Rome's Republican Legions

Apr 10, 2016 12:45 AM

Views

38123

Likes

1419

Dislikes

12

Background info about the Polybian/Manipular Legions

In this certain phase, the state did not give troops arms and armor, that would be reserved for the reforms of Gaius Marius in 105 BC, and most commonly associated with the Roman Empire. During this time, the system of roles in the battlefield was superimposed on an older class based on wealth and age originating during the Roman Kingdom, traces of which still remained.

At this time it was a conscription based system, and each province had to raise a specific amount of troops for the campaigning season. This number varied, depending on the threat on hand. The age requirement was usually 17-46, though this could change as well. After the Battle of Cannae, the recruiting age was lowered (though it was not specified how much it was lowered).

Property qualifications had to be met in order for Romans to actually join once the call to arms came. The Romans mostly would have needed enough land to support a family, or 400 Greek Drachmae (Wiki says 1 Drachmae = 46.50 US dollars. So 46.50 x 400 = 18,600 USD). Anyhow, this was because they were expected to provide their own arms because either the state did not want to spend its own money, or could not. Another reason is that property owners would have been more or less literally fighting for their own homes which would have made them fiercer fighters.

At this time, the Romans did not have a standing military. Rather, there were often campaigning seasons, when consuls would ring the call to arms, and everyone would join up. Each campaign's length would have varied but as time went on, the wars became longer and longer, often taking place out of Italy. It was for this reason that the Roman military would soon become a full-time occupation with a standing army.

Velites (Latin for “fast men”)

These were the youngest or the poorest men of the Republican Legions, and they were stuck in the skirmisher class due to their poor wealth and experience as infantrymen. They were equipped with a small circular shield, a gladius, numerous javelins (similar but not exactly the same as pila), and wolf heads for identification on the battlefield. Sometimes the slightly richer Velites could afford helmets to provide some meager protection. After they had accumulated enough wealth or proven themselves in battle, they moved up to the Hastati class of infantry. When out of battle, these men could have been used for special missions, foraging or scouting.

The Velites were organized into maniples of 120 men. It is possible that they did not actually have officers of their own, and would have attacked as a single swarm or in waves.

Hastati (Latin for “spearmen”)

Slightly older than the Velites (Hastati were typically in their early twenties or late teens), they were richer and as a result, could afford better equipment. They changed their equipment to reflect their new role on the battle field, that is to say, become the heavy infantry we all know and love. As a result, they were primarily armed with the scutum, gladius and two pila. And because of their wealth, they could buy body armor. This body armor typically consisted of a small bronze plate called a pectorale or a tri-disc plate, both of which covered the chest region. They would also buy helmets for themselves, often just a simple bronze bowl with cheekpieces. Sometimes they would employ a bronze greave on their left leg.

They were the first in the line of battle, as the Romans used a checkboard system of sorts. After the Velites were done fighting, they would have stepped up to try and hack a bloody path through the enemy lines.

The Hastati were organized into maniples of 120 men. They, unlike the Velites, had their own officers.

Princeps (Latin for “first men”) - Princeps on left. Triarii right, Hastati rear row

These men were of their mid to late twenties, and had gained lots of experience in the art of war and had some considerable wealth. Most would have upgraded to chainmail, and purchased additional equipment, like a greave for the left leg or a new helmet. But as for the most part, it is likely they would have kept whatever equipment they had received while a Hastati.

They were in the second line, used as a reserve just incase the Hastati failed to break the enemy. If the Hastati did fail, the enemy were tired and injured, and the Princeps were well-rested and were even better than the Hastati. Most enemies of Rome would have failed at this point.

The Princeps were organized into maniples of 120 men.

Triarii (Latin for “third men”) - Triarii on left, Hastati right

These guys were the pinnacle of Roman might. However, they were armed slightly differently compared to their sword armed counter-parts. They retained the Hasta, the thrusting spear, a holdover from the older phalanx style the Romans used during the reign of kings (no not that shitty medieval DayZ game). However, they still used the Gladius as a backup weapon. They were also the oldest, and the wealthiest, and therefore it is often correct to assume that they were heavily armored and very well experienced.

These guys were the last in the line of battle. If everything else went to shit, victory were solely upon these guy's shoulders.

The thing to realize about Triarii, was that there was not many of them. Therefore, they were organized into half sized unit sizes. While this may have severally limited their combat capabilities, their experience made them exceptionally fierce fighters. Therefore, they were organized into half-maniples of 60 men.

An Equites (Latin for "horseman") fighting a Greek peltast

Unlike the infantrymen, these men, or rather, politicians were mounted atop horses. Just in general, they were the richest, their wealth was comparable to that of a Triarii, though their political background did matter. A bit like the Triarii, they were armed with a Hasta, to give them an advantage over sword armed infantry/cavalry in charges. But, they were also given small circular shields like the Velites, as they could not carry the twenty pound scutum on horse back.

The Roman Equites would have actually looked more like Greek cavalrymen, since they mostly borrowed like all of their equipment from the Greeks. However they would have differed slightly, perhaps in the use of chainmail and local variants of whatever Greek equipment was available for production.

Bonus info: The Equites class was extinct by the time of Julius Caesar. Some time between 102-58 BC, the cavalry class was entirely abolished, at least for the Romans. Auxiliaries filled the gap now, but the young politicians eager to serve would have become officers who were still mounted on horseback, though they would almost never participate in direct combat.

The Equites were organized into turma of 300 men.

The Socii Legions/Alae (Allied troops to the Romans) derping around

To put it bluntly, these men were essentially the auxiliaries for most of the Republican period. They were recruited from areas and peoples conquered by the Romans, so they would have recruited from Tuscany or Sicily, to name a few recruiting places. However, they were not Roman citizens which was probably why they were segregated. This type of segregation led to the Social War of 90 BC, where most of the non-Romans fought for citizenship. After this, all of Italy was given citizenship, and they served as normal legionaries, whereas barbarians would have been auxiliaries.

We do not know much about the Socii troops, who were drawn up from territories conquered by the Romans. But from what we can deduct, is that their organization, tactics and equipment was largely the same and used the same system. However, we do not know much about their training, but because the Socii were placed on the wings of their Roman counterparts, we can say that perhaps, they were not as reliable in combat.

They compromised half of the Roman army, and provided most of the cavalry, as much as three times the number of their Roman cavalrymen. And similarly, they had a small force comparable to that of the Triarii, called the Extraordinarii. They were handpicked by their generals and were at his immediate disposal, and as their name would suggest, they were quite in fact, extraordinary troops.

Misc Notes

After this I might do a short post on the Servian system that came before the Polybian system, though there's not really a whole lot to talk about. My last (and first) post did horribly, so here's hoping to this one goes over well.

I mostly did this in response to the newest Roman post on the FP right now. Link: http://imgur.com/gallery/ki1ut

Sauces used (for further reading if you wish)

The Complete Roman Army by Adrian Goldsworthy

Soldiers and Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity by J.E. Lendon

An Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Uniforms of the Roman World by Kevin F. Kiley

The Roman Army A Social & Institutional History by Pat Southern

Ghosts of Cannae by Robert L O'Connell

Quality post sir. +1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ha, I knew all that. Thanks, Total war

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fun fact the Lorica Segmentata that is synonymous with Roman soldier was actually used for a competitively brief time compared to mail armor

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This has got to be the most well educated, well organized, informative post I've ever seen. Please, PLEASE do more

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That middle guy definitely shit his pants

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Informative, interesting and not an Ali repost. +1

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Upvote for learning

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ONLY BARBARIANS WEAR PANTS!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whoop, my classic civ course is finally useful

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While political equites were non-existant during the Principate, there were elite equites of naturalized Auxilia, who were part of the 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Praetorians. They were the handpicked guard of the emperor and the best cavalry in the empire until the formation of the Scholae 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd be shit with a spear.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Going to the Triarii" was a saying in Rome well into the Empire, it meant: going the distance, or, to the bitter end.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

He's going the Triarii. He's going for Velites

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They'll poke a pole in your time of need.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good choice of post OP.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/ It might be worth noting that for much of Rome's early history, they did not use the Gladius, which was copied from tribes in Spain

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ during the 3rd century BC. Also, the Romans learned the manipular system from their wars against the Samnites in the 4th century BC

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but apart from all of those things, what have the Romans ever done for us!?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a history buff, Love the historical posts.. keep it up +1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How to build an empire: Make social advancement dependent on military success.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I graduate I want to buy those huge history books with illustrations like the first image above. I miss flicking through them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really need to get back to my massive Rome: Total War 2 session and finally conquer the world.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never forget 1453 A.D.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this feels like my exam.... +1 for decent sources

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The checkerboard strategy is really interesting in battle. Anyone interested in learning about that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

helps with a project I'm working on, thanks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rome: Total War, (the original), you started the grand campaign with a unit of Triarii. Those tough motherfuckers survived the entire game.

9 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 0

i can still remember them shouting "Triarii" whenever you clicked them

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Down to 3 men at one point, I retrained them back in rome, and they would roll entire armies with almost no support.

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

I managed to get a few of them from the Senate missions. 1 unit of those guys can hold a city on their own in street fighting

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Once I sacrificed my general to save them

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The hell were you fighting that triarii needed saving from?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Must have been cheat code oliphants

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was aware of many of the facts in this post already from having played R:TW. Thanks for the entertainment and education, Creative Assembly

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

That's what I was thinking.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Got nerfed to hell in Rome 2. Can barely hold a line without taking extreme casulaties

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rome 2 was just depressing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I enjoy Rome 2, though. I never played one, though. I also bought it years after realese.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My personal favorites were always the Arcani. I had read up a lot on the Roman military but had never heard of them. They were badass!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure it's because they were invented for Total War. A bit similar to how accurate an Egypt would have been almost identical to Greece

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I suspected as much. Though considering such a long-lasting empire, I'd be surprised if Rome didn't have some kind of secret warrior cult

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, Mithraism springs to mind, though they would just be part of the regular military rather than dual-wielding ninjas.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, maybe the Arcani were a reference to the more cult-ish side of the Romans. But yes, while a bit over the top, the ninjas are fun :D

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

damn i need to get my PC back and get back into the total wars

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've been cracking out on Total War: Warhammer. It's amazing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Medieval 2 with the Deus Lo Vult 6.2 (Crusades) or Europa Barbarorum 2.1 (Roman Empire) is the way to go.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah, empire and shogon i both thought were good too, i liked the ship battles as slightly unrealistic as they were! ha

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

empire was ok, but the performance was bad and there was mostly line-combat with rifles, quite boring. Shogun2 was great but archers were op

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years of patches and bug fixes really made empire a strong game after its garbage launch and reboot as napoleon.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ROMANES EUNT DOMUS!

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Romans eat donuts?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Brilliant movie, I know

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's this then? "Romanes eunt domus"? "People called Romanes, they go the 'ouse"?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

It says, "Romans go home. "

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No it doesn't. What's Latin for "Roman"? Come on, come on!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Monty Python's Life of Bryan reference

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Aug 17, 2016 2:23 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Goes like...?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0