He isn't regarded was one of the world's top propagandist of all time for nothing

Dec 17, 2016 12:35 AM

Ventura2099

Views

76906

Likes

1563

Dislikes

79

Meh, History...we are doomed

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

@boobcat

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly I'm surprised this post wasn't downvoted to hell as it normally is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Goering was commander of the Luftwaffe... Goebels perhaps?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I like that people are arguing about the origin of a meme depicting mass propaganda in the comments here.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Dec 17, 2016 7:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's how propaganda works.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you can tell something is propaganda. It isn't working the way it should.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*on you. It may work on millions of other people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the deal. You're either a leader or a follower. Since most don't want to be leaders, you choose who to follow. Make the choice.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Wat th hek z gonna on here?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gee, I wonder what you're trying to say...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The grammar police have arrived. The future is past tense.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That title is a bit of a mess.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do the words not ring true? Don't care if this is a quote from Ricky Bobbi.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not from the Nuremberg Trials. From Goebbel's diary.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

regarded was one

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Goebbels

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SS delivered.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Luftwaffe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you're referring to the Head Chef of Proper stanza, Steve Gaburble.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chief of propaganda was Joseph Gorbels

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 6

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Grobels is in Glasgow

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you mean Joseph Gerbils

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Joseph Turkeyman

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Turkey Stuffingjosephman

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No wait, Turkey Stuffingham the second

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Goebbels*

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Gobbles

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Trump is for peace and Prosperity. We voted right. WarHawking Obama and HRC, we dodged a bullet.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

Boots on the ground against ISIS is peace? Crazy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could have had Bernie, we donked up

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The way he completely rolled over for clinton soured him to me.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Dear all: Goebbels wasn't at Nuremberg due to being fucking dead. Goering did say this, but it was horseshit then and still is now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How is it horseshit? That's how propaganda works. We've seen it repeatedly.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We're seeing it today.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, we are.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think you meant 'as'... I starred at the title for too long trying to make sense of it.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

Lol it confused you for that long?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Auto correct

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

More like auto incorrect.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think you meant "stared"... I stared at your comment for too long trying to make sence of it.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I did. I also think you meant 'sense' it briefly looked over your comment and noticed that.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Yah, my bad. Also I think you meant "I"... I briefly looked over your comment and noticed that.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

God dammit, I give up. lol

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Aw, I thought we were doing it on purpose... but then I forgot to misspell something in my last comment... :. \

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's bad enough that it's true, but it's even worse that it still works after everyone has heard this. Our history education really sucks.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Absolutely true, lack of education nearly always being a part of the game plan of governments/regimes like Nazi Germany.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Eh. It's less a lack of information, and more that patriotism and nationalism are both very strong social forces. Every country has lots of1

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

people with all sorts of different views. To bring all those people into an organized polity where everyone, at the very least, buys into 2/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the idea that they're part of a broader country is really difficult. Germany in the 1800s, for example, required a massive nationalist 3/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

movement to create the country we know today out of numerous little princedoms and fiefdoms. Or look at pre (and post) revolution U.S. 4/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

where colonies (later states) saw one another almost as distrustful foreigners. 5/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think you're thinking of Goebbels.

9 years ago | Likes 281 Dislikes 6

I agree. Definitely Goebbels

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Goebbels should be considered one of the evilest masterminds of all time. His teachings are used everywhere by bad people to convince masses

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He has done a terrible damage to modern society because he taught a way of messing with the society's mind to do whatever they want.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Gerbils.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Why aren't you voted higher? Let's remedy that.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Can someone explain this to my friend?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The quote is correct, and correctly attributed, but Goering wasn't the Nazi Minister of Propaganda.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1/3 Yess that could be true. Seen as that Goebbels was the minister of propaganda and he was very productive and quite succesfull in it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3/3The quote is in fact his but he was not the greatest propagandist in the world or even of the Nazi's.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't quote me on this, but I believe the quote should be attributed to Joseph Goebbels instead of Hermann Goering

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, this is a Goering quote, Goebbles is just the one who actually did it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not that versed on Nazi quotes. I was just explaining the other comment about it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/3Though he wasn't alive at the time of the trials (killed himself after the fall of Berlin)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or faked his death and moved to Argentina.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... the funny thing was the experiments they did trying to prove him wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which experiments?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... all of them trying to prove that evil can be found in some malady or deformation of the mind, rather than in the hearts of every man.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Millgram Experiment, Stanford Prison experiment, all those scientists searching for aberrant brain structures and the study of Phrenology...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

found in the heart of every man? In addition, I don't understand how any of this is linked to phrenology (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They were really trying to prove the opposite.... and had very disturbing findings about how close evil really is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not following you. Weren't both of those experiments controversial because they seemed to show that "evil" as you put it, is (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then again, sometimes there *IS* a clear and present existential threat to a country and you'd be an idiot not to be for neutralizing it.

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 13

As long as neutralizing doesn't mean killing, I am all for that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like Covid! Plenty of people choose not just to ignore it, but willingly spread it with no care for others!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the acception of propoganda :]

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

Did you mean "acceptation?" Do you mean the prior commenter is "accepting" propaganda as true

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The Russians in world war 2?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

History is much more clear than anything we will personally encounter.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Of course. Just stating that it does occur. Difficult to sift through what we are shown by the media though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is in how you react to some other country following THEIR propaganda. Should France have never gone to war when invaded?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

neutralise? hell we elected it

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 8

I don't know many Americans that spell neutralize with an 's.'

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think spelling it with a Z looks weird. Both spellings are considered correct. Im definitely american

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The only thing I dread for the next four years is the left melodramatic hand-wringing. Lets make the safe spaces nice and quiet children.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

Fuck you. The only thing you'll see these hands do is flip you and your fake president the bird.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

I didn't vote for him but that doesn't make you and your ilk any less annoying.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

You are funny. It's annoying to care about things? Fuck you who ever you voted for.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I would be somewhat distressed if abortion is banned or gays face forced electroshock conversion therapy.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

None of that is going to happen. You're just proving my point.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah it's not like you have people in some of the most powerful positions in the country who wants to push for that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yea! Like Russia! Hacking our election! Hacking HRC!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

If you're more outraged by them hacking than you are about what was in the emails you never cared about a clean election to begin with.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 28

EXACTLY! Typically the dems and their media hacks don't think they did anything wrong. The truth got out about their unlimited corruption

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's obvious the emails were hacked, faked and given to WL! If you dont believe it you are LITERALLY HITLER!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For all I know it could have been a puss ed off tech savvy Bernie supporter who was pissed she fucked him over.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No you've got to get with the narrative. It was the Russians, WW3 with the Russians is preferable to a Trump presidency!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nobody is saying they weren't hacked prove who did it before creating an international incident!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*If you're more outraged by them hacking than you are about what was in the emails you have read the mails. There is nothing in them

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The emails hacked showed why they lost. Had they nominated Bernie he would have wiped the floor with Trump. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Abstained*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I said from day 1 the only way I would vote for Trump was if Hillary won the nomination. I would have obtained if Bernie won. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I feel this is how Trump got elected. Mixed that with selling ideas people wanting to hear vs what's actually plausible and voila.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 14

Definitely a bunch of fear mongering, yes - immigrants, muslims. But also because he was the only candidate promising real change.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

(Not that I agree with it, personally I think he's a horrible choice which will lead to some really terrible stuff, worldwide.)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

People dont want millions of muslims & illegal mexicans entering. Theres no middle ground - its open free for all or someone else: trump

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Trump blatantly lied to you, saying "your life is terrible because those other groups of people." All his promises meant nothing to him.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The thing is looking over the things he said after he became PE he clearly just said a lot of things just to win. I know any president 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 does that but hear me out. He's acknowledge multiple times (drain the swamp incident, send her to jail thing, etc) that he had no real

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 intention on doing it. He just new it was a good seller. Truth be told I didn't like Trump at first but now I realize he's brilliant.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 He played on what people felt and what sold rather than what he knew was actually plausible and he fucking won. That's genius if you ask

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Matters not whether theres a wall there, its whether adequate systems & policies r in place. Sanctuary cities are ridiculous criminal havens

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

I agree but the point I'm making is notice how his rhetoric changed. He practically went from "Yeah I'm going to do this!" to 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"Eh it's not that bad or that big of a deal." Honestly I'm not even upset I'm impressed. Previous presidents don't own up to it like he does

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Because he's suffers from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder and literally thinks he's a god, he can't *not* brag about duping voters.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

stepping out, ill reply to you in few hrs. pls dont reply to yourself .to read convo i have to click your name. do this >

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

< like this and person sees all notifications & replies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Fair enough but I'm essentially done. Trump supporter or not just look at how he's changed his message so drastically and see what I'm sayin

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sorry for late reply. I understand your point & i agree with it in part. Of coursed its embellished. i dont think going after clinton>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you say we are sold on a lie. Absolutely not true at all. His election is best thing for the western sphere in a long time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3< immigration policies for starters. Enough kowtowing to islam.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its how demos are trying to start a war with Russia currently. OH THEY ARE ATTACKING US! TRUST US ON THAT! DON'T BELIEVE THE FBI! BELIEVE US

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 16

And if you believe that Clinton/Obama want a war because Putin said they want a war, then you're believing Russia over the US. Why is that?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Then we have the fact that Clinton just wants a scape goat so her investors don't take their money back

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

I don't trust putin, I trust the FBI's statements. Clinton was majorly backed by media and Defense contractors who make bank on wars. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

What FBI Statements?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

was there a reversal. No evidence was given by the CIA to the public and FBI's proof is still in the public (points to internal DNC leak)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

FBI was against the findings of Russia hacking the us for months only after they've come under fire by the press/put in secret meetings (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

If you believe that Putin hasn't been attacking Europe/US with cyber warfare to make them weaker for Russia's gains, you're in denial.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Its a serious accusation to make. Where is the proof? CIA refused to share theirs with the ODNI while FBI has been transparent with findings

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

The CIA is still actively investigating the entirety of this, but the point remains that they are certain of this. And if you want to sit

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

it was someone Russian, and someone powerful pulling the strings. And Putin has already done this in several European nations.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So provide some evidence that it was even a Russian. All I here is half of our intelligence believes it was Russia.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

And it's not a serious accusation to say "I trust Russia over the US's intelligence agencies?" We know enough info as is to know that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No I trust The FBI and their groups more as they've given all the evidence they can to the public CIA keeps hiding it all and says TRUST US

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

there and say "Putin is telling the truth, the CIA is lying", then think about how insane, and how borderline treasonous that sounds.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

How treasonous is it for the losing party to claim the election was rigged and offering no proof?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Trump got elected because the Democrats took the rust-belt union workers who used to be the backbone of the party for granted.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 21

Why are you downvoted? Also, why did she ignore WI and M? Because she took them for granted. You cannot just expect people to vote for you.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Furthermore, you just cannot ignore, then admonish voters when they DARED vote for Stein or whomever. People's votes are NOT your propriety.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

The same places trump was campaigning like crazy in the last days of the election. And people are suprised that hillary lost.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'd say there's some truth in that and 140 characters isn't exactly the best way to fully elaborate but long story short: Hillary lost, he 1

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

2 knew what sold (not what was actually going to happen), It was different for a change, and people who thought they had no voice have one.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Why not both?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

If the election was effected by the Russians how did Hillary win the popular vote? Selective espionage/mind control?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

I don't follow your logic? They're not gonna be able to get 100% of the votes, they just did what they could and hoped it'd be 'enough'.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If Russian hackers have more of a say than the candidate nominated that speaks volumes for the candidate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Saying we have Intelligence that links Russia to the hacks is one thing claiming they influenced the election is another. I still 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3