Force Awakens (The Original Star Wars Trilogy Remix)

Jan 4, 2016 11:53 AM

ImageStufzzz

Views

326738

Likes

14137

Dislikes

1448

"Anybody got any ideas that can match the awesomeness of the Death Star?" "...A bigger Death Star."

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So basically, Star Wars is a rip off of Star Wars?

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Actually the galactic government in this instance would be the Republic, and the first order would be the insurrectionist group

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Woah Woah, looks like you didn't watch the movie carefully: the giant round weapon is MUCH BIGGER than the death star. Complete game changer

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I heard they were going to call it the Stardeath but they went with Starkiller,to be original.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very true! The plots of the movies can't possibly be compared with such difference in weapon size!! :D

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the superweapon was such an important part of the story development in this film. Pretty much the only interesting thing that happened.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

White text w/ black outline works on all backgrounds.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Sadly, there is even more parallels than this person points out. Really thought JJ Abrams would make a better movie full of new stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

He already made a new Star Wars movie. It was called Star Trek.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was fine with the prequels being different, even if they didn't turn out amazing. At least I was seeing something new.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Yes we all noticed it. I thought it was done on purpose. Kind of like a "full circle history repeats itself" type thing

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

It's really just JJ Abrams playing it way too safe and trying to demonstrate that he can make Star Wars.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

yeah i thought that too but I was hoping it wasnt that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so glad this was made! I've been saying literally this exact same thing since the movie came out! The reused plot was so disappointing

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 8

Why are we so quickly critical? It was well-made, fun, & yes, very derivative. Easier to be critical. Better (imo) to just enjoy.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 14

Maybe, just MAYBE, people actually have problems with the massive pile of shit.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

maybe. I can enjoy AND be critical. I think we need more of that

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Maybe I can also have thought it was bad and be critical too. Since when are personal opinions not allowed?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I get much more enjoyment out of movies (especially movies I love) by Being extra critical of them.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's difficult to tell with them being SO similar, but why do the original/TFA images keep swapping sides?

10 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 9

It's a re*mix*... Doh

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 5, 2016 2:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Just no. Humans are hard wired to detect patterns. Literally every normal person is bothered by those patterns failing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

think its part of the joke

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Mind. Blown.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I found this annoying, but I think it was to see if people would notice, as the films were so similar.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because the original creator was an idiot?

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

That drove me crazy. You don't do that! If it's on one side, leave it there.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Like Anakin?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Swaping sides? Like some kind of TRAITOR?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah, well spotted. Weirdly it's just the two images with Han in them.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Clearly because he aged so much better than Leia and it's hard to tell the difference between original Han and TFA Han.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the one with just Rey and just Luke.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah, curse my poor observational skills.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People act as if the original trilogy had some deep Inception-level plot >_>

10 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 14

The beauty of Star Wars was in its simplicity. The prequels ruined that. FA is a return to simplicity, but a little too closely.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It was amazing for its time, but yes, nothing super 'deep'. It's actually quite simple, plot-wise. The fun is in the journey, really.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Exactly. The stor isnt about the resistance or the first order. Its about rey, finn, han, and kylo.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People act like inception had a complicated plot.

10 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 4

it did..... for people who dont pay attention

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Ok fine, Primer? or some other movie that deals with time travel. =P

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Primer is the most awesomely confusing shit.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just rewatched all 6 before seeing 7 the most overrated saga of our time. It was so disappointing.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 28

The entire Star Wars series? Or just TFA? If you mean the entire Star Wars series I completely agree with you.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 16

I don't think the original trilogy has aged well is all. It was a big deal in the special effects area for its time

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

it was adopted from Non-Canon fiction written in the 90's, except they made Ben, Han's son not Lukes

10 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 17

A very bad not even close to the source material adoption? It shares almost all of Ep IV's plot points. What book/series do you think it is?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 12

Films normally only have a few plot points, so that doesn't require that much "sharing".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The point is that only the name is shared with any of the books. I've read most of the EU and couldn't name a single book it emulates.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I was responding to "It shares almost all of Ep IV's plot points", which was not a comparison to the books (at least for that part).

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was my point. It really only compares to the movie. Wasn't a complaint. Was making a point it DOESN'T emulate the books.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except theres about a million things that happen that make this meaningful instead of a cashgrab.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Didn't feel like a cashgrab to me *shrugs*

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Agreed *shrugging intensifies*

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even in the extended universe, Han and Leia's son, Jacen solo, fell from the light and become a Sith Lord.

10 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 4, 2016 5:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I did call him Jacen. The circumstances of Ben's fall are different, but my point was that the dark Jedi was Han & Leia's son, Not Luke's.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And wasn't Jacen killed by Jania his sister?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes, after Jacen killed Mara Jade

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And whose twin sister Jaina learned exceptional piloting and mechanical skill from Han and Force sensitivity from Leia. I think Rey = Jaina.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

God i miss that series. I should go back and reread those.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

They're pretty fuckin great

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's it called?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Legacy of the Force. 9books written by two good authors and one great one.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seriously? I've been leaning towards regarding Ep VII as non-canon, I think that seals the deal.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 18

Well, it kind of is canon by definition.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The creators said that the books are no longer canon and that they would be re-doing it with "reference" to some stuff in the books.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Such as somehow once again finding Luke's lost saber

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...where do you think canon comes from, exactly?

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Usually from the creator. In this case, George Lucas. Who has been very vocal about his dislike of this movie's story.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Dangerous path. That makes all the revisions canon, and means all stories must die with their creator.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sure as hell not the mouse and jar jar Abrams. Thrawn was canon long before this business.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

Thrawn for president.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Random authors, got it.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Kylo Ren is like one of those douches who wears glasses without lenses because he likes the look. Vader needed that to live you putz!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes I know but I liked it anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Agreed, for me the new characters were also just excellent.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

IKR? Blatant enough that it let me focus on the differences/twists, which I really enjoyed. The Wise Old Mentor is Han? Awesome!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Really excellent way of putting it

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't remember Star Wars ever being intended as a spectacular piece of writing, it's supposed to be a mythical adventure in space.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's called Star Wars for fucks sake. We're people wanting Shakespeare? It's pretty damn amazing for a space saga

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Think of it as an hommage and not a copy. Also, it's the best after three very...well...shit movies. So, I'm totally fine w/ ep.7 like that

10 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 22

The prequels were better then the originals besides VI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah. No. But thatsjustlikeyouropinionman.gif

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

more a pastiche than an hommage - I think they could've made nods to the original without using virtually the exact scenarios

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It didn't feel like a pastiche to me. But opinions are different obviously.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that said, I enjoyed it, and the new aspects were quite good

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I consider it a nostalgic set up for the rest of the series, it's also a really good movie.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

exactly. Thanks! +1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like to think it was the best way to get back in the universe, and bring it to a new generation

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

This. Lucas made three movies for a new generation of kids, not for old Star Wars fans.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I have no qualms with TFA mirroring A New Hope, as long as they make the next ones their own stories

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see it this way for the prequels and new movie. Fans fussed about the difference, so to get back into the new story, they did what worked

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People really need to stop saying: "Well it's not as bad as the prequels." That's not a good sign if that's how you're defending a film.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not defending it by only saying it's not as bad as the prequels. I love it as an hommage. The better-than-prequel is just a bonus.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Man I don't know, revenge of the sith was actually a very solid movie

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

Look, it's about opinions here. I don't like the prequels too much, ep.3 was okey, but they were too much CGI-fest for my taste 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ep.7 found a good mix of CGI, story, hommage and (mostl) loveable old and new characters, whether they're bad or evil 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I enjoyed 7 a lot, but I don't get all the hate for the prequels

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

prequels into one single movie. Less CGI, more story 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where can I find that edit?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You know "shit" is maybe wrong. I enjoy part of them, b/c it's still SW after all. But I prefer the "phantom edit" that cut all three 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The Phantom menace (minus jar jar) was clearly the best prequel.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I can't tell if you're joking, but I quite enjoy that movie, with a few obvious exceptions

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not so sure. I prefer the "phantom edit" of all three cut to one single movie

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"The finale of the saga so bad, this [sic] mess is known as the good one" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l5eZp8Ae9c

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From my point of view, the jedi are evil

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I noticed that on my most recent watch. You start sort of siding with Anakin

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just meant that I think that was a terrible line

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Palpatine had Anakin convinced that the Jedi Council was trying to take control of the senate and rule over it all.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Evil is a pretty strong word. They're misguided from past experience.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are having selective memory. There were some good scenes but the tone was sporadic, the dialogue clunky, and the script was convoluted.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you look at it as a movie (like you did) instead of a "Star Wars movie" it is clear that it is majorly flawed.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are numerous videos out there that can explain to you every single thing that is wrong w/ them so I won't...But it's out there. 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So the next person Rey will kiss is going to be her brother. Got it.

10 years ago | Likes 1278 Dislikes 3

You mean sister. :^)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She'll also be surprised to learn that Kylo Ren is her father too.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

inb4 finn is her brother.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I volunteer to be Rey's brother

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And lose her hand

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Brotha*

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

Cause he's black!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well she missed her chance to kiss Han Solo.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Its not too late, use the force.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well... probably. In Star Wars universe, people tend to survive the weirdest shit. Next up; cybernetic Han Solo returns and kills Kylo Ren.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Harrison Ford has openly stated that he doesn't want to return to the Star Wars franchise.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know. 'Twas a joke.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Finn is her brother

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Plot twist

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's racist.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Maybe she'll develop feelings for Luke the Mentor only to find out he's Luke the Father.

10 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 1

Based on Battle Front two that might not be true.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I sure hope he's not. It's too obvious and I'd be really pissed they went for the easy one.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

She's definitely a Kenobi

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

mfw Captain Phillips reference

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I definitely think Luke is her father!!! ^_^

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 4

Nah, Han & Leia left her with Luke, Luke later erased her mind with the force thus her force-sensibility

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why do this to her?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In non cannon books, Han and Leia had 2 kids, boy and girl. Boy was sith, girl was under Luke.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually I read a pretty convincing theory that Rey is a kenobi

10 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 9, 2017 12:48 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

This, that theory is pretty rock solid

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

from Huffington Post? I was just directed there... reading that made me feel a disturbance in the force. I'll marinate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the one that assumed that accents and wardrobes are inherited traits?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In movies, the parallels don't need to be genetic. It can be similarities that foreshadow a relation. You don't inherit a mask, but Kylo >>

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also puts in account the character parallels. Such as a whole scene dedicated to showing the Jedi mind trick.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't there a possibility that both are true?

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I LAUGHED SO HARD I LIKE THE WAY YOU THINK

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jesus man Senephillia in the extreme

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

She's Hans daughter.. I think, So she'll be kissing Kylo Ren

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

if that were the case, the interactions between them in the movie would've been much different

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't think so. Why would both Han and Leia never talk about their daughter, only about Ben? Rey Kenobi makes more sense.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How does Obi wan knock someone up as a spirit?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Obi had a fling with Kryze. Though never confirmed having sex, their son or daughter could be Rey's parent.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oooh grand daughter yes, that could work.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd love her to be a Kenobi, but I think they don't talk about her because they think she's dead, Kylo was the one who abandoned her, becaus

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because* .. he couldn't kill his sister, and that's what all the "I know what I have to do" was about, killing a family member, because he

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He failed before when he couldn't kill Rey...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was supposed to be "ok guys see we can do Star Wars right, now we can go in different directions"

10 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 5

EXACTLY! I went in skeptical, left feeling the franchise was in good hands.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

THANK YOU, this was so fucking heavy-handed it was like being beaten with a brick. Actually hurt the film for me somewhat at first.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm not getting how people aren't understanding this.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

this is just some stupid fan rationalization. a good, original story would have done just as well.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

No, really, it wouldn't have. If you buy a franchise for 4 billion you don't take risks like that. You make the first one solid and then 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

2/2 you can branch out into a solid story. People shit over the color of light sabers. You think "original story" is going to work?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

At least not for the first one. Another prequel quality movie would destroy the franchise. Blame lucas for selling it to disney.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yes, because it doesn't have to be completely foreign. it also doesn't have to be a re-write of episode 4. 8/9 will be just as unoriginal 1)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

as 7 and people will be on here saying, oh wait for 10/11/12, THEN they can branch out instead of doing whatever it takes to make money

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It's like you're forgetting Death Star 2 and Ewoks. This has always been about money. Of course it's going to follow the same general path.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Disney is the king of formulation. If you want an original starwars story, that's what the awful fanfic is for.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Realllllllly bothers me that it keeps switching sides

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Same. I almost stopped reading out of pure rage.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's almost as if they did this... intentionally?!

10 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 10

A New Hope is a simple "hero's journey" that's been done a thousand times before. Just presented in a new format. The same people pointing/1

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

this out are the same people who point out that every episode of House has the same plot. They're missing what was different.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Right? Its like the cyclical nature involving sins of the father is important to the Star Wars series or something

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 6

It shouldn't be its fucking awful.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Eloquently put. Thanks for explaining your perspective intelligwntly.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See, I think the central theme to the series is how the choices of one person are passed on to their children. I hope Rey isn't related (1/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

to anyone, but she probably will be

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For canon continuity she needs to be a Skywalker, Solo, or Shan. She's too strong otherwise.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except they could've written it without Death Star (freaking) #3

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

To me, it doesn't feel like Star Wars without a Death Star to destroy.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

So, you don't like ESB? Strange.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No... I actually don't. It's my least favorite of the OT. Hope, Jedi, then Empire.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Starkiller base was introduced in the second act and while it was the location for the last battle, it was not the main plotline at all.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Without Starkiller, the main plot line was a series of random character introductions. It was shoehorned in to tie things together.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, the main plot was getting the map to Skywalker back to the resistance.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's called the heroes journey. You can compare Star Wars to Harry Potter, hunger games, lord of the rings etc... the exact same way.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 16

The matrix

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Star Wars series couldn't hold its fucking jockstrap against LoTR or even Harry Potter. Star Wars is an overrated repeat of itself.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Wether that's true or not, that's not my point. Look up "the hero's journey". 90% of stories follow the exact same pacing. Which is my point

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No you can't, that's a plain fucking ignorant lie.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Are you serious? Harry Potter fights a seemingly invincible enemy has to be taught by older mentors, and needs to find (numerous) items 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To accomplish it. Luke fights a seemingly invincible enemy, has to be taught by and older mentor, and has to find the strength within 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lots of the rings followed the heros journey and was so good, it's only in the last 10-15 years that fantasy has broken it's mold

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*lord

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Find strength within herself to carry on and win. Google "the hero's journey" the details change but the story remains essentially the same

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Himself to accomplish it. Katnis has to fight in and against impossible odds, needs to be mentored by numerous older ppl, and had to 3/4

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lucas was buddies with the guy who came up with the Hero's Journey and explicitly said that Star Wars follows it. Don't know why people mad

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well...he was friends with the guy who named the heros journey and verbalized it. The structure of it has been around for 1000's of years

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know. Just the guy who coined the term.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ex: King Arthur, Merlin, Excalibur, Mordred. Story is way older than either of them

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yeah, but they don't get so specific as stolen plans, droids on the run, and identical super weapons. These too are identical.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 8

There aren't any stolen plans. It's a map. I get what you're saying but it is different.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

The expanded universe everyone laments so much has at least 2 "Death Stars": darksaber and suncrusher and I don't even read them may be more

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Superweapon/Legends Hell here's a list. But nah guys, TFA is totally unoriginal unlike the absolutely high

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

quality and TOTALLY ORIGINAL EU!!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The EU didn't pick up after ROTJ and write a copy of the same story previously told. The EU is actually quite unique.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeaaaaaaah, let's take this on another plane. even the fucking tavern was the same! stop fooling and admit the sad truth

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's the nature of a tavern. There's a bar, seats, patrons. They didn't have the same floor plan, what else do you want?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are people really mad that VII had a bar? Get over yourselves.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right? Omg the first two hunger games movies both had Katnis in a hunger game. So similar same exact story complete bs!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha, exactly!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah,of course,nothing related to the IV, like..band! hideous table! t's a copy, get over it. if you like to pay for endless copying,it's ok

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Of course it's similar. Think of it like this: British pub, British decorations, maybe a bagpipe band. Multi species cantina, has 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Various aliens, of course some will be the same species. And fuck who knows, maybe that band species is musically inclined. Pull up 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Various aliens, of course some will be the same species. And fuck who knows, maybe that band species is musically inclined. Pull up 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Screenshots of the cantinas from new hope and force awakens. Put them side by side. They're visually different but have similarities 3/4

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because surprise surprise, they're both cantinas. Much like British pubs all have British decorations, and maybe a bagpipe band...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nobody forces you to watch them, if you don't like it, go away, and watch whatever it is you do like. Probably transformers....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

typical answer. *bored* i loved star wars and i like to be entertained; i just get angry when they waste an entire episode on the SAME [1/n]

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

story. because star wars is an epic fantasy saga and the fucking story and epicness is the basic, not a sat-down shit-sommelier [2/n]

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

approach.anyway a pub is a pub, they could have skipped the pub maybe?bc you NEED to have a meeting in a pub right? pls be honest [3/3]

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've never left a star wars movie feeling "meh" before I saw this one.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

reallY? that's.... incredible. How old were you when you saw Ep1?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I don't even remember... I just rewatched it in preparation for this one and I still preferred it, even with jar jar

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I left infuriated by it. I think it's a really bad movie even for a "soft reboot" marketed as a sequel. Episode 1 was better. (the worst 1)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

By literally any standard, this was a far superior movie to Episode 1. Please enlighten the rest of us as to how it could possibly be worse?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I agree the movie was 90% fan service of the original trilogy. Hopefully it goes a different direction in the next two movies.

10 years ago | Likes 1036 Dislikes 35

I prefer to call it reparations.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

how many times can they make a death star (although bigger each time), and blow it up?!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's also training wheels for the newer generations. Episode 4 is, what, 30-40 years old, give or take? Young audiences need to acclimate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I also thought the same, however I will still watch it repeatedly and like it because I am a geek

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It will. Rian Johnson is writing VIII and IX. He said it would be "weird" and "nothing SW has seen before"

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

I've heard lies like this before...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I expected that from JJ. Most of it was done smartly so it's OK. But episode 8 needs to break free into its own story.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't mind. I didn't get the minutae of the senate sessions, followed by wacky spinny space battle. I watched, ate popcorn and was happy.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Don't forget that SW is going to get the Marvel treatment. The main episodes won't be the only films.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was basically a remake, without being called a remake

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

In VIII: Fin meets an old friend at a city floating on water(Kamino? Makes sense) gets encased in Siliconite. Rey loses her foot. Robot foot

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Other two won't be directed by J.J. Abrams, so it's a good sign. Figuring it was just a warm-up to remind people why they loved Star Wars.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

that is, actual fan service, not 'fan service'

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

THERE'S my fellow grammar nazi.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Keeping in mind that George Lucas was always a fan of the Monomyth as a key to his writing the mirrored origins/journey is appropriate.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think episode 7 was just to confirm to people it's not going to be as shitty as 1-3 and then 8 and 9 are going to be very different.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This movie was disney telling sw fans they are going to treat star wars like a lady unlike darth lucas whoring out

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I hope Lando makes an appearance in the second movie like in the original trilogy. Looks like there's a reason for it happening anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Alright, instead of focusing on the similar plot points, focus on the characters. The characters are different than their "counterparts" 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rey is a Force sensitive from a desert planet...and that's it. She isn't like Luke in any other way. Finn was a traitor. Poe was a hero who

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

gave up sensitive information from a half-Sith. Kylo Ren wasn't ANYTHING like Vader. Oh, he wore black clothes and a mask and that's it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, some of the plot points HAVE to be similar because they work. Droids make great recon units. Planet destroys are good at what they do

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I watched it for a second time last night. Still good but didnt hit me the way it did the first time. I hope the other ones are differnt.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it were truly fan service, they would have had Luke in a lot more and they wouldn't have killed off that guy we liked. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 14

Since most of the characters were entirely new, I never understood where this idea of fanservice came from. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 12

that's not how fan service works. it's not merely, here's your fav chrs. shut up. It's the shooting, the comedy, the puppetry, the adventure

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Kinda hard to make any sort of Star Wars film without any of those things.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

agreed, but its called fan service only when it is a detractor. A film is always good in spite of fan service not because of it. so, (1)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I see it more as a fauxreboot for a new, younger audience.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

which is basically what they did for star trek.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's fair

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't understand why people are so upset over it. It's like they were saying remember this? We're bot gonna get wild with it like the pre

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think there trying to just make a familiar base to build the next two movies on.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah hopefully they'll stope this madness

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tbh I liked how it was familiar, gets me back into the franchises. I'm sure they will change the plot in te next one though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how is it fan service dishing the fans the same meal again? I dont know...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It probably won't

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From what I'm hearing, the next movie is supposed to get WEIRD. Like the kind of weird that only JJ Abrams can deliver.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The next movie is directed by M. Night Shyamalan

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But, I shouldn't "like" or hell I shouldn't pay for a movie because its sequel might be good.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 23

I'm with you on this, personally... I wasn't really a fan of it...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... and a story/ adventure, that respected the first trilogy atmosphere and thats what they did and that why it worked so well.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You are entitled to your own opinion of the movie. All i'm saying is it is like Abrams is making for the younger gen but trying to appease

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

the die hard fans as well as the older generation that are watching out of nostalgia.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

was better than a new hope though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But it was still good. It was the same thing but it was good. There's a reason I order the same thing every time I get Chinese food.

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 5

Yep. The basics worked - unlike the prequels, they nailed the actual "this is a movie that tells a story using cinematography" part.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Theres a reason Hollywood makes 3000 sequels and remakes every year. "More of the Same"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

one of the reason why we want star wars again, is bc of the special effects, we want good space battles, lightsaber battles...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah but we had a couple great space battles and lightsaber battles in the prequels, didn't stop everyone from hating them.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

have been condensed or outright eliminated. Hating them is a recent fad, they're honestly solid films, but they weren't close to perfect.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Definitely not recent. I don't remember anyone excited for 2 or 3.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

saber duels and multiple large scale battles; unfortunately, the first two films were filled with nonsense cheese that really ought to

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There were a multitude of excellent, actually good looking duels and actual battles in the prequels. In ROTS alone there were 5 distinct

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I loved this movie, and I'm fine with such a close plot retread (the characters really aren't a retread though, at all), we'll see in ep 8

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that will determine if they have what it takes to tell original stories

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We always hope that but J.J.'s history tells me he's going to keep on doing it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just like Jurassic World

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fan service is one thing. TFA should have just been called, Ep. 7 A Newer Hope.

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 7

Or, A New Hope Awakens

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

OR Another New Hope.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This is how I've described it to everyone who asks what it's like. I still enjoyed it though.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I've seen it four times in theatres, I am in no way, shape or form, hating on the movie.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't think you were, just didn't want to make it sound like I was!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All I wanna know is why would they build star killer base if the first 2 death stars blew up. Only complaint I had.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Well, the first planes crashed, the first rockets to the moon crashed, and so on 'til the deathstars...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everyone said I was daft to build a Deathstar on a swamp, but I built in all the same, just to show them.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

first one, got infilitrated 'nd blown up. The 2nd one got sabotaged 'nd blown up. But the THIRD one, fueled up, caught fire 'nd then blew up

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Could not resist.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So they could kill Luke if it turned out they couldn't find the last map piece. They could kill several planets at once, and refuel fast.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they probably figured that the deathstar was defeated due to security holes, like vents and actual tunnels for ships. so they put more

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

security, but that didn't work because the enemy this time did a ground infiltration first. but they believed they could do better

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because... If you were an evil empire and had the ability to build something that destroys multiple planets, wouldn't you build it?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

They're not really an empire anymore, but point taken

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean if it's failed twice already..

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I want to know why the Republic had zero clue that the very people responsible for the first two death stars built another one.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Especially one with the same goddamn weakness that allows the entire thing to blow up

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude yes. I understand parallels and fan service but I wasn't super excited when it was so very similar.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was a turnoff to me. It was good, but the plot was downright identical.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To create jobs and stimulate the economy after a massive depression caused by the others' destruction. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.09054

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe they thought being built inside a planet would make it a tad sturdier...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"we will just make it an entire planet, they cant blow up a planet"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe blowing up a single enemy planet was a pretty good return on investment. They keep pulling that off, so why not build more superweps?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

At least in the books, a single star destroyer could completely glass the surface of a planet in hours.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

eh, which class of star destroyer? The imperials we see in the movie certainly can't do that, the executor maybe if no planetary shields .

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That doesn't fit well with canon, unless there's a reason why death stars are more effective than star destroyers.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Okay but I already saw it and liked it. what do you want from me

10 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 12

It's popular and a good film. CLEARLY WE MUST NOW HATE, SEARCH YOUR FEELINGS! RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Don't buy the Star Wars Cheezits and limit yourself to two chest-high Vader figures. I feel that would be a fair compromise.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He wants you to stop liking it! DO IT

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well he can fuck himself with a lightsaber if that's the case.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

JUST DO IT!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Prequels are too different from originals, now TFA is too similar. Maybe we should make up our minds?

10 years ago | Likes 126 Dislikes 32

The prequels were the best ones. (besides VI which you could watch literally just that one and understand the entire story)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The prequels were only "too different" in that they were terrible garbage that was badly written and poorly directed.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Episode I rethread a lot of concepts from the originals, including but not limited to using a less advanced aboriginal race as battle fodder

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Prequels follow the same parallels actually. Stop hating.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can pay homage to themes of the original trilogy without making it a glorified remake that makes no sense 50% of the time.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

What made no sense to you?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh god I could make an entire list of things that don't make any sense, too much to place in 140 characters.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Will you make that list in a message to me? You're the only person here not being rude about their opinion and actually explaining it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And then there's other things like who was the dude at the start, how did Maz Kanata get Anakin's lighsaber when it was lost on Bespin,..

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Didnt they mention that in aftermath? Something about a cult claiming to have recovered the saber.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't Moz say "That's a good question for another time"? I assume they'll explain how she got Luke's saber later on.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maz*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally all the plot holes feel that way which is just baiting people into watching the sequels.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's be real, that was just a lazy cop-out to avoid blatant continuity errors. I'd be seriously surprised if they actually explain it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The movie is filled with things that are left unanswered or just don't make any sense.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's why they're making more movies

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Left unanswered doesn't mean it makes no sense, to me at least... Plenty of movies leave tons of stuff unanswered. And I figured that 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure, which is why I made the distinction. And I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt that they'll answer these things in the sequels.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Starkiller Base could move to other suns to charge

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The entire concept of Starkiller Base for one. It's meant to be a bigger better Death Star, but no amount of suspesnion of disbelief can >

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the planet and the base itself is useless after two shots? Why then waste a shot on a menial military base.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

make me ignore the lapses in logic. How do you aim a planet? It drains a sun to charge itself. Does that mean there were two suns around

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because there's no middle ground, amirite?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about balance?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, but I think the prequels main criticism wasn't that they were too different, it's that they were shit.

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 5

Well yes that was definitely a part of it too

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The prequels were not bad because they were different...They were bad because everything that was different was awful.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would have loved to embrace Dexster Jetster and his 50's diner or Jar Jar if it was well done and made sense...But it didn't.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My issue with the Prequels was the AWFUL dialogue throughout, not how they were too different from the original trilogy.

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 3

Thank George!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you listen to the dialogue in 4, 5, and 6, it's not all that different. Carrie Fisher famously made fun of it and Harrison Ford (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The actor who played Obi Wan considered it cheesy BS too.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Fairy tale rubbish", in fact. He was embarrassed that Star Wars is what he would be remembered for.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

refused to say some of the lines. Alec Guiness called it "fairy tale rubbish". Difference is, fans have a nostalgia factor for the originals

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have an unpopular opinion. I actually enjoyed the prequels and lived some of the new chars like general grevious and dooku.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The dialogue is garbage I agree, some of the worst I've ever seen, but some complaints from fans were that they don't feel like star wars

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The dialogue is only bad between a few characters. I felt most of the characters were well written and acted. Anakin unfortunately was not.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Let me just drop one name on you: Jar-Jar.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Jar Jar was written for kids. He may be a bit annoying at times, but he doesn't RUIN the movie.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

How doesnt he? An entire half the plot revolves around "Lol this guy is so clumsey. Look, he stepped in poop!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed, but compare JarJar to the Ewoks (also for kids). Ewoks were cute, but very brave to fight the Stormtroopers. JarJar was just stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

George has said Star Wars is for children yet I seem to remember a child murder scene followed by a man burning alive so yeah,

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So good, no spoilers then

10 years ago | Likes 5344 Dislikes 57

It all started with @MankDemes

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you don't want spoilers, don't click on what is clearly a Star Wars post.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

You see, but the now majority to be inconvenienced forever because the minority can't make practical decisions for themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Seriously, good thing I finally saw the movie a few days ago.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you still haven't seen it after all this time then that's really your problem.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

At this point, if you haven't seen it, you can't blame others for spoilers, they're not even spoilers anymore

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

It's been a month, get your arse to a cinema!!! Can't be any spoilers then!!!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

To be fair, the first images are small but increasingly serious spoilers which should clue you into the fact that major spoilers are coming.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 3

Winter is coming

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No shit! Its easy to click next if you suspect.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Should say in the title though...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Agreed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't the rule no spoilers for 1 week per $100 million at the box office?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

If you haven't seen it by now you're not a big enough fan and it's your own fault

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Good thing I saw this movie last night, then!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dude, its been out for like 3 weeks. That is plebty of time for any fan to go see it.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Nope. The majority need to cater to the needs of the entitled minority who can't stay off social media/not click star wars posts

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Yeah. Imgur seems to have gone from "spoilers are the scum of the earth" to "spoilers deserve the front page" in the course of mere days.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just go watch the fucking movie then. You are just asking for spoilers at this point.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

When does is hit the theaters?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

China will get it 4 days from now (9th Jan)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In -3 weeks.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK!?!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Nice Pirates of the Caribbean reference.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, glad I saw the movie on Saturday.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I went yesterday thank god

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Cuz it's so hard to click next on a star wars post, right?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm pissed. I've avoided spoilers this entire time. I had romantic getaway plans to see it in a cool small theater in a sex time weekend1/2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

Wait, so you intentionally waitied this long? Thats your own damn fault.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even my 10 year old saw it and didn't ruin it. Two frames in, I'm fucked. At least my bag of toys, restraints, and costumes is still a go.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Lucky you! I had it spoiled by a child I know shouting it to me across the road the day after it was released. People around me were PISSED!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Little jerk. My kid is queen of accidental spoilers. That's why is so shocking!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I "accidentally" told his mum. He was in so much trouble I felt a tiny bit guilty.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Spoilers have been on the front page for weeks...every Kylo Ren post mentions that he's Ben Solo. Im pretty sure the embargo is off

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

Embargo? Shall I dispatch the jedi ambassadors to negotiate?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No!

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I mean....we did agree to hold off, but only til the new year right?

10 years ago | Likes 182 Dislikes 5

First business day after the New Year. Our office rule. You would of seen it, if you really cared.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah, new years was what I agreed to. No other prominent marker to go by this month.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Ummmm the most important day of the year is this month........ FACKEN STRAYA DAY CUNT!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of people agreed on a week or two.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's been two weeks.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 10

Fuck you.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 41

I didn't fucking spoil anything you cunt.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

Fuck you and your mentality. It's only been two weeks? It was the holiday season. Some of us work more around that time.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

Here's a crazy idea, show some personal constraint and stay the fuck off social media, or at least away from Star Wars post ya entitled twat

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It's been two weeks we're letting them fly

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wait... so... Han... ?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

:), don't worry you're not the only one. :))))))

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh boy, I hope you're joking!

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Me? It's in OP's post.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah, I meant I hope you're joking about it having been spoiled for you. Sorry :(

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ohh! Well... yeah I wasn't joking :( that's what I get for browsing the freakin front page!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Spoilers now making it to the front page

10 years ago | Likes 317 Dislikes 16

'Bout time.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

wouldn't be an issue if they just added SPOILERS to the title really

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

No-Spoiler grace period is over.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

im very happy that I just saw it yesterday

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Honestly the movie doesn't deserve any of the protection the community has given it since it's just a rehash of the original.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If you haven't seen Star Wars yet. You're either not a fan or hospitalised.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 26

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 16, 2019 6:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Thats still a choice. Deal with crowds, or deal with spoilers. You had plenty of time to make whichever choice is best for you.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its funny because I just saw it yesterday so fuck you.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I don't have money to go watch it... but who cares right?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 1, 2017 5:22 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

yeah... I wouldn't mind if they just added SPOILERS to the title... I managed to avoid those

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I waited until last night because of severe agoraphobia. It wasn't bad, only a few other people in the theater.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or Chinese/ in China... It doesn't open there until January 9th

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah movie tickets are out of budget for a lot of folks

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or I'm being polite because my parents keep putting it off and begged me to watch it with them.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Go see it without them, then see it again with them? That's what my roommate did.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Like I said, they would commit to a day and then be busy and put it off.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Or broke as fuck

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

How long does the internet need to wait for you to save $10? Theres no shame in being broke, but it's a one-time expense, not an investment.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's been like 3 weeks

10 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 28

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Aug 24, 2016 7:00 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

As far as money, if you cant drop $10 once a year on this big of a movie, then how long do you expect people to wait while you save up?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it releases here in China this weekend! (i just scrolled past everthing except the first 2 panels, closest I've come to getting spoiled)

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I hope everyone there likes it as much as we do!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right, it's only been 3 weeks

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

I saw it opening weekend. I'm just surprised

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

its still sold out in a couple theaters in my town

10 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 5

Dafuq you live? And you only try on Saturday night or something?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Dafuq you live? And you only try on Saturday night or something?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

How many seats are in the theater? 5?

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

Just saw it for the second time in IMAX, completely sold out

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

not enough, I had to try 3 theatres yesterday before I could get tickets

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

It's a small town, it's just some dudes basement

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I said this a couple of days ago and got down voted.. it's not our fault if they haven't seen. A warning in the title would be nice though

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

It's a matter of choice: post that thing you want to post, or be considerate of others? Which do you think will be more respectable?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Down voted again, and as the comment said, a warning in the title would have been nice here... how much more respect is needed?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's a matter of choice: enjoy discussing a movie you enjoy in a public forum after waiting several weeks, or 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, we really dodged a bullet with this one :/

10 years ago | Likes 653 Dislikes 11

whew! that was a close one!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Got spoiled on imgur THE DAY BEFORE THE MOVIE CAME OUT. I would dexter thr fuck out of that person if i could ever find them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As the spirit of Ben Kenobi said in Ep.7: If you haven't seen it yet, you probably don't care

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But did we dodge a bowcaster projectile?

10 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 0

Fuck no. That shit will fuck everything in its path

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Unless you can take the hit.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's part of the expansion pack isn't it. I'll *never* get it now.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

*Original idea by most everyone who saw the movie. Still enjoyed it and it was different in enough places. Bring on 8 and 9!

10 years ago | Likes 636 Dislikes 36

It's almost like it was done on purpose

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5/7

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well this an exact copy of what was in the video.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

One way I judged it was by the presence of X-Wings: Original: Had X-Wings. Prequels: "X-Wings" show up in III. VII: MOTHERFING X-WINGS!!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

like 2 places tho

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People seem to forget that Star Wars is, and always has been, just the Hero's Journey. Even the prequels *shudder* fit that template.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 4

And that's okay. There's a reason we've been telling that story since Gilgamesh.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Why is that though? "Look, a multibillion dollar company bought SW. Lets lower our expectations to a strict minimum and forgive everything!"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

people forget how awful the prequels were. i believe disney had to play it safe, use a tried and true formula and just make it entertaining.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Exactly. we havent seen a non-shitty star wars movie in three decades.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

now hopefully with that "safe" method out of the way, the other films will be a bit more unique.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can enjoy a flawed movie. Yes, there is plenty about it that wasn't perfect/could have been better, but that's true of most movies.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Same. I'm not forgiving any mistakes, but I'm also not holding them to an abnormally high standard. They delivered a fun, entertaining film

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, rolled my eyes at "original idea". You'd have to be willfully ignorant to not see the obvious parallels to the originals.

10 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 7

At what point does a "parallel" become a rehash?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

They even flew through a fucking trench....

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the whole point of the movie is to act as a hand-off, it's not plot advancement, it's plot set up.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

also I see it as showing that even though Luke defeated the Empire, absolutely nothing has changed, it gives a reason for the next movies

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You'd also have to be pretty damn simple minded to stay glued to the parallels.Starkiller Base was an over-arching plot. A means to an (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

End to drive the characters forward. This movie was about The Force.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being thematically different doesn't excuse the recycling of ideas on the more superficial level.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7, 8, and 9 are supposed to mirror the original trilogy. Hopefully 8 and 9 will be a little different . 7 was almost identical to 4.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Thank you for repeating exactly what this entire post way saying.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Also, who said 8 and 9 would be mirrors? That sounds like something someone extrapolated and you're just repeating as fact

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I loved the new film, I just wish they varied from the planet destroying weapon plotline.

10 years ago | Likes 640 Dislikes 22

Couldn't agree more

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I learned anything from watching star wars is that the best way to get your ideals across is by blowing up a planet.

10 years ago | Likes 142 Dislikes 0

It blew up multiple planets from what I remember

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

That was the only part I thought was lazy and weak. I welcomed the nostalgia rehash as it washed out the prequels taste.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Not really a problem for me, but I understand how it is for others. My only real problem was how did they power the first shot from (1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Starkiller base? For that matter, how does it make sense to have something like that on a planet that isn't able, apparently, to move (2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Snuffing out a Star is going to kill a solar system with each shot. Even if they're in a binary star system, this seems a pretty major flaw

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To me, it doesn't really feel like Star Wars without a Death Star to destroy.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

and the fact that the new planet destroying weapon has the exact same weakness

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the droids containing valuable information. And the dessert planet.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dessert planet with a cherry on top :P

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, just whipped cream. iOS thinks it's so smart with its autocorrect.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm fine with the other things being similar but Starkiller base is just too much. Still loved the movie, though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or omitted it entirely. It wasn't necessary for the plot, they could just as easily go there to save Rey.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it worked well with Kylo Ren trying to become Darth Vader. He wanted to do everything Vader did.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The "bad guys" have a history of ruining planets, even in the legacy EU

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Let's never speak of the Yuuzhan Vong again.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, even the galaxy is bored with it. There was virtually 0 reaction to the billions that died when the planets were destroyed

10 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

Before I realized it was the Hosnian system, I thought one of the planets they blew up was Coruscant. I was sad until I realized that

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, it wasn't? They talked about destroying the senate, so I assumed Coruscant as well.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, the Senate moved to the Hosnian system between Episodes 3 and 7 before being obliterated.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not just any old planets either but the capital of the Republic's government and their entire military fleet!

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Too bad there was no emotional link to the Hosnian system, at all.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hahah, exactly - No emotional resonance in that scene whatsoever. Rey's captured! Moving on.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

And somehow the only force that anyone in the entire galaxy cared to muster against this threat, was about a dozen or two X-Wings.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I get that point. I looked at it as an allegory about how powerful the First Order has become out of the Empire. ]

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But surely they would be like much less powerful?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Possibly. But, with Snoke supposedly watching events from the shadows for some time, it is possible that he had been building his forces 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

for some time, and maybe converged with the remnants of the Empire. After all, the empire only lost the DS and the Emperor. War continued.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the fact the had a "viable" power source, even though after destroying the star they couldn't survive on it anymore

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

They even say in the movie that the planet has hyperspace capabilities. The planet can move to any star they want.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...You realize there are more than one star in a galaxy, right?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Exactly. Since they fired already and the. Used another star I greatly assumed they could move it to other locations

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah, but how are you going to move a planet to another system, whilst it's not receiving light or heat for warmth/photosynthesis? Droids?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would have been so fucking hype if the whole planet went hyperspace

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They did state in the movie that the planet had hyperspace capabilities.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not a planet... It's a Death Star the SIZE of a planet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

it was a planet they hollowed out and built the weapon (and a hyperspace drive) into

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But why only planet destroying? Kill a star system to power the weapon -and- a distant planet I say!

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

it destroyed 4 or 5 in one hit, which is impressive, but it eats it's own source of life.. great if you're a droid army, but not organisms

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or fire it again, for that matter. What exactly was the threat here, Why was it so urgent they destroy it immediately?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It could move also. It's just not covered in the movie. It destroyed the senate and republic fleet and was about to wipe out the resistance.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's not covered in the movie, it didn't happen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless it's covered in any of the extra material that is considered cannon, because Disney

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it is covered in the movie. They state that it has hyperspace capabilities.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thought I heard that, wasn't positive.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this sounds poorly thought out.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

they must have known it was doomed. Either that or the ginger twit running it had one sunburn too many

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Uhhh... Hyperdrives. I assume they would move it to a new system for every sun they extinguish. Just like the deathstars.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

so they could immediately relocate to a similar orbit, using the remaining power of the last sun it devoured.. seems a bit risky

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's SUPPOSED to mirror the original. That was the whole idea. Lucas has always said that Star Wars is like poetry. "It rhymes"

10 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 30

It's a pile of unoriginal shit.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

And what would you have done exactly?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Now Lucas says Star Wars is like an ex-girlfriend.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And a slave.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, though if you're rhyming with the same word, it's not quite creative.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Not the same, just similar. If you thought they were the same, you weren't paying attention

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

i hate sand

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's coarse and rough and irritating. And gets everywhere.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think a lot of people, myself included, expected something new. A third death star just felt lame, we all knew what was going to happen.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Okay, the third Death Star was a bit much. On that point I agree

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"I create themes,” [Lucas] told Entertainment Weekly in 2002, “and I repeat those themes, in different chords and different arrangements."

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Yes, thank you, I've been trying to tell all my friends this. I feel insane seeming like the only one who understands it.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

so you're going to be excited when 8 and 9 are just this same story told again and again?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

But to answer your unrelated question, if the next 2 are as similar but with unique deviations as TFA, yes, I will be excited for them.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Don't know if downvoted b/c my opinion was dumb(which is fine), but sorry if I came off rude, I was only trying to match your sardonic tone!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not what I typed at all. All I said was I understand why it mirrors the original and am not perturbed by it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I doubt they will be. VII needed to have the same things in it to revive the SW magic and convince fans that is was legit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

or could you actually enjoy an original story in the SW universe that was well written, acted, and produced

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

the mental gymnastics people are doing is hilarious. did you personally need the story to be almost copied to "revive the SW magic"?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I'm sorry that basic thought process qualifies as "mental gymnastics" for you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 25, 2016 1:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

People complaining like this seem to forget that the SW universe is going to get the Marvel treatment from Disney.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They're not repeats, it just has narrative similarities. It's Star Wars. If you wanted Citizen Kane, watch a different movie

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 25, 2016 1:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

A) There's really no franchise to compare it to. So don't know what you mean. B) WTF do you mean? When they don't repeat they're criticized?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He may have gone too far in a few places

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I've been so exasperated with all the people shouting about it being the same.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Exactly, that's the nature of story. Recurring themes, symmetry. Heck, I'm pretty sure that's considered good literary device.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Someone gets it at least

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just like all the films begin with a shot in space of a planet and a big ship, and end in a scene with no dialog.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There's a difference between mirroring a story thematically and telling it again verbatim but passing it off as new

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yeah, Abrams did the former, not the latter.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Did our new force user learn the ways from an old Jedi? Did she single-handedly use Force to destroy the superweapon? Themes, not verbatim.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Exactly!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

slightly rewriting a story for the sequel is considered good literary device?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

A little more than slightly

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

heck, i'm pretty sure i've just never heard that anywhere before.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't see it as a rewrite. There are familiar elements, but it is in no way a point for point remake of anything. Lucas intentionally...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1