Nothing a good 'ole book burning party can't solve. 

Aug 30, 2017 5:43 PM

Views

197437

Likes

5216

Dislikes

405

Every day things get closer and closer to idiocracy.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Where they burn books, in the end they will burn people

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

I don't think the folks trying to take down statues read books or they wouldn't have started with Robert E Lee.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 19

The guy who disbanded the confederates who wanted to continue to fight and was Lincoln's first pick to lead the union armies.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 12

We shouldnt nan stuff like this so we can learn from the errors of our past. Not recreate it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wait till they find out about museums

8 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 11

Museums are for queers! No really that's how these kind of people think.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

These are the uneducated /brainwashed, They'll never see inside a museum for fear of being proven wrong, or contradicted to their beliefs.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Moving public statues into museums is more about "not celebrating" your dark history. Nobody is erasing anything.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Silly educated black man! Them southern white folk can't read!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Put those Saddam statues back up! Its important to history!

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Who is saddam? His statue went down so we have no historical record of him

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Where were these history enthusiasts when they gutted CBGB's?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This seems silly. How many of these statues have been destroyed? Sounds to me like they're just moving most of them.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

If people want the statues to stay for the sake of "history", can we please remind them of slavery every single day?

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

Sure, most people have ancestors that were slaves in any given ethnic group, depending on the era.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

I'm sure a few extremists think this, but otherwise these two ideas are diametrically opposed. The museum relocation idea is very popular.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I would love to hear what these Confederate-defenders would say to a statue honouring Nat Turner or Malcolm X, lol. Watch the fury then!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Like the one in Harlem? It's fine. Humans are complicated.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of sumbitch or another"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When they learn of museums it will really blow their tiny minds.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I thought one of my tweets got posted! Then I remembered that I don't have twitter. And I'm not a black man.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

“The good writers touch life often. Mediocre ones run a quick hand over her. Bad ones rape her & leave her for the flies.” Fahrenheit 451

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And to be fair Texas and southern states have a lot of say in what is printed in books.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The problem with the statues is that they glorify and memorialize these people. Education about them is necessary. Glorification is not.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 9

Statues of people are meant to be looked-up to as exemplars. Oh, and to remind negroes that whites are always watching them.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

It doesn't "glorify" them. They are all there as a reminder as to never repeat all of the bad things that happened in history.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 19

...Usually if you're building statues to commemorate tragedies you build statues of those who suffered, not the torturers.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This is just patently false, the statues were erected to glorify them as paragons of the time.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

And museums! They even have museums for racists, I bet!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Oh yeah, public education will help. Pfffffffft.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most of the statues need to be relocated but history in books is all but ignored

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

i know! i cant remember the last time i left my house and i wasnt assaulted by a book flinging itself at my face and making me read it!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would make things easier :/ "THERE ARE NAZIS HERE AND -" *Rise and Fall of the Third Reich to the face*

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 for the caption.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

For hate groups, it was never really about the statues.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Oh it was to an extent. Much like the swastika confederate imagery has become synonymous to them with their ideals. That's why some are >>

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

willing to kill for their symbol.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

All these folks thrilled to have the statues come down will be shocked to realize that it did nothing to reduce racism.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

So like I get it. Slavery is bad and having statues of slavers is bad. But then if it was any other historic statue it would be an outrage

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Including Egyptian work aka the biggest slavers on the block for a few hundred years.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Yep, gotta tear down those Pyramids next.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Because no one is carrying the flag of some pharaoh and associating with him and what he went to war to preserve.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most americans aren't saying bring back slavery. The monuments are dedicated to those that fought for southern ideals due to the increasing

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gulf between southern and northern ideals mainly due to the lack means to travel and limited communication. The separated into different

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cultures and when Lincoln proposed an end to slavery they felt so detached it would be like another country trying to ban their main export

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

except the pyramids being build by jewish slaves is a myth.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

still built by slaves

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah and statues of that slave owner Washington

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never said anything about pyramids or Jewish people. Egyptians had many slaves from multitude of back grounds and religions.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the reason they pull down statues is because statues are a way or honouring, or celebrating people's lives, not because it's history

8 years ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 24

Yes. Idolatry =/= historical memory.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Yes, and the people whining about preserving history aren't really interested in true history - just their rosie-lensed view of it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

No. As black person they should not be destroyed

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I think they should leave them all... BUT add a sign that says "I had really stupid ideas and lost on the battlefield"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Seriously, it's baffling how people have a hard time with this concept...but then again there's a lot of baffling things going on these days

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

They're pulling Confederate statues down because they're like the OLDEST form of participation trophies.

8 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 12

God, I wish I had more upvotes to give.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 12

It WAS a way of honoring someone's life but now it's history and out in public it's a reminder.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

No they have no context just flowery romanticized inscriptions. They don't belong in the front of public schools and gov. buildings

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

A reminder that the South doesn't view black people as human and they shouldn't have the same rights as whites.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How would you feel about Germany if it had a Hitler statue?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Not to mention they were placed strategically during times of white supremacist intimidation and violence as a reminder of who's in power

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Wow, the one person that got it right.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

You can make an argument about taking these statues down and moving them into museums, where they belong, because they are on public lands 1

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

But recklessly taking them down in protest? Please, let's just act rationally and petition government instead of rashly mobbing together. 2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Shitty state legislatures make it illegal for cities to do that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What if your governor passes a law that makes it illegal to remove them? I'm not pulling em down but I like seeing the cheap ones crumple

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

You're assuming these people are literate

8 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 44

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Aug 31, 2017 2:10 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's not.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

My first thought.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

That's why they need the statues! What we need to do is get some picture books for them. Or maybe some pop-up books!

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 13

With interactive popup bayonets!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

You had me at bayonets.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are tearing down statues because it hurts their butt, I would assume illiteracy as well. What next? The museums? Then what?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 20

No, just the statues erected to honor traitors but don't let that stop you from making your slippery slope argument.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Lmao yes, because you keep political sides from 100s of years ago, and know who traitors were. Piss off.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Traitors to whom? Enlighten me please, I don't want to slide off the slippery slope of Facebook clickbait top 8 arguments to avoid.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

how has this gotten so my uppers? are people in support of tearing down statues for the past?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 11

weird times, man

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously. It's about emotion, not logic.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

The current generation has confused feeling with thinking.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

You sure that isn't you? You seem pretty emotionally invested in those statues staying out in public rather than in museums. There's >>

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

also only one side in this that tried to kill multiple people about their emotional attachment to those statues.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I am very much against historical revisionism. Erasing the past condemns us to repeat it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because letting them take the statues can lead to taking other things. These items are art. Art is supposed to evoke a range of 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 14

Feelings including shock, horror, and anger.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Slippery slope fallacy.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Art that doesn't have to be there. It's an implied intimidation. "Don't vote. Don't seek police help."

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

If these statues were such a big deal, why weren't they taken down sooner?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

You're not the only one wondering that.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Because people have to have courage enough to ask. Sometimes that takes time.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Again, during Obama's reign, where Democrats had control, why was nothing done? It's mostly democrats demanding the statues of their former-

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

leaders, I mean Civil War statues being torn down now? Especially since Trump's administration is so fascist and oppressive.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

This didn't pop out of the blue. This was an issue that was, in fact, being discussed during the Obama era

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They've already banned a lot of books from schools since I've been in school. Like pretty much everything Mark Twain wrote.

8 years ago | Likes 1054 Dislikes 74

One of my old school librarians keeps a collection of banned books he lends to students.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its banned in elementary and junior high but taught in highschool wtf do you mean

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This would be a concern of mine but note that this isn't a national thing. No controversy reading his works in High School.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And completely unrelated to statues honoring confederates. Its the same idiot parents that get books banned for profanity and sex.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

My middle school English teacher gave us extra credit for reading banned classics. "There's this shelf in the back corner of the library..."

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's awesome. Which ones did you read?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

1984, To Kill a Mockingbird, and 2 or 3 others I can't remember off the top of my head

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Those are both good ones.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And in Sweden they change Pippi Longstockings...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but were they banned from schools that are near Confederate statues? I bet there's a huge overlap in that Venn diagram.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We read Huckleberry Finn in my senior year. And I just graduated earlier this year.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a liberal Im strongly opposed to this. Preventing access to this kind of information is tantamount to pretending it never happened

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The books still exist, you'll be glad to learn

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Time to move to a better school district. (if you have kids)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yep better censor perhaps one of Americas greatest authors for the use of one word they hear hundreds of times daily in the halls and online

8 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 11

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"From schools" is just vague enough to be technically correct while misleading you to believe this is widespread. Well done.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A politician or a lawyer in the making... =P

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hopefully there are more kids like me that will then seek out banned books to see what the fuss is about.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just so everyone is clear, a book being "banned from schools" and a book actually being banned are completely different things. Schools 1/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

are run based on tons of government-written rules. Those rules often restrict what subjects are taught, so a weird teacher won't spend 2/

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

two months just introducing their class to scientology or some shit. Sometimes books are ruled out, particularly for young kids. But 3/

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the books are still in libraries, and any parent who feels like it is free to have their kid read those books. 4/4

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We watched the original roots mini-series in 7th grade social studies. Boobs and all. The teacher had a copy of the book to lend out.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Wait... When? I was forced to read Mark Twain in school less than 15 years ago.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only book that was banned in my school was 50 shades of gray. Public school and graduated in 2013. All the classics were there.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

What about the Anarchists' Cookbook? That one's pretty universally banned, but it has no real literary value. some stuff is interesting,1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but a good chunk of it is just how to be a piece of crap human- how to steal identities, commit petty theft, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, there's a ton of bullshit in the comments. The actual bans vary wildly from place to place, and are all local.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Lol'd at the username

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well the books are still in stores & libraries

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No shit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

They also alter the books to make them more child friendly. Tell them when it came out and they will understand the context.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

my librarians from 6th and 7th grade had a banned book week, were you could check out some of the more recent books to be banned.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats awesome. Did you read any of them?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

actually, I did read one of them, I couldn't remember the name unfortunately.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a browsed through some (one of them was catch-22 surprisingly) and they looked like good books.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think its a bad idea to ban books anywhere.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

definitely agree.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They being a few concerned parents that end up changing a district for a while. They tend to get overturned once those parents leave.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are right.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

could also be downsizing. My highschool probably didn't have them simply because the library is now like one shelf.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

our school had banned books. they just needed an adults signature for permission to teach as it was to be read by those under 18

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Not in Mississippi!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm actually proud of my school cause we got Mein Kampf in the library

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good! I loved that book! It was a masterpiece of fiction; truly a classic. Seriously though, it really was an interesting book.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eeyup. I'll be shocked if the books I read about Aztec live sacrifices is still in HS accepted books.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are. The commenter literally admitted they made this shit up, as well.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is literally not true. Conservatives do most of the banning and it isn't about the N word. Twain is not banned widely at all.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

you can read in other places like idk libraries

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well that's disappointing

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guarantee you that people have been banning Mark Twain books since well before you were in school.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Im sure you're right. I graduated HS in 2001. Mark Twain is juuuuussssst a bit older than that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

lol. I'm just saying, there hasn't been some rash of censorship. People want monuments to white supremacy torn down, is all.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think they're illegal. They just don't assign them for summer reading.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just want to say that I think there is a lot of agreement across the political spectrum that banning books in schools is fucking stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's more a shitty overprotective parents thing than a left/right thing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

uh..what? did i miss a headline?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. It's isolated cases. Some districts ban other books. So, it's not across the board but huckleberry Finn has the n word. So. Ban.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

dafuck? you can say it in historical context... who the fuck is running these schools?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

School boards and angry moms.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's a bit of a stretch. Wasn't it just one school, and only The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn that was banned?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly, only that book, and only banned in Montgomery Co., PA. Hardly the same as "schools" banning "everything Mark Twain wrote."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alright alright. It was a bullshit statement I pulled right out of my ass but check it out I got like 300 points for it. What can I do now?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

IDK, continue being dumb?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

lol there's a school named Mark Twain near where I live and I'm from a very liberal city. DOWN WITH EDUCATION!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 26

Probably not for long.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It's not really liberals or conservatives, it's overprotective moms

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

You say "from schools" like it was a national decision. It was not a national decision.

8 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 9

And thank goodness for that.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Neither was the removal of statues.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

Were they national statues, though?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

National schools?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. every single one. I should know because I totally wasn't forced to read Mark Twain or John Steinbeck ever. =P

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 12

Seriously man, Poe's Law. Ya gotta mark that shit. Usersub is dumb as hell.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you telling me you've attended all 98,000 public schools in the US?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

yes. Every last one.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Well that is just damn impressive. Thats somethin like 140 schools per every day of highschool. lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Just because you didn't have to doesn't represent the other thousands of schools that are not your school.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

It depends on the school. Not only did I study Tom Sawyer in school, we had a lengthy discussion about why some of his book were banned.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

This. Banning books is a local thing, and other schools use it as a way to promote certain books. We had a whole "banned books" shelf in HS.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My school in upstate NY did the same! We also had a whole semester class on just the Holocaust and books about it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We literally read Fahrenheit 451, and discussed the dangers of banning books

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

F451 and 1984. Im so glad I got a chance to read those. I even bought 1984 a few years after graduation.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Them you had what is known as a "decent English class", a rarity.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Based on the replies here, I don't know if it's as rare as you think. Then again, I could be the wrong one. It's probably regional.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I don't think it's a unicorn, I exaggerated for missed comic effect there

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My bad. Jokes on the Internet are hard.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seriously? No one is going to point out that reading Tom Sawyer rather than Huck Finn is whitewashing why Twain is an important author.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I read Tom Sawyer in elementary school and Huck Finn in high school. If you ban either then you might as well ban the history textbook.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like I said, we talked afterwards about why some of his stuff, specifically Huck Finn, was banned. I don't think there's anything wrong 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

with reading Tom Sawyer over Huck Finn in that case. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bonus points to those who understand the whitewashing reference. You da man.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why Mark Twain? What's wrong with him? Where do you go to school?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

uses the "n" word throughout

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

In historical context...shudder

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They weren't banned when I was in school. I graduated in 2001.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

A lot have happened under the year 2000 when it comes to topics like racism and slavery, as you probably know. Apparently one work was 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

banned due to it using the N-word in it, which made some students uncomfortable. dventures of Huckleberry Finn from 1884 for example.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I graduated in 2005, Huck Finn was part of our required reading.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah we read Mark twain and I graduated in 2012

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Shush up. The adults are talking. /s

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Can someone explain why the fuck catcher in the rye was banned?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It encourages rebellion and there's sex talk and underage drinking. And the f word.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah ive read that as the reasoning at the time, but it just seems so... tame nowadays

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is a case of parents starting trouble in their own districts. They lose a gasket, call meetings, etc. Since school boards are local...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks! Still seems weird they found it "obscene", even in the 1950s

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

My daughter is 4 and 1/2 years old and I'll be damned if some of the Great American Classics are barred or not taught

8 years ago | Likes 322 Dislikes 11

You'll probably be damned then

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But the N word!

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

The best way to have these books never read again is to force children to read them in school, though.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Time to move to a better school district.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ironically, the "better" districts are the biggest banners, terrified of being judged by what happened 100 yrs ago.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

If they ban books then they're not better. Easy as that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4th grades nowadays are learning how to code. The only thing I know about coding is from the semicolon memes from Imgur.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

spend a little time on http://scratch.mit.edu

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your 4 1/2 reads Mark Twain?

8 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 4

No, she reads Samuel Clemens

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I did. Well I was 5 but close enough.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Someone HAS to explain it to me. :)

8 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 3

"There once was a big black guy named N****r Jim." "Daddy what's a ni-," "Go to sleep honey it's past your bedtime g'night". *runs out door*

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Your daughter will start school soon and they can teach her about what her gender is but not about history.

8 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 37

History is required in every public school. If someone didn't learn history, it is probably more because they made no effort to learn it.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I know that some public schools dont have the resources to teach some things well, but a student that is dedicated enough can learn anything

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What can and cannot be taught is almost always the result of parents complaining and not the teachers. Our job is to educate and

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

get thrown under the bus by people who think we're glorified babysitters, while dealing with ridiculous curriculum requirements

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

from business people who have never taught classroom, taken course about human development, and are getting paid by testing companies

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Went to public school and learned history just fine. Doing well for myself now

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

So did I in the 90's

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I graduated in 2013. Fairly recent still.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's retarded, pardon my eloquence. I'm seriously thinking about shelling out for private school. Fucking public system makes me sick.

8 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 22

As a high schooler, I just want to learn but schools fuck me over at every turn. I'm moving away from America if I have kids to somewhere <

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

> the public school system doesn't suck. I won't be able to do a private school on an indie game dev salary, and America sucks anyways. <

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Teacher here. We talk about history all the time with an emphasis in kids tracing back events to explain how people could feel that way. 1/3

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Starting in 3rd grade. 5th does reports on how WWI led to WWII and learn critical thinking for why things happened, not just lol ppl evul

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Do it. Your child's brain and soul is not worth saving the $10Gs+. Look into Montessori.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I went to Montessori public schools throughout elementary and middle school. Best thing my parents did for me.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bitch and complain each year about the cost of private school & then realize my children are getting a damn good education. Worth it.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

And that's what I would do, most certainly. Piss and moan about the money, when the end product isn't in sight yet, but I know it's worth it

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

As bad as public schools are there is no way private school can be as good as how expensive they are. Prices are ridiculous

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Teachers at private schools usually care a lot more both about their students and what they teach

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It's worth it. Your child's brain only develops once.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Considering by going to private they will actually get an education, I'd say it's pretty worthwhile.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Seriously. I would if I had kids.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 10

Did you two enjoy your right-wing mutual masturbation session?

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 42

Want to see me stick Nine Inch Nails through each one of my eyelids?

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3