Big numbers made small enough to understand

May 16, 2020 11:25 PM

These are simplified to the point of being so simple, these are confusing.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

learn what "recorded" means

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, then every day would be Christmas

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

lol.. y

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gonna call bullshit on #1 recorded History or wrotten history started 4th Millennium BCE

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You really fell at the first hurdle. "Recorded" history IS "History". And it is but a FRACTION of the time humans have existed.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if everyone farted at the same time, you would have one big stinky noise.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If my aunt had balls...

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

...she'd be my uncle.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The people in Manhattan are pretty dense...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but they have the best projects!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we're just going to ignore 'human wingspan'? In #1

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think people are more focused on the "recorded" part of the statement. Humans have been around a lot longer than recorded history.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The COVID death rate in Colorado would be appalling

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But for once, Trump would be able to claim it's not his fault and not be lying!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you put a penis inside of a vagina without protection most of the time the female will get pregnant

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought people in Manhattan were generally smart, learn something new today.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

We have wings? WE HAVE WINGS?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Human wing span?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think he means after we break out of our chrysalis stage and join the hive mind? Understandable mistype.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 for the username alone!

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Have you heard the song played slowed down? It’s breathtaking

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#6 why is being on the 50 yard line relevant to its size?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because the 50 yard line is the center of an American football field.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Middle.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

because its the center of the freedom unit universe.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I dont buy it. Has anyone set off a nuclear bomb in the eye to test its brightness? Checkmate atheists

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

im sure some poor Japanese person did, or close enough ya know. or this guy who lived through two of them

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

neither of those were hydrogen bombs, which is the type Randall Monroe specified in What-If #73 (ripped off incorrectly here)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The warren buffet one gets me. Like I agree we shouldn’t limit people’s wrath but like ... who can even spend that much.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I don’t know why he has to wait until he’s dead to give it away A lot of the world is hurting right now and these dick bags got billions

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let's say I have 1,000,000, and I'm getting a ROI on it of 15%. If I give away that $1M now, that's it-- it's gone. If I give away 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

10% of that each year, then my wealth is increasing, but over time, I can give away substantially more than $1M. Buffet makes *bank*, 2/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

but continues to try to give as much total away as possible. As he is a very smart investor, his RoI is probably higher than 15%-- he 3/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

does more good over a longer period of time by giving away less, and by directing its use in a sustainable way, particularly by 4/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, of course the Football field unit couldn't be missing from any American post about measuring things

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

It says Football Stadium. Seems fairly relatable to me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the same vein as #2: https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

That made my brain hurt. EAT THE RICH!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I scrolled to the end. No Easter egg. Very interesting though.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wish I read this first

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Net worth =/= liquid assets. At least 95% of his wealth is invested in Amazon and probably a few other companies.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is it moral that 400 Americans own $2.96T of stuff, regardless of what that stuff is? Could they not convert 3.3% of that into cash to 1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

eradicate malaria? Beyond morality, there would be significant economic benefits: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria#Economic_impact 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The arguments presented on this website are shocking, but they felt flawed to me. It was jarring enough that I will research further though.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Retarded

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you lay out a persons blood veins, vessels, capillaries, etc., end to end... they will die.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the Earth were shrunk to the size of a billiard ball, we would all fly off into space and die.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: Texas is so large, that you'd need a state the size of Texas to hold it all.

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

Texas is small. Try the state of Western Australia.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Texas is an above average man's penis. He's insecure enough about it to wish it was way bigger but he's not exactly disappointing anyone IRL

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fun fact, Idaho has the largest surface area of all states in the US

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or a state half as large as Alaska.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I still didn't understand some of these

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

someone dumbed them down too far and they feel a little stupid now.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I send gifts to friends in Pokemon Go.
6598 1518 5639

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Me too, friend

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Added!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#5 who tf decided "nuclear blast pressed against your eyeball" was the best analogy?

5 years ago | Likes 384 Dislikes 1

“A nuclear bomb” isn’t a measure of anything. It’s not even close.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I liked it

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

who even can measure this?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably lifted from xkcd. https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The same person who thinks someone else has been recording this planets history...

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I dunno, pretty sure everyone's familiar with that one. You're the odd one out here, bud

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An American probably

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It removes distance in calculating the light intensity. That's literally why.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

All of these are a little bit "who the hell thinks like this??" I guess thats the point?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm still puzzling over "wing span". Am I disabled and just never knew it?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was like, "that's dark...and bright."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably energy release to distance ratio. Possibly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know, something everyone can relate too.

5 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 0

It's very bright. Do not recommend.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can anyone relate to a supernova ?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

xkcd. I'm pretty sure whoever wrote this ripped it right out of his book, "Thing Explainer".

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Also got it wrong. Says 9x brighter. Reality is that a supernova is brighter by 9 magnitudes.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I think you mean "What if" - https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Will Wheaton does the audiobook reading for Audible and it’s always a favorite of mine to go back to every in awhile

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now I have more questions!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#5 is wrong. The people that ripped it off from https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/ don’t know that nine orders of magnitude means 1 billion times.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

#6 also contradicts what ive heard before. i heard it was the "head of a pin" which is significantly smaller than a pea. dont know which >>>

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is right, if either, but im gonna err on the side of "not siding with the infographic on imgur" for this one. #3 is suspect as well imo

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neither do you because it doesn’t? 9 magnitudes difference is a brightness difference of around ~4000 times

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, in my experience one would say it is 9 magnitudes brighter if they meant stellar magnitude, and orders of magnitude if they mean 10^9.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But maybe not everyone follows that convention. You might be right that he meant apparent magnitude.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to be fair, most people don't know that order of magnitude is logarithmic where values are relative to previous values. regardless, gets 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the point across, right. a supernova is so bright, it's a moot point anyways. supernova that close would end all the problems lol 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 who recorded history if not humans?

5 years ago | Likes 462 Dislikes 6

It's a very poor choice of words.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted May 18, 2020 10:49 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Reeeeeelaxxxxx... Breaaaaaaathe... Caress your taint gently...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Whiooooaaaaasa

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Historians and scientists.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's still history, even if is not recorded.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trees and their rings

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I read it like 5 times trying to understand wtf was going on

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Yeah, whoever created this doesn't know what recorded history is.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Did even get to the second one because this pissed me off so much.

5 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

Yep

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same haha

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Came down to ask the same thing -- couldn't focus after this

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Steve

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What's up?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Steve is in charge of the history before

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, my name is Steve and I thought you were trying to get my attention. Carry on.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You must know the history from before then

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rocks.

5 years ago | Likes 166 Dislikes 0

Yeah this album definitely has a rocky start to it.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Technically true

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

and ice

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Water rocks

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah they mean time instead of history, classic mistake.

5 years ago | Likes 166 Dislikes 1

"Recorded' literally means someone was documenting it in writing. It shouldn't say recorded at all.

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

Classic Doric or classic Ionic?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if he was trying to say big bang the caption needs work

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"duration of earth", 4.5 billion years, certainly not history.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

And even with that, you have to go forward to 3.5 billion years ago to get to the point where the planet was habitable for microorganisms.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

History is what the human race recorded. So "prehistoric" means "before there was history". Before we wrote shit down. Not when we existed.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, some historians have begun incorporating a Big History or Deep History approach to their work, looking at history that goes 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

back far beyond humans. It's not accepted by everyone as history, I'm personally not a fan, but they make the argument in favor of it. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

lame

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0