revcleo
66178
185
24
Student 1
Student 2
Professor 1
Professor 2
Professor 3
Professor 4
Professor 5
Professor 6
Found here https://www.reddit.com/r/LawSchool/comments/4rva9m/law_professors_response_to_blm_shirt_complaint/
teal deer:
Students: we dont like your t-shirt about BLM, we want you to not give your opinion, we want you to teach us stuff, our law school is suffering. arms crossed, huff and puff
Professor: fuck you. BLM is not a bad thing, youre upset about my tshirt lol, your letter is flawed and like not smart enough so here's how you could make it better. gg mic drop
DolleryDoos
Someone really hates free camping...
FlamingCabbage
The most eloquent smack down I've ever read.
elfTastic
I am favoriting this for important documents later. What an excellent way to summarise most of advanced comp.
gingersoultaker
Summary at the end is perfect
CrackingOwlSanctuary
r/thathappened
ohgeeRick
Even if this didn't happen there are so many valid points people don't realize when criticiZing BLM. This was done wonderfully, thank you!
debilitatedbychoicehelp
Nice. Also, what a colossal sense of entitlement amongst those kids, just, WOW.
ithrashanus
It's about 20 degrees cooler in this shade.
JerzeeTomato
LOUD NOISES!
[deleted]
[deleted]
revcleo
lmao nice
FlamingCabbage
Someone's printer is wonky.
revcleo
Or scanner tbh
ProbablyCrazier
While I applaud the post, your "teal deer" forces me to dislike it.
revcleo
It's not my tl;dr, it's from the reddit post. My tl;dr would be "Read the fucking post."
sorrynotsorryimnotcanadian
Sign me up for this guy's class.
jtn1978
'Tis a woman.
ShipoopiShipoopiShipoopiTheGirlWhosHardToGet
Wow, you completely misunderstood what the professor was writing.
elfTastic
Not really, those were definitely some themes. They've been internetted of course. I would say some larger points were left out in the tldr.
revcleo
https://www.reddit.com/r/LawSchool/comments/4rva9m/law_professors_response_to_blm_shirt_complaint/d54kpt2 did the tl;dr
Daridae
I would like to see the students response to his letter. I can poke holes in most of his critiques as easily as he did theirs.
lawrus
Only on the ones that are largely tangential to the central point. His critique of the "only" implication is spot on. However, his (1)
lawrus
inclusion of all the other "critiques"--esp. the ones that aren't really critiques--fly in the face of his advice in Part II about focus.
elfTastic
Nah, the overarching point was that this was a teachable moment, not a similarly persuasive letter. Hence captlztn in 2 about yelling at aud
Daridae
You throwin too many big words at me, ok, now because I don't understand them, I'm going to take them as disrespect.
lawrus
+1
thisaccountdownvotes
I read all that. That professor cast mad shade
Frosthawk87
How? Is he a really tall, really fat guy? Is he casting the shade on his students? They must be happy because this is a really humid summer.
eldeffie
That was not shade. That was a full-on in-your-stupid-face-attack!
thisaccountdownvotes
How did you find this? It's like a month old.
BitterExChristian
#blacklivesmatter
BitterExChristian
I'm telling you, that's how he found it, was by using the hashtag, but sure downvote this one too.
thisaccountdownvotes
I didn't. Must've been OP or eldeffie