Rekt

Sep 13, 2016 10:26 AM

yaotzin

Views

458263

Likes

24690

Dislikes

554

Logged in just to UpVote.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're gonna need all that space money for your hospital fees and burn ointment prescriptions.

9 years ago | Likes 279 Dislikes 7

Nah, just let him burn up on re-entry. I'll look for the flaming streaks of his corpse in the sky tonight...That was funnier in my head.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Sad but true

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lets forget about all of the hospitals that the govt relied(s) on the Church to build.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 7

Do you like CT scans? MRI? Wireless phones? This and much more came to be because of technology developed for space exploration.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Legalize marijuana, tax it and the money goes to NASA. The program slogan would "Get high, so we can go higher"

9 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 4

You're going to tax medical marijuana? Check mate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Genius!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

And you get an upvote! -Oprah

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Logged in just so I could give you an Updoot!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Umm potato chips

9 years ago | Likes 1242 Dislikes 18

I'm eating some as I read this post :/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But on pretzel day? Well I like pretzel day.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Stanley Hudson is my spirit animal.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shouldn't this be a Kevin gif?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be more appropriate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IKR they're called crisps

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

Fuck you Britain

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

Fight me

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We already did and won

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You'd just cry after I threw your tea in the harbor

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

why cry? what is a harbour if not a giant cup of tea?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone fact check any of this? Or are we all just jumping on the Jens wagon?

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

I don't know how he could have calculated how much tax revenue churches would provide since they aren't required to disclose their profits.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It would be miniscule and no where close to that. Besides preacher churches most churches are charitable organizations that would hardly 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Get taxed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Also, the majority of Nasa's spending comes from donations. Most of what it gets from the Government is spent on day to day operations.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

That I didn't know. Seems a bit sad, but it also doesnt surprise me.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Curiosity cost $2.5b, defense budget is $618b a year (about $2,328,082,191 every 33 hours, someone check my math). He's pretty close.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

By the way, the way I calculated the 33 hour number was ((618 billion)/(8760 hours in a year))*(33 hours)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even if Jens was completely wrong it wouldn't stop the sentiment of the picture from being stupidly short sighted.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Yeah what has NASA ever given us? Other then artificial limbs, home insulation, hearing aids, velcro, smoke detectors, solar power. . .

9 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 1

Brought peace?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

...world stability via nuclear retaliation capabilities.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Nah, that was a separate military program that predated NASA.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What did NASA give us other than the microchips we use for most/all modern electronics?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You forgot Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whatever, I can get all that stuff at Home Depot.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Velcro was invented by a Swiss engineer who was inspired by burdock burrs and how they stuck to his dog's fur. I'm fun at parties.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Damn! At one point I knew that too! Internet point.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*than

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Tang!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Integrated circuits, which led to the computer and/or cellphone you're using...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A chance to explore cool new places! A hell of a lot better than sitting on your ass, wondering what it is like out there!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

...and you know, gps which is pretty much directly behind on the techtree line of the modern revolution that is Pokemon Go!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also an important part of the nuclear launch detection network.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They gave us the Aquaducts... and the sanitation...

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Alright but apart from those what else?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

UNDYING DEPRESSION

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The roads!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The advancement of technology and pursuit of the development of the capability to get off this rock is not wasted money.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It is arguably one of the most important things we can do since we know that extinction events happen fairly often. Humanity had no future

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

as a one world species or even one solar system one. It is insane that we don't have a system to protect from impacts from space.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We we do technically have several volunteers and there is a portion of public money reaching them , but it should be so much more. /agree

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The government spends over $600 billion on welfare programs for the poor.How is that going to help us get a remote controlled buggy on mars?

9 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 10

*philosophy dude* What if we used the poor to explore Mars???

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It prevents the NASA engineers from being late to work because they couldn't get through the starving desperate children on the street.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Asking the important questions

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some of those welfare programs will support young children who might get a shot at becoming an engineer and putting robots on mars.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Asking the real questions

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Corporate welfare is 1.5 times that of domestic "conventional" welfare. Look it up.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Does it include building weapons systems the military doesn't want?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. That's just corporate subsidies vs welfare, foodstamps, public housing, etc. Corporations take far more tax money than the people do.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why not end corporate subsidies AND welfare? Why not make people actually be responsible instead of subsidizing their poor decisions?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because some people are disabled. Because sometimes investing in business is also a good idea. I'm arguing the extent of the latter.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or, why are we not sending poor people to Mars yet?

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

I think that was one story points to Total Recall, that Mars was inhabited by working class poor indebted to a company with a monopoly.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Send them to the moon!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

+1 <3

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because the medicaid treatment for one of those poor children might save their life and they could become a world renowned engineer

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

The history of science is full of people like Fraunhofer who were impoverished but got a leg up and contributed greatly to science

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

And many scientists who have known quotes akin to "I owe my creativity to not having to worry about putting food on my plate."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's even more full of poor people who died due to malnutrition or lack of medicine and never got to contribute in the first place!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I'm confused. Are we supporting spending on science or not?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The first guy is delusional about how taxes work. The second guy is delusional about how church taxes works. End of story

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

All the same guy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Good thing the 60 trillion dollars we've spent on the "War on Poverty" has worked out. Whew!!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Separation of church and state goes both ways.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

it's supposed to at least

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Can you explain taxing churches? Because from what I understand, churches don't have a reliable source of income apart from donations, 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

I know a lot of PEOPLE who don't have a reliable source of income. BUT THEY HAVE TO PAY TAXES, ANYWAY.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

People aren't an organization, and most people that don't make much money get all or more than they paid back in tax returns.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Ever heard of super churches? Churches that operate like non profits should remain that way, but for-profit churches are cheating.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

There is a church down the road from me that is bigger than a JUCO and requires your credit report and tax forms before joining...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

2/2 Most of which go towards helping others? Tell me if I'm wrong, but I'm just curious.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Until you see churches so large they have credit card terminals and jumbotrons.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, pretty sure you're 100% right. Churches are non-profit religious buildings, and so there's no logical reason they should pay taxes.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y1xJAVZxXg John Oliver proved virtually anyone can start a church & claim tax free status. enjoy.=)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Not always. Anyone can start their own church and ask for money...and do whatever they want with it tax free. It's bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

you can stand on the side of the street and ask for money and do whatever they want with it without any additional tax. Is that bullshit too

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Anyone can start their own business, church, organization, etc. But making it successful is extremely hard.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No one would give money to a random church without them preaching or helping their community.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

#scientology

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have never met a real person who thought space exploration was a waste of money

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

I have. With this same mentality: "what good did it ever do ME? I've never directly benefited from the space program!"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Hello, even if i agree on religion and military, i also think ressource consomation (fuel mainly) on space program is a "waste"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Until we build another way, rocket fuel is the only way off this rock

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

well, destroying this "rock" by trying to get off isn't the greatest of ideas

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The fuel used in the space program is hardly destroying Earth. Not even REMOTELY close.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

well, technically i don't think the whole rocket is green, and you are correct; however their is waste by participating in the system

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lucky

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I unfortunately have. People don't realise that space shit advances everything else at the same time, as well as being really cool

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have a space-buff friend who thinks manned space flight is overrated. I don't entirely disagree with him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probes, however: FUND THEM ALL.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've had long talks with my mom about why this is important. She was raised in super-Catholic-school Barbados. Science isn't a thing there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have, but I'm an aerospace engineer so it might come up more often.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

I have a few aerospace friends I'll have to ask them if it happens to them too. Do people confront you about it?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People aren't usually confrontational so much as they just don't understand the purpose. I've definitely been asked why It's worthwhile.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

For me the major increase the survival of the species long term is reason enough to spend infinite dollars haha

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Because space is cool" is totally a legit reason. And we'll keep getting cool shows about space on Netflix

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What happens to all the resources that get burned upon leaving earth do we ever recover it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When they talk about resources they mean monetary. Everything that was burned or launched was payed for on earth, back into our economy

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a good thing. It means the people you know are worth knowing.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Unless you're talking about No Man's Sky

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Savage

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shots fired (but no other players can see them)

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

because increasing taxation is totally the solution to all of our problems.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

DECREASING taxes is the CAUSE of all of our problems.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Are...are you serious?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only thing that solves is the inability of Congress to cut their waste and spending.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's more about WHAT you tax and WHO you tax. Why not an exponential tax curve? Richer get taxed more. That's why it'll never happen.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"If we tax religious tax payers twice, we'll have more money" -the guy in the post probably.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dislike megachurches and what they stand for but as a christian whose 50-60 people congregation barely gets by, taxing them would probably

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

kill the church and community. A lot of what we do is put into the neighborhood and is really selfless. Taxing churches would hurt the

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

little guy but not stop the people getting rich off of religion

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

If a tax was levied there would be deductions for charitable work. Only churches who are pocketing and not using the money for good works

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But look at how taxes affect corporations. These kind of laws dont affect people who dont play by the rules. The smaller churches would hurt

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

would feel lit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't make sense to tax a church anyway as every member already paid taxes. It is their donations that would get taxed again.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This guy actually really bothers me. Churches are nonprofit and the money they "make" are all donations. They should not be taxed. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

Also yes, the military spends a lot, but they are the best military in the world and it's a price worth paying for the best protection.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I'm pro military but it is bloated. Every govt. program is bloated - cut every one by 10% and use the gadrillions for great civic causes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

doesn't bother you that pastors in mega churches make millions? religion interferes with advancement of science, and should be taxed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

...it doesn't interfere with the advancement of science, rather stupidity of ignorant individuals who refuse to use their brains do.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree megachurches are a little different with their pastors earning $147,000 on average. They aren't being pastors for the right reasons.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How in the world does religion interfere with science in the modern world? And since when is that the basis on what should be taxed?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aaaaaah. The ol' church tax bandwagon.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

The church my family helped grow from 5 people to over 1500 actually helps fund local public education on a pretty large scale...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's sad how many people don't know what churches actually do.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

rip off people who need the money more than them in many (not all) cases, spend money they do take in less well than a non religious charity

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you have facts for these claims?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to read Bastiat's Parable of the broken window.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

What is seen eclipses what is not seen. Reading selected works right now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL if i have much more monies i can fix my window, buy my new shoes, buy a new book, instead of just fixing the window.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living. Orwell, 1984.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

http://bastiat.org/en/twisatwins.html well that was interesting.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like Jens, he seems to be the kind of guy I'd loe to follow around at parties just to hear him rekt people.

9 years ago | Likes 1229 Dislikes 46

I need a friend like that XD

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"Did you just assume my gender?"- Jens

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Jens is a pretty cool guy. Eh comments and doesnt afraid of anything.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

He could try with me. :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

am I the only one around here that thinks "jens" is a woman?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Seeing as Jens is a Scandinavian male name, I doubt it, but y'never know

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

This is the premise of Eurotrip all over again

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interesting, in the US and other places... "Jan" could be short for "Janice". '...the more you know', I guess

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

love*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is the dynamic upon with my relationship functions, he rekts people, I giggle.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I knew a guy like this. He had a smartass informative comeback for just about everything.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

He's dead now...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But he uses bad arguments :( One is unconstitutional, Nasa came about because of military (more military = more NASAs) and eating chips?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 22

All he has to say is NASA is one of the few organizations where money in brings in enough tax dollars to pay for itself

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

How is making churches pay tax unconstitutional?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

MuCulloch vs Maryland - the power to tax is the power to destroy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The scientific breakthroughs have created many many jobs and improved quality of living of everyone

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

"Rekt is past tense" - Jens

9 years ago | Likes 672 Dislikes 3

This is gold

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Classic Jens

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

lol

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

New meme alert

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Rekt.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Classic Jens

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was having problem with wreck, rekt, was leaning towards rek, but that just sounds wrong. Jens, what's the correct term?

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 2

I would go with "watching people get rekt by him"

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

i've seen and used rek a few times, so it's cromulent

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

SHOW ME WHAT YOU GOT. Sorry, read Cromulon

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It really embiggens one's vocabulary.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Why are you following me"? - Jens

9 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 1

Haha classic Jens. So guys, what're we doing for Thanksgiving? Wanna set it in stone? And also, Christmas? Plans? ..Anyone? Jens? New Years?

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

This was fun.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

rekt

9 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

It's actually usually a past participle

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's a lotta adverbs. Rekt (wrecked) is only a past participle if the wrecking continues from past to present tense. That's uncommon.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? No. "Rekt" is typically short for "he/she/it was/got rekt," in which case it is a past participle. "He rekt his car" uses past tense.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can't infer extra words & call it a participle. In "get rekt" it is a participle. "Rekt" is not.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It most commonly occurs with crummy passive voice, like "have rekt"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About the church tax thing - you do realize that one major corporation that doesn't pay taxes would be way more than almost all churches...

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

apple

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Shocking, but wanting to tax churches and wanting major corporations to have to pay their fucking taxes aren't mutually exclusive.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

For some reason it's always "churches are tax exempt" but these major corporations that have the tax breaks that you voted for are getting

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Away with criminal theft of the American tax dollar. But yes, lets tax churches where the average citizen lives.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

No, actually the corporations are legally moving to countries and the government allows it. Don't like it, ask for change.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm willing to bet anyone that wants to tax churches also wants to close corpoarte tax loopholes as well.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The put back into the economy bit is the best part, people seem to think we load the money in the rockets

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

There's a bit of Bastiat's broken-window fallacy there.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, you can legitimately question the enduring value of these investments compared to for example infrastructure or housing projects.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

True, but the real issue is defense spending, it's unnecessarily high and the real issue when it comes to the misappropriation of tax money

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The DoD has about $8.5 trillion of spending unaccounted for. The Mars roverr is pocket money in comparison.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The more space stuff you do, the more innovation and technology you stimulate, not so with housing really

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How much exactly is one hundred dollars billion dollars?

9 years ago | Likes 834 Dislikes 18

Tree fiddy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 1

dollar dollar bill...ion.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Roughly sixty billion double dollars

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Just enough to catch a humanoid typhoon!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

$$60 billion dead or alive

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

100 billion squared

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To put it in perspective, Bill Gates doesn't even have 100,000,000,000 dollars.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3.14

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Roughly seven signed pictures of Neil DeGrasse Tyson wearing a bunny suit

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

About 4â‚©

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At least 3.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Easy peasy. One billion, one hundred dollars. Did you not take basic addition in maths? :P

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

actually, it would be one hundred billion dollars squared

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

How do you even pay for something in dollars squared?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You get an intern to cut the notes into the right shape.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Or about $4.5^17 Vietnam Dong

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's put it this way: That's enough money to buy every person on earth one sandwich and soda each.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$²100,000,000,000

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Man, if I had that much I could pay off Half of my student loans *sobs into bank statement*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well if they're buying parts abroad from airbus, rolls royce or something, technically the $ is leaving...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm going 101 Dimmidollars Bob.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

A little bit more than Vash the Stampede.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About three fiddy.

9 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 15

You had one shot.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was hoping for this comment.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

About 7 salmons

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

13 times the speed of light

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All the Monopoly money....ever

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 whole marijuanas

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Not according to my guy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

whole? no fucking way

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Pfff I can get 1 and a half Marijuanas for that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Two parsecs

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So six of those should be enough to bullshit your way through the Kessel run, right?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aha!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

About Tree Fiddy

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

5/7

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

30 speed

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

LOL

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

too late...pls stahp

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You win

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Something something reference

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

numbers.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

100,000,000,000 one dollar bills

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What does a million dollars even buy today it doesn't even buy a million dollars!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's dollars one hundred billion dollars

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

More like one hundred billion dollars dollars.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

1x10^11 $^2.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The exact amount you can get out of an ATM machine.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dollar dollar bills yall

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least 12

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Stop, thief! My idea! Its been stolen!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, you're not wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About 25 billion + bags of potato chips.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Depends on what you want" - drug dealer, probably.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

About 5

9 years ago | Likes 380 Dislikes 4

About tree fiddy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

5 out of what? ....maybe 6.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Let's give it a 5/7 and call it good.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Not as good as the dark knight.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

meh if both numbers can fit on a white board they're practically the same number

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You sound like my astronomy professor

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

maybe a little more.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3.5 is the best I can do bud

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

You ain't fooling me, LOCH NESS MONSTER!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have a buddy who is an expert in Mars Rovers. I'll have to get him to have a look at it.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I'm afraid there's no market for Mars Rovers at the moment

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

It'll be sitting in the shop for awhile, best I can do is .25

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's kinda like a large medium pepperoni pizza.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not four

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Remember that pile that the Joker set fire to?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can't put a price tag on that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All correct until the tax exemption thing. People really don't understand how taxes work and how little taxes their would be on churches

9 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 11

Property taxes would be the big ticket item. These little 12 pew churches surrounded by 40 floor highrises.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mhmm, does this guy want minister lobbyists? Because that is how you get minister lobbyists. Separation has to go both ways.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

A lot of people forget the 'no taxation without representation' thing that started this whole crazy America experiment.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*there

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

i've seen people write "there" where "their" should be a lot, but rarely the other way

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah their deductions would be massive. Idk why people get so hung up on it

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

Because murdering an Evangelist is apparently illegal so I'll just take their money instead.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Reddit echo chamber tells them this should be a thing, so they say it without critically thinking about it.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Because taking away tax exemption wouldn't hurt the big churches but would choke the smaller ones. I've been to churches that if they --

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

isn't it a percent? would affect big churches more than small churches

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Consider: One man makes $25k a year, another $50k. Each pay $23k to live. If they were taxed 20%, only one could afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

-- were taxed, they wouldn't be able to stay afloat. Small town, small congregation.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

church ain't a business to stay afloat. and priests can work too

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

No but the buildings require maintenance and utilities to pay.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Because there's supposed to be a separation of church and state and the churches being tax-free kinda breaks that?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 19

Egads, downvotes from the 80% Christian country that gave us The Rapture? Shocking!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

I'm saying even if they did get taxed, their deductions for charitable activity would be so massive that they'd pay almost zero tax

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Hmmm, I dunno, I think some churches would be in much bigger trouble than others. They're not all so charitable.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Actually it's the opposite. If churches were taxed, then they could have explicit representation in the government.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

How does that work? Businesses are taxed and they are (technically) represented the same way as anyone else.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

A business can donate money to influence politics how they wish. A church is not allowed to do that and retain tax-exempt status.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the church is a business (and it's very easy to argue that it is) then why not tax it like one?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Sorry you've being downvoted for your opinion. I don't think 99% of churches could be called businesses because no private entity benefits.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

more like they treat churches as charitable organization, though it's far-fetched imo

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Charitable organizations have some form of oversight. Although you have to go through a review process to become a recognized church it >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

doesn't have much to do with their finances (as evidenced by Scientology). That said, the oversight for non-profits isn't great either.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Right, the organizations that regularly feed the homeless, reform criminals,help the attendees deal with their family issues and depression.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not knowing enough about it to angrily side with you or the FB commenter, cab you explain or point me to something that does?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Alright so when people think of churches they seem to think of Big for profit preacher churches where the preacher asks you to plant a 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seed of faith [1000 dollars to help him buy his new mansion]. While these churches do make the most money out of all churches they are 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Very few compared to catholic churches and morman churches which actually do charitable work and get very little income.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Right, and they would pay little, in any, tax (as they could file exemption against the charity work that they do) but we would still be >

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They should at least be required to disclose their finances like every other charity.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

1)Not to be that guy, but why Jens inferred the pic meant the money was literally sent to mars instead of what it states as a waste of $$$$?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because when you spend $100 billion on something, the people who got paid that, still spend that 100 billion in the economy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was hyperbole. The syntax is ambiguous, the words are text-only with no inflection, and context is everything.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2)then use it to jump into their rebuttal?? Legit curious!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Much confuse

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Not sure how it helps us people on Earth". The post implies that no benefit to people on earth is gained by doing the rover launch.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jens is explaining that despite the rover leaving the planet, the money goes into research and the local economy. So it's not a "waste"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is taxing churches such a big thing?

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 11

Coral Ridge Presbyterian in Ft. Lauderdale would pay about $218,000 in taxes a year to the county.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Fraud, lots and lots of fraud. There are several half a million dollar homes in Detroit that are tax exempt for religious reasons.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

That would be a state property tax exemption, the issue at hand is Federal tax exemptions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for the clarification.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fine, tax churches. Then deal with what they're entitled to as a result.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Removing entitlement doesn't create more entitlement. They'd be entitled to the same BS an average tax paying entity gets.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Why is separation of church and state such a big thing?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 17

ISIS. Crusades. Spanish Inquisition. Holy Roman Empire etc...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Because otherwise it gives people more incentive 2 violently fight each other. Separate & the state becomes a neutral ground 2 hash out prob

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The state becomes a neutral ground? Because there is only harmony in our political state. Unsure that last sentence is at all true.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Neutral ground != harmony. The championship field is neutral ground but the teams just sit around, braiding each other's hair.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 29, 2016 11:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The free practice or lack thereof is (supposed to be) extremely important to the US

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

When our lawmakers continue to pass legislature based upon their religious beliefs the separation of church and state isn't even real.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Separation church/state doesn't mean that lawmakers must exclude beliefs in passing legislation. Regardless if beliefs coincide w/religion.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You can pretend that two centuries of court rulings disagree with you, but that's not intellectually honest.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disagree with what?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My church has most of its money going back into the community, through programs for youth, community service, disaster response. Etc.

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 11

And I've been to churches with a congregation so small, a tax would choke it and make it close.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Everyone that attends a church like this seems to be an expert on their church's finances. I find this to be highly unlikely.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So the money spend on non-religious charity and community activities stays tax exempt, everything else is taxed.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The problem with that reasoning is that churches will still have to keep their buildings running and pay staff so the taxes on even just 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

for that will take away from charitable work they could otherwise do with the money that gets taxed. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If they had to pay taxes, then we would essentially disappear due to not being able to pay bills.

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 9

Atheists and groups united on non-religious agendas would also appreciate the opportunity to put money into their communities.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

There's plenty of secular charity/community groups to donate to. And if there aren't then they're welcome to start one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously. But they have to file. Churches don't.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily - if their books were open to the IRS you could assess how much is spent on charity and tax the rest of it accordingly

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Yes necessarily. MuCulloch vs Maryland - the power to tax is the power to destroy

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Question: how public/transparent are church financials? Because it seems like megachurches would be great laundering opportunities.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Charitable donations would still be tax exempt.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then it closes. Welcome to capitalism. People vote with their money and ridiculous claims shouldn't be funded.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ever been through Nashville, or anywhere in the Bible Belt? Church "corporations" have literal skyscrapers. It's insanely profitable.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 10

Those are the exception, not the norm

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

I seriously doubt that any more. 50 years ago maybe.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

I wouldn't say exception but rather an anomaly. In comparison to the number of churches, it is a very small minority.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Then perhaps they should be the exception to the tax rule as well

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Who is we though? I'd say there is some people who would like for churches to disappear but regardless, charity is not exclusive to religion

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

He is not saying charity is exclusive but many churches do in fact give to the community.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Much more common though. After all, look at hospitals, they were mainly started by Christianity.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Started? Without even going there, I'm talking now. C'mon guy, because I don't believe the exact same things as you, you think I dont care

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Most churches are non-profit (not including megachurches). They only keep enough money to pay the bills, the rest goes to charities.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

Meaning that they would pay little, if any, tax due to charity exemptions. So why not have the tax exists. The churches that are truly >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

non-profit would see very little effect (so long as the tax code for them was written correctly) and churches that actually turn a profit >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

would have to pay tax on that profit. While I realize churches that turn a profit an exception (not the rule) the ones that do turn quite >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

big profits, like megachurches. And they depend on public services, like firemen, public roads, subsidized energy costs to exist, so they >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For scale, a median church size is 75 regular attendees, the median yearly offering is $1100, and the median pastor salary is $31,000.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Median yearly offering per person, in case that was unclear.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is false. On average only about 13% of a church's income may go to charities. No evidence that it does, only that it MAY go to it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 9:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 9:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You're asking for a citation, and then you give an anecdote. You're new to this aren't you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The 13% for charity is actually cited as 13% that may go back into helping the community, which covers those things.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I do not have the most recent studies, but here are the ones I used for an article I wrote in 2011. I doubt they've changed that much.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

85% of the income goes to internal operations of the church. about 2% typically goes toward overseas missions.Very little goes into charity.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 7:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No, that's what the 13$ is.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Citations above if you're interested.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm even religious and I still don't see why churches aren't taxed. However taxing them isn't suddenly gonna solve the debt crisis like 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

I love how I get downvoted just for saying I'm religous, riiighht

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

i see you're just glossing over the three replies that actually explain why you got downvoted then, in an attempt to start a firefight

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Those are respectable disagreements explaining why. You don't get down-voted by people with respectable disagreements.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's the whole reason for the downvote system - for people to disagree with your statement. It's not a hate crime to downvote something.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't it just be taxing money that is already taxed though?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes, that is literally what it would be. Double tax on anyone religious.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So religious people should get taxed twice because they have group meetings 2-ish times a week?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some crazy people like to claim. The majority of all church's make jack all so there wouldn't be anything to tax besides property

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Thats not true. Many churches have lots of money, earning interest. Also, lots of funding go through churches for various things.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So while you could make money off of preacher church, regular church's do so much charity it wouldn't even be taxable

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Preacher churches make money, those are few and far in between. Real churches like catholics and Mormans make very little money and do 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

A lot of charitable work, so their money wouldn't even be taxable. Catholic and Morman churches are the majority of all churches

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Uh.... you do realize that it's a charity and a nonprofit.... everything gets put into charitable work in 1 way or another. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

there are some cases of abuse, which I detest, but it is far from the norm. (Other nonprofits have the same issues..)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Tell that to the Catholic Church.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I was talking about Protestant Churches, but the Catholic Church corruption peaked several centuries ago and was largely due to secular 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the most charitable organization out there? You must be thinking of preacher churches

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If churches lost their tax exempt status, most would close quickly. Which might sound great to some, but they do a ton of charity work.

9 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 20

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 22, 2018 7:33 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Also worth noting, they can also just exempt churches that bring in less then X amount of money per year who have less then X number attend.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nonprofit guy here: its also worth noting, that the only ones that would close would be low income churches/mosques/synagogues who don't 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

2/2 have the money/expertise to navigate complex 501(c)3 laws paperwork.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

Yup, I've been to some churches located in populations >5,000 people so the congregations are small. They can barely keep afloat sometimes

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 5

I am not even remotely religious but I am all for tax exempt churches. If you took that away the churches that actually do good in the (1)

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

community would quickly close and those abominations called mega churches wouldn't even slow down.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Losing tax exempt status = immediate loss of at least 30% of all charity work in the US. Yea, that'd be great!

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

If only charity work was tax exempt.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You're right but I bet a lot of people would donate less in fear that it would go to the government.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If people paid taxes and government ran as it should, there wouldn't be a need for charity towards people in need.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Utopia doesn't exist. Government is always corrupt.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yep. My church has built a hospital in Honduras, built a dream center here for homeless meals and mental/health needs, gives away school

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Supplies to kids who need it, does laundry drives for the homeless, donates more to ministry than it takes in for the church, I could go on.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

All I hear from people is "but churches should pay taxes" even though I've never been in a church that isn't open about their finances and

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Hasn't given way more than they take in. There's definitely corrupt churches but if you're actually following the Bible, you're a charity.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Where is your church?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not sure why people argue for this when the money donated is after tax dollars anyways

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's an income. Income is taxed.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get that but it's an income that has already been taxed before

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Company sell stuff. BAM VAT. Company makes a profit. BAM tax. The remains is paid as dividends to shareholders. BAM tax.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not as much as they would have you think (charity work).

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Perhaps we can invent a way to not tax charity work.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm totally cool with only taxes churches that rake in serious cash. I don't think small community churches are taking advantages, only

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They definitely need tax exempt status to do charity work. Jesus couldn't have done any kind of comm. service w/out a church building.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yea pfff, charity work for ur mom prolly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

multimilion dollar mega churches with credit card terminals and jumbotrons.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

As I understand it, the average church would get 501(c)3 status, the little bitty ones might struggle a little, and megachurches? Rekt.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the problem isn't churches in general, the problem is in the insanely profitable super-churches.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

My former church brought in ~$16M annually. ~$1.5M went into operating costs/etc, the other $14.5M went to charity work. There aren't (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

many non-profits that give 90% to charities. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would agree with you that they shouldn't be that profitable, the churches that bring in excess should be giving that money away to other

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2) churches and the community through projects.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes. I know many people hate Christian churches but for the most part they do important work in their communities. For example my church <<1

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 8

has an after school tutoring program which helps kids in schools who don't offer that, which is most of the schools in the area because <<2

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 3

of poor funding. Access to tutoring is a huge step up for most of these kids who come from economically disadvantaged families that have <<3

9 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

been stuck in a cycle of poverty for generations. There's also support for domestic abuse victims, food for the homeless, and help with <<4

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

What about the non-Christian churches that also benefit from tax exemption?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

(2 hours later) medical bills. Our church came out and took out trees and built a driveway for my dad after he had a heart attack so he <<5

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Religion isn't the only provider of charity.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

As a christian, I'd prefer that no church get a tax exemption. I'm not looking for the approval of a group that can't differentiate 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

between a suicidal cult and a group of people building a hospital. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Easy to say when you're not on the elder board trying to raise money to fix your church roof.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

While I understand the desire for money, it isn't at all about money.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not about money, but the desire to scrape by at any means to keep the church afloat, including utilizing whatever tax exempt you can.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, you just sound like someone who doesn't understand real world financial pressures, but is trying to sound profound on this matter.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are several countries in the EU that levy some form of tax against churches, they still have churches.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

True, but I feel like NA would need a sliding scale of taxation, like more tax for bigger ones and that would get complicated and difficult.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to say it'd be wrong to tax certain things, but it would most likely not work in an 'ideal' fashion and thus the most vulnerable (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

businesses/persons would be affected far more than the things that really SHOULD be taxed. If that makes sense. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. But it's also not any different than how current tax codes impact individuals and businesses. It could all use an overhaul. =/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not as many as they could. Starting new churches would be very difficult too. My church keeps many of the small churches in our state open

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

as well as churches around the world, from Europe, to Africa, to Asia

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think they don't have as many churches as they could because the rate of atheism/agnosticism is much higher, and even for those claiming >

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

a denomination, the rate of active practice is pretty low, statistically. At least in Europe. The countries that you're church is helping >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are likely in Eastern Europe (which needs help in a lot of ways), not Denmark, Germany, etc

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They would not close. Too much money in it. At the same time the amount of money that ends up in charity work is a VERY poor percentage.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

You do know there's not just giant mega churches, right? They don't have much money but spend what they have on the community

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was, before becoming an atheist, a member of the finance committee of what you would consider a minuscule church. I stand by my statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The smaller the church the higher percentage of money that goes to the preacher and education materials.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guys Churches are a non-profit. They live off of after-tax donations. So why just churches, why not all nonprofits? Take all the taxes back

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I guess you're not a big art fan, huh? Nor a fan of helping the poor and old.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

But...lots of churches help the poor and elderly

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because churches are not just non-profits, they are pushing an agenda through their non-profit status.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is my argument as well. Are we going to start taxing donations everywhere?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

if you exclusively learned about christians from imgur you would know they are horrible people who do nothing good for anyone.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

surprised to find this comment here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is why I believe this tax exemption should only apply to churches that bring in more than a set amount each month. Mega churches.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 7:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 13, 2016 7:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I may have worded that wrong...only small churches should be tax exempt, giant million dollar churches should pay.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Why should there be a tax on them at all? The money has already been taxed when earned by those who contribute. It's just people pooling $.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

By that logic any business should be tax exempt. Income tax has already been paid, right?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Government's got a good thing going, right? They make money when you make money, when you spend money, and when you die.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also, they make money. As in printing it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly right. Around the globe, governments have instituted multi-level taxation, and most people don't even remember pre-income-tax days.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If there was a bag of chips I could get that donated half the money to a space program I'd exlusively eat their product.

9 years ago | Likes 6546 Dislikes 12

Samr

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This just in, Elon Musk starts new chip company

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Just don't bring them into space! https://cdn.pastemagazine.com/www/blogs/lists/39.png

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Watch out, they're ruffles!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If someone crowdfunds this company I will support you. As long as a significant portion goes either to NASA, or just space/ocean exploration

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ocean Exploration - that could be whole new branch of the company

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Finding Cthulhu or your money back*.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Refunds will be split evenly among all surviving investors when the stars align in 2347.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SunChips donate half the money for a bag of chips towards their goal of sending someone to the sun. At night time, of course.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The amount of upvotes on this comment is an excellent argument for why space exploration could be done with private money

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think this suffers from the 'awareness' fallacy. Just coz people are willing to click a button doesn't mean they'd support it meaninfully

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't even care if they're good. If I had to eat munchos just to give money to NASA I would

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I like Munchos, wtf?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really hope @nasa notices this and decides to go through with it all thanks to an Imgur comment

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It is technically possible for private citizens and corporations to donate directly to the NASA budget... this isn't out of the question.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i'm pretty sure it'd be really dry

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem with that is the chip company sets a cap on the size of the donation, so it's '25% of all proceeds up to 5 million dollars' >>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After 5 million, they no longer have to donate anything, but can still use that as advertising to drive up sales. Sick, twisted, world.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you could stop eating them and donate the money instead :))

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If only we could explore the space they left in the bag of chips then nasa would save millions.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Being a Google know it all its cool but sometimes you gotta roll on their own ignorance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've been donating all the money I pay for a humble bundle to wikipedia, maybe we could pick nasa as a charity instead?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Houston we have puns,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cool idea. Nasachos or something. Im a bit buzzed btw

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

That's a good name though. Easy to say, catchy, and unique.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Buzzed Aldrin?? AHAaaaaaaa

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Part of a healthy launch....................*takes another bong hit*

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Maybe you should do that more often, then

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Half the bag is just air [space] anyways. They can donate the money from that half.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like, to the exclusion of all other food?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. For science. Maybe they can make some kinda supplemented superchip so I wont die too quickly, or they can use me to test human limits?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

red bull funds nasa.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Difficulty - the donation chips are made with Olestra and taste like Cheddar Cheese and Cher's asshole...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the organization that sells them could be "International Taste Station"

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

In my opinion, you have won the internet for the day!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why not "Terrestrial International Taste Station", in short "TITS".

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fucking brilliant combo there! +1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Someone just had a billion dollar idea

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Brb

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As much air as they put in the bags you could probably survive a while in space

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

$100 a bag. Get your space chips here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I helping by drinking Tang?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not a bad idea, I've been wanting to do start a twitch channel so I can donate a percentage of the tips

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

why is your comment 2nd?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even if the chips cost more or were of slightly lower quality/quantity to offset the expense?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe they could decrease the margin going to a space program to 10% or so to make the chips more reasonably priced.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd pay extra but not for low quality.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't how long you'd live just eating potato chips but I'd be interested in watching your descent into madness.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Be a smartass and have only baked, low salt/low fat and drink lots of water and it's feasible, isn't it? Chips are technically potato...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is where my potato eating survival knowledge is highly lacking I'm afraid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotta have a 24/7 live cam for that. I would be able to take my eyes off the screen.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Haven't I seen this comment before?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can but they are Phyllis Diller's Used Dildo flavored

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe on the back it could debunk the space pen BS story. Or am I the only one who likes light reading while eating chips?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they made the percentage of air in the bag up by funding science I'd be fine with having %50 less chips.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about the Mars candy company?! They could get in on this too!

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Why has Mars foods not done this already?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be a genius marketing move on their part

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Mars is a privately held family company. They bathe in chocolate and shit on solid gold toilets.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

One of these facts is not like the other

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are history buffs, they donate to historical sites like colonial Williamsburg in Virginia

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hmmm...I do really like Colonial Williamsburg. That's my historical Disney land.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rightfully so, that place is a blessing to have still with us. I've been there a few times, probably going to visit this year too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So....they might benefit from a little positive publicity?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

...as it is clear they don't need the revenue.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Sign me the fuck up for some space chips

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had to read this so many times to understand. Now I agree.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even if they tasted horrible, I'd still do it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I care too much about flavour for that. Nasa still needs to learn to cook.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Legalize marijuana, tax it and the money goes to NASA. The program slogan would "Get high, so we can go higher"

9 years ago | Likes 1133 Dislikes 7

Love it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I like Turtles.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which makes me think, we need turtles in space. A turtle in the ISS would be the fastest turtle in the universe!!!!!!!!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ill smoke to that !

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Colorado is already richer because of that. Politicians are wondering why they didn't do this sooner they're just rolling in the tax $.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, $996 million in 2015

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We need more funding to rescue Matt Damon from Mars. We need to get more kids smoking pot, ASAP"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

spaceweed

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

this is fucking gold, i tell u. .

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's actually genius. A little too subversive for the average consumer, but really clever +1

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Already goes to education in Colorado I think. Which would be my first choice.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Educate new rocket scientists, so we can go higher. My slogan still stands. And I'm high. GO NASA, GO SPACE, GO SCIENCE (the real kind)!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

AND GO EDUCATION! LEARN COOL SHIT, STAY IN SCHOOL, DO DRUGS. (just marijuana, don't touch the other fucking shits, they will fuck you up)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Holy fuck thats genius.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

. this is my destiny

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you work in advertising? If not, you've missed your calling my friend

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just like tobacco settlement money would go for roads and health care? lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh that's fucking good, my man

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

605th up vote here. You sir either work in advertising or should!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Close, I am a Steadicam operator, I film the ads, I don't write them though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And thanks for your upvote.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except those marijuana taxes already in place are going to the schools :P at least in WA

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

So they can cut the budget from other tax means to support local contractors and garbage collectors? /s

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I went to a pot shop in Bellevue that had a deal where Microsoft employees get 15% off... I'm pretty sure there's a joke there somewhere.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Get high for higher education?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This needs more upvotes, it needs to be higher in the comments!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Argh! Fucking useless!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Goes to schools' Yea sure, like all the lotto money.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Colorado collected so much that they had more than the schools could use (at the time).

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Neat, so the actual tax funding didn't have to do anything, just like when they put money to schools; cut the same amount.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nope, you obviously have never seen the gov at wotk. You can always spend more money. Salaries, technology, books, arts all cost money.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That would aggravate the NASA physicists so much since "up" doesn't even mean anything in space. Let's do it.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

True, but the enemy's gate is down.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The gates are open!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes, however height does exist in space, since it is distance from the ground

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So *technically* does that mean that "up" is just distance from earth in every direction?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's the distance from whatever you're going to or leaving from.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the distance from whatever you're going to or leaving from.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

well if i was floating in space I'd probably say someone above my head was 'up' from me, but I wouldn't do that with height

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just made an account so I could up vote this

9 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 4

That's a good reason. Cherish it, you might have signed up for... more difficult ones.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome aboard dano37.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the fold.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Welcome to this weird website where everyone reposts things and comments the same jokes. I LOVE IT!!! (you'll fit right in!!)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most excellent Mr Dano

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Worth it

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Lol, I'm relevant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you already have 123 upvotes?! I'm going to start saying "I just made an account so I could up vote this"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I made an account just to up vote this

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a good idea. Serious question though: What would be the cutoff? 40%? 25%? 10%? (I don't think 50% would be possible w/o overpricing)

9 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 0

Whatever % of air is in the bag. It would make me less mad about every bag of chips I eat.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on the markup. I remember reading that a 57g bag of lays is about 50 cents to produce (before distro, etc) so if they 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Aimed for a lot profit (ha..) and sold a bag for like, 2 bucks, you could send $1 per bag to NASA. And they sell about 200mil a year....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

low profit* bleh

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An luxury tax on chips to put money into the space program in order to increase domestic spending would adversely affect dip sales. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

The French Onion Dip Manufacturers would have to lay off all their workers. Governments don't create wealth, they only move it around. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So you're saying that sauce companies would see a dip in sales?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I assume you're being ironic?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the premise here is private donation from one company, not broad taxation on a category of product.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As much as the % of fucking air in the bag.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Without that air in the bag, you'd be popping open a crispy bag of crumbs

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's nasa, inventers of the upside-down writing pen, I'm sure they could find a way to maximize the crisp to dead space ratio.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Russians will just put the chips in a tube then?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't argue against that, but the air to chip ratio seems a little skewed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, I actually thinking I'd pay up to double for the product because space is awesome. Realistically I think 10-25%, fantastic and do-able

9 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 0

If they put the price up 25%, and then donate half that amount to the space programme, they'd be taking a 37.5% cut on revenue per packet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not donate the price of a bag of chips everytime you buy a bag of chips?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Because it's not automatic and therefore harder.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

What about potatoes chips made IN space? Whoa, I think I blew my own mind

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Or make them from china's space vegetables. The have tomatoes, chillies, rice and pumpkins, I'm sure potatoes are in there somewhere.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What about chips made from potatoes grown on Mars?

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

who are you? mark watney?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As long as they aren't grown by Matt Damon

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Poo-tatoes!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

What about potato chips from space potatoes that are sliced and fried via the heat of atmospheric reentry and land directly in your mouth?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ok yes

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'd pay 50% extra tops. Unless they were super tasty.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would certainly do this!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, it's a good idea. BTW, are they sell astronaut's meal? I think it would be good to eat when hiking

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can get MRE equivalents produced for the consumer market at like 1/3 the price.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I upvoted this post and your suggestion because the idea is good. I also just recalled that my parents did NOT buy a $1300USD microwave 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 but did buy when they dropped to $600, so I hope some of that $$ helped get Neil to the moon.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And they could call them Spacechips...

9 years ago | Likes 3316 Dislikes 3

Two words: Homer Simpson

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This some Stir Friday-level shit.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's... That's not a bad idea.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it were a work satchel you could call it the Space Case.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

?1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That Spacechip fries very fast as well!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck you all I'm TM this all rights reserved

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I shall eat them in my spacepantz

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And try not to make a space mess

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That name may be misleading to a few

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...now with 50% extra empty space in the bags.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

0_o Perfect!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@Planetarysociety plz???

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where is the Kickstarter?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the dip is called the Milky Way, right?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

AND NASALSA. I FORGOT NASALSA.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And Alien mash aka guacamole!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spudniks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Got a friend here who doesn't understand what Spacechips is, and I can't seem to explain it to him. Anybody wanna help?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 18, 2016 7:00 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

thanks breh. My friend totally gets it now and says to pass on his thanks

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lego like set made from 45 record inserts http://shop.monkeybusinesssports.c">ps.aspx">http://shop.monkeybusinesssports.com/space-chips.aspx https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VZtXmZFed4

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I need context for this gif, because there are few things that would get a reaction like this from Ron Swanson. Id guess breakfast food

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I relevant?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Damnit. For a moment I got excited thinking of "vacuum packed for freshness!" labels, but then remembered that's other foods, not chips. : /

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eat Space chips, fund spaceships!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I smell a start-up! And chips. Fuck, I'm hungry.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bonus: Every bag of chips has a smaller plastic bag in it that has a tiny rock from space

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So.. You eat chemicals?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Are you seriously trying to imply that you don't? Care to share what mystic immaterial substance you live on? Might solve world hunger. '-'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look at his alias/username.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His alias is "eatchemicals"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're 1701-D-lichous

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

GIVE THIS MAN A PROMOTION

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Spacechips! The Official Snack of Spaceballs Everywhere!

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Will they have shocolate spacechips? My dad has an accent that makes him pronounce "chocolate shake" as "shocolate chake" so for me, this

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He some kind of Hispanic? Because that sounds similar to a friend of mine

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol yeah. His dad was half mexican and spanish, mom was Ute indian

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well shucks. That's a fun combination.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was a very funny comment.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or they could bring back Asteroids

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

We should also get Old Navy making space pants that half the money gets donated to Nasa. Peter Dinklage can be the spokesman.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Imgur's marketing team is great, because it has thousands of employees that get paid in fake points.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

And we need favourite comments

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Thats it. @nasa get this shit done.

9 years ago | Likes 844 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

@nasa pls

9 years ago | Likes 395 Dislikes 1

Lemme snack

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@nasa pls

9 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 4

@nasa do it!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

@nasa plzzzzzz???

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

@PlanetarySociety plz!!?

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

@planetarysociety please Billy boy the science bro do it for

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

@planetarysociety please Billy boy the science bro do it for

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

@nsa please

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

oh shit, they've gone dark on us!

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

No not them.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Even better: NASA buys out Sun Chips; rebrands to Galaxy Chips. 'Donates' most of profit to space and deep sea exploration.

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

Or Sol Chips

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They'll have to send the Sun-Rover at night though, right? -I used to be a blond guy.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

You. You there. You're a class act, I like you.

9 years ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 3

Someone get Bill Nye on this, he has an imgur account

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Name of this account?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Found it! @planetarysociety

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Spacechips, taste the galaxy.

9 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

The taste is out of this world.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

chips as big as jupiter, and as many as the things inside saturn's rings. but in just one bag.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If they were Cheese Balls, we could call them Spaceballs... don't worry, I can leave on my own

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 3

What about Pizza the Hut! They should get in on this!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Heh, good one. I am coming with you

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Are we having, the sex? Yay!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No homo! NTTAWWT.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

are you leaving for the store? i go with ya i wanna get some spaceballs

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0