All up in you!

Mar 10, 2017 2:48 AM

muffdiver5150

Views

70555

Likes

1822

Dislikes

236

What did he expect, that the people would rise in rebellion and overthrow the government?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Don't make a Robin Hood out of this guy! He broke the law for petty motives.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 22

Newsflash: a spy agency has the ability to spy on people. This is literally the CIA's job. The dump has no evidence of actual domestic use

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Snowden worked at NSA, NSA is the one that wants to track every email and such.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He sacrificed his freedom? I thought he ran away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you guys actually know what the CIA does? Do you know they spy on people outside the US? Not US citizens?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't trust a damn thing Wikileaks puts out. They have an agenda

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone see that Jon Oliver segment where he showed Snowden people on the street's knowledge about him and the surveillance? Snowden sad.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Jesus this is ignorant. WikiLeaks is a Russian puppet

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

Didn't they say he caused risk to u.s. military men and women in the field?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I mean they say it. It doesn't necessarily make it true. I haven't really encountered anything backing it up. I could be wrong though.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Snowden revealed the NSA spying on U.S. citizens. The new CIA dump just details their capabilities, not targets. It's very different.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

In the beginning I was conflicted and leaned towards agreeing with those who called him out for treason but as I got older and began /2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Studying journalism I found that I support what he and people like Manning did to an extent. There's a right and wrong way to do this /3

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kind of thing so while I can understand and support being a whistleblower to an extent, I can't support running away to Russia.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So edgy

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Ironically, you comment was much more edgy than the pic.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And all the government does is investigate the leak, not the spying.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

If you actually read what's leaked so far, there's no actual accusation of spying. It's basically "here's what the CIA can do now and the

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

POSSIBLE risks that arise from it", so they're basically revealing the new methods of wiretapping these days. The only actual impropriety is

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

allegedly not reporting "zero day"vulnerabilities they discovered to manufacturers.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ECHELON was public knowledge for years.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And yet we were shocked about the NSA leak. We are naive as fuck

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who remembers ISP's throwing shitifts over raptor and carnivore?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pissing contest with his boss and he threw a tantrum. http://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=743

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good news, you're not paranoid!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too bad he doesn't talk about other things like Russia's reach or Theil's spy company. US was low hanging fruit for him

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 13

Well I mean, he worked for the US, not for Russia. You can't give inside information about a place you've never worked.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

He could use his influence to get people digging at all the states but he isn't.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Of course,but the reality is that all this focus on US spying just gives others a good distraction from their own governments.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

And, of course, off Russian spying.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You have no clue what you're talking about, OP. Pretty reductive.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Actually a lot of things changed regarding keeping records and companies complying with the government because of Snowden.

9 years ago | Likes 199 Dislikes 6

I don't agree. Can you cite supporting evidence?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Now they know most dont care and they dont need to hide it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For Europe there was a lot of change. Most big US companies moved EU data to EU servers to not be legally accessible for the nsa

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_Freedom_Act for one. Yahoo and Google shored up encryption to the hilt so the gov't can't get in for two.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Could you give some examples?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 10, 2017 8:36 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

check the comment above you

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The USA Freedom act is the most tangible, took away some of the powers of the Patriot Act for spying/surveillance.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not accurate. Snowden released info about the NSA, a subdepartment of the Dept of Defense. The CIA is a separate independent department

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Both leaks were about surveillance, but in very different context and departments. The two leaks are independent and likely not much

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Related as far as one confirming the other

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't say they're confirming. The Vault 7 leaks basically just reveal what the current "wiretapping" tricks are, that's like revealing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

what kind of firearms are in the CIA's armory and saying it confirms leaks about NSA assassinations.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We knew the government was spying on citizens long before Snowden. They've never really been that good at hiding it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This guy is a fucking turd. Stop trying to make him out to be a hero.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 21

Gotta disagree. We deserve to know the illegal activity conducted by our govt. Snowden sacrificed a cushy 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

govt security job to let us know our governments were engaging in illegal, domestic espionage and in 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

espionage of our allies. He tried to go through the whistleblowing procedures and they 3/?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

didn't yield any resolutions. Idk how you can be more of a patriot than sacrificing citizenship 4/?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

for your fellow countrymen. Fuck the govt, the people only owe their 5/?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

It's not a conspiracy theory. Doesn't change that Snowden's a self-important twat, and that Assange is the same. Putin's loving it, really.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

What kind of self-important twat gives up a cushy life in america for Russian exile treason charges from the most 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

and treason charges*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

national-security obsessed country in the world? The govt was conducting illegal surveillance activity. Chances are, without him, 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

we still wouldn't know about it to this day. And you can deny his importance all you want based 3/?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

on some disagreement of politics, but he IS important and will be for a long long time. 4/4

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Well, he could have used appropriate channels instead of leaking classified information to the whole world. I support the cause not his ways

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

Yes he should have just asked

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yeah he could have just gotten black-bagged instead of accomplishing anything

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Honest question: what kind of channels are those?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

He tried and no results

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Lmao you have no idea what you are talking about

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Breaking news: Spy agency uses tools to spy. There's still no proof they were spying on American citizens, and I guarantee FSB has the same.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

No proof they were spying on citizens? Wasn't that the entirety of what Snowden leaked?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Or do you specifically mean the CIA?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Snowden leaks, yes, there was internal activity by the NSA. CIA is a different organization under a different charter and different laws.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah, i figured that's what you meant after i wrote it, sorry. I thought "they" referred to govt in general.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd be more concerned if the CIA WASN'T spying on foreign nationals. It's what they're tasked to do

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Agent 7 or whatever Wikileaks published last week. No proof of spying inside American borders, CIA charter forbids activity inside USA

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Why would i believe someone who doesnt even know the Name of the leak lmao

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who the hell actually follows the charter?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/08/519205172/the-cia-document-dump-isn-t-exactly-snowden-2-0-here-s-why relevant.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, we still don't know whats in over 99% of the leak, so I'm going to wait for some more to actually be released

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The leak is basically, "You know how bad guys steal credit card numbers and personal info online? The CIA does it as well!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Wikileaks always oversells how much it has. I'd be very surprised if leak #1 was less than 25% of it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could try reading it,.. won't get anywhere waiting for someone to do it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Less than 1% of the documents have been published so far, according to Wikileaks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Though I will be open and honest. I still havent had the time to finish what's already been released

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think he means they haven't published most of what was leaked.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ive never read WikiLeaks, so i just assumed that once it was leaked it was published,.. eg: not leaked until published by definition

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You are correct

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is why America is a toilet, some how this guys the criminal

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Gotta be careful there, OP's narrative is entirely based on Snowden's claims, which is going to be biased. This is an interesting read:

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But where do u stand

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I believe it's indisputable he did some good, but he also fucked up something fierce and refuses to own it. I believe a truly heroic person

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

should not only be brave enough to act on his/her belief, but also be brave enough to accept their failures. Snowden is not a hero.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Heavy dude, I respect ur view, I just don't see why he should be punished for what he did. The whole terrorist excuse is stupid n invalid

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Maybe cause he recklessly put American lives in danger. Most agree with what he did, but not how he did it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Since it's release, the government has acknowledged that the info he released has not endangered anyone.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Mind providing a link? I'm trying to search for it but can't find anyone but Snowden making this claim.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea I'm gonna need a source on that

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeh... how many terrorist attacks on us soil have happened from what n how he did it

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

i'm glad you went through all his leaks that were on and out of "us soil"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Read a good analysis of why he shouldn't be pardoned: http://www.newsweek.com/why-obama-wont-pardon-edward-snowden-nsa-538632

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 12

.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good read man, thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Doesnt proof its claims. Makes contrary statements. I.e. makes fun of the lacking intellect if its readers lmao

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Read a biased, pro-authoritarian piece of trash

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 25

I thought it made a few good points. You think Snowden is totally blameless?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

I think that we absolutely should be very concerned with broad, unjustified, secret surveillance of us all by our own government. I also(1)

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

think that the claims made by this biased opinion hit-piece you linked are suspect at best, and even if right, Snowden still did this(2)

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

country much more good than harm, nor do I blame him for securing his own future after deciding to blow the whistle(3)

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

The wikileaks thing just recently is very different, the CIA thing is done physically with access to the devices, the NSA thing was remote

9 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 3

Except I assume everyone knows the CIA is forbidden from operating domestically, never has, and would be almost destroyed if it did.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

MKUltra definitely destroyed the CIA

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It got stopped 50 years ago. I'm much more worried about this: http://crooksandliars.com/2017/03/trump-traded-ukraine-russian-wikileaks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah I'm gonna go ahead and not trust to CIA to follow rules.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Then go ahead and distrust literally every institution everywhere.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I'll distrust every institution that has done something to lose my trust.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

If you trust wikileaks more than the CIA... I have a Russian bridge to sell you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I am, because apparently their secrets keep being circulated, so you know their ass would be caught if they did anything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

you mean like when they lied to the US president to start a war?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude, the timing of the release wasn't a coincidence. The objective is to undermine public trust in the CIA when they're most needed.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 8

I've not had trust in the CIA for a long time.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Neither have I, but they're pretty much our last defence at the moment.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Why is CIA most needed at this time?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You have a look at it? Scares the f#*$ out of me. Never wanted the CIA so bad. lol.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0