This is the Protest Nobody is Talking About, Because it is Nonviolent in Nature.

Nov 1, 2016 11:22 PM

DaFunOne

Views

33354

Likes

1246

Dislikes

314

This is happening right now in Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, North Dakota

This is an organized protest lasting 2 months now against the Dakota Access Pipeline, a $3.7 billion investment to move 470,000 barrels of domestic crude oil a day through four states.

This is happening to protect sacred Native American lands which the pipeline will use.

As you can see, police have been used heavily to protect private property.

But damage to equipment and roadblocks have been done to try and stop the construction.

This has ensured a very heavy and continued police presence.

When people won't move or fight in any way, special bean bag shotguns and such have been used, and have caused minor injuries.

It is actually getting worse as more and more people from across the globe have joined the protest.

People are often arrested in minor clashes with police.

But overall the protests have been peaceful. No looting, no major injuries or attacks. Nothing of the sort.

Why, because they are organized.

And stand their ground peacefully in most cases, trying to block the pipeline, not do more damage.

They have spiritual rituals, and have created a huge encampment to house all the people joining the protests.

Most protests like this are well respected, despite their disruption. There is disagreements among the Native Americans about this entire ordeal in fact, and small towns in the area have suffered great inconveniences in commutes and commercial traffic. But this is not Ferguson, Baltimore, or Chicago. This is not violent and aggressive behavior towards people or non-related property. These people feel as strongly about this issue as others do about the current US race issue, but have chosen far more sensible means on taking a stand. They are not standing in a major highway, nor are they burning police cars, and they most certainly are not hurting anyone or any individuals property. They are not destroying businesses or killing people in anger. In the 60's when the US had major racial issues across the country, we saw mostly protests exactly like these. Organized movements with lots of people taking a nonviolent stand. And fortunately for all of us, it worked back then to desegregate America. Now these type of protests don't always work, but they convey the message, and need to be respected far more than anything the news media has covered in the last 2 years about our current race issues.

Whether or not this specific protest is something any of you agree upon is not the point i wish to make, but how people who have given up so much to stand for what they believe in are doing so in a far more professional and organized way. I just felt this needs to be discussed more. Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks.

Oh get off OP it's been on the news in the Netherlands and bunch of times already. Maybe you should do a little research first

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I live in MS and people are all over this story here. Hell some people from here are there protesting.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Literally EVERYONE is talking about this.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Please stop with the headline new stories that "nobody is talking about". It is cancer.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

NPR talked about it today... a whole show on it

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Nobody is talking about it.." Have you been on Facebook or the Internet in general recently?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's literally trending on Facebook

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The protest "everyone" is talking about.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I'm no longer sure what propaganda I'm supposed to believe anymore.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Much ado about nothing. Some people protest anything for their sense of identity.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Your definition of nonviolent and my own are very different.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It says they aren't looting. Look around, the only stuff around was the equipment they stole/destroyed. They hit 100% loot capacity.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol no looting, dude its ND theres nothing fucking there. But hey lets glass over that the protest is protesting something completely legal

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would you love them so much if they did this to an abortion clinic?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

title about non violent protest. Followed by pictures of violence from protest

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

Your forgetting the violent part where they cut the fence and trespasded to attack the workers, including injuring two k9 units

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Hey, I live like 15m from this ... just thought you should know.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So what's your take on it? Are they peaceful, and are the police violent?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just go on youtube dude. its pretty night and day

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

"The protest no one is talking about" that blows up my Facebook every fucking day.

9 years ago | Likes 246 Dislikes 9

Where's Magua when you need him, I wonder?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not covered by news outlets as much as BLM stuff or Trump sign vandalism.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Is NPR, Fox News and MSNBC not a news outlet anymore?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"As much".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Peaceful" but has pictures of two dump trucks burnt up....okay...

9 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 13

Property damage isn't necessarily violent. Human life > property.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 25

While human life is more valuable that property. Damaging property is inherently violent on some level...sorta needed for the word damage

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Don't forget the lady who was arrested for attempted murder of a police officer when she shot at them.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

"Non-violent": Other than the attempted murder of a cop.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 12

"Please the cops over exaggerated when she shot three times" - said a bunch of these retards

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I've read that a lot of the people protesting aren't even from around there and the native residents think these people are making them (1)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

are blocking their roadways. I've heard ya just a bunch of liberals wanting to get attention. But again, idk how reliable that source is.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

bad. Because of the protesters the locals have to drive 49 miles out of there own way to get where they are going because these people (2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Nonviolent in nature" --> "damage to equipment and roadblocks have been done" Is there something I'm missing?

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 2

well, if "violent" means in regards to harming other people then that's accurate to what was said

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Comparatively nonviolent if you take into account the usual way 'protests' go in the US.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You're missing the brain damage required to allow that much cognitive dissonance.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

They are also claiming that it will hurt the environment. That's why they lit the tire fire.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I can tell that wiki article is bullshit since they claim "# Barrels of crude spilled" on fields that use hydro flooding which means one 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Barrel of crude" is actually just one barrel of produced water which had like 5% oil in it. TMYK

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I also like the reasoning scabab has, the oil companies pollute so that means protestors can too. Mom never taught the two wrongs lesson.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everyone is talking about this. They have destroyed property, fired at police, trespassed, and killed livestock. They are far from peaceful.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

BULL. SHIT.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

I haven't seen anything that would indicate that, excluding partisan "news" blogs with .wordpress links.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

I was fine with all of the comments....but then i found yours. It is statement like this that cause problems. A lot if what you said is unde

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 15

To be fair trespassing and arson accusations are easier to prove, since everything has been recorded since day 1.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

R investigation and has not been tired to the protest. Respect our law enforcement and respect our citizens. Don't spend bullshit!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Spread, sorry

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Who else would shoots cattle with arrows? Unless thats a setup.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yeah it's certainly true of that there is no doubt. There are literally dozens of witnesses

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There's no looting because it's in the middle of nowhere.

9 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 14

Thank you!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Actually the protesters have been stealing and slaughtering cattle so there's that.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

source?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

http://www.tsln.com/news/stolen-butchered-livestock-near-dakota-pipeline-protest-site/ I've heard of horses and cows going missing and 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I've got friends in the area that have had to take their herds in because they're afraid of losing some. I'm from about 2 hours West of it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Have they really?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Horses and cows from what I've heard. Friends in the area have moved their herds in to avoid any potential loss.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Here is an infodump post (not mine): http://imgur.com/oeClKM8 The company did everything they could to avoid sacred land.

9 years ago | Likes 178 Dislikes 29

Thanks for the link. It's a good read

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

The company claims they did everything they could, and that ignores the water issue completely. Almost like they're shilling for corps.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

ok but pinch of salt here: it was ALL native american land before america invaded only 300 years ago and proceeded to fuck it all to fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 18

It was a war of conquest. They lost. That's like saying Celts have rights to all of Gaul (France.)

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Thank you!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That post is biased. People didn't "voluntarily" give up land, it was taken thru eminent domain by a private corporation forcing it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh yeah, the post that copy pasted Storefront and used the Daily Caller as a primary source. Nice info dump there, sonny.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

BTW the Army Corps of Engineers has said they don't have the right of way for the pipeline, since the ACoE has it. So pretty much that...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

whole thing is trash, since they could've have built a pipeline right next to where the new one will go, since they don't have right of way.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Just as a cautionary note- OP allegedly copied and pasted that from Stormfront, and uses some shaky sources. Just approach with skepticism.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

If I recall, that source is more than a little biased.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

There's 2 credible sources. 1(Reuter's) says there is no easy work around and the other is a US gov link describing the water pipes

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

anyone have cited sources for this info?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I didn't read any of it myself, but that's where the image is from.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you read it you would of saw the sources

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is neither a racial or cultural issue. The pipeline company bent over backwards for them. These people just want to cause trouble.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Which is fair because they've been shit on for a couple hundred years but this isn't really the place for it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Agreed. Did you read the judges ruling on their case. Pretty much sums up everything the public needs to know.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

When the pipeline company dies I will be content.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Pipelines make your life easier in so many ways you don't even know.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Until they bust, and then they don't. There are better sources of energy out there. Time to split the oil monopolies and let something good

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We don't have the tech or infrastructure to quit oil. And we won't for decades

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We do. But theres a bloody monopoly on energy, and it needs to go.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

replace them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I live in bismarck and these "peaceful protests" are bullshit. The natives are just pissed because dapl offered them money 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

To go across their land and the natives got greedy and wanted more money so dapl decide to go around the reservation because it was cheaper

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

And not to mention the natives were shooting at the cops not even a week ago. Bless those poor cops and their families

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

And they were shooting and killing and ranchers cattle and buffalo there too.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

I too live in bismarck, one shot is not shooting (not exceptable either way) and the cattle/bison killing, missing, is under investigation.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The numerous shots that were heard were believed to be hunters. Respect our law enforcement by spreading truths not lies!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Shhh everyone out of state is afraid of offending the natives with facts like that. They can protest all they want on the rez. Once they 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Start burning and sabotaging private property people are bound to get arrested.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

What do you mean? Everyone's talking about it. I live thousands of miles away and it's on all the news.

9 years ago | Likes 480 Dislikes 9

I live in California and never heard of this

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's in the news on England.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Never heard of it but I live in Finland so

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I was going to say the same. It's on the news often and I only watch it a couple of times a week.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most American news agencies are not reporting on the protests, just occasional briefs

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live in Australia and it's the first time I've heard about it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You must live in Adelaide

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope. Qld.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hahahahahahahhaha I thought the same thing and I'm a year late to this post

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I haven't seen it on the news once in the us

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our national news service has one article about it on sept. 8th. That's all. Only heard about it through Imgur and foreign media. (EU)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Germany's Spiegel has its last item about it at sept. 17. Don't know how big the protest really is but it's far from 'all over the news'.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 12, 2018 7:35 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I live in Qatar and hear about it often. Mainly through a half blooded native american from ND who has lived and worked here for a decade.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Is he allowed to leave though?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol.....but seriously that can be difficult.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why I said it, I know a guy who can't get out. He's paid better than most people who get stuck there but

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 12, 2018 7:35 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why not both?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think he meant love.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People who don't use social media don't know about it. It's not being covered by televised news networks or newspapers

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 48

Down in New Zealand and this is the first time I've heard about it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I beg to differ, my grandma was talking about it and she doesn't even know what the internet is

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's been on tons of News outlets.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um... I've heard it on the nightly news here in Southern California as well as on NPR.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is in montreal. Not front page/headline but it's there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Incorrect Friendo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes it is being covered by national and statewide media.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Exactly! Except it TOTALLY IS.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just read about it in my local paper rofl. I swear every fucking news story I see here 'isn't being covered by the media!'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, this is the first I'm hearing of it from PA.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live in New Zealand and I know about it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's on the news.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

It is on NPR

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I've been hearing it on NPR for a while. Love their coverage,

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I listen to MPR every day and it's just now getting some attention. this has been going on for much longer than the last 6 weeks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's on MSNBC every few nights and I've caught it briefly being discussed on Fox awhile back

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Minnesota it is.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

It was on the news here in Portland OR

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cause we live right next to it..

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not in NC, MD, or TX

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

As far as I know. These are just placed either I live or where people who I've talked to said they had no idea about NODAPL till now

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heard about it on the news several times. I'm in Houston TX.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not true live in MD. It's on the nightly news.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's everywhere.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Somehow I feel like this has got to be incredibly illegal considering that those lands were set out specifically to segregate the Indians...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... out of lands that were to be used by earlier Americans. Now it seems that now that land is wanted back?.. that's gotta be a huge no no

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd like to preface this by saying I agree with the protestors on this whole issue, but it's not nearly that simple.They're protesting (1/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

B/c the pipeline passes under the Missouri River, which supplies the drinking water for the reservation (so any spill could contaminate (2/?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their entire water supply) and that it would limit their access to culturally significant land; it doesn't actually pass through any (3/?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure the pipeline is Only going near tribal lands, that the tribes ok'd the project, and the protest is basically "what if it leaks?"

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 9

They weren't given critical information in order to make an informed decision. And it's kind of a matter of when, not if.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

They were given every opportunity to get involved beforehand and they didn't.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seems like I've heard of that happening before!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It does seem familiar. I wonder if any beads were involved this time?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They most certainly were given critical information.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Could they not do research? Or lawyer up? I feel bad for these people but if they didn't try to protect themselves then i cant back them.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They did file an injunction, I believe, but a judge denied it. They are appealing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Research would involve hiring their own team of scientists etc. and they negotiated the deal under false pretenses so, meh?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Awwww, downvote fairies!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because you're wrong. They refused to meet with the ACoE on the matter. They had options.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Agreed, meh.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah deals like this take months if not years to get all parties lined up sounds like sellers remorse or leaders moving without consent

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Army corps and the construction firm tried to meet with them. They basically refused. It was documented in the trial so that's why they lost

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're claiming they own the land due to some 200 year old treaty no one can find. Meanwhile the oil company has a deed to the land.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They're protesting the pipe because it'll run under a water supply, and because it supposedly crosses "sacred" land.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The water supply that is scheduled to move before the pipeline is complete. And I've yet to find land natives don't think is "sacred."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it's not theirs, it's sacred and should be theirs. I'm embarrassed for my people...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And that's the history of the US in a nutshell. Native Americans think they own white people's land, but here, look at this paper

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Do, you live in the US? If so, when are you selling your land to the near by Natives? You are, right? Such a good man.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OMG you are right, because I don't want to give my land away, that means America wasn't stolen through genocide! Oh thank God

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, that isn't what I was saying at all. But if the issue offends you, you can do something about it. Being snarky on the internet,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh extra bonus post. Read up on the Natives of CT. We had some fun ones. Just in case you need the illusion of the 'Noble Savage' broken.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0