Just give me a few minutes, I want to see the end of this inning.

Jun 21, 2024 12:14 AM

plinkey

Views

56174

Likes

1181

Dislikes

33

It cost that guy $200 dollars a minute, our tax dollars, for him to do that.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I’m so elated this is where all our taxes dollars go!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

When you've stepped into the kitchen and is all "wait.. what was I doing here again?"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is he hoping to catch a homer with his canopy open?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This gives a new meaning to holding patterns.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I just want healthcare

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Cannot park there mate.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those planes are awful noisy, even at idle mode. Very noticeable

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yup. They actually stopped the game briefly because of the jet noise.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In case you were wondering, no, that plane doesn't cost $1B. That's a lie. The F-35B costs $109M per unit. Still sounds like a lot? Eh, not particularly.

F-16 (block 70/72) = $63M
Su-35 = $70M
FC-31 = $70M
F-35A (most common variant) = $80M
F-15EX = $80M
Gripen E = $85M
Typhoon = $90-140M
Rafale = $100-120M
J-20 = $100-120M
F-117 (in today's money) = $100M
F-35C = $102M
AC-130 = $130-170M
F-22 = $143M
F-14D (in today's money) = $170M
NGAD (projected) = $300M
C-17 = $340M
B-21 = $550M
B-2 = $2B

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If i know my movies, there are terrorists in that building with a nuke

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If they find a good updraft, they can hang there for hours

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If that particular bird can’t find an updraft, a KC-10 works, too.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Watching yearly tax contributions of about dozen middle class Americans burn up in hopes to convince kids to join and fight aimless forever wars started before they were born.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They left as soon as they saw the beer prices.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

TIL we can do that kinda shit with planes

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

We've been able to do that kinda shit with planes for over 50 years....

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That plane (F-35B) is STOVL: short takeoff, vertical landing. With low weight, it can hover like that and drop gently to land, allowing the Marines to use bombed-out runways without enough usable length for normal planes.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

it was a fun game to watch even on TV, the game basically stopped a few times because of fleet week flyovers and demonstrations.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

v

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Looks like the Baltimore Orioles park?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Camden Yards. Yup.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thats why you can't have affordable healthcare

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

No, Republicans are why we can't have affordable healthcare. We spend more per capita on healthcare than Canada or the UK (by far, and possibly more than both combined), it's just all gobbled up by greedy fucking insurance companies, with a lot of it spent on bribing (sorry, I mean "lobbying") politicians to ensure that they maintain this status quo.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i agree with you 100%

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that the plane we spent 1.7 trillion dollars on and it only works like 40% of the time?

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

No, more like 1.7 trillion. 1.7 billion is chump change. It works now though.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

1.7 trillion is the lifetime cost. The F-15 program is around 5. And it's one of the best jet fighters in the world with a remarkably low accident/fatality rate. There is a reason why countries are climbing over each other to get one.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's not really a fighter, it's more of an all purpose attack, like the f16

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Cool cool, that's like saying, you're not a sword fighter you just shoot people from a distance.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The F-16 is a legendary fighter and it is a very common misconception that because it's a pretty good ground pounder it made it a poorer dogfighter. It wouldn't be until aircraft made two decades later we saw actual competition and even then the viper is a nightmarish opponent in BFM. An aggressor pilot once told me that fighting an F-16 is like having a knife fight in a telephone booth. Likewise the F-35 is an incredibly dirty knife fighter aerodynamically because of internal stores and a

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very very powerful engine. The most powerful to be fitted to a jet fighter, period. As powerful as three F-104's strapped together on afterburner. The internal carriage of missiles makes it very very agile. Most aircraft lose a lot of their agility when you actually start mounting missiles. The top speed of an F-16 drops by almost 1/3 with four AMRAAMs and two sidewinders. The MiG29 can't break Mach with a fuel tank.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 2

The building on the background also made me think of True Lies

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I haven't seen this movie in sooo long

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it still holds up

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My house is between the stadium and where it was hovering! Very cool, but yes, I would prefer free healthcare.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The US has enough money to keep its current military budget *and* provide free healthcare.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not a zero sum game.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Probably looking for Bane

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is the camera's shutter spend synced to the plane flapping its wings?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know each on costs close to a billi but that's so fucking cool.

2 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Jan 6, 2025 10:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

And they'll beat a 767 in a dog fight EVERY TIME!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Getting cheaper every day. The purchase cost is under 100 mil these days.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Banging out one every two days with about a 1000 already existing does that for your prices. Pretty crazy numbers, actually.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It helped when Russia single-handedly doubled the order numbers.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not correct. These days, it costs $109M to make an F-35B.

The most common F-35 variant is currently $80M per plane, same as an F-15EX and cheaper than a new Rafale, Typhoon, or Gripen E.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

closer to 140 mil

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

That cost is only from early production runs. As of Dec. 2023, each F-35B (like the one hovering in this video) costs $109M. Seems overpriced, but let's compare to other modern military aircraft:

F-16 (block 70) = $63M
Su-35 = $70M
FC-31 = $70M
F-35A (most common variant) = $80
F-15EX = $80M
Gripen E = $85M
Typhoon = $90-140M
Rafale = $100-120M
J-20 = $100-120M
F-35C (Navy variant) = $102M
F-22 = $143M
F-14D (in today's money) = $170M
NGAD (projected) = $300M
C-17 = $340M
B-21 = $550M
B-2 = $2B

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh shit, my bad. Give me two!

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Depends on the vintage but none of them are remotely close to that expensive. This marine variant is the most expensive, a little north of 100 mill, the air force is 70 ish or so. For perspective: F-22 - 180 million, Eurofighter Typhoon - 150 million, Su-35 - 90-120 million, Sea Stallion-K - 120 million. The F-35 is not only arguably the best jet fighter in the world, it's actually very cheap.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

The price of a Sea Stallion is ridiculous. OK, it's a heli the size of a C-130 and I know the costs are just as much a matter of the production rate as the actual properties of the aircraft, but come on.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ppl make such cool shit to kill each other. So many technical problems solved

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Right? Samuel Colt is an icon.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You and everyone commenting you deserve to live in america.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry to inform you, but the amount of about US$ 100.000.000 buys you one F-35B . That's 10 for US$ 1.000.000.000.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I know Angel Hernandez was a terrible ump but an air strike on his last day seems dramatic

2 years ago | Likes 303 Dislikes 1

...but worth it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He still wouldve missed it

2 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This made me chuckle.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's racist!

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Hey man, take it up with the union

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Marines are weird.

2 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

He had plenty of crayons to snack on in the cockpit.

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

… dude, who the fuck ate all the good colors and replaced them with brown?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

buy me some pornos and crayons, jack. I don't give a fuck if we ever go back

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Lmao you think marines get to fly those???

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 32

The F-35B is operated solely by the US Marine Corps in US service. The pilots who fly them are Marine Corps Aviators, not Navy pilots.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They do! If they’re pilots.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Yes, the VTOL F35B... so they can take them off from their Tarawa-class LHAs.

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

STOVL, not VTOL

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Marines do have aviators.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I saw something recently that said "Leave it to the USA to give their navy an army... and then give that army an air force."

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

r/confidentlyincorrect

2 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

Swing and a miss

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

saaawing batter batter

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is why we can't have universal healthcare.

2 years ago | Likes 280 Dislikes 34

Do you really believe that if the US military hadn't updated their aging jet fighter fleet with F-35s that the US would have universal healthcare?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really, truly, genuinely don't give a shit what the military industrial complex thinks it needs.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really..? This is the reason..?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Ashctually ya'll could have a healthcare system and keep bloated war expenses if you bothered to regulate medical prices and slash down the enormous cost of these middlemen named insurance.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Universal healthcare costs less than the current healthcare system. We could waste more money on the military if we had universal healthcare!

2 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 4

Well, money alone was never the issue. it's privatising it for profit and to squeeze as much money from the poors as possible that is.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(your logic is drowned out by the sound of 'freedom'...)

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

oh. carry on then!

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah but then how are we going to "incentivize" warm bodies to join that military!? Gotta keep folks poor and desperate for that, we can't have poor kids feelin like they got OPTIONS, or they get uppity and start refusing to risk their lives for the murder machine.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If only they could read.

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Hilariously, it isn't. We can't have universal healthcare because insurance companies and pharma companies fight it. Single payer costs $32tn over a decade. Our current healthcare system costs $47 trillion. We don't need to spend more money to make it work, we get to save fifteen trillion over a decade, but...we can't even do that because of the insurance and for-profit healthcare lobbies.

2 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 3

Healthcare without the exploitation and for profit industry between the patient and the healthcare? Why that sounds like filthy socialism.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yes. It is. Fuck capitalism, capitalism means we get billionaires. Socialism doesn't permit that when there's no fucking CEOs and every business is a co-op or locally owned.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Consider: they have home addresses. We could take some bullhorns and make a ruckus...

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

OH. You said -bullhorns-. I thought you said...something else.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I'm avoiding a 'HI THERE!' from Imgur...

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

To be fair, the rooskie carrier is a pile of soviet rust that will never go to sea again, built as an off-brand of its counterpart on the left with the dream to be as stronk as them and to eventually have 6 units. China has the same one but completely remodernized. France or Italy alone have a better navy than Putin's.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hell… Ukraine has a better Navy than Putin's… And they don't even have a navy.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fun fact: it was stolen from Ukraine. Before the Soviet Union fell, a message was physically sent telling the captain of the kuznetsov what to do and to just keep it parked until further notice. Before that message could reach, another message was sent out with great haste telling the captain to leave port immediately. The USSR broke up and the ship was already in international waters with a Russian captain, effectively transferring ownership to them.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

… And they literally would've been money ahead of they had just left it in Port at Ukraine. It is a low slump pile of post Taco Bell and tequila shit.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good riddance. Ukraine's pro-Russia govt sold the hull that was to become its sister to China who turned it into their first carrier.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The contrast between the two is night and day though. The laioning is a fully functioning ship while the kuznetsov is a barely floating disaster kept alive as a symbol.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Watching the game at about $278,000 per hour.

2 years ago | Likes 937 Dislikes 6

That really impacts your mpg.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cost less then Star Wars Acolyte... ;)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you my thoughts exactly

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They gotta fly anyway for training, may as well score some recruiting points

2 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

Most expensive seat in the house.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's enough for about four stadium franks.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Whoa there no need to flex that you get a discount now

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

what would be the miles-per-gallon consumption ?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean gallons per mile?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Somewhere between a buttload and a shitton

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It costs closer to $40k, but that is also a misleading figure. A lot of people look at military spending like it's some black hole where money goes to die. The actual lost value here is pretty low. There's about $5k in fuel. The rest is going into jobs of some description. The guy is flying it. The people who fix it, the people who drive the vehicles to support it or who maintain the hangar. That's a lot of money and jobs being created right there. /1

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The problem I have is that it's money and jobs for an industry that at the very end of the day is about killing people. I know we don't live in a perfect world, but I would rather we didn't spend billions on the killing machines before we spend it on social care programs. 2/2

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

No. It’s about the *capability* of killing people. That is an important difference. You are literally living in the longest era in human history without a major war sized with the technology of the times. It happened previously about once a generation. And the reason it hasn’t happened again ISNT that humanity suddenly evolved and grew beyond it. Hell, a lot of the developed world’s quality of life is based on US and NATO.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yes, by and large because we spend so much on weapons we are unlikely to see major conflict. It doesnt stop me wishing that we could spend the money elsewhere first. I can still wish things were different even if the current sitation is one of the better alternatives.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Stop exaggerating... the F35 only costs $40,000 per flight hour.

2 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 4

So, one natty Bph in Camden yards?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Gas is not that expensive. Flight mechanics don't make $1000/hr+. Half of that cost has got to be uninvolved management types.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fly, not hover. I bet hover flight hour is a lot more. Not only in fuel but it's running parts that aren't designed to be run a lot of hours.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'm curious, what all goes into that cost? Is that just fuel or does it include the pay to the pilot and everyone coordinating to make each hour of flight happen and like pre/post flight maintenance?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The issue with US army is that they always go for the most expensive options. The coffee cup alone in a F-35 costs a grand just for the part.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US Army doesn't operate F35s.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For every hour of flight, it requires 4.4 man hours of maintenance... However, during that hour, the F35 burns 1,200 gallons of fuel (figure $5k for JET-A)... but that isn't the problem.

After that, I am not sure how they get to the total (it is a range $25k to $40k)

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It will depend if they are in stealth config or not, the coatings are expensive as shit. This is clearly a training jet out of probably Langley? that refulled in middle river. Maybe from NJ?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maintenance is a lot more expensive than just the cost of personnel and training (and the entire cost of personnel includes salary, housing, training, admin, etc etc). The consumables/testing/parts/etc become extremely pricey in a big hurry.

Source: corporate life, not military life. But it’s the same deal.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I would assume the 4.4 man hours would include all associated sundries...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also allocate some for wear, and you gotta finance the thing somehow. You gotta pay the jet payments or the repos are gonna get ya jet.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Money is made up.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The plane costs $$$$ and is rated for a specific lifetime. $$$$ / lifetime = $$$/hr
100m to buy and a lifetime of about 8000 hours

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Plane cost isn't included in hourly operation cost. The 40k/hr is purely the maintenance, fuel, and crew.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Man, that's as cheap as a Taylor Swift concert on Ticketmaster.

2 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 1

That's why you buy tickets in another country! I saw her in Lyon a few weeks ago and the whole city was packet with swiftie Americans who were able to go cheaper by buying concert tickets, international flights, and accommodations than seeing her in their home cities in the USA.

It's great to live in countries where there are legitimate consumer protections. But you do you, USA

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I mean you also have to be able to afford to travel, that's the real issue.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My point is it's been cheaper to buy tickets for a T Swift concert overseas, and book travel, than to simply buy tickets in the US. Because you have proper consumer protections against touts (what Americans cringingly call "scalpers") buying up tickets en masse and reselling them at 10x have value, as is common in the USA.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

How do we know the F35 isn't Taylor just popping in from next door to see the game?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*angry Pearl Jam noises*

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

It costs $400.000 to fly this plane... For 10 hours

2 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 3

And that's before AI took our jobs.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

$400 that isn't too bad

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

(for the love of god I hope people know im joking and don't have to explaion that other places use a . instead of a , in bigger numbers)

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

...and?

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 14

...? It's a TF2 reference. A joke.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

No, shit like this is expensive, who do you think engineers and builds it, maintains it and refules it?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 26