Jun 20, 2019 7:35 AM
DaRYL35
996
19
5
69satanist
Russia plays the long game. Yuri attested to that.
Yasumibi
Considering that us supplies helped keep England from suing and also heavily supplied the Soviets, it's certainly possible
getadogupya
Without any of the participants acting the way they did, the outcome would have been... unpredictable.
Jowler
Well without the participants there wouldn't have been a war. Which would have been wayy better.
Guess we should have let the Nazis have their way then...
xXMidNiteXx
No humans = no human war..... makes sense
LaCroixJenkins
One rifle for two troops... Yes
ko0ji9hu82718
No friend, one man carried the rifle and one man carried the ammunition.
From what I have read( just as a glance).. They sent between 4 million and 27 million.. (I doubt the high, and question the low).. 1/2
2/2 I can not fathom the logistics of feeding the horde.... I feel the Battle of Stilegrad was brutal to the Germans.. And had them back off
AdamCoakley
the more interesting hypothetical war scenarios are "what if entered the war on the other side?"
agermanguy
Americans didn't want to be on the cool side fighting commies ?
Also, "what if Hitler didn't declare on the Soviets?"
ItIsStillWater
IIRC the German economy was not sustainable, so as long as the Allies could keep the war going the Germans would lose. But so would the Jews
Daloth
I prefer "what if Hitler let Rommel do all the military decisions and he just focused on publicity and speaking"
KnowmSaying
Thank god he didn't do that. Angry little meth head lost the war for himself.
of course most of europe would have been speaking german a long time too. The US and Soviets wouldve won eventually but it wouldve been hard
i mean he did only have one ball and a huge hormonal issues. but lets be fair. if rommel were in charge we most likely dont see the genocide
69satanist
Russia plays the long game. Yuri attested to that.
Yasumibi
Considering that us supplies helped keep England from suing and also heavily supplied the Soviets, it's certainly possible
getadogupya
Without any of the participants acting the way they did, the outcome would have been... unpredictable.
Jowler
Well without the participants there wouldn't have been a war. Which would have been wayy better.
getadogupya
Guess we should have let the Nazis have their way then...
xXMidNiteXx
No humans = no human war..... makes sense
LaCroixJenkins
One rifle for two troops... Yes
ko0ji9hu82718
No friend, one man carried the rifle and one man carried the ammunition.
LaCroixJenkins
From what I have read( just as a glance).. They sent between 4 million and 27 million.. (I doubt the high, and question the low).. 1/2
LaCroixJenkins
2/2 I can not fathom the logistics of feeding the horde.... I feel the Battle of Stilegrad was brutal to the Germans.. And had them back off
AdamCoakley
the more interesting hypothetical war scenarios are "what if entered the war on the other side?"
agermanguy
Americans didn't want to be on the cool side fighting commies ?
Yasumibi
Also, "what if Hitler didn't declare on the Soviets?"
ItIsStillWater
IIRC the German economy was not sustainable, so as long as the Allies could keep the war going the Germans would lose. But so would the Jews
Daloth
I prefer "what if Hitler let Rommel do all the military decisions and he just focused on publicity and speaking"
KnowmSaying
Thank god he didn't do that. Angry little meth head lost the war for himself.
Daloth
of course most of europe would have been speaking german a long time too. The US and Soviets wouldve won eventually but it wouldve been hard
Daloth
i mean he did only have one ball and a huge hormonal issues. but lets be fair. if rommel were in charge we most likely dont see the genocide