This is America!!

Jul 24, 2020 7:17 PM

infiniteflux

Views

119820

Likes

6683

Dislikes

198

His last words were "ouch daddy, ouch"

His father could not accompany him to the hospital because the cops decided to handcuff him after shooting his kid.

We are pretty fucking far from OK.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/texas-deputies-open-fire-on-non-violent-suspect-6-year-old-boy-playing-inside-his-own-bedroom/

This is so negligent I’m sick to my stomach....I can’t even imagine

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

As a father of young children, im fucking gutted. What the fucking fuck, America.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

"Offered a $100,000 settlement" the sheer audacity of these people, to say that baby's life has a dollar amount. I feel for this family.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Poor kid..

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Poor parents that now have to live without their baby.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

"Ouch, daddy, ouch." - my soul's bleeding. Lock those cops up.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I'm truly afraid that if anything like this happened to my child, it would turn me into a very violent person. I can't really imagine

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

Insurance rules the world

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

so long as police unions exist as they do, neither this, nor any other viable solution will ever, EVER HAPPEN

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Which seems odd to me. Other professionals have unions but those unions dont stop them from needing liability insurance.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think durring hunting season someone should follow the sheriff home and shoot him then claim you aren't responsible because you 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Meant to shoot the deer 10 miles west of him. It was an honest mistake.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Trying to put a price tag on a child life.

5 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 3

Apparently that poor kid's life was worth $100,000 and a bullet. Fuck these assholes for thinking this was how you make amends.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I mean it's the south, it's not exactly a new thing for them.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What are you advocating for then? Shoot one of the cop's kids dead instead?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No, hold a criminal trail for murder.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately grand juries are how prosecutors pass off any responsibility.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Texas lawyer here - $100k is the statutory cap for TTCA claims. That's the most the state government can be held liable for damages.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shithole country is a shithole run for profit and lives don’t matter.

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

“Ouch, Daddy, Ouch”...my heart is breaking thinking about this. I can’t imagine this happening to one of my kids.

5 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 0

I don't even have kids and this made me sob... Hug your little ones tight, this story is crushing my heart.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

can't even imagine this

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Same, literally crushed me. That poor boy, I can’t imagine.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I don’t think I could live with myself without exacting revenge.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

So freaking horrible. Definitely immediately hugged and kissed my son after reading that.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The worst part is this shit happens all the time. The PD settles or pays and the money comes from the budget. WHICH IS TAX PAYER FUNDED!

5 years ago | Likes 220 Dislikes 4

It does happen all the time. This happened just before Christmas 2017. Doesn’t justify it, just saying it’s not breaking news.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

WE ARE PAYING THE POLICE TO KILL US

5 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 1

They need to make settlement payments come out of police paychecks or retirement funds. Maybe they would actually think about their actions

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This is why you defund them. If they can't perform their jobs in a responsible way, we need to force change

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The exception are §1983 claims where you can get punitive damages against individual cops, but that's a federal case and harder to pursue.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Umh, bystander child dead is really bad, but credit card abuse and fraud isn't worthy of a death sentence either...

5 years ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 2

it's not even worth a police chase

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Here in Texas, sadly, it doesn't matter. An excuse to fire off a few (or 20) rounds.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

The south really likes the death penalty. Which is funny when you consider the south is also largely "pro life".

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

There's so much subtext to "pro life".. it's disgusting. It's pushing religious dogma on others. Hang in there rbg.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is just like when that ups driver got taken hostage, so the florida cops lit up the highway during rush hour like an 80s action movie.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

That the one where the cops killed the hostage and took cover behind cars with families in them?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Yeah killed the hostage, killed the dude at the red light behind him, injured a few more. Etc.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's the one.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

1) They shouldn't have shot if they didn't see a weapon. 2) They are expected to know what's beyond their target.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

3) Deputy Keller needs to retire and go into some other line of work. Perhaps underwater basket weaving.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Frankly, on those three points alone, the county should have to pay. Whether that's how the law works, I don't know.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why do you need to shoot 20 times to kill a non violent offender??

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

I think they just really wanted to try out that assault rifle. Why even take it out in the first place against this kind of suspect??

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guess they take credit card fraud VERY serious in Texas.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

In a country run by bankers it is a cardinal sin to commit credit card fraud :D

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because they miss 95% of the time? (/intentionally missing the point)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because shootin guns is fun y'all! Fuckin A right! Hit your target boys!! Feel the power!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cops are fucking pussies

5 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 8

I downvoted you. You paint with broad strokes.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Please don’t insult pussies. Nothing wrong with those.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Whoever downvoted me can eat shit

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

Boot lickers gotta boot lick

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I've spoken on this multiple times with friends and family. As a veteran, who pulled guard in Iraq, with rules of engagement to adhere to...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Face to face with potential enemies everywhere and a language barrier, to come back and have this many people killed by law enforcement...

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Officials. It does strike me as either they're doing it on purpose or they are of the most cowardly of pussy. Not all, but it is a culture.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Waiting for the “all lives matter” crowd to show up and demand justice. Any minute now, I’m sure.

5 years ago | Likes 232 Dislikes 10

They're busy memorizing excuses for not wearing a mask in public and why this whole Covid thing is bullshit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They only care when it’s still in the womb. Once it’s out, it’s on its own

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

ALM just exists as a counter to BLM. The reality is they don't give a damn about any lives, especially black ones.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Shooting was in 2017. If they are coming, they are taking their time.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

If they did, would you then berate them for supporting all lives matter?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 19

But they won’t because they’re just bootlickers for the cops.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But thats not what is being asked. So, answer the question.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would. The only reason they came with that slogan is to go against black people trying to improve their conditions.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, you don't care about actions. Even those actions contradictory to the preconceived notions of what a person in a group will do. You

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, because they would still be awful morons. Just not hypocrites too.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

So then why would they come here, to morally prostrate for your benefit, when you would still berate them and treat them like shit?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

but they won't.because their nature is of self victimization "how dare they think about this kid's death and not about the peble in my boot"

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

That doesn't answer the question.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the question is moot, since they won't do it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The question isn't moot, because its a hypothetical. Whether it is likely to happen or not, is irrelevant. Its hypothetical. So answer it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey firearms people, what's one of the 3 main rules? Know your target and what lies beyond? Fucking makes my blood boil.

5 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

I cant belive my tax dollars go to pay for stupid hitmen like this.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

There are 4 main rules. Treat all guns as if they are loaded, Make sure you know your target and what is beyond it, keep your finger off 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the trigger until you are ready to fire, and never point the muzzle at anything you aren't willing to destroy.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is exactly why cops should have no more power than a .38 special or .380. 9mm and up over pen like a mofo.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

If you need more firepower, THEN. pull out the rifle.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honestly I think that 45 would be better in terms of rounds. Large, "slower" round that is easier to stop if it does hit something.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've heard firearms trainers often say cops are the worst because they have high levels of confidence exceeding their knowledge and skill

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Most cops don't train outside of their yearly qauls.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Curse you Dunning-Kruger Effect!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've always wondered, who the f is on these grand juries that don't indict when it seems so clear to the rest of us.

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Cops, Judges, Prosecutors....they're all pals. They got each others backs.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You read an article on the internet. They saw all the evidence.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a bold assumption that they were allowed to see the evidence.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a fair point, but where's all the evidence? When I try to look into these there's nothing but things pointing to indict. Conspiracy/s

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They don't exactly post a full inventory of physical evidence, transcripts from interviews, witness statements, etc online. We only see 1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a tiny piece of what happened, and it's usually just someone else's opinion.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s the Prosecutors who purposely tank the case to the Grand Jury. If the prosecutors hide or downplay evidence, the GJ may not know.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Prosecutors don’t like going after cops because cops testify for prosecutors.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

This kind of crap is done a lot by prosecutors. There's a lot of hate against cops but many people neglect to hate on prosecutors too.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, cops wear uniforms and are easy to identify in public. Prosecutors hide in suits inside secured buildings and courthouses.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What I mean is: people bitch about cops but barely anyone bitches about prosecutors too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a case involves a cop in any way, it should automatically be taken over by the FBI and a special FBI prosecutor brought in.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This is something i could get behind

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That unfortunately makes a lot of sense. The whole system is fucked.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So... they’re murderers not cops

5 years ago | Likes 413 Dislikes 17

They are both, which is an exponentially larger problem since they think their murder was warranted.

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Always have been

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's a difference?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

No, they're murderers AND cops. And the institution of "good cops" has protected them.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

That's downplaying the issue. They are cops, who are murderers, and that's a big problem.

5 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 2

Yup. People will play the "No True Scotsman" card every time and we can't let that fly anymore.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well put. Them being both is the outrageous part

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 1

Yes they absolutely are.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Manslaughter. It would be murder if they killed the guy they were aiming at. Pedantic, yes. But that's law. Its pedantic by nature.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Well it has to be

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. She was unarmed and they lied about it to justify shooting her. Murderers.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't see anything about her dying. Him, on the other hand, was not intended. And lack of intent is thus manslaughter. Which is not less

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of a crime. I don't know why people insist on calling it murder when its manslaughter. Guess it just doesn't have the same punch you want.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From the article, "The 30-year-old Jones, who had been previously arrested more than a dozen times, was also killed in the shooting."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

third degree murder does not require intent

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well it's also murder of the UNARMED woman they shot, no?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Where does it say that they killed her? All I see is the death of the kid, which is manslaughter.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

If they fired 20 rounds at her I'm assuming she's dead, even police aren't THAT awful shots.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If she had died, don't you think they would have reported that too? Death of a child and an unarmed woman, what journalist wouldn't heap

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

v

5 years ago | Likes 517 Dislikes 7

v

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I heard this gif

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

Oh my GOSH that face jumpscared me

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Downvoters: Would yall please explain yourselves?

5 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 16

Would anyone here listen?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Here's my reason for down voting, mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/. extreme leaning"news source" that tell half truths

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Most of the downvoters are bots, trying to increase the chance for the owner's post make it to the front page. It's stupid.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Let me guess what downvoters are going to say: "I come to imgur for memes not to get sad and political". The same downvoters that instead of

5 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 7

opening a post with memes, decided to open a post with an obviously tragic story, then decided to scroll down and read the comments to say

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 4

they don't like any of that.

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Might be people who prefer cute/funny stuff. I wouldn’t know, can’t remember ever downvoting.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

A post that is. Comments, yes.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Usersub has an army of people that downvote stuff like this to repress it. I see it constantly.

5 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 6

Currently 5463 upvotes to 169 downvotes. What army are you talking about? I'll ask again. What is being repressed?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

When he made the comment 7 hours ago about 1/5th of all votes were downvotes. You comment on the front page votes; ignorant or troll idk.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1/5th!?!? O.M.G. Yep that post was almost downvote brigaded and lost into the oblivion for eternity. 1/5th. Ahahahaha rediculous.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Thanks for the laugh first thing for me this morning. Great start to the day. 1/5th ????

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Does it actually get repressed though? I'm a regular usersub popular browser and I see these posts all the time. Nothing is getting buried.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

No one said they were *competent*. Just organized.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Currently 5463 upvotes to 169 down. Hardly worth even mentioning let alone raising such a fuss over. Wouldn't even call it organized.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

We're pissed that all of the good social media sites always turn into political propaganda machines.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 15

Not a single bit of this post is political except the comments section.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is America?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How is this political propaganda? I’m genuinely curious

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

America bad. It's the only country where innocent people get shot.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

The article was about an innocent 6 year old boy that was shot and killed. Is that not bad?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Of course it is. Is it America? Or is it humanity?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I mean it basically is. The only comparable country anyway.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ok.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I see you've previously defended the murder of George Floyd based on his alleged criminal background that is mostly BS (see Snopes link ...

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

below). Meaning you do not only engage in political discussions on imgur, you're a part of the deplorable alt-right misinformation machine

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yet this is too political for you? Why? Because even someone like you realizes that the murder of a child is absolutely indefensible? And …

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

that bugs you because far-right nationalism doesn't allow for criticism of the system. That's precisely why nationalism is so toxic.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'd guess some people don't come to imgur to get sad. They want an escape where they can look at fun, cool, funny and cute things

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why are they in this post? The other posts are funny. But no, they want all the posts to be like they want.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You never scroll through the posts in the front page like you're flipping through TV channels?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like clockwork, it appears.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 42

Putting aside the question of whether this is a good place for it, @OP seeks discussion, not indifferent rejection.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

People who ask this question aren't seeking discussion. They're seeking to shit all over someone who actually tries to have...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

... a discussion. (trolls aside) anyone who tries to offer up a suggestion outside of "MAGA" gets downvoted and rediculed. No wonder..

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

... folks don't want to get into serious discussions with people demanding to know why they voted the way they did. I've seen people suggest

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

OP seeks what they know are easy useless points these days and a circle jerk to wash them down.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Oh, yeah, I don't agree with that statement even a little.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Circle Jerk is what dumb people uses when they're angry because the majority don't agree with them.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Where did I say I don't agree? I just don't see the need to aggressively demand that downvoters explain themselves.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Still waiting on the part where you show me where I disagree with the "majority".

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Buy guys, credit card fraud! She made someone lose *gasp* some money! Open fire! /Obvs S

5 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 3

Not really "someone," but a bank.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

CORPOrATiOns arE peoplE tOO /s

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And it can be reversed. Bank of America and WF will not go bankrupt of it. Sure it's a crime, but fuck so is j walking. Appropriate response

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

for each crime man. Like imagine we start executing people for not stopping at the stop sign long enough?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Not just anyone! A large corporation with billions of dollars in reserve!

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

oh my god, that poor corporation

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How will it ever survive? It has subsidiaries to feed!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey, America, you suck.

5 years ago | Likes 144 Dislikes 11

This isn't America, it's the piece of shit cops.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Take responsibility.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We know...

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

We know. Many of us already knew that, and more of us are starting to realize it every day.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

As American, I agree.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

As an American I hate Americans good amount of them are beyond stupid these fucks should be in jail for killing that poor boy

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Our flaws have been laid out for the whole world to see. Bye bye super power status. We don’t deserve it anyway.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like really suck. Stop being so fakely nice to everone yet habour a blood boiling hatered for anyone thats not like you.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4/4 .... we're just not living up to said potential....yet.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

So the leaders the laws and the citizens are all bad but somehow the country isn’t?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The citizens aren't all bad.... Just naive.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.3/3.... like some police officers and most politicians... but the U.S. is a great country with great potential... the problem is...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

2/3.. there are a metric f*cm load of stupid, oblivious, self righteous assholes in positions of leadership and responsibility...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I disagree... our leadership definitely needs improvement, laws and regulations need improvement, and 1/1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

"...fired twenty rounds from assault rifles..."... "non-violent suspect". As a person from a civilised country, my mind boggles.

5 years ago | Likes 2489 Dislikes 37

Do you think as an American I can get refugees states

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Do you feel like you are being oppressed by the govt. For views or opinions you may have? Is there threat of persecution or bodily harm?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

These are people whose training as armed officers of the law took less time than that of your average hairdresser. They're not fit to serve.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

And somehow that little training meant they're suited to wield assault rifles too. That boggles my mind.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a person in america, it boggles mine too....

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

America is an uncivilised nation lead by a cabal of moneyed interests whose only purpose for the citizens is as a source of further wealth.

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 6

I'm pretty much a fucking neanderthal and even I think this is nuts.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Well, apparently you're not an asshole. The cops & bounty hunter are.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I will say, if there was in fact a 2 hour police chase I think this person can definitly do something dangerous, does not justify this but1/

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Leading police on a chase is dangerous and an act of violence. No I don't think they needed to shoot just saying this is a bit biased.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

America is not a civilized country. :(

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think cops do this because we don't have gun laws. So they all assume we have machine guns and grenades. It's fucked up. We don't want it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I doubt your country is as civilized as you think

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wait, you're from a "civilised" country, so I expect you'r not from the US? /s. I'm sorry for you guys, please vote?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

right like if someone is running away it isn't ok to open fire

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

...On a non-violent suspect, that has faked a few credit cards? Not really, no...

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

As a person who lives in this hell hole, my mind boggles too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I’m tired of living in a shit hole country

5 years ago | Likes 227 Dislikes 12

Me to. Id give anything to leave.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Same. This is beyond the pale.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I'm sorry for all you sane folk. I really am. But what the flying fuck guys

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Same

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Me too

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

I've noticed this crackdown on police behavior in the US is simmering down lately. I really thought it would lead to lots of good changes.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Too much money being made by not changing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that doesn't even sound like real......

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 20

what happened to my comment? o_o

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

maybe I should've said, this whole thing is so ridiculous that this sounds like something from badly scripted movie.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don’t even sound like real

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

There have been horrific tragedies in every nation on earth. Get off your high horse.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 22

So because they happen, we just accept it?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

By your flawed logic, nobody can ever be mad about anything, ever, 'cause the holocaust or black plague happened, dip-shit.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The Jews were blamed for the plague, and the Nazis blamed the Jews for everything, dipshit. A superior attitude precedes atrocities.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Name one “civilized country” that is morally blameless in any era.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes but only one claims to be a shining city upon the hill

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

This. Exactly. “Beware of the man who has to tell you he’s great”

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It happens so. Fucking. Often. In the US. It's not remotely close.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

All police force combined doesn't probably shoot 20 rounds in the field within one full year here, not to mention assault rifles

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Why do police even have assault rifles? It sounds like these cops just wanted an excuse to use their toy.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

The 1986 Miami shooting between FBI agents and two bank robbers, agents had 9mm&357/38 handguns, suspects had a semi auto rifle and others.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The agents did have two shotguns in vehicles as well as other agents with rifles who were too far from the scene to help, this is credited

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

With changes from more officers having easily accessible rifles in cars, only two agents had body armour, so more officers got body armour

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I get what you're saying but can you use an example that is more recent than 34 years ago? And why have an AR against a woman for fraud?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Sorry it took me a little while to finish typing, I explain that I don't think every police should be that heavily armed.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, we're talking about America, and Texas at that, so we can shelve the concept of 'civilized'

5 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 13

Luckily they're not as civilized as Portland, Seattle, or Minneapolis, or a lot more innocents would be dead.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

a shithole country for decades broken down by their system to believe they are the greatest nation in the world

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 10

Do people still believe that over there? I still hear it often. But its unfounded. I suppose you are the wealthiest, but even china will

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Take that crown soon. Apart from that you lead in incarcerations per capita but thats about it

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We aren't even the wealthiest in the world. It's just the wealthiest people in the world live here

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

... are you guys accepting applications, or...?

5 years ago | Likes 399 Dislikes 4

please let me in too!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, thanks to Covid, there's a wall around the US.

5 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 0

Yeah nah, we'll all happy to pay for that wall now.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No thanks. Sorry, but you can keep your freedom nicely contained in the USA, that'd be good.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

?

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Your username. I agree. Not just 13 y/o kids though, but also a whole nation.. And it's laws and legal system// Hope you're doing okay man.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Your username, I agree. Not just 13 y/o kids though, but also a whole nation, its laws, legal system and ideals. // Hope you're doing okay

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

we’re pretty far from Ok

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a person living in Texas, I'm not surprised at their behavior. This immunity to their actions shit has to end. They murdered that kid.

5 years ago | Likes 211 Dislikes 3

I mean, technically manslaughter. They manslaughtered that kid.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They murdered the suspect and the child

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

That child would have grown up to be a killer, i mean- after all its parent was murdered. Thats a batman right then & there.. /s

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 20

I know you used /s but would like to make it clear that the suspect and the murdered child were NOT related.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

And that's related, how? It's irrelevant, both are gone. This idea of immunity for the police is at best fucked, hold them all responsible.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Killed for fraud and credit card abuse. Just wow....

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

If only that applied to a Wall Street and Politicians too

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Murder implies intent. It was grossly negligent. Totally not defending the scumbags here. They need to be held accountable

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 16

third degree murder is murder.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

At the very least it is Constructive manslaughter, which is a murder charge... Aka fucking murder.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nah with power comes responsibility. If you killed that kid in a car accident without intent you'd go to jail.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And my sincerest apologies to the family, I support you.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is a damn shame 'corporate manslaughter' is not a thing for these kind of cases.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

It's it not?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is not, generally, only a few jurisdictions have the concept. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_manslaughter

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only possible intent of that many rounds is death. It's not negligence.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

I’m pretty sure they intended to kill. It’s not like those rifles fired bubbles.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The distinction being that they definitely intended to kill the woman, but not specifically the child. It's an ugly legal loophole.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They might get manslaughter but I'm not a lawyer and I only know this much from watching too much YouTube

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

third degree murder

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, they did intend to murder. Maybe not Kameron, but that had intent to murder.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

could still make the argument it is murder. If the first murder was illegal, then any manslaughter charges at the same time get bumped up

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to 1st degree murder, but would need lawyers and a court to argue the semantics all day long

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Once a kill shot is lined up you should have thought about the possibilities.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

wait, killing the woman was warranted then?

5 years ago | Likes 755 Dislikes 14

someone closed their eyes as she ran past him, it was OBVIOUSLY required to gun this woman down, no matter who or what she was near

5 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 3

fair enough...

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

1/2 Not from what I’ve read. She was unarmed. A couple of deputies claimed she kept grabbing for her hip, but this was just pure insanity.

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

2/2. That poor baby boy. There are no words.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

No. Police are not juries.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

They are the executioners.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Somebody needs better trained police

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Look, if the government is going to give police assault rifles, they gotta use 'em somehow.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Now has come the time when neither the killer nor the killed know.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Uh, not sure about you, but its pretty obvious to me it was unwarranted. Im thinking since the city made an offer, even a paltry one at

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thats what i mean, the killer didnt have a reason, and neither does the one that was killed. There was no reason. He shouldnt have died.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$100K that THEY know. Im pretty sure the parents feel it was unwarranted along with most of the people looking at this post. You dont need

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

to shoot at unarmed suspects you have stationary against the side of a trailer. A dozen police should be able to take down one unarmed

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

female without a weapon. Come on. Trying to link anything prophetic to this travesty is unseemly and inappropriate in the context you form.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They shot a fraud suspect 20 times. She was unarmed. Standing in front of an occupied trailer.

5 years ago | Likes 622 Dislikes 4

There were hi 5s at the station after. They did such a good job/s

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even this should be highly illegal - killing a suspect without a threat of life to the officers or innocents - this is so sad

5 years ago | Likes 280 Dislikes 2

Shoot first ask later. What else is new?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Please make it stop. What is wrong with our system?!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There was a “threat” the officer then said there actually wasn’t and they lied about seeing a gun

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

They pulled an Uncle Jimbo of screaming "she's got a gun!" Without any proof. They should be jailed

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Don't regular people go to court for misleadingly yelling "fire" in crowded public areas to incite panic?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because one deputy said she pointed a gun at him, and then admitted to lying. So, a lot of onus is on that asshole.

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

Also later admitted his eyes were closed cause she was coming at him. Closed eyes and flinched

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And nothing will happen to him.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Dec 8, 2022 3:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

... Though since they obviously never saw a weapon themselves.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

"Still no reason to shoot." Say that again. Opening fire without immediate threat is inexcusable.

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

That's literally what i said only pointing out the officers who shot did believe she was armed. Not excusing the shooting just...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

...replying to someone saying unarmed fraud suspect. That's not what those officers were told.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Context matters. Assuming someone is armed changes the mindset the officers are in and explains why the high end tensions. Explains, not

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Excuses. The dude getting downvoted is agreeing with you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

guess the horror here is how poor of a shot they are?

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 16

Does this talk about how NYC included the suicides of officers in their percentage of "targets hit"?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that really should be enough to take guns off them

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Statistically over 75% of shots fired by cops miss their targets.

5 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

Cops are some of the worst shots

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

As a soldier, I disagree. They're objectively terrible, but armchair cowboys are usually worse. Most can't even group on a stationary target

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

True. That is what George Lucas used as a basis for the accuracy of the Stormtroopers.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Uh no.. the horror here is that they decided to use their gun in the first place. Good shot bad shot, doesn’t matter, that was FUCKED up.

5 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 0

I normally stand by your sentiment, but the fact they MISSED 20 shots is also highly alarming to me. What if this WAS a situation where..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...shot placement mattered? They absolutely should not have engaged here, but what about the obvious lack of firearm training?...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and they used bloody assault rifles, not just a hand gun, which might not have penetrated the home behind.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

And that’s awful. But using any gun in that situation was completely out of line, period.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

yes, I rather agree

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Yep. No reason for force.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Tell you what... If you're a Cop who shoots an innocent person, you should be fired, and the family gets your pension, automatically. 1/

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

By "fired" you mean in front of a firing squad, right?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that is before the civil lawsuit. This family should be getting the pensions of every officer who fired a shot, before damages are discussed

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Fuck that. If you’re a cop who shoots a GUILTY person and it’s not warranted you’re a fucking murderer.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I'm talking before trials, charges anything, if an innocent dies by your actions you're out and lose the pension, outside legalities

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not just fired... should be processed as criminal, it's manslaughter.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I'm all for that. But there should be no discussion about a cop who killed an innocent staying on the force, outside of any legalities.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These people desperately need better training.

5 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 5

I have zero training, yet it fucking occurs to me that it's not the best idea to shoot a non violent person and everything in his direction

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Training won't bring back their humanity. They show complete disregard for human life.

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

They act out of fear and panic because they lack the confidence and discipline instilled by training. Watch Jocko Willink's latest on JRE

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

They are also free of consequence which I think is a just as big contributor to cops being thugs.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They need to stop watching Birth of a Nation on loop.

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

They are also always afraid because no matter how well trained a simple traffic stop could turn deadly due to how many guns are out there.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Then they can find a new job

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You can't downvote this point if you want to have an honest discussion. Watch this bodycam footage if you don't believe me.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

https://youtu.be/RE9fVYJWcKA

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I don't want anyone to think this JUSTIFIES anything, certainly not what happened to either of the victims in this post.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But it is evidence that @starhaven350 has a valid point in any discussion about how to fix this.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Suspect reported to have shot, but before securing suspected firearm they back perp into corner with parading potential drug charges?!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to mention the witness in the background for those background shots

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd also like to add I'm not 100% comfortable with camera 3's shooting given the bystander ...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(starts at about 3:06)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Be aware of what is behind your target. Fundamental rule of firearm safety

5 years ago | Likes 597 Dislikes 4

This- 25% of the PRIMARY rules of firearm use. -FOUR- rules to know to even touch a firearm. “trained professionals” my ass.

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

Yea I learned that when I was like 12 in fire arm safety

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My family doesnt even own guns and i knew that shit in like 3rd grade. Cops are fucking braindead, hateful, violent pussies

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I had my firearms traing from a private firearm traing instructor this was rule #5 or #6. Trainer drilled "YOU are responsible" bigtime

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

4th in the military, but yeah. Every gun loaded, Trigger discipline, don't point at anything you aren't going to shoot, what's behind it.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Police don’t give a flying fuck. They’ll hi-five all the way back to the station knowing they got the legal system in their pockets.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

At the VERY LEAST they should have alerted/evacuated the mobile home.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You think cops know anything about any kind of safety?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Part of problem is that once 1 fires, they ALL have to fire even if they dont know where the bullet may land so they can't trace it to 1 cop

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They don't have proper training or discipline.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm a moron and I was taught this when I was about 10 or 11, when I first shot a firearm. Drilled into my head probably more than anything

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

halo gave me better trigger discipline than these cops have.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But you're talking about the IS police force whose main rule is pew pew until everything in front of you is dust

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rule only applies if you give a fuck. If you have no respect for human life, shoot away.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That only applies in war zones, not America

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone concerned about how Americans love their guns, I can't help but think that the civilians with firearms probably handle them >

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

> better than a lot of the police do...

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

This is too accurate

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's because we're actually held accountable for our actions. We can't just say oops, line of duty and shrug

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

No shit, Sherlock.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

^ this. Because the legal gun owners realize that it's a privilege and take it seriously.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Well....its not tho. Its a right. And rights come with responsibilities. Good citizens understand this.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not using lethal force on a credit card theft should be pretty fundamental as well.

5 years ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 2

Or drones, helicopters, K-9 units.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Well Yes of course, but these perpetrators shouldn't even be carrying, is my point.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Agreed but it did state that the other cops involved were told by one of their own they saw a gun so they thought there maybe some danger...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

...I’m not saying they were in the right or that it isn’t such a tragedy a child died. They should have been aware of their surroundings...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

...and tried to take the woman in peacefully. I get why we gave immunity to cops for potentially harming a bystander in a gunfight. But...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

... that was before when cops had higher standards for assessing the situation first. Now we just have trigger happy cops who think they...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Cops are so stupid

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seeing a gun in Texas is excuse to shoot? No sir. Not unless that gun is drawn. I reject that as police making up b.s. excuses and spin.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because cops abuse this gun thing. I think cops should do like UN troops don't fire unless fired upon.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“Mam, can you please stand against the brick wall so we can shoot you, so we don’t hit anyone else??”

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 21

Awareness doesn't mean don't shoot. It means don't shoot unnecessarily and negligently.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Let's shoot wildly at a fleeing individual in front of a mobile home, which are renowned for their weak construction, with rifles."

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Maybe contractors should have offered an option for bulletproof walls for mobile homes. .../s

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you saying they made proper judgement shooting when they did?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No they didn’t. But in the moment, when you shoot a person, thinking what’s behind her, is the last thing on persons mind.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

It absolutely shouldn't be.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It shouldn’t be. Should have could have. Even soldiers, rarely have the time to think what’s behind the target.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

If you ever point a gun at a person in any situation, the last thing you’ll be thinking, what’s behind the person.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Sure, if you're a complete fucking idiot.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Real life is not a video game. Pull a gun on a person and let me know in detail what went through your mind.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not if your properly trained. Your supposed to take a second and confirm your target and surroundings.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s easy to say it when you are seating at home, relaxed in front of a computer. IRL, you have tunnel vision. Shit goes out the window.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

JFC. There wasn't even a reason to be shooting at the suspect. Let alone with a mobile home behind here with unknown persons inside. (1)

5 years ago | Likes 2890 Dislikes 16

This IS NOT what immunity was meant to protect.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You North American with your shit weapons!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

What the ungodly fuck does this even have to do with Trump. I’m sick of seeing his face everywhere

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

They're just spamming this on every post

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

JFC 2nded

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s like police took the first 10 minutes of the other guys as a training course.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying they should have fired, but she verbally stated she had a weapon and was going to shoot them, then pointed an object at them.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

You mean the murderers said they were justified?!?! Holy cow!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You mean according to the report that the deputy later admitted to lying about?

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Too many different stories. Police have a history of lying on their side. How many times have they said "they had a gun"?

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Thanks for additional sauce. But it seems like they just straight up lied, 4 deputies and none could identify a gun and they never found

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

So it seems that it's based on the sheriff's statement (not video). It's perfectly possible that they are making it up (it happens too much)

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

one within a few feet of her body? Basically impossible.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Down votes. For this. I smell Trumpkins.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

That kid had the nerve to get in the way of those bullets. The family should be sued for wasting all that lead.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

And the lying about seeing a gun should raise questions about pretty much all police testimony.

5 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 0

It’s the usual response.m, and if changed to “just kidding, I don’t know why I shot,” they still don’t get charged with lying or negligence.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He should be charged with murder since his lie started the chain of events

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Cop here: criminal charges are made on the actual outcome, not the intended outcome. He should be charged and convicted.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Maybe I'm weird, but when I was taught to use a firearm, I was told to FIRST THINK WHAT'S BEHIND WHAT YOU'RE SHOOTING AT.

5 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 1

Especially .223 or 5.56

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm betting US police are never taught that at the academy.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes!!! Thank you!!!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the difference. Cops in America aren't taught to think. There was no reason to fire at the suspect no matter what was behind her.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Cops in america get less training than hairdressers before they're set loose.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was like 10 (I think) when I was taught that by father when I got a BBgun for Christmas.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's because there wouldn't be any immunity for you or me

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All we really want is accountability.

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

Well, it would be nice if police stopped doing things they need to be held accountable for. But accountability is a good first step.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

If the police knew they could be held accountable for their actions they wouldnt be so open about brutality or negligence.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Like I said - a good first step.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are not open now. They continuously lie on their reports.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Before the protests maybe but since the protests started way too many officers have been open about brutality

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why the cop said he "saw a weapon" so he could get target practice.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

"I saw a weapon" and "I feared for my life" are the 2 most used excuses by cops in killings. Cops in Baltimore even kept toy guns /1

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

in their cars to plant on people they killed exactly for the first excuse. /2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But 20 fucking rounds ?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They need practice.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some cops here like to shoot until empty for some reason. I'm sure it's fed by hearing other cops they're with firing. Like applause.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These cops need to be fired and prosecuted. (2/2)

5 years ago | Likes 1186 Dislikes 8

Executed* too the guillotiiines!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Executed. If reject the $100K, and offer that the cops get to be in a trailer bedroom that I get to shoot at with a high powered rifle.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fucking hanged. Fixed that for you.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Too fast.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fair point

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Executed*

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

No. I don't believe in the death penalty.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A grand jury said there would be no indictment: i.e. no arrests. The system is broken.

5 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 1

So the best outcome we can hope for at this point is the officers who shot to be so full of guilt they are haunted and remove themselves?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

*Executed.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I do not. I don't believe in the death penalty.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Screw that settlement. I wouldn't ask for a dime, I'd ask for those "cops" to be locked up for life.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fucking CC fraud? Come on man. You don't shoot people for that. Before some brightlight chines in with "well she should have not ran", yes

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

suspects sometimes run, and you have to use logic and common sense to determine the best solution for that particular suspect.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The penalty for resisting arrest is not death. And penalties are determined by courts, not officers. People seem to forget this.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To be clear, I'm stating this for those sorts, it's not directed at you in particular.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, they do. But they won't. Sigh.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think you mean executed

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Need to be fired, out of a cannon, into a concrete wall.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And maybe not have a police force with assault weapons.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

And hung

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

I don't believe in the death penalty.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I have mixed feelings on it but we know these mfs are guilty

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

thats the best you can come up with? you Americans just keep going in circles, i swear

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 55

That’s what happens when shit is going down the drain.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

It'd be the first step, surely. No one said they should stop there. But systemic change is hard if they're not even held accountable at all.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

True, they also need years more training to handle this stuff better. Stats show a well trained police force is a lot less forceful.

5 years ago | Likes 289 Dislikes 10

That depends on the training. It's dangerous to demand more training without being specific because a lot of the training police receive(1)

5 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 5

What about “...to handle this stuff better...” was unclear? Thanks for all that pointless sass-mouthery. You can hush now.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 32

No. Fuck you. You dont know what you're talking about and I'll keep calling that out

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lol what a fucking cunt.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

now revolves around their own self-interests. "More training" can lead to more violent training if not specified. (2/2)

5 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 5

Hold them to the same use of force triangle as the military is.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

As a father, what gets me regardless of all this talk, is the little boys words 'ouch daddy, ouch' - what the fuck do you say as a dad? :(

5 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

Funny thing is, if they just train more on shooting, they would probably have been better at knowing what was beyond their target :(

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

They don't need more gun training. They need to learn to NOT SHOOT.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

hi, gun owner here with zero official training. even I know that "know what is beyond your target" is a fucking fundamental of gun use.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

They need to be doxxed or at least have their social media forever inundated with 'closed his eyes and flinched when [woman] rand PAST him'.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Their names are in the article. The one who lied about the gun needs to be in jail. He is directly responsible for murdering a child.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All of them need to be in jail.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No doxxing...as shifty as it is, mob justice is real

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Lack of justice is better than mob justice. Mob justice is better than NEGATIVE justice. Still support normal methods, but when they fail...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

When the institutions that are supposed to protect us fail, we need to take matters into our own hands.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hear me out. Would it be wrong?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I hate mob justice, but at this point it's not mob justice, it's self defense of the masses.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

So? Let the mobs get these fuckers

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Let alone with an AR. 5.56 bullets are specifically designed to penetrate the shit out of things.

5 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 8

https://youtu.be/6qXwdBOZzpY barrier protection is worse than the movies make it seem

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Canadian, not remotely a gun guy (by any stretch of the imagination)… But: this guy knows his stuff! Highly educational. Excellent content!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah he gets straight to the point too. No like and subscribe bs every vid

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's insane it's even legal. In sone states, you assault rifle bans prohibit ownership of even some ammo, and cops *are* civilians too

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

It's not insane and it isn't illegal anywhere.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not to be "that guy", but 5.56 is terrible at barrier penitration.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

I thought they moved from nij III to nij iv plate standards specifically because of 5.56

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Jul 24, 2020 11:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

So would many common handgun calibers, doesnt mean they were designed for it.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah I thought those were nato rounds, i.e., "more humane"?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A 5.56 was designed to fuck you up more. Back in the day 7.62 was more common as a service round in many countries, but it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

over penetrated people leaving "only" a small hole, so they designed a round to turn and tumble inside your body doing more damage.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not to be "that guy" but a mobile home isn't a barrier to any bullet of any caliber lol

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

This. A .22 will penetrate a car door (albeit with a tumble).

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

A 5.56 literally is a .22 caliber round. It's just faster moving. In ther gun world the 5.56 isn't that powerful of a round when u look at

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Thats largely my point. Even 9mm would have sang through that structure like cardboard. The cops shouldn't have been there to begin with.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1