I'm not sure I'm actually awake.

Jan 23, 2025 12:47 AM

dickblack12

Views

38297

Likes

1273

Dislikes

80

In case you haven't heard, the giant , douche-hole in chief has renamed it the Gulf of America....

It is and always will be the Gulf of Mexico 🇲🇽 FFDJT the BLOAT 🤥 FOTUS 😤

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just keep calling it the Gulf of Mexico. It's still the Gulf of Mexico.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except we're not changing the name of that body of water. Just like China renamed Tibet to China, we're still calling it Tibet.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 2

A much better name, by all accounts.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Does the US even own that? How does that giant sack of pig vomit get to just declare it's been renamed?
I will never refer to it as anything but the Gulf of Mexico just to spite him.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thanks

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh, yeah, that's the gulf of Mexico, anyone who says differently is a moron.

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

70 million of those morons voted for the stupidest fucking moron of all, so yeah, nothing new there. Now we wait with plans ready for when civil war against fascists happen soon.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Watch me deadname a geographic location.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's still called the Gulf of Mexico everywhere in the world, except USA.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah no, he hasn't renamed it any more than I can rename the moon to Bubb Rubb's Woo Woo Pleasure Orb. Say your words, dickhead, the world will not comply.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I haven't thought about Bubb Rubb for a long time. Da whistle goes WOOOOOOOOO WOOOOOOOOOO! It's like a 'larm clock.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, that's real?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 182 Dislikes 4

Can I just say, this one is really good.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How about t h e stopped up toilet filled with shit. Seems to be more appropriate

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Next up - Trump naming national parks and warships after himself.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Trump can call it whatever he wants, the rest of the world is not gonna change our maps. That's the Gulf of Mexico.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you can have a full tranisition team of people to go from Biden to Trump, isn't that a metafor or something....

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"douche-hole in chief??"

an orange, crying, diaper-wearing, cellphone-clutching baby?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Witless cocksplat?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unpopular opinion: I'm kinda OK with the name.

I mean, I know it's just a "power move" to appeal to fragile minds, but the name is still apropos, maybe even more so. It's the largest gulf in the Americas, the name still fits. It's not like he wants to call it the Gulf of Trump or the Gulf of the United States.

What the US govt calls a body of water just doesn't matter in the grand scheme. Trump also does stuff like this to distract the public and keep people outraged about nonsense.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

He also renamed Denali to Mt McKinley because fuck non-white people right?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you mean the Rapist Donald Trump?

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No worries. The Rio Grande is named that from the U.S. side, but is named the Rio Bravo from the Mexican side.
Let the Blowhard rename it for U.S. maps, and the rest of the world can leave it as the Gulf of Mexico.
Surprised Grump didn’t rename it the Gulf of Trump 🙄

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not calling it the Gulf of America just because some spoiled rich brat who never grew up hates Mexico.

1 year ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Freedom Fries

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

bingo.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, but we're not going to be calling it the new name.

1 year ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

Deadnaming is back, baby!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And Alaskans aren't calling Denali the name he also put in the same EO.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody will except people trying to "trigger the libs" like we care how stupid they're making themselves sound. Go for it bud. Call it whatever you want. Fly as many red (and white and swastika'd) flags you want to the sane people around you. You're only saving them the time they'll need to waste to figure out your nature

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm going to deadname the gulf of mexico just like I've deadnamed Joe Robbie Stadium for the past 30 years (it's a Miami thing). Anyone who corrects me on the point is going to be mocked.

1 year ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 3

This dude Floridas

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just because the US called it something new, doesn't mean the rest of the world will play ball.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I for one will call Trump by her preferred gender pronouns. Since she's declared that all Americans are female in an executive order I think it's only fair that she and all her supporters should get their wish.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia, PA, was formerly the First Union Center - and thus, it will always be the FU Center in my heart. Because what's Philly without a little Brotherly Shove!

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I want go mock them but all ive got is point and laugh. any other suggestions?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I deadname Candlestick Park in San Francisco too. And the Sears Tower in Chicago.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure Candlestick Park has been closed since 2014.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've probably only said "The Gulf of Mexico" like 15 times in my whole life. I'm going to endeavor to say it that many times per day for a while.

1 year ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

This was my exact thought.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's fair. Also as an Illinoisian, Sears Tower and Comiskey.

1 year ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Knickerbocker Arena (1990–1997)
Pepsi Arena (1997–2007)
Times Union Center (2007-2021)
MVP Arena (2021-)
To this day, I've never heard anyone in person ever call it anything but the Knick.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not from Illinois. Still Sears Tower.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And Marshall Fields

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It will always be sears tower, even though the company is gone I refuse to call it willis tower, and I’m not even from here

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

wachu talkin about?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

According to the executive order about sex, all US citizens are, federally speaking, female now. Your sex is, according to the order, determined at conception. Therefore, you are all legally female.

1 year ago | Likes 247 Dislikes 12

You're 1 cell at conception. You're not female. You're not even a you. His executive order makes no sense and people shouldn't pretend it does to prove he's an idiot. He's done that himself and it's inefficient

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That is objectively funny

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ironic, because the big orange pussy just chucked a hissy fit at the bishop who asked the big strong macho man to have some compassion. What a clown faced cunt he is.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hmm actually 😜 they're non binary, we have proto bits until week 6 where the male gene activates if it's present.
So all Americans are non binary now!

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well shoot, I had to do it the hard way.

1 year ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 1

You still got that 12" black dick as your name implies?

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

NGL, first time I opened @op's profile was because of the name 😅

Stuck around for the top notch writing, though!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Glory to you and your identity. I laughed pretty hard at this.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It honestly isn't that much fun playing with this tits. I thought these would be more fun as a woman. Oh shit! Are we all lesbians now? Dope! That makes the acronym MUCh easier to remember: LA (lesbian asexual) these LA clubs are on Firetoo soon.

1 year ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Well this turned weird in a hurry.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

There's something sinister about that order that people aren't picking up on. The language essentially states that you are a person at conception. This is something anti-abortion advocates want.

1 year ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

This is so important! It also defines women by their ability to reproduce, so that’s not ominous at all. /s

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean they're going to do a total abortion ban soon. It's not a maybe.

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

I feel like "people aren't picking up on" and "people fully expected so it's not worth remarking on" are two different things. This has been the plan for decades for most of these people

1 year ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

What I mean to say is that the discussion (and the memes) regarding this order seem to be centered around gender and Republicans making a stupid mistake when the actual intent is far more nefarious.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I think his point is we knew it would be nefarious before we saw it, and it is nefarious in exactly the way we expected it to be. We don't need to discuss it now, we made it clear this is exactly what would happen last November. Personally I feel the "big/small cell" is to give a loophole to screw intersex over, and let the SCOTUS define intersex legally to be whatever suits them at the tine

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Listen. I hate this timeline as much as anyone, but let's not FoxNews ourselves and spread misinformation. Phenotypically, genitals appear female until about 6-7 weeks, but the sperm carries the deciding chromosome. Sex is determined at fertilization. Gender, and gender identity are not. But this is legislature that they are trying to pass, and peddling misinformation won't help the public fight for their rights.

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

This isn't legislation they are trying to pass. This is an executive order which bypasses congress and can only be challenged by congress or SCOTUS making it null and void which they won't. Same with the EO eradicating birthright citizenship which is the real menace

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Except that it has the backing of the Constitution to make it null and void. They have zero argument when it is in plain text and has been affirmed multiple times by the SCOTUS across a hundred plus years. No EO or law can get rid of that language. It would take another Constitutional Amendment to remove it, which won't happen.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except it stays active until they do something. It's a 6-3 court with 3/6 installed by him and 2/6 he'll bent on doing whatever he wants. They can accept or deny cases they want to take on. I feel they won't touch it for 4 years and just let it ride.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It will end up being challenged in a lower court first anyway and I'd be hard pressed to say any reasonable federal judge or any appellate court (in panel or en banc) would rule that the EO is Constitutional. If SCOTUS refuses to hear it then lower court order stands so any federal judge can overrule the EO as soon as it comes in front of them and immediately suspend it.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, not really. Your sex chromosomes determine what hormones are *supposed* to be released but they dont actually determine your sex, because if the male hormones aren't produced you still end up female-everyone is until forced in the womb to develop otherwise. So, while your chromosomes are determined at fertilization, your sex IS NOT. Thats why chromosomal, phenotypical +gonadal sexes can all be different.

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Youre absolutely correct (see: Swyer syndrome) and idk if the language they used even addresses intersex people, though sex is, by definition, determined by the gametes.

I am by no means dismissing intersex humans, nor arguing that genotype and phenotype are the same. I'm trying to make people poopooing the language used as dismissable to realise what they're trying to pass as whatever this is (I'm not American and don't entirely understand your politics or the politicians you choose)

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think Trump even knows what intersex means.

But ultimately, by the definition we use to determine sex (the phenotype) everyone is female at conception. Unless they're willing to accept all the nuance that comes with sex typing, that's the measure that must be used based on the language of previous american laws.

(I'm also not american thank god)

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's where I'm unclear, though - are we using phenotype or genotype to determine sex? Because if phenotype, then, nothing, at conception. If genotype, get ready to DNA test everyone, because phenotypes don't mean anything when up to 1.7% of a 9billion person population is intersex.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So - all people are females at conception? Gonna require a lot of biology textbook editing for that one.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 23

found the guy who skipped highschool biology class

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Yep. If your high school bio class didn’t get into how chromosomes work, you may have missed some important information.

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

My guess is that people that make this assertion are referring to the period when the genital ridges exist but haven't yet started to form a penis (for males). That's roughly between 4-9 weeks *after* conception. Before that there are no reproductive organs at all; only DNA, and DNA is most assuredly not female-only.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

Actually its because female is the default. If we took every baby and grew them in a lab and flushed the hormones (or gave hormone suppressants in the womb) to prevent testosterone acting on the baby they'd all default to being female. Everyone is female unless forced to develop otherwise. That's why we have women who find out they are actually XY fairly often.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's like saying if you sliced a giraffe's neck down it would be a horse. That's not how biology works. E.g. looking up the definition:

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So you're saying we're all non-binary by federal law?

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Scratching my head on your logic for that one. I said "not femaie-only". That .... doesn't equate to "all non-binary".

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yes exactly.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0