I was asked to make a follow-up to my post from March:

Nov 9, 2016 10:23 AM

Gradieus

Views

705905

Likes

47848

Dislikes

1619

In March I explained in-depth how Donald Trump had already won the Presidency by implementing almost every strategy found in 'The Art of War' during the Republican Primaries. You can see that post here:

http://imgur.com/gallery/HO5TT

Needless to say I was right. Hillary had no plan against Trump. She used the same attacks against Trump that his Republican rivals did: he's a bigot, a racist, a blah blah blah. That didn't work in the primaries and it didn't work in the general election.

As I stated back in March there is no political strategy to beat Trump. He's not playing by political rules, that's the whole point. I did see two paths to beating him, and neither was about Hillary: The first strategy was Bernie winning the Democratic Primaries. He had the swag, the charisma, the cuddly Grandpa mentality. His appeal was the same as that of Biden: Go-lucky, real, passionate. Unfortunately he was running against the Clinton Machine/DNC and he got churned out like a hunk of beef.

The second strategy was Bernie, yes THAT Bernie, again. He should have been the VP even though Hillary leans center way more than progressive. Her inability to negotiate was her undoing. It's not just about the Bernie voters that refused to vote Hillary, it was about their enthusiasm. Like it or not they were a ground-game unlike anything anyone's ever seen. The ridiculous amount of donations, the millions of phone calls, the millions of doors knocked. Their passion was most needed against Trump.

Yes, Bernie campaigned for Hillary during the general election, but it was no longer the same. Bernie used to be their guy, their champion that could fight against the 1%, for $15 minimum wage, free healthcare, and free tuition. He couldn't do that while campaigning for Hillary without being on the ballot because everyone knew she didn't really care about any of that.

So what was Hillary left with? No passion, no drive, no enthusiasm, no Bernie, no Presidency. She was too proud, and that, ladies and gents, is what Trump exposed to perfection. Yes folks, Trump is a master strategist, and he knew Hillary's weakness was her stoic character. During the campaign you often heard Hillary mention that the Republicans have been attacking her for 30 years and never found anything to hurt her. She wore that as a badge of honor, she thought that made her stronger. But, as Trump had done in the Republican Primaries, he took the quality his opponents covet most and he turned it on its head.

Crooked Hillary. Hillary Rotten Clinton. Drain the Swamp. Lock her up.

Much like Picasso's abstract paintings, Trump's brush strokes made little sense to most people. Yes, she's a political power house, yes she's a stalwart in her convictions. But that also makes her stiff in her beliefs. The world is ever-changing, how can someone maintain their convictions for 30+ years unless they're crooked and a cheat? How can they maintain power with the elites unless their entire cesspool of a swamp was also polluted? Lock her up.

Trump took her stoicism and grounded it into a pulp. His first attack on Hillary during the general election was that "If she wasn't playing the woman card she wouldn't even get 5% of the vote." BOOM, head shot. How did Hillary respond? "If fighting for women's rights and equal pay is playing the woman card, then deal. Me. IN!"

This played perfectly into Trump's hand. He knew she'd be defiant in being a woman and take that attack personally. He used her soundbites to wedge a gap between men and women voters. The male vote wasn't 2:1 for Trump because they were misogynists, it was because Hillary's words excluded their existence. Remember 'The Art of War'? It's all about divide and conquer. When did Hillary ever talk about men's issues? Never. While Hillary thought she was being stoic in protecting the woman card, Trump was actually playing the man card.

I could go on and on, but truth be told I haven't slept yet and I've written too much as is. If you're interested in reading more I'll post again tomorrow. There's plenty to talk about. How Trump had more Hispanic voters than any Republican in history, how Trump had more LGBT voters than any Republican in history (even though his VP is the biggest anti-LGBT in politics), or how Trump ended up with 48% of the woman vote even after those Access Hollywood tapes.

Regardless of how you feel about the election, it truly was a masterful performance by Donald Trump. One that will go down in history as not only the most shocking victory, but I would dare say the most expertly perfected victory in US political history.

The only thing that I don't like about this is that you talk as if it was really Trump's master mind, I think most of the credit for 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

the strategy goes to his campaign team, those anonymous bastards are the real experts in playing this game 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Watching his campaign, he seemed to do worse when he was letting his team orchestrate his moves. They did best when handling details.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can see this being a movie. Starring Alec Baldwin

9 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 10

*Arrec Bawwin

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

One of the best things for me about Trump winning is Baldwin can suck it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"The Art of Wrong" coming this summer

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Or Johnny Depp. Have you seen Funny or Die's "Art of the Deal" parody?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Danny Devito, with orange hair.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

His hands are way too big.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just a reminder to read things with a clear mind. Confirmation bias is a mother.

9 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 12

Damn I had to scroll way too far to find my people.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Its sad, isnt it? I think its really just an indication of the young average age on Imgur

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

exactly. That original post smacks of confirmation bias. I'll wait until 2018 when Trump-lites run for state positions to vindicate this

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

By trump Trump-lites, do you mean people who have Trump's demeanor or people who use this supposed strategy?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

if he's as smart as he is, then he'll disseminate his strategy to anyone who can benefit him yet pose no threat (state-level)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yup. The complete lack of critical thought someone must have to actually believe all this is absolutely astounding, and frankly embarrassing

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well, a lack of critical thinking by an astounding percentage of our electorate is what has given us President Trump. The Bush years [1]

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

will look positively rosy in comparison, and he had the most disastrous presidency of the modern era. [2]

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Having read the art of war I feel like the OP is really stretching it out of some sort of hero worship of Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

^ In order to pull of giving exact information at all those exact times, he'd need insane foresight that you just dont see when he speaks

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

That, or he tries to rationalize the "baffling" outcome of the elections.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Truth lies somewhere in the gray. Some of his actions were, in hindsight, well planned. But it's silly to say all of this was a master plan.

9 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 8

Yeah. His performance in the presidential debates definitely didn't seem rehearsed or part of a greater plan

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm of the assumption that he just surrounds himself with smart people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 9, 2016 10:48 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Sauce? (I'm actually interested in seeing that)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Just go watch his youtube channel. There's no way he's a genius. I've yet to hear any real plans from him.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

He's motivated, manipulative, and well connected. Not even close to smart.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Cue Popular from Wicked.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep, the qualities needed to win a race are not the same ones needed to be a good president.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"Ponder and deliberate before you make a move" Sun Tzu..Trump is not this at all. Hold on,kids!

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 9

How do you know he didn't do that before he made his moves? He could have thought it out thoroughly before he mad any comments, etc, IJS

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

His debate performance and late night tweets didn't seem planned. Maybe I'm still naive on the majority of America to avoid manipulation

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True and I guess I'm not saying that everything that came out of his mouth was well thought out (which seems obvious), but, just maybe 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His overall plan to act like he's been acting was well thought out? I'm not saying this a Trump supporter I really didn't like either 2/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

candidate. And the Dems did not help HRC either 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Art of the Shill. Every successful person in sales knows it. Tell them whatever plays to their emotional bias to make the sale.

9 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 10

wtf the art of the shill? google says nothing about this...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

This is more like it.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Trump is a demagogue plain and simple. He told people what they wanted to hear and they ate it up. Corporations will be taking over America.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I had classes in my MBA called "business acting" where we studied the art of war. "business acting" teaches you exactly what it says

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Hillary (and every politician) did the same. She chose the wrong group to pander to.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

She couldn't even do THAT right! She's shit at pandering! A shitton of the left wasn't buying it, how do you fuck up pandering?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. You could easily write a lengthy post explaining how Trumps "strategy" was not based off the Art of War at all, but rather

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

On successful salesmen tactics in a retail setting. Try hard enough, and you can draw parallels between anything

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Yup! It's "synchronicity"; invent causal relationships through casual metaphors. Trump has a simple formula that does not need AoW reference

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

All this proves is that he knows how to fool the masses. I'll reserve judgement until I see how well he runs a country.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

"Reserving judgment" implies you think there's a decent chance he'll do a competent job...what on earth would make you believe that?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He might have competent advisors and actually listen to them once he figures out he has no idea how to run a country?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, he's surrounding himself with people who already screwed this country up or are dangerously right-wing. And if he relinquishes power [1]

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to anyone it'll be to Pence, who's just about as evil. [2]

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's gonna be shit

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

I've seen people say democracy failed... but it didn't really, the people got what they voted for, democracy failed way before yesterday.

9 years ago | Likes 233 Dislikes 31

Except we aren't even a true democracy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

We are a democratic republic. A true democracy wouldn't work in a country with 300+ million people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the people voted for bernie, and then for hillary, electors and super delegates voted for who we got.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bernie lost by over three million votes though. The people voted for her in the primaries too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*representative democracy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” -Winston Churchill

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

No, we didn't. Hillary won the popular vote.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pretty shit that exactly 50% of the country is pretty pissed off about the election. yay 2 party system

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

That's actually a boon. If it were a 3-party system, then 66% of the country would be pissed. 4-party=75% pissed, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, then 33% would be pissed and 33% would be ambivalent.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If there were a middle ground between "everything is FREE" and "nuke the abortion clinics" people would accept a party they're not in.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Democracy is the worst form of government, except all others that have been tried.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 6

Its a good thing we aren't a democracy, we are a democratic republic.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

so you're saying democacry is the least bad form of government ever tried?.. Which is to say: its the best form of government ever tried?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bollocks, there's plenty that's never been tried.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

North Korea has the leadership through divinity thing going on pretty well, don't you think?

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

You mean Best Korea?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I stand corrected.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Can't say I necessarily agree. This reminds me of the 'JarJar is a super genius sith' theory. COULD Trump be some master genius? Maybe.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

The narrative that Trump isn't sharp is really odd: both that they went with this, and that so many actually bought it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I think this is more accurate. Trump's either the most genius genius to ever genius or an actual pompous blowhard. WHICH COULD IT BE???

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Could he also just be a jackass who played into the worst of America and got a bunch of angry white people to back him simply for being

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

different and stoking the rage? Yup. We will see based on his presidency. I really think you give him waaaaay too much credit, though.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Who'd you vote for?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Art of War? More like cheesy car salesman. He's just been around and knows how gullible people are. Old tactics like fear and lying work.

9 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 16

Then Hillary should have won with all the fear mongering and lying she did. Plus cheating.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

He told the right lies. People wanted to hear everything is terrible and it's someone else's fault and he'll make magic jobs appear

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Then why didn't Hillary win?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 13

Because Trumo promised crazy things. And because Trump voters were more active voters.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

Because Trump won the blaming match.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Again, fear and lying works. It has nothing to do with genius war tactics. lol It's just the same old campaign promises and fear mongering.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Integrity.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Compared to Trump, yeah. And that's a pretty scary thought.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

People wanted change. Hillary was a shady 'elite' politician. Trump was a populist - a different outsider unafraid of speaking his mind.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also, Hillary is shit. This whole election summarized: http://www.lovethisgif.com/uploaded_images/14601-Days-After-Leg-Day-Bored-.gif

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She limited the scope of her sales-style promises to the rational and possible. Trump did not.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

About as 'expertly thought out' as the acts of an 8th grade bully. The people are why he won. We lack empathy, education, and wisdom.

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 29

...

9 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 2

Yes, @op, please more. I haven't followed the whole thing closely, but it being real now makes me think it wasn't (just) luck on Trump's >>

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 9

well he did win the right stats , that's all that maters in the usa , you can win the election by only sub 25% of the votes ....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>>behalf. I'm intrigued on where this is going

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

It's the result of both establishment parties *severely* underestimating the disillusionment of their own constituency.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It kind of was. But I agree with OP that Bernie getting screwed over by the Democrats helped Trump a lot more than Hillary.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, I got that much, but I'm mainly curious about op's implication of Trump using strategies out of the Art of War

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Let's be real, his victory had nothing to do with the Art of War and everything to do with Hillary's shadiness.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 19

Scott Adams has very insightful writings and interviews and Trump's purpose. Everything he did was with purpose, even if it didn't appear so

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Almost, it had everything to do with how Hillary's shadiness was portrayed and how she defended it, Trump is shadyer but kept up the attack.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

lets be more real he won du to a shitty election system , if it was a direct vote he lost

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That doesn't explain why he won the GOP nomination in the first place.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

look up pied piper candidates

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The pool of candidates was shit from the get go. I'm hoping 2020 will be much improved all around.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The front runners were equally shady, for the same reasons: globalist neconservatisim.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What? Marco Rubio was actually a potentially amazing candidate, nothing shady there at all.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, America is an extremely reactionary country. The final FBI investigation had far more to do with this than anything. Microwave society

9 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 20

Do you mean reactive? Don't get me wrong, reactionaries certainly voted for Trump, but I'm not sure what that would have to do with the FBI.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, I apologize, reactive. The FBI has a lot more to do with the election then anything else due to this nature. 12 point lead evaporated

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Microwave society?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We need everything now. Not a new term. As indicated by the advent of the 24/7 news cycle even without newsworthy information

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Everyone in America is a racist bigot. Not an educated, morally superior guy like you.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 18

Wild conclusion to draw off of what I said though

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not everyone but clearly a huge number based on the election results. That or sexist.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I hate to tell you, but you responded to a ridiculous sweeping generalization with a ridiculous sweeping generalization...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a fact that white non college males were the only reason he won. Many in their 50s that have never voted, yet, know what's right for US

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I would argue that I'm a white non-college male that didn't vote for Trump, but I didn't vote because I disliked both candidates.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you sure 40 years of neoliberalism wasn't a major factor? The dems gravitating toward the banks, military industrial complex, and

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

outsourcing trade deals like NAFTA and now TPP. Trump's closing argument ad details this well: https://youtu.be/vST61W4bGm8

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Americans' wages have been stagnant since the '80s and are begging for help. That's why they picked Trump, because at least he said

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

he was going to help the American people. "Well so did Bernie" Yes, but unfortunately, Bernie was cheated out of victory.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But seriously, if what you say is true, it actually gives me a little more respect for Trump. As unpopular an opinion as that is.

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 18

I don't like him in the slightest but I respect his strategic approach.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Its not. A guy "masterfully" pulling something off doesnt fuck up this much. This is just a popular gotcha moment being hyped.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

dude won the america competition. he can't be THAT unpopular

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Due to strategic voting and all that, he can.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He got almost nearly 50% of the popular vote, so...clearly not that unpopular.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The man does show business for a living, and the election is a big show! Of course he would know how to make himself a likeable candidate...

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

... while making Hillary look like some sort of demon woman. People say he's an idiot but I would wager to say that he's much smarter...

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

... than people give him credit for. The same thing happened in the election where JFK won The man had a charisma and showmanship about him

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Your arguments about how Hilary failed are very insightful. Your characterization of Trump as a master strategist are hilarious.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 9

Everyone who predicted he would win from the primaries saw that everything he did had purpose. This didn't happen by accident, which is why

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Many saw this coming, and you and the MSM did not.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I'm not positive he did this on purpose. But if he did, hope that means he's not a nutter.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

You were as lied to about Trump's character as you were about the polling data. The entire media system is an echo chamber at this point.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No one had to lie to me. I watched some of his speeches. I watched him on TV for the last decade here and there. He's a bigot and a sexist.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

He's baffoonish but possibly cunning underneath. He's a meglomaniac, a nationalist, and banks heavily on his cult of personality.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Trump doesn't do things on purpose. He lives in the moment. He sounds like a nutter cause he has no brain to mouth control.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I've got to hand it to you, you know your stuff

9 years ago | Likes 2811 Dislikes 73

1/2 F this guy.Hate to hate but she didn't take it personally at the 5% vote/women.She rolled her eyes and thought 'ok how can I game this'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2/2 her and her advisors played this wrong but if any more of this is about her 'poker face' failing.Wrong.F'ing wrong and that was her flaw

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 830 Dislikes 9

Fucking. Perfect.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Nice, Two jokes for the price of one!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 1

Why is this only at 47 upvotes?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ooh, you almost had it. You gotta be quicker than that!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

LMAO, I don't know anyone else that loves that commercial. Thanks for the reference to it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, unlike the vast majority of voters and people talking about the election. Facts? Information? What's that?????

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 8

Im assuming you're being sarcastic since OP has zero facts/evidence, and instead just irrationally cherry picks evidence to fit his theory

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

If you think OP cherry picks his evidence, could you please make a post with evidence countering this post?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah that stuff is boring. Especially when it's dry Hillary saying it. Trump wouldn't have ran if Hillary weren't the likely nominee.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

he ran in 2012, but bowed out when his support was lousy. Then, in 2016, Obama is a success, white conservatives are afraid, good time 2 run

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It's almost like people don't give a shit about personal conduct. Have you ever watched reality tv?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

"Stalwart in her convictions" She changed some of her convictions several times this season

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really. Remember no one had any real investment in attacking Bernie during the primaries. Not saying he'd have done worse but better?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 10

He brought a degree of emotional that Hillary could never quite muster. Emotion won the day, and the democrats ceded that asset.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Well during the dem primary he did pole a lot stronger than hillary did against trump.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The polls were so incredibly off though. Hillary polled great against Trump for the most part.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

during the primaries, not that well, near an even split iirc

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bernie polled about the same. Anyway it's not worth dividing the Dem party now over something that may have happened.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bernie could have defeated Trump. He would have unified the black and white millennial vote. OP is 100% right.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 6

But as the election begun and he became the target of the GOP. Who knows? But with the write-ins and the disillusioned people-

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-I could easily argue that Bernie lost the election for Hillary. We can both beat each other to death with Bernie but that'd be pointless.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This election wasn't about policy. It was about rallying pissed off Americans and giving them a cause to fight for. Trump and Bernie had it.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

That's what most elections are about.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True. It's kind of sad. Voting by emotions, not reason. This is just a super extreme example.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In my country we had 1 coruppted canditade and he was in lead by 1million votes(population of 18million), a strong campain from youth

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Aug 18, 2017 12:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

did a turnaround of 1,5million votes or more.. if Bernie would have been a choise i'm sure did would have happed in USA too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No he doesnt. He's like someone who randomly guessed the cubs were going to win, then describing in detail how he "knew". Its specious logic

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 53

Theres a hundred political analysts who understood why Bernie might have been a good Presidential candidate, yet not a good VP pick

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

U did not read his post from march

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

He made two. One for Trump and one for Hillary. He deleted his Hillary post before I could screen cap it. So yeah... you all are gullible.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 35

Yeah lol Imgurians arent very smart. Even the reasoning of "I predicted this based on X, therefore X must be true" is hilariously irrational

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lol, did he really?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I believe you. This has the hallmark of taking a known end game and plopping overly complicatited rational into making it seem like a plan

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Did HE delete it, or...?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Nice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

going to assume you're trolling unless you can supply evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Not sure how he would supply evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wish I would have screened it. It was irritating because this is his second post on it and I remember seeing that and down voting.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 19

He was later found in his apartment with three bullet wounds in the back of his head. Clearly be committed suicide.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If that were true why would he post the it?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He post he it?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's he a it though?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Though an it he was he.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

he's not a strategist at all, he's a winger, people got enthralled in the idea that they were fighting the establishment. They sort of were.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

In all he was the best type of politician the one that gives everything they want, and what they wanted was end to corruption,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

so he ran with that to be elected for himself, but since people didn't want to hear nothing negative about him the dismissed it,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trump isn't a lefty or righty he is whatever the people want him to be and a person with no established thoughts he's the worst type of

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He will just be manipulated, by pence, the money that's already corrupted the Republicans and not change a thing because he's not capable

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It would also help if people stopped voting against their own self-interest.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A society would need good political education for that. Most countries lack it, sadly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would also mean taking popular septic-spigots like Rush Limbaugh off the air. They're pretty powerful, so... that's not so easily done.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to sound like a polarized jerk, but point is, you've gotta cut off the flow of super-bs before you can start to heal that divide. >_<

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Comey's letter definitely played a role too. It erased every gaff, etc. leading up to its release and killed HRC's momentum.

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 10

The only momentum she's had was downhill

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Which is true but silly since they said the new emails had nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It was released too close. No time for real coverage on it. Trump was even referencing Comeys 1st letter in ads the day before the election!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Were your expecting people to respond reasonably?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No I knew it would ruin her.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The FBI elected Trump

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Clinton elected Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Even if she carried close states further, it wouldn't have changed the electoral vote in the rust belt. These are pissed off poor whites.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

But the rust belt was a lost cause anyway. The Midwest (OH, MI, PA) are what sunk her. In my state, PA, pennsyltucky is what did us in.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yeah, I meant Great Lakes and NH/PA. All the places filled with unskilled labor and no more repetitive factory work.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

PA is part of the Rust Belt.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My mistake. I was thinking of the Bible belt.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's more the spirit!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://i.sli.mg/qcs5uP.png

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Half my family is from the middle of PA, and I have spent a lot of time out there. I know what it's like, and I stand by my remarks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am from Berks County, bruh I know why you stand by your remarks, but you can stand by remarks and also my reply be true.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am still kinda waiting for someone to tell it was all a joke.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

do you have any references to your statements about LGBT and Hispanic voters?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

Looks like 14% voted for Trump, with 10% more LGBT voting Democrat this year than in the previous election.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not sure about LGBTQ either, but found this article

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Interesting. I didn't think the female vote would be a wide margin but what reason could Hispanics have for voting trump?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dunno about LGBTQ #s, but I saw at cnn for black/hispanic voters he was like 1% more popular. So only 8% vs 7%, not enough to even be 1/

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

yeah, all the numbers i could find were saying he got significantly fewer LGBT votes than Romney (14% vs. 22%)

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

statically significant, but you'd think it would be much worse, not similar (those are Trump/Clinton vs Obama/Romney numbers btw)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It was 29% vs 31% for Hispanic voters with McCain, so Trump did worse then (though yeah you'd still think it'd be much worse).

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Delusion is his reference. Women polled way more for Hillary, only hispanics in Florida polled significantly higher. Anyone can look it up.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I expected Hillary to win simply because I couldn't see someone as tactless as Trump being a diplomatic leader. Time will tell, I guess.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

by direct vote she did win , se got more votes just get the right states

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If he fucking obliterated her this might have a little more credibility. But she won the popular vote.

9 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 23

There's a lot of people in New York.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But he still won and that's all that really matters.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

The electoral college is 100% necessary. I mean it's only 2016 and we hand count each vote and deliver results via pony express. Right?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, because it shows his purposeful actions in campaigning the shit out of the swing states. He would've acted differently for the pop. vote

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yet another reason to get rid of the electoral college.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

By an incredibly small margin.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Over 200k votes is not small.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of 318 million? Yeah it is. Plus it's been the closest margin in recent elections. Plus we just found out that over 3 million 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Illegals voted in this election and we can all be semi certain most of them voted for Secretary Clinton. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which means exactly nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

Other than that our system is flawed and the OP is on weak ground with his "Trump is supreme master of strategy" stance.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

If California and New York alone made all of the decisions for the other 48 states in every election, that system would be just as broken.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough :) I'm not saying I agree with OP (or a Trump presidency) but clearly if running your goal is key states, not popular vote.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It really does boggle my mind how people will literally say "just cause more people voted for her, doesn't mean she should win."

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

It has only happened 4 other times in our history, and each time it was controversial. This time should be no different.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As CGP Grey said "You wouldn't tolerate a sport where 7% of the time, the winner loses"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Has he posted a new video? I need to check it out, if so.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He updated one of his old ones. https://youtu.be/zcZTTB10_Vo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, because maybe a half dozen large cities should always determine the Presidency. Fuck the rest of the country, amirite?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

I didn't say that, though. I said it boggles my mind that a majority of the population's votes are dismissed. Like, it's weird to me.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I also highly doubt it is half a dozen large cities that determine things, but whatever. Everyone's too angry to actually discuss things.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

CA, NY, and IL are three of the top 5 in population, and are staunch blue states. The other two are TX (red, but with growing urban areas 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're not dismissed. Their function is to determine how the electoral votes are apportioned. POTUS isn't a representative. We have the 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

House of Representatives for that. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

yeah this whole post wreaks of reconstructing an appearance of elaborate ruse after the fact. Apparently he had 2 posts 1 for each candidat

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

Ooo. Where is the one for Hillary.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Let's not call Trump a genius - like every demagogue in history he told idiots what they wanted to hear and they believed him.

9 years ago | Likes 265 Dislikes 49

Someone said he's a used car sales man

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

https://i.sli.mg/qcs5uP.png

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We're strong progressives who deserve pats on the head when/if we do what they command yet retarded rednecks if we don't...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This type of polarization, where anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, is EXACTLY why he won. You did it to yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 39

This type of polarization, where anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, is EXACTLY why he won. You did it to yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 42

What you are saying is one of the reasons hillary lost, if all you do is call anyone who opposes an idiot, you are going to lose

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 12

What do you suggest we call idiots, then?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Not every Trump voters was an idiot of course. But he had a good swell of idiot support.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

What do you consider an idiot, what made a large amount of them idiots?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Trump had more uneducated conspiracy theorists than any ogher candidate. Anti-establishment would be good for America but his kind is a lie.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2/ personal feelings, rather than facts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you actually measure that, because it really sounds like you are just trying to take digs at anybody who supports him based on your

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This type of polarization, where anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, is EXACTLY why he won. You did it to yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 25

You're right, people hate being called out for what they are but that's what the Democrats did.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This type of polarization, where anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, is EXACTLY why he won. You did it to yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 43

Piornet didn't say trump was an idiot, he said he's not necessarily a genius. You might want to take your own advice.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hell, you're looking so hard for people to disagree with that you're making up shit they didn't say so you can attack it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Go back and read the comment, you will see that you are incorrect. He said "he told *idiots what they wanted to hear*".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So right

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

You are making a critical error: you assume idiots don't exist. It's not pretty but the fact is they do. Plenty of people on both sides...

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

I'm not making any error at all. Disagreement does not equal idiocy. And I'm sure someone considers you an idiot, too.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

...may be idiots but Trump directly appeals to them. It's a decent strategy. Small minds in large groups are very powerful.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Yep. The contempt Hillary and her supporters have for white working class people is what Trump appealed to. And it was genuine.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

I'm not sure it was racial. There are working class people of all colors and creeds tired of being taxed to death and treated like shit.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Agreed. He rode the wave; he didn't create it.

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 9

Ultranationalist sentiments have been rising in every western country for a while now, and have been accentuated by certain... events.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In other words he played the perfect politician without a single day in law school?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

"Perfect" in what sense? He's terrible for the country.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bloody well written and informative. It's a brilliant view point and well researched in it's comparison to The Art of War.

9 years ago | Likes 1372 Dislikes 53

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I hate to be that guy (I really do), but... its* comparison

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

You don't have to be that guy. It's entirely your choice.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*its

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 34

I meant it should've said "in its comparison"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's cool folks, Mister Fuck Face knew what was up. I mean, obviously I have no grip on the English language and must be taught in kind.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its is for positions e.g "The cat's bowl = Its bowl." It's is for description e.g "It's a cat's bowl."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

MisterFuckFace probably meant the 'in it's comparison' part.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I did

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's. As in "it is".

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I meant that it should've said "in its comparison"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's well worded. The OP is way off base comparing Trumps campaign to the art of war tho.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

The Art of War is a survey of successful tactics, any successful campaign that doesn't resemble it would be news.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's such a tired cliché as well. As if no strategy books have been writen since ancient China

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Play your enamies straights as weaknesses. Fall back and surround. He let her defeat herself.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Art of War applies to a lot of things, including Hillary's own failed campaign. I don't see how this is particularly insightful

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 26

Heh! You don't 'see' how this is insightful.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Curious - have you read it before?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It isn't particularly applicable here op is full of shit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 Sun Tzu just happened to be a guy whose work circulated it the furthest. It's probably meant more as poetry in its original Chinese

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

Having read the original Chinese, it dowsnt read anything like poetry. It reads like an instruction manual or textbook.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yeah actually. I just found it to be a collection of obvious platitudes that sound good as quotes, and passages that outline common sense1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

dude... Art of War is *the reason* everything in that book is a platitude now...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So it's the theory of everything ?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

that only makes my point stronger really. It's common strategy, you can tie it to just about every modern game plan

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

*shrug* I think the male/female thing was not that big a thing to count as "divide and conquer".

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 119

This has genuinely changed my opinion on the whole event.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

No offense, but then you lack critical thought. People voted Trump because Hilary was for womens rights? Seriously???

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I love how people say "no offense" and then proceed to, ya know, be offensive.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sounds like you dont understand what it means. Sometimes truth hurts and its helpful to point out your motivation isnt just to hurt them

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Youre joking right? Like the one comparison to 'divide and conquer'? Do you think The Art of War just a couple pages long?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

Did you even read the previous post he made and referenced?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you try hard enough, you can draw comparisons between anything. This post is really nothing more than "I told you the Cubs were going to

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

win! Now let me make up some really complex sounding details as to how I just "knew""

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

You do realize they wrote another post 7 months earlier with many more comparisons to "The Art Of War"? Maybe you should give it a read.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I did. You do realize its still completely illogical right? You can draw parallels between anything, and find any evidence to fit any theory

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Exactly; it's chronological reversal; only 2 possible outcomes, allowing BS reasons for the outcome to "prove" themselves via that outcome.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You are super brittish

9 years ago | Likes 210 Dislikes 4

It is spelt British and pronounced Bwittish

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Biggus Dickus.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that's because she/he used "bloody" right? Ohh I get it, and i've actually learned something from my English class. noice.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lucky for you, my whole face is British

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mr. F!!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, yes I am.

9 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Hello. I'd like to apply to be a colony please.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We are not a wise nation. See Brexit. Though if you want to be part of the colonies I hear Canada is quite nice.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Was purely joking. Was not suprised that Trump won. Very similar to the Brexit vote

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You failed at spelling 'British', so I shall assume you are super American.

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 2

savage AF

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You can't spell Amuricah without 'U'

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

And you can't spell brittish without titty. . . . . Sorry I meant t-t

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Murica'

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I feel you are crediting him with much more intelligence than he deserves. It's not a strategy if you define it after the fact.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 16

I agree. While it turned out this way, I think it was more coincidence than intent by Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, this was started in March, so it wasn't that obvious at at that time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I meant that I'm not convinced Trump had a rigorous plan of action rather than just winging it. And if he didn't plan it then it's not a 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Strategy. The parallel with art of war fits and is interesting but it gives him too much credit as a strategist. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Strategy is always more abstract-"punch at the emotional centers",tactics are more specific-"call illegals rapists,which will piss off dems"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep. He did fire and higher multiple campaign strategists though out the campaign. Sounds disorganized

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Can you define artwork before paint has hit the canvas?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Did this make sense in your head?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He may be a "master strategist" in propaganda, but he knows nothing about civics, economics, history, or foreign relations. Good luck USA.

9 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 42

Thanks. We'll be just fine. If we're still around after Obama's shenanigans, Trump won't be any worse. And no, I didn't vote for Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 28

This. Also, while OP has a keen eye, Hillary can make mistakes and lose without it being the product of Trumps "master plan".

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 3

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(from someone who didn't vote for him) that's why he has advisers and a cabinet

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The entire situation is pure comedy. I'm apathetic about Trump winning, but I seriously care about people eating their words.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Thanks. We'll be just fine. If we're still around after Obama's shenanigans, Trump won't be any worse. And no, I didn't vote for Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 27

"(...) He's not going to go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down. You can take it anywhere you want."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But he didn't. He wen't into the Crimean Autonomous Region that Ukraine illegally annexed in 1997 through force. He'd be in Kiev otherwise.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

He knows the nuclear launch codes though!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Not yet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's protocols in place so he can't go all Willy nilly launching nukes at everyone.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually there really isn't. Sane officers will refuse the order to launch, but only POTUS has any official decision in using them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well it's good to know resetting my email password is harder than launching nukes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks. We'll be just fine. If we're still around after Obama's shenanigans, Trump won't be any worse. And no, I didn't vote for Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 27

I'm really glad I got a chance to downvote this comment 3 times.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Good for you! I'm a farmer, our internet is less than optimal out here because we are usually out working and growing your food.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Is that supposed to make me feel some type of way? You do a job that is a part of our social system. Great, so do the rest of us.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Nope, just explaining why my comment showed up 3x. And I highly doubt you do anything but social media and video games.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

The cabinet and advisors and the actual government is what makes things happen. Appoint good people and you're golden.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Pence as VP got people to vote for him. They were impressed with him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Unless he stuffs his cabinet with stooges...

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Well he's bringing Palin in. If she got any stoogier they could give her a bowl cut and call her Moe.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

which he is not doing. trump is surrounding himself with some good people. I think everyone is going to be surprised. You heard it from me

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

wow, turns out I was right after all...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And the head of the EPA is a good person? The climate change denier?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gingrich, Pence, that assclown heading the EPA, Christie, Palin has appeared more than once..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same thing everybody said about Obama - an even younger man who had almost no political experience.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He was a senator for a number of years.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fair, but at least Obama had a partial term as Senator under his belt.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah it's still CRAZY that a man who's never been in office is about to be president. USA made it clear we hate politics as usual.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This will be a true test for America. Perhaps it will go all to shit and they will see how voting in a man with lots of words and no 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

Yes?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

we did it once with Andrew Jackson. except for a genocide or two, it turned out pretty ok

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hell, that was the only time our economy was in the green.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

In the green?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We weren't in debt.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ideas in spite will work out. His words on NATO and the UN are particularly scary. And tax and healthcare plans straight up ineffective. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 7

Define effective. ACA is the reason I voted for Trump. I don't like socialism especially if I'm paying for it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As in by the end of his term 15 million more Americans will be uninsured and deficits like those of Bush and Reagan. Plus what scares me 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

even more is how many Americans talk about how great their nation is yet have no compassion for their fellow Americans. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

this post is utter bullshit to get the gullible voters of trump to upvote his 20/20 hindsight reconstruction of bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

It's not hindsight if he wrote it before, genius.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As long as we're on good grounds with Russia, we don't need to worry about getting vaporised by A-bombs so that's a plus

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Obama was elected twice with only a single term in the senate and basically zero private sector experience.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks. We'll be just fine. If we're still around after Obama's shenanigans, Trump won't be any worse. And no, I didn't vote for Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 30

Literally, the whole post is about how nobody knows the real Trump, all we know is that he can't be as stupid as he presented himself.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Pretending to be stupid is literally a cliche trick. "Uncle Joe" did it well, and "goofy dad" Tim Kaine tried to pull it off too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Commenting to return later for actual research purposes.

9 years ago | Likes 278 Dislikes 15

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Absolutely agree

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Research"?

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 5

I heard "Access Hollywood", that sounds kinda dirty.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn our Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

you're....going to masturbate to this?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

That's not a bad idea.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dotty Mcdotface

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Auto dots roll out

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just want to see what else you have to say.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read this when sober

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

( . )( . )

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As am I

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Agreed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This a dot. Dot.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah dawg

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This would be a very interesting topic for a research paper.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Historians do typically like to write papers about failed civilizations.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Who histories the historians?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Who watches the Watchmen?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Who avenges the Avengers?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The same old chap

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

. ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

:0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am doing the same

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

also .

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now I feel informed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

-

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You should make a career out of this. It's kind of easier to swallow this pill after knowing that Trump is not a complete idiot

9 years ago | Likes 287 Dislikes 32

And thats what you want to believe, so you believe it. This, despite the fact this post is fundamentally illogical and simply isnt true

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

that cognitive dissonance though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wasn't registered, so I can't complain. Manipulative mastermind does have a better sound than the idiots' idiot.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

True, the dems shold be looking for new blood, well here's your chance

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He is a monster.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

Id take madman over evil mastermind any day homie

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Idiot or no, he doesn't know jack shit about the issues

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Is it? The policies he's said that he'll put in place are monstrous regardless of whether he's a genius or a moron.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

Only if you believe he will actually put them into effect. Talking big talk is one thing, but how many of Obama's promises happened?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Obama had no Congress/Senate to move things. We have a fully Republican government now. RIP public lands, climate, education, altruism.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

That was because of Republican opposition. Now they hold everything. He can do a lot...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

GOP really dislikes him though, I understand. They may hinder many of Trump's plans.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Love how people bash Obama for the "do nothing" congress. They literally stone walled everything.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

He played some of the right cards but other factors helped him as well, such as Democrats screwing Bernie over(1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

(2/2) and how surprisingly well his supporters resonated with his buzzwords. Plus the whole divide and conquer based on sex, income and race

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Let's be honest. Trump is a moron, his aids and the people actually running the campaign are the smart ones. He just did what he was told.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 15

Nah man, I don't think so. Not this time

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

aides* Sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except Trump fired multiple people from his campaign staff, including, at one point, his campaign manager. He was in control.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Genuine question then, were all of his misinformed "facts" and disproven claims all part of his plan during the debates?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Gonna go with yes. Most people don't care about policies, they care about emotional appeal. His claims got emotional buy-in from listeners.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Once he claims something the general public will believe it. It's easy to disprove but less people are listening for that.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Under no circumstances should Trump be considered an idiot, that is foolish and dangerous in the extreme! This man is very very smart!!

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Actually it makes it a lot scarier... like he's an evil genius and any means to an end.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

Close to genius? Yes. Evil? I don't think so.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let's hope the ends that he advertised were only strategy.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

met him at fundraiser, he isn't brash, and he isn't dumb, he's quiet spoken, remembered everyone's names and thanked everyone personally.

9 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 7

He is pretty stupid though, due to his anti-science beliefs.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 27

the fuck

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Anyone who actively disbeliefs in modern science despite evidence is a moron. Objectively.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Can I actually get a source on that?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That was what stunned me watching him thank his staff. He had everyone's name known and was very humble. That makes all the difference.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Oh, he's polite to his close circle of supporters. I guess that makes everything--the racism, sexism, sexual assault, child rape, lies--OK.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

The reason people say he's brash is because people don't really think about his actions off-screen. The same with any politician really.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

He says brash things, but in the back of his mind he's playing the field and playing to win

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

I've been arguing for months that what was going to win Trump the election was everyone thinking he was an idiot, when he was a strategist.

9 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 10

But he isnt. This post is irrational. OP cherry picks evidence to fit his theory, instead of developing a theory to fit the evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

As others have pointed out, people have a NEED to believe something like this, and so theyll make sure it makes sense to them

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He's a shitty businessman because being a shitty businessman benefits him more than being a good one would.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strategy, bah, just be lucky enough to have an opponent who people dislike more than you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm just concerned that his skills as a strategist may not translate well to skills as a politician and a world leader

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He's sure as hell not a statesman.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(2/2) Realistically the only predictable thing is that he'll probably use his position to improve his business dealings.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I don't suspect it will, it's two very different skillsets. At least it means he probably will be more moderate than he campaigned.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Did you hear his acceptance speech? Dude humbled himself. Pulled a complete 180. I said it last year and I'll say again: He's a great actor.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He really didn't humble himself at all. I just read the transcript. It was him thanking people he had to, and then saying he was great.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Donald Trump did not get to where he is by being an idiot. He's a smart man, in certain fields, and is excellent at leveraging opportunity

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 6

Nah, im pretty sure his father got him where he is.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

① So many of the things people were assuming him an idiot over were probably deliberate strategy, such as his vagueness on all his issues.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

② With a direct target of one of the most disenfranchised groups in the country, under-educated blue-collar workers, going into extensive

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Been saying that Trump is smarter than most people think on this website for awhile. Glad to see its not being downvoted for once.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

③ detail as to his plans for trade or the economy would've only confused and muddled the issue among his core base, diluting it's effect.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Now the question is, what does he really want to do?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have absolutely no idea, and TBH nobody does. AFAIK over the past 3 decades, he has donated equally to Reps and Dems. He's an opportunist.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That was my thinking. Blue collar only want the short and sweet stuff. 'Build a wall' 'Make America great again' .

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

They're not interested in any complex economic policies or foreign policies

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But the real question is how did you get those circled numbers?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Copy-paste from any other website that has them. They're just unicode characters. http://xahlee.info/comp/unicode_circled_numbers.html

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

America deserves to know

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump has never been wildly successful in any of his adventures that tells me he lacks a certain skill set. Expect policies to come 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

from outside influences such as his cabinet or other political heads. His skill set predominantly remains in getting office and staff.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Oh don't get me wrong, I think his skills are purely based on personal advancement, and I doubt they'll translate well to politics

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Don't get me wrong i totally agree with you. He is exactly as you said he is. I warned of underestimating him when Bernie was removed.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think Wikileaks did more to stop Hillary than Trump ever did.

9 years ago | Likes 384 Dislikes 62

Sorry, I just don't think that some IT scandal that never amounted to anything was actually ever much of a factor.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Outside some of the DNC leaks from earlier in the year, I don't think they moved the needle as much as the FBI Investigation issues did

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Let's also not discount Project Veritas videos coming out.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wiki leaks didn't write those emails, the authors of them did more to stop Hillary than trump.

9 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 10

No, morons and Bernie did. Everyone wanted stop badly to believe that something was "rigged" but there's nothing at all in those DNC emails.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Anyone ever find that guy yet??

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

He's on holiday in Ecuador.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The WL emails showed that Trump's accusations over months had actual foundation in the DEMs own messages.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 7

And they had actual foundation because he had the emails before WL posted them.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

If so I'm totally sure it was an anonymous source that gave them to Trump, same as the NYT got Trumps tax return.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You mean the truth was exposed?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I can imagine someone posting this as an unpopular opinion puffin, when it's not that unpopular

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

guy just wants upvotes he's bullshitting everyone and they are taking the bait.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yah, this is a great analysis but I think it's giving trump way too much credit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

all the buffoonery is the smokescreen, fanned by flames of media. only the simple believe and protest, swayed by irrelevance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One compounded the other. Just the leaks would have been dismissed, then the FBI talked & in the court of perception that was proof enough.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep, Hillary had quite a lead before those Weiner emails came along. Then she dropped in the polls.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

Those had nothing to do with Wikileaks though, that was the FBI case

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The polls clearly didn't know shit though. They were all wrong and that industry is gonna go out of business.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Yep, maybe you're right, no point in complaining now.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I hope it does go out of business.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The polls gave Trump anywhere from a 5% to a 25% chance as of yesterday morning. The polls were not indicative of actual voters.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Yes, they were. Pools were neck and neck day of. Combo of FBI and Republicans that hate Trump biting the bullet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those polls were so wrong even going back to the primaries. Spirit-cooking actually had a bigger impact than the FBI inv. in the 'polls'

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think there were a LOT of Trump voters that stayed quite as well

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

tee-hee Weiner

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So, a BJ ended Bill and a Wiener ended Hillary?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Comey's timing certainly didn't help her either.

9 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 13

Yup, I think that was the nail in the coffin. It was already close, and that was the tipping point for swing states that she needed to win.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Paul combetta

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

thanks for the info

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just to clarify, ^^^ was not a sarcastic comment. I looked up Combetta and found out more info on the issue

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honest question: If that never happened, could she have won? Or was her defeat inevitable?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

She lost by a few percent in some major battleground states so yes, it is completely feasible that the FBI gave the election to Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Many rubles yo you comrade Comey. Many rubles from Mother Russia.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If she never did really evil and awful things then yes, she would have won the presidency. But she is evil and deserves to go to jail.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

She didn't. Get fucked. Please go away.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

You're so fucking stupid if you really don't think she did anything wrong. You should pull your stupid head out of your stupid ass!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

she had a dbl digit lead until then. I think that f'd her cause the average american deemed her a criminal again with out understanding

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The problem is the two-minute attention span in this nation. The mainstream media knows how to manipulate that shit like nobody's business.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and they believe ANYTHING. lets make america great again... We have 300% gain in stock market 8 years of job growth... Whats wrong where?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's true, but info like that shouldn't be withheld.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 15

agreed

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

You mean nothing? Because that was what was in the emails

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 9

It's not the action, it's the timing. He should be fired for that.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

There was no info to withhold. Nothing new, nothing about Hillary, nothing at all, but he announced it like "she's guilty of something".

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It also shouldn't be prematurely announced. That you MIGHT have something is not worthy of announcement.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Yes but we're talking about someone who put government emails on a private server, and then destroyed it all when people found out.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

A matter that the FBI had already thoroughly investigated based on due process. And they were right for that part, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All of that alone was enough to convict her - the FBI did her a huge favor by not pursuing charges. They made up for it, I feel.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

You misspelled final FBI investigation right before the election.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 7

(which, by the way, found nothing incriminating on her (unless you count her apparent inability to use a printer))

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

They already had all the emails, but it didn't matter. The American public only hears the charges and makes their own judgements immediately

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

If you read the statement from the original investigation, she's guilty, they deliberately chose not to prosecute.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

"None of the remaining emails rose to a level that would cause agents to reconsider whether Clinton or her aides had knowingly (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

mishandled classified information." —Federal law enforcement official (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9)& been prosecuted for less. Even if they were all personnel, having lawyers delete emails to prevent investigation is obstruction

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7)violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3)36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level ...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2)or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent;

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5)and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4)It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8)in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information. - FBI Director Comey. Many people have lost their clearance & been

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6)their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery....Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The FBI clearly fucked her with announcing the wiener incident. Clearly partisan politics in the FBI. She had a dbl digit lead until then

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

you don't get it. the polls were faked. she never had a lead. just close contention.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the polls were with in the margin of error. The double digit lead was legit

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those polls were so wrong even throughout the primaries. Spirit-cooking showed a bigger difference in the 'polls' than the FBI announcement

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

the polls were with in the margin of error. soooo go on

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had a wiener incident myself recently.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is really well written. Makes change from seeing "The world is fucked" everywhere.

9 years ago | Likes 1669 Dislikes 46

Right! I'd let this man run my country.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's nice to see some analysis as opposed to pure panic.

9 years ago | Likes 241 Dislikes 4

Pseudo-analysis, but entertaining nonetheless.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, pure panic for families affected by this decision. I want to jump ship and leave the country, weʻre looking at an increase in violence.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trumpʻs anti-acknowledgement of climate change makes me fear the damage heʻll do by motivating his following to do the opposite of nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My entire facebook feed is full of people cursing white people and talking about how we're now essentially the third reich. It's retarded.

9 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 4

Same, I'm not going to bother with Facebook with the next few days.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Username very relevant. But agreed. And meanwhile they wonder why white people voted against the one calling them racist.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

Trump had a variety of different points to attract frustrated Americans. Race relations was just one of them.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Then wouldn't we be the Fourth Reich tho? I mean contrary to your username, we can't be the best Reich again.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah and I got called a racist, sexist, homophobe by my "friends" for voting for him... How "tolerant" of them.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 10

So, you support a racist misogynist homophobe for president, and expect people to just say "that's nice?"

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 18

You're not necessarily any of the three but I can't possibly fathom the reasoning behind voting for Trump. Could you explain?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Thats fine, I can understand not voting for him either, he really is a terrible person... But most of his economic plans seem good (1)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Thanks. Very interesting to read. Well written and simple

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're interested in similar thoughts to OP's about how Trump went about winning, look up Scott Adams' blog; he goes in depth on this

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your're perfectly right. Not many people can think like this, and write it so nicely. Oh man! This world is fucked...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the world IS still fucked.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I'll be honest, this is coming from an outsider (UK) and I never cared about either Trump or Hillary, but I don't think it'll be as bad 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

I have a quick ? For you. I read everywhere that Europe was very against Trump. Have you found this to be true?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, I have a very small outlook on the world (still at school) but, I've never really heard anyone talk about him, it was mainly 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

16-17 year olds talking about the election, everyone else didn't seem to care too much about who won. We were busy with Brexit

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As everyone thinks, as he won't be able to just say that there is going to be a wall around America, and it'll just happen, right? 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

I understand he could do some serious damage to US climate policy, which could screw the world.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

All I could think about near the end there was "Trump played the man card and banished Hillary to the shadow realm"

9 years ago | Likes 3038 Dislikes 41

Trump is the Joker to Hillary's Batman. Paul Ryan can't fill that role and Obama is leaving for retirement...in the absence of powerful 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

enemies to rail against, he'll be judged on the substance of his policies & economic results, which does not bode well for him. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

ITS TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DUAL!

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Duel*

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Does anyone have Swords of Revealing Light to freeze everything for the next 4 years?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YOU'LL NEVER GET MY REPUBLICAN PUZZLE!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bernie had a blue eyes white dragon. Missed opportunity.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bernie was never seriously vetted, that's a silly thing to say.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*Kitchen realm

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's more like the purple realm

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we get Eleven back out of the vale of shadows so she can fight the trumpagorgon

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does that mean Trump is Arceus

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YOU ACTIVATED MY TRUMP CARD!

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

hey you double-dipping motherfucker, this comment was actually so clever I'll updoot this one too. lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You only get one upvote and I already gave it to the other one.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I voted Trump for same reasons as post and don't like seeing nasty people being salty but a good joke +1 Trump bot gif was great too.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 21

You have lost due to the effects of "Tump the Forbidden One"

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Good ol Dornald Tump

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Erh mah gerd Dornald Tump

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. The problem is that Hillary's only car was the woman card and that wasn't enough to carry her. Trump played the white card and won.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

"I'll play the man card which allows me to draw 2:1 votes."

9 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 3

Should have been 1:0.77 votes.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Yet she won the popular....

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

you don't understand american politics very well, do you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think the implication is, the claim that one candidate had more enthusiasm + was better ring hollow when that candidate got fewer votes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, I do. I was commenting on the 2:1 votes. 228:279 is not 2:1, so they must be referring to the popular vote, which she won.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My understanding of how our President is elected, is fine. American politics, not many truly understand it, so I am not alone in that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YOU ACTIVATED MY TRUMP CARD!

9 years ago | Likes 1048 Dislikes 1

Not so fast! I activate monster reborn and bring back my Bernie Sanders!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I PLAY MY POT OF GREED CARD

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

UH? WHAT DOES POT OF GREED DO? WE HAVEN'T EXPLAINED IT 5 TIMES THIS EPISODE!

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

IT ALLOWS ME TO DRAW 2 CARDS FROM MY DECK AND END MY TURN!

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Oh my god. That's the most powerful card in the entire game!

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

But that card doesn't end the turn...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I would've just once like to see someone draw three cards, like what could you do against that? Yugi has literally battled GODS before(1)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

this comment is under-appreciated, needs updoots

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well you just activated my ALUCARD.

9 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 1

Dandy Man plays Aircraft Carrier: It's super effective

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did someone say my name?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Hellsing abridged is the best

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

#fuckmotheringvampire2016

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Yeeaaahhhh! THE CRIMSON FUCKER!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

#bitcheslovecannons

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Hey Dandy Man....

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Apr 26, 2017 2:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oh, you are just a treat.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

*muffled grunt of terror*

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You lost.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Didn't he call him Dandy Dick?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He called him dandy man right after he beat him, right before he drank all of his blood.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Hey dandy man." "Uhh?" "You lost" "uh huh" "and now I have to read your mind" "uhhh??" "By drinking all of your blood!"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0