 10 minutes to figure it out, but I've never understood math as easily as right now.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I was going to say, "Relevant username," but I see that you literally just made your account! Sweet

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lol, yeah, thanks! ^^ I've always struggled with math and this post just made it a thousand times easier for me. Pretty silly, but cool!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is that there are some kids who will only understand traditional methods, and others like me who could have used this more :/

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I am inordinately happy that *this* was the post that got you to join.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha, ikr? This post actually made me feel super empowered because I was able to finally grasp the foundation. I've been practicing all day!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm the opposite! I enjoy the traditional methods and I look at my cousin-in-laws homework and just want to scream!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They want the student to make the numbers easier to add. 10+3 is easier to conceptualize than 8+5. Ffs it's not hard.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 20

Alternatively, you can substitute 8 = 5+3 , Then you have (5+3) + 5. Rearrange. 5+5+3. Sum to make ten. 10+3 = 13.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's just that the way the question is phrased and the explanation given is confusing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck off with your logic and raise your pitchfork back up

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

Onward with the witch hunt!!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Since when was addition a concept that required extra convoluted ways to conceptualize? Its fucking addition.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

It's not convoluted, just worded badly. We use regrouping in everyday life. 10 + 5 is easier than 9 + 6. https://youtu.be/8mcTsyV56jI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Since the day we want to teach kids to solve problems with logic rather than teaching kids to memorize things a computer can do faster.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If that "logic" you want to push is doing simple things in convoluted, inefficient ways, then no wonder your economy's shit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's pretty much a fundamental framework for algebra, only with rearranging tangible numbers rather than abstract letters.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not convoluted, just worded badly. We use regrouping in everyday life. 10 + 5 is easier than 9 + 6. https://youtu.be/8mcTsyV56jI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

61+19 or 70+10. Which is easier to solve?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

They both are. I think the point is, most people who can break numbers down like that, weren't force fed the info. They found what worked.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And this method is attempting to teach what works, the first go-around. So kids don't have to go find it themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that makes sense.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the time it takes to figure out what to take from 19 to put to 61, you could just add them.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's...it's literally what you do in your head when you add complex numbers together. I do it all the time, but not with single digits.

10 years ago | Likes 309 Dislikes 27

Nope sorry but the wording is complete bullshit. You can't say it makes sense when the language fails to convey the meaning....

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

the directions are conveniently left off the picture. it might have explained it there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the issue is that the question was worded in such a way as to imply the end result was supposed to be 10, not that the (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

(2/2) answer would have a 10 somewhere in the equation, but that the end result could ultimately be a different number. Misleading as fuck.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, exactly. The core (ha!) of Common Core is legit. It's just taught in a fucking stupid way.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I do this too, but 10 shouldn't be the final answer it should be 13. 10 just confuses people

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You never add 8+5 to get 10. I don't know what kind of math you are doing.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You find the 10 and add the remainder. 8+5 = 10+3.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thanks for the explanation, couldn't figure out what everyone was talking about. :D

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I agree that not every kid thinks that way, but it IS a logical way to think about math problems.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

^^ Thank you. People bitch about the declining education and instead of creating a solution, they just want money thrown at the issue

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is not addition of "complex numbers". It's addition of "real numbers".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Ah roger that. Wasn't meant to call you out :-) These teachers....third math related post with this type of terrible/tricky teaching. Sad...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Another good way of explaining it is with time since it is base 60. If it's 4:48 what time is it 15 minutes later? 15=12+3, 4:48+12min=5:00

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

With 3 min remainder, so it's 5:03

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This.... this makes sense. Thanks you

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I do too. Wasn't taught to do it, either. It just made things easier.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 2, 2017 12:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

the directions might have been more clear. they are conveniently left out of the picture

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm willing to bet the full page starts with something exactly like that. Showing a single problem takes away a lot of context here.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah... Otherwise the question is meaningless.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

taught*. Now you've learned something. I like this thread. We're learning things.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 2, 2017 12:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Good on you for learning so many languages! I'm pretty much stuck at one.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your name is perfect for this comment

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

357 + 193 = 357 + 3 + 190 = 360 + 190 = 360 +90 +100 = 450 + 100 = 550. It's the same process written for first graders.

10 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 7

Yeah idk what kind of slow crazy business this is but I don't like it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(Never had CC properly explained to me, only heard the internet bitch about it.)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The problem with this is that it confuses students that don't use it intentionally. It's an intuitive way to do math, not a method

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thank you. i dont know why people think this is the devil or something. its supposed to teach number sense

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

None of these are complex numbers.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

To you. First grade is a little different.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

First grade isnt first grade. To you. hurrrrrr

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just add 357 + 193 without breaking it down

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I only break down large numbers into simpler ones if multiplying

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd argue that at least up to twenty simply adding is the easier operation regardless of age. The subtraction is unneccesarily complicated.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

357 + 193 = 360 + 190 -3 + 3 = 360 + 190 = 360 + 200 - 10 = 560 - 10 = 550. Seems easier that way.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or 357 + 193 = 357 + 200 -7 = 557 - 7 = 550.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but were you specifically taught that method? I've talked with a lot of people who break numbers down in vastly different ways.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Let me see if I've got this. CC is asking kid to find numbers they can more easily work with to complete the equations. In this case, [+]

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

the kids are trying to find 10 because addition from ten is simple. So you take the two from the 5 to make 8, 10; leaving 10 + 3 = 13?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Yes. Mental math instead of blanket memorization.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

that was my understanding too. Only i would naturally take 3 from the 8 to add 5 + 5 and then put the 3 back in, but whatever

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Thank you! This right here is what's wrong with forcing a method like this. Not everyone will break numbers down the same way.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The problem with this is that not all students think this way so it ends up confusing the ones who use different processes.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

thats why common core teaches multiple ways of doing the same problem... instead of just procedural math that everyone is SO GOOD at

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The common core aims to teach this type of thinking. Most adults find it confusing because they were taught differently

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

So, common core is putting round heads into square boxes?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

They're trying to teach round thinking and square thinking and triangle thinking to all groups, so eventually the students will (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

be able to use the type of thinking that comes most naturally to them. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If this specific method was being forced on adults your analogy might be on the mark. But as an adult, this is how I always did math.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, guess you have a square head then. :P The analogy still works.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

common core teaches the way you probably learned if, and teaches others like this to help understand why it works

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/2 Math teacher signing in. This isn't common core, this is how math is learned using compliments of 10. If you don't understand this then

10 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 55

I thought you were saying you were "half a math teacher signing in" at first.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except the question is written very poorly.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can't trust you though, because you are only 1/2 of a math teacher. :D

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But... but... I want to have knee-jerk negative reactions to things I don't want to understand! Why must you ruin my fun?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yay, glad someone else said it. Engineer here. Memorization won't get you far if you can't THINK using the underlying relational principles.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Yup, lots of people in here went through math the wrong way and are now too stubborn to accept the reality that a better way exists.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

I read through some other comments and I'm beginning to grasp the meaning. Maybe this is why I've hated math all my life. I'd get in 1/

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

trouble in school for using what made sense for me, and not what they taught me. So I'd memorize things for tests then forget. I'm 2/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

completely useless at math now, considering it's so easy to just use a calculator rather than figure it out myself. /3

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The issue I think is the wording.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Other math teacher here, I've had to explain countless of these "common core" things to my relatives.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Perfect SAT Math Score chiming in here. Learned math the asian way. Memorization is faster. Conceptually, I understand this, but it's slower

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never took the SAT, but my degree is in math and I can assure you that memorization did very, very little to help.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish we never called it anything and just rolled it out. Then nobody would be looking for a punching bag.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

God yes. And then you try to explain it but they're shit at math so they don't understand.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

There are better ways to teach addition using compliments of ten. For instance, not every lesson was handed out on a paper.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you have to be good at math to understand? Now thats an odd approach to learning.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's a math teacher for you. "You don't know math so you don't understand" OK.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Theyre talking about parents and you fine folks who have a poor grasp on math and don't understand why we are doing what we are doing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What I'm saying is that since they probably weren't very good at math, trying to explain this to an adult who's learned it another way 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 you never really understood math. Anyone can memorize that 8+5=13, but a student needs to understand WHY.

10 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 52

If you have eight cookes and i gove you five more how many will you have ...Thirteen... Yep good job son now go get me a beer. Thats the WHY

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why? why 8+5=13? because when you add 5 to 8 you get 13, fuck.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Teachers/systems that blame students for not understanding "easy" concepts when those concepts get taught poorly, well, it makes me weep

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

The phrasing of your comment makes me think you're the teacher from that pic up there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Never really understood math" Oh that's definitely completely true...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

why only teach 1 way to come up with the answer.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The "why" is very important in every aspect of our lives, but this question is all kinds of confusing. I'd go with multiple choice,TBH

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which was the real failure of education when I was a kid, you were expected to memorize thinking it made you understand.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 for logic and reason over fear of something they don't understand

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Yeah, but if a kid innately can get past the simple-breakdown method doesn't that make 'em smarter?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not if getting past the method is memorising the answers. If the kid "solves" 8+5, but then has no clue how to do 1008+5, it is a problem.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok so you know that 1+1=2. But you need to understand WHY. See how stupid that sounds?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

THANK YOU! I was taught "speed math" by my piano teacher, and it's this. This is basically teaching kids how to use the map instead of GPS.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Now, if you'd only be taught to find the direct route on said map instead of driving the other way around the globe...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can get East by traveling West long enough. No one criticizes Physics teachers for teaching with that kind of thought process. Why math?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So ... Trying to build a basic understanding that 8+5 = 8+ (2+3), ya?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You're on the right track, that IS the function of math that is exploited here but the kids won't appreciate for many more years.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Won't appreciate for years? This isn't remotely extensible so in years they'll have memorised the results and use better methods to add

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The wording is strange in OP, but I'm guessing this is an exercise they're taught in class. Nothing I learned in this manner.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like I mentioned earlier, the brain of someone who truly understands math DOES learn this way. Just not explicitly.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Try this exercise: 7 + a = 11 (hexadecimal). If you're not extremely comfortable with hexadecimal, you'll have to split with a + 6 +1 = 10+1

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

... BRILLIANT. That's actually really good. Thank you. I might steal that ;)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So ... the basic principle is that our normal counting is base 10, so make a pit-stop at 10 (along the 8+5 path), ya?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the idea, using a base you're not familiar with just expose the process as something non-obvious

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd rather let the kids find their own techniques though. I'd say "you can try this" not "do this". They still get the same answer anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes and no. There are objectively better and worse ways of doing things. A lot of kids, when left to their own devices, will just count.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

A kid learning how to count using math? We can't have that now. /s

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're either deliberately missing the point, or you yourself are not a very mathematically inclined person.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That will forever tether them to a lower level of thinking.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I guess. But a guy learned to perform complex forumlas on his own. You might end up trampling on some genius by forcing techniques.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This was still phrased in an unclear way.

10 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 6

how do you know the directions didnt explain it? this is one conveniently cropped problem on a whole worksheet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can see that. But I'd bet the students did this in the classroom and one poorly worded problem does not invalidate the entire lesson.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 11

It actually does. Either incorrect terminology was introduced earlier, or incorrect terminology makes testing what was learned invalid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I cannot stress this enough, this has nothing to do with "Core" or the problems schools have had rolling it out.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

It doesn't invalidate the lesson but makes it even harder for students to appreciate/understand. Teachers are supposed to make learning easy

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

You need to see the bigger picture. A student that knows how to add sums over 10 will never need to memorize a thing in their lives.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Exactly. I was never taught this as a child. My mind is boggled at being able to understand simple math equations for the first time.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

A lot of people are very stubborn and can't handle the realization that they don't know something. Last time I posted this I got flamed.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Seriously my kid's 2nd grade teacher helped me understand math and I cried in a tiny chair that day.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A lot of your posts are in the negative, despite being accurate. Some people just want to hate on "Common Core".

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's sad. The memorization method never worked for me. This foundation makes it so simple and I'm learning it at age 30 on imgur, wtf.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Never too late. I was great at math but never took grammar/spelling seriously. The internet fixed me.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The question is poorly phrased. And there isn't a difference between memorizing 8+5 and 8+2+3. At the end of the day it's just lots of 1s

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand it the way YOU said it. That question is a poorly worded trap whose only result is to make a student feel shame and hate math.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

We're only seeing 1 problem. There was [hopefully] a full lesson behind this that the problem was quizzing on.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

True, but that terrifyingly means there's a lesson plan that makes math students learn bad sentence structure to get a test question right.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't "make" 10, you say "USE 10 to get the answer to 8+5". Easy enough change.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, I won't defend the wording. I'm here giving insight as to what the lesson is trying to convey.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I like how math was taught back then. With adding sticks together and counting them. None of this common core bs to be honest.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Have you been to an elementary school or only seen internet stuff about it? My kids are taught core math with sticks and blocks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I cannot stress enough that his has nothing to do with core.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Have you been to an elementary school or only seen internet stuff about it? My kids are taught core math with sticks and blocks.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was taught core math with sticks and blocks around the 1st grade back in 1995. Never with a question as bad as the one on the pic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

but WHY would we need to calculate it in sets of 10? Why not just do proper addition and make 8+5=13?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because it is a concept of splitting additions into simpler parts that make the whole thing easier.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understood the question only after I looked at the answer. And I still dont think kind of math lessons is necessarily. Yes in order to 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Learn math you need to the every part of the elements (grouping, partition, etc.), but this one in particular is ridiculous. 2/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The main beauty of the math is in the freedom of your choise, but this task makes you to think in the way teacher wants you to. 3/4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also it is equal 10 in the field of module Z/30Z if you replace + with an *. Yeah, abstract algebra FTW!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some things, like facts, don't have a WHY. They just are. I understand they are teaching a method here. (So, a HOW, not a WHY.)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Regular person checking in. Understanding the "why" used to be simple and we all got by just fine. (1)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You have 5 apples, Scott takes 3, Scott = a dick.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You may have, but many didn't and it was not their fault. While other kids' minds filled in the gap between memorization and understanding1/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

some kids' minds just didn't and they never understood why. They gave up an came to the conclusion that they simply didn't get math. And 2/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

all their parents and teachers came to the conclusion that the student simply wasnt trying hard enough. The reality is math should be 3/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This is still how I add 8+5. I don't trust myself to just remember that it's 13.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As you shouldn't. Memory is not infallible, logic is.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Perfect SAT Math Score chiming in here. Learned math the asian way. Memorization is faster. Conceptually, I understand this, but it's slower

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do you use an abacus to teach this method?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On rare occasions. Its a last ditch effort. Abacus can become a crutch just like a calculator or finger counting.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, you know your students, so if you teach this method and you find some that can't grasp the concept right away(like myself) (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

an abacus might help to get them started since it is a more visual approach. (2/3)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't learn it in school, I taught myself this stuff when I was making change as a waitress.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am getting my PhD in partial differential equations this summer, and I don't understand any of this.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Sounds more like you don't want to understand it. I'm sure you could get it if you tried.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tell how to make 10 when adding 1+1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you add two hard numbers together, do you ever break them down into chunks that are easier to work with? This is exactly that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well _clearly_, to quote a math teacher, "you never realy understood math"

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I can live with that :). To quote Shaw: He who can, does, he who cannot, teaches.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

oh nice burn

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, haha, I know exactly who you're talking about. They like to sniff their own farts I think.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good luck on thesis defense. Actually ... Use this. If you can adequately BS an explanation for OP, you can defense your thesis, no prob.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thanks! Im pretty smart but not that smart.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not a teacher of basic mathematics but is it truly neccessary to teach this explicitly? Do you yourself calculate 8+5 in that manner?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'm not a math teacher either, but that's how I do it. 46 + 28 = 50 + 24 = 74. Or 12 * 18 = 12 * 2 = 24 * 9 = 180 + 36 = 200 + 16 = 216

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I do 46 + 28 as 60 + 14. Is that the same thing?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is the same concept which is asked in the question. For 46+28 you can as well go 44+30. Or however you like to make the addition simpler.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/2 Everyone who understands math does this already and don't realize it. If you even for a moment hesitate and have to "Remember" what it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

2/2 is, then I have bad news for you... you don't understand math the right way.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Of course, I'm only saying that if you calculate 8+5 by changing it to 10+3 then that is no indication of understanding. As for larger 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is why I had hard time understanding numbers without any context. Make 10 out of 8+5. How the fuck do I do that. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Using real world examples. You have 8" piece of lumber and 5" piece of lumber. How do you make 10" piece out of them. This makes sense 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is more like "Add 8 eggs and 5 eggs. Show when and how you filled the 10 slot egg box.", the answer being 8+2 or 5+5.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honestly, I completely understand the concept. I just don't remember learning it. What grade math is the above problem?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You likely were never explicitly told this but deduced this on your own. This is late 1st or early 2nd grade math.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That makes sense. Has teaching this "trick" if you will, shown an increase in understanding?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously it will, I'm just curious if its taught as a trick or if the focus has bled more into "this is how its done."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously it will, I'm just curious if its taught as a trick or if the focus has bled more into "this is how its done."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't get this, given the provided information. The closest thing to a correct answer I could think of is http://imgur.com/p2NqHeI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're over thinking this. Imagine you have two piles of coins, in one pile is 8 coins, in another is 5. Pretend you DONT already know that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're over thinking this. Imagine you have two piles of coins, in one pile is 8 coins, in another is 5. Pretend you DONT already know that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 and 5 is 13. What you can do is move two coins from the pile of 5 to the pile of 8. Now you have two piles of 10 and 3. Now thats easy to

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

rationalize that 10 and 3 is 13. Much easier than 8 and 5 is 13. I'm speaking from a developmental psych standpoint.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, I assume this is a lesson on place value, but that is only an assumption due to the lack of information provided.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its not. There is indeed a wealth of context a small picture on the internet is not showing you.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could you explain that a bit more? Why does 8+5=13? From what I understand/was taught, it equals 13 because 8+5=13..like 8, add 5, get 13..

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 3, 2016 7:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1) How? 2) No it isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Re-read the question. It doesn't ask for the result of 8+5, but rather how to get 10 when performing the addition. The answer is 8+2 or 5+5.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Great insight there. It could also be 6+4. Or 3+7. Or 2+2+2+2+2. Or 1+2+3+4. Or 1+2+1+2+1+2+1. Yeah real superior method.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

On a larger level, it's kind of the idea behind taking 67+42. Most people see 60+40 to get 100 first, then adding 7+12 to get 112.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

*cough*109*cough*

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My original problem was 60+52 but I liked the other one better and I didn't change the answer... Fuck

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's what your mind automatically does. When adding large sums, you start either the highest e.g. 100 and then add the rest from there.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its a little tough with only 140 characters but I'll try. Basically instead of memorizing the FACT that 8+5=13, which even a parrot can do..

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

you teach a student to reason that 8 is 2 digits away from 10, so when you're adding something to 8, say its 3, you'd go 1 stop past 10..

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

and youd get 11. If you add 4 to 8, you'd go 2 stops past 10 and get 12. If you add 5 to eight youd go 3 past 10 to 13. And so on.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Fine, but the question is get 10 from 8+5. You don't. 8+2+3 is 13. You might hit 10 in the middle, but adding 3 makes 13. You CANNOT get 10.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

"make 10" is probably the name of the method. You make 10, then add the remainder. So 8+2 makes 10, 3 is the remainder, 13 is the answer.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 1

The point is to find the 10 and the remainder. Further, we don't know if there was a fuller explanation in class or on the sheet.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I think we all get that now, but nowhere in the original question is that made clear

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless, higher in the worksheet, there's a definition of what "Make Ten" means.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no remainder in addition. This isn't modulus division.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The question is not proof 8+5=10, but rather to show WHEN you get 10 while performing 8+5.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Never because I'm not an idiot." Might as well ask "Show how your face hits the ground when you walk 10 meters."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's telling you to show how you can get a result of 10 when adding 8 + 5. That's what "make" means in the context of addition.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You can't get a result of 10 from 8+5. The problem is that 8+5 doesn't "make" 10. It "makes" 13.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1