most people cant just get up and leave their home, and this type of dictatorial edict restricting the freedom of americans living there forces them into a kind of pen, like cows, or sheep. if this is the future of people living under republican rule, then why should they bother working for them? a general strike is the only solution - across the entire country - the grifters understand economics
All avenues lead to war. One of the first things you aim to do in a war is disrupt the other country’s economy. If you can’t make shit, you won’t be able to defend yourself for long (outside help is required). A general strike is essentially an act of war. I mean, the response would be to send the true believers to eliminate the vermin. I think a lot of people are really holding out hope that we’ll resolve this peacefully in the 2026 mid term.
You want to create shroedinger's human being, be my guest. Make every woman hypothetically carrying a human life that is entitled to all the civil rights we extend to an infant.
Meanwhile, kids are gonna have sex. Churches love unwed mothers, bc it's easy to indoctrinate then into the fold when they ask for help. Small businesses love young unwed mothers or couples with kids, bc cheap labor to exploit. The military loves guys trying to run away from their girl they knocked up. Eventually they outlaw sex outside of marriage, to push that entrapment more, or get kids joining military hoping to get laid on shore leave.
Yeah hey. I lost an aunt to anti-abortion laws just like this, because it turns out rapists don't give a shit. She had to find a back alley abortion, and bled to death.
The infuriating thing is that I've tried telling anti-choice assholes things like that, and they're like "well that doesn't happen very often." And I literally have no idea how to argue with somebody that finds it acceptable for any woman to be forced to carry rapist's children to term or die.
Supreme Court not wasting one day before ordering drone strikes on women after having an abortion the only constitutional option under any circumstances, after said lawsuit drops... Just cause they'll get a kick out of it.
"It's called being pro-life, you godless communist! We love life and want to protect it! You know, unless it's already born, a woman, an immigrant, someone with dark skin, a veteran, someone who's asking for healthcare, someone living in a country we have economic interests in, or it requires wearing protective masks... basically just fetuses. And only if their life is threatend in very specific ways. Like malnutrition because the mother is poor? Not our problem.
Maybe everyone should chill a little. To say simply that S Carolina is going to do all that is a getting a bit ahead of reality. The most conservative R. members of the state legislature have proposed this irrationally extreme bill and many people in SC are vociferously opposed. It has also been splitting the Repub party and anti-abortion politicians who oppose the extreme provisions of the bill. This post is split - the second part has links. 1/2
We could have had THAT, now be a good girl and be happy you only go to prison slavery for life for your rape baby abortion. No thanks, I prefer voters not chilling even a little on this.
While I actually do appreciate the more rational take, as I'm tired of people giving way too much airtime to one random state congress' one random dipshit's lunatic bill proposal that never even makes it past the first committe vote....there is also the aspect that they could start with something this extreme and negotiate back to merely evil.
So you don't even think that people introducing this type of legislation is an issue? See, you're part of the problem who thinks 'the system' is going to protect people.
It's nice being a straight white cis male, isn't it?
Used by same sex couples, used by women who left having kids late to get an education or build their career. Back up option that lets people put off having kids until they're older and in a better position because there's a 'safety net'. They don't want those people having kids, they want them young and dumb and trapped.
God decides who gets to reproduce. Anyone of the other doesn't deserve to reproduce except to generate servants for the ingroup. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYOoCfYEqSI Interesting treatise on the nuclear family as a social construct to enforce the hegemon and secure the right to reproduce for the white identity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_identity and their resultant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics#White_identity_politics
All these TLAs (Three Letter Acronym) are messing with me. You people really need to stop that, and accept names that actually describe the thing you're talking about. I was thinking of IUDs.
You couldn't keep things straight and you're mad about it and you're making it someone else's fault. It's redeeming that you used a three-letter acronym to complain about three-letter acronyms though, so I think it evens out.
There are numerous eggs removed during the process, and they sorta fertilize them all and keep the "most viable." Depending on the agreement, the Dr's keep or discard the rest of the eggs. Which are babies, or something, and so it's murder, or something.
IMO if society is demanding women give up bodily autonomy for pregnancy, then men should be mandatory redundant organ and tissue donors. Because it’s “all about saving lives” right?
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Wilhoit's law
Yeah, but the people making these decision don't give a shit about that. Only that they can keep it up for the disturbingly young prostitutes they hire.
CitizenPrime
Pretty soon Afghanistan will be worried about women's rights in Americas
Sebastopol140
Fuck!
ParallelParkingInABurka
darkoshen
The surprise is that people still live in those ridiculous states.
iusedtodream
Translation: they want to kill women.
RooGryphon
mostly of the non white kind
georgejimmydoodle
Women tend to vote blue. These laws will kill women. It's all part of the same Republican plan.
RIxspacexCK
most people cant just get up and leave their home, and this type of dictatorial edict restricting the freedom of americans living there forces them into a kind of pen, like cows, or sheep. if this is the future of people living under republican rule, then why should they bother working for them? a general strike is the only solution - across the entire country - the grifters understand economics
JeezusJuice
All avenues lead to war. One of the first things you aim to do in a war is disrupt the other country’s economy. If you can’t make shit, you won’t be able to defend yourself for long (outside help is required). A general strike is essentially an act of war. I mean, the response would be to send the true believers to eliminate the vermin. I think a lot of people are really holding out hope that we’ll resolve this peacefully in the 2026 mid term.
CoarseAndSalty
You want to create shroedinger's human being, be my guest. Make every woman hypothetically carrying a human life that is entitled to all the civil rights we extend to an infant.
sadurdaynight
Meanwhile, kids are gonna have sex. Churches love unwed mothers, bc it's easy to indoctrinate then into the fold when they ask for help. Small businesses love young unwed mothers or couples with kids, bc cheap labor to exploit. The military loves guys trying to run away from their girl they knocked up. Eventually they outlaw sex outside of marriage, to push that entrapment more, or get kids joining military hoping to get laid on shore leave.
phockeModel
Fuck south carolina! The dumbest of the dumb!
JesaraB
make information illegal huh, so much for that 1st amendment, right?
SleazyBijou
Oppressive!
VitaminJay
Yeah hey. I lost an aunt to anti-abortion laws just like this, because it turns out rapists don't give a shit. She had to find a back alley abortion, and bled to death.
Fuck off with this frankly medieval thinking.
ilovetraveler
The infuriating thing is that I've tried telling anti-choice assholes things like that, and they're like "well that doesn't happen very often." And I literally have no idea how to argue with somebody that finds it acceptable for any woman to be forced to carry rapist's children to term or die.
VitaminJay
It doesn't 'happen very often' *because* of the legality of abortion in the country.
Conservative mindset is 'its not real until it affects me personally'. Like a very stupid version of solipsism.
beeeeeeerkaaaaa
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. FAFO.
redtruck
Ya that's a country to avoid.
DJOldguy
Well that's gonna help women's natal health a lot.... dumbasses....
claytonhadams
Lawsuit in 3,2,1....
EpsilonBeSmallerZero
Supreme Court not wasting one day before ordering drone strikes on women after having an abortion the only constitutional option under any circumstances, after said lawsuit drops... Just cause they'll get a kick out of it.
allmycommentsareGold
Ah, yes. Land of the Free
MrsHowVeryDareYou
And the party of small government
TheWombatStrikesAgain
"It's called being pro-life, you godless communist! We love life and want to protect it! You know, unless it's already born, a woman, an immigrant, someone with dark skin, a veteran, someone who's asking for healthcare, someone living in a country we have economic interests in, or it requires wearing protective masks... basically just fetuses. And only if their life is threatend in very specific ways. Like malnutrition because the mother is poor? Not our problem.
But pro-life!"
StunttheRunt
Home of the Depraved
TooRexyForMyShirt
TresusIbor
We need gramps on MST3k
fumptrucker
Maybe everyone should chill a little. To say simply that S Carolina is going to do all that is a getting a bit ahead of reality. The most conservative R. members of the state legislature have proposed this irrationally extreme bill and many people in SC are vociferously opposed. It has also been splitting the Repub party and anti-abortion politicians who oppose the extreme provisions of the bill. This post is split - the second part has links. 1/2
fumptrucker
https://www.southcarolinapublicradio.org/sc-news/2025-10-01/sc-bill-that-would-outlaw-abortions-eliminate-most-exceptions-d">ouse">https://www.southcarolinapublicradio.org/sc-news/2025-10-01/sc-bill-that-would-outlaw-abortions-eliminate-most-exceptions-draws-hundreds-to-statehouse https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/south-carolina-criminalize-abortion-ban/article_2b15b70e-8d33-47b9-b139-c1a7fb762310.html
EpsilonBeSmallerZero
We could have had THAT, now be a good girl and be happy you only go to prison slavery for life for your rape baby abortion. No thanks, I prefer voters not chilling even a little on this.
SilverNicktail
While I actually do appreciate the more rational take, as I'm tired of people giving way too much airtime to one random state congress' one random dipshit's lunatic bill proposal that never even makes it past the first committe vote....there is also the aspect that they could start with something this extreme and negotiate back to merely evil.
invadeboiss
So you don't even think that people introducing this type of legislation is an issue? See, you're part of the problem who thinks 'the system' is going to protect people.
It's nice being a straight white cis male, isn't it?
devasto
Ok, can someone please explain their issues with IVF?
senefen
Used by same sex couples, used by women who left having kids late to get an education or build their career. Back up option that lets people put off having kids until they're older and in a better position because there's a 'safety net'. They don't want those people having kids, they want them young and dumb and trapped.
TheDefective
God decides who gets to reproduce. Anyone of the other doesn't deserve to reproduce except to generate servants for the ingroup. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYOoCfYEqSI Interesting treatise on the nuclear family as a social construct to enforce the hegemon and secure the right to reproduce for the white identity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_identity and their resultant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics#White_identity_politics
Higure
It's contraception, and contraception is abortion. That is all the sex ed you're going to need. Now shut up and keep it in your pants until marriage.
doublebutttriplehut
Yeah because marriage makes unplanned pregnancy impossible. God says.
Zamerine
What ? IVF ain't contraception, it's the opposite of that :o
Higure
All these TLAs (Three Letter Acronym) are messing with me. You people really need to stop that, and accept names that actually describe the thing you're talking about. I was thinking of IUDs.
doublebutttriplehut
You couldn't keep things straight and you're mad about it and you're making it someone else's fault. It's redeeming that you used a three-letter acronym to complain about three-letter acronyms though, so I think it evens out.
Totallyscrewedinaustin
There are numerous eggs removed during the process, and they sorta fertilize them all and keep the "most viable." Depending on the agreement, the Dr's keep or discard the rest of the eggs. Which are babies, or something, and so it's murder, or something.
cjandstuff
Louisiana has a law that all fertilized embryos MUST be kept frozen indefinitely if they are not used.
Sebastopol140
Further proof thjat they're dumbfucks.
delecti
They absolutely are. But being against IVF is at least consistent with their "life begins at conception" idiocy.
Totallyscrewedinaustin
Yeah, well, you know they love the poorly educated!
Unclescam
So we're making viagra and other similar drugs used for that purpose illegal too, right?
Someshithead241
Well Viagra is about making more, not less.
Thornaxe
IMO if society is demanding women give up bodily autonomy for pregnancy, then men should be mandatory redundant organ and tissue donors. Because it’s “all about saving lives” right?
mabbo
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Wilhoit's law
girlyBIRB
My take is that Viagra is gender-affirming care and should be banned under those laws.
Unclescam
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1ZzdobXMxeDc5Y3I1OXJkN2EwdTdpZ3h6ZXU1d3loenNjbTZvcHB4NyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/8meyFzZfNdQMaa81tg/200w.webp
fillerbunny9
As should things like hair plugs/restoration, basically all forms of cosmetic surgery….
murderonamonkey
oh gosh now, that would impact MEN.
RooGryphon
its only for white men who hold land and wealth. but no, not for you. Peasant
Unclescam
Older men
girlyBIRB
Also younger men with medical conditions or certain physical disablities.
zFUBARz
Yeah, but the people making these decision don't give a shit about that. Only that they can keep it up for the disturbingly young prostitutes they hire.