What's happening to common sense?

Jul 23, 2017 5:29 AM

IthinkImightknow

Views

105914

Likes

1634

Dislikes

70

Dude owes 65k in child support.
Here's the link to the news if you wanna check it out.
http://abc13.com/news/court-man-who-isnt-father-of-child-still-owes-payments/2236804/

He neglected to fight having his wages garnished for a child he said wasn't his in 2003. That's being held against him now despite the DNA.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

MANDATORY DNA TEST at birth! Let's make it happen!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Whatever about the content, Jesus christ that article hurts to read. Someone was paid to write that badly

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As I am not entirely sure what the rules are about these kinds of situations but honestly that woman is hella fucked up

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I tapped the play button and expected a video

8 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 2

Hahaha what an amazing gif. Saved

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

he should counter sue, asking for her to pay child support on his 3 kids. "Their not my kids!" Ditto.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Marital courts are SHIT.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is not justice.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like always the clickbait title is false. The court didn't made him pay even though he is not the father. A few years ago he was already

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 14

This. Thank you.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Sentenced by a court to pay the child support but he claims to not have been noticed by that court. And the new court just denies to reopen

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

the case and states that the old court rule is still valid. That is its own problem, but it's what the headline implies.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

So a court DID order him to pay support even though he's not the father...

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Back when he didn't attend the court and had no DNA test, yes. Clickbait-apologist

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

So if he doesn't pay support for a child that's not his then he goes to jail. Then five kids lose their father. Justice? No!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I always wonder how people be pushed so far as to snap and start mass shootings, then I read stories like this...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's some sexist bullshit, the guys always get screwed over in court.Funny how woman are always complaining about there being no equality

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

Just remember..the courts are for truth and justice..oh but mainly money..money..money

8 years ago | Likes 272 Dislikes 16

"Everybody's got a price!"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...it's so funny, it's a rich moms world!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why it's mostly refered to as the legal system n not the justice system.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Family courts aren't courts of law, but rather courts of equity. Normally the judge has final say and a few laws tilt aid in the mother, 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

At all costs, in courts' interests 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Domestic courts in a nutshell, no matter the "lack of fathership" you never did enough whether 3/4 of your paycheck went to her

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This has murica written all over it

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well it does say Houston

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The real dad doesn't have any money, but this guy does. It's the new socialized medical plan.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

im telling you, florida has NOTHING on Texas..

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My brother is actually fighting something similar right now. His ex got knocked up by someone else. He found out it wasn't his but since...

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

They broke up he hasn't been able to see his daughter (they had one before she cheated) because her mom ants him to pay support for both.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

In most states, visitation CANNOT be denied for failure to pay child support.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She can't deny visitation, if he seeks a court order then ex is going to lose, and lose hard.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is the other guy still involved with the ex? Why else would she ask money for both kids? Can he fight for custody for his kid?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

No the other guy is long gone, wants nothing to do his kid. He can't really fight for custody because he is constantly traveling for work...

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Like in one week he might have jobs in four different states. But any time he sets up a visitation something comes up & baby momma can't...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Make it. She's all but said actually showing up for visitation is contingent on him taking responsibility for both kids. So he could...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I always wondered what happens when Maury is over...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If he wasn't around for 16 years, and isn't the father, then why isn't this crazy B going after the real father?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Doesn't know who he is. Broke/dead/prison

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cause he's broke.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My guess would be she doesnt know who the real father is.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mandatory DNA testing at birth will fix this crap.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The fucking mother is the real bitch in this story.

8 years ago | Likes 560 Dislikes 18

Nooo. Really? What a shocker

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Even she agrees that it's not his kid. She obviously cheated on him when together. All round a wonderful character & role model for the kid.

8 years ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 1

It's a child support story on IMGUR, of course the mother is the bitch.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 26

I wish people realized its often the State being the shitty party, instead of one of the parents.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the source says the mother wants 16years of backdated money since the kid is 16. Its not even his. ofc shes the bitch in this story.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Hey hey hey, don't let your shitty facts get in the way of her misandristic hatred of males.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In some cases, the mother isn't the person going after the "dad". Even if mom is like "never-mind" the state is like "pay up, chump"

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Well they are just following the law. It's there so men can't intimidate women into not asking for support.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah the state made me go after my kid's dad, Floridian here. They'll take away benefits. I was so scared of the drama.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Florida Man can't catch a break =(

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah well this Florida Man was a fuckin' loon I was so happy when he dealt with it just because the state was making me >_>

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Often it's to make sure the child gets what they need. This is law in France for eg. Paternity tests are illegal for this reason.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Male privilege.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Either the guy is lazy as fuck & is lying about never being notified in 03 or she lied about collecting any child support from the past (1/2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Or maybe they both legit don't remember since it was 14 ys ago. Still, people tend to notice when $ is missing from their paychecks (2/2)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Still a fucked up system. "you paid child support once? TOO BAD YOU'RE ON THE HOOK NOW NO MATTER WHAT!!"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's more to do with admiting responsibility, e.g. paying a traffic fine implies you plead guilty

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yeah, that's crazy, if anything he should get his money back

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Title is misleading as fuck. Court order is from before he got a paternity test. He is waiting to go back still to attempt to overturn 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The old ruling. There is merely a chance that the old ruling will stand since it's a decade old

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also with court cases aged to a certain point this is coming practice. There's always that chance the ruling will stand when this old

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The fuck!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why I'll have a vasectomy for myself.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't want kids in general.....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, that is kinda the norm in a lot of places, heck in France I think it was paternity tests can be blocked.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

What? Strange, you don't hear about France having gold diggers though. must not happen a lot

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Not in places that have Civil Law aka most of the world (including France), Common Law is just more prone to this kind of crazy shit.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a legal issue, if you sign the birth record you are responsible.

8 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 49

He didn't signed it. Read the article mate.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

He doesn't have to pay for amounts AFTER the paternity test.But he can't get out of prior $$ the child relied on when he thought he was dad.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

He thought he was a dad for a few months before the DNA results came back, wtf are you talking about?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read the story. It ain't what happened here.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

This. I was all mad until I read it. It's a reasonable law.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

How exactly do you sign the birth record of a child you never knew existed?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jul 25, 2017 2:01 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He can sue her for fraud.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right like he only signed the thing because he thought it was his is that like being coaxed, or something?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jul 24, 2017 5:05 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Nope, Mom straight up never told him apparently and the daughter is 16 and now the moms asking for money

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Not the case here, but because he ignored court orders and wage gouging he will be responsible

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would it be a void signature if the signee proves they were deceived? I doubt most judges would grant a DNA test before birth.

8 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 1

There is a 2 year statue of limitations he didnt do the test till the kid was 3.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I can imagine it would be, but my knowledge of US law isn't very good. I can say for sure it would be here in Denmark.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

read the article before posting

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

No

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 20

Then get fucked

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

So I can just sign other people kid's and their now mine?

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

You have to be the first to sign tho. Can't just add your name to existing birth records.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

call down Kony

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In some states if you are married to the mother, you are the legal father of record regardless of DNA. You have a time window in which to

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

file documentation and request a paternity test to "absolve" you of paternity.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well that's just stupid

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There was a case where the girl didn't know so she just put down a name and the same thing happened to him.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I call bs

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Depends on state law, but it can happen. All they have to do is show a "good faith attempt" to contact the supposed father. (cont.)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Under some state's laws, that's really about all it takes to be put on the hook for child support, esp. if the woman and kid are on (cont.)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

public assistance of some kind. Then, half the protections are gone for the poor schlub she names as dad.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If your not the father you shouldnt have to pay child support period.

8 years ago | Likes 1034 Dislikes 21

+1 for the sentiment, but -1 for the grammar. Sorry, dude -- I don't make the rules.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 31

Why are the comments displaying as 2yr old?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fucking stupid

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I am actually a little bit amazed that this needs to be said. So sad

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If only she'd had a period instead AYYYYYYYYYYYYY

8 years ago | Likes 142 Dislikes 7

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Are we sure this isn't a Michael Scott situation?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

unless you want to be the childs father figure, which this man clearly doesnt want to be.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

In canada, anyone who willingly acts as the main father figure for at least 2 years becomes the father legally. (at least for child support)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean why does that even have to be stated these days!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What if he knew before the child was born, willingly signed the birth certificate, but after a divorce, decided it wasn't worth it?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This happens in WA too. A friend has to pay child support for 15 more years cuz they didn't discover the baby wasn't his until too late.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A man who raises a kid who is not his is more a father than the biological father.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Yeah I agree but it's not that simple.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How incredibly fucking insightful of you. Do you have a PhD in philosophy?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Unless you are the mother.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They do it for the kid who will need the money. Read about a story where a woman was in some database as the father of a kid and had 2 pay

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

What if you adopted the child?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's about what's best for the kid, not what's "fair".

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 17

Slippery slope

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The dude has nothing to do with the child. Might as well sue a stranger for money.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

There are lots of things that are best for the kid but if the dude was not the father then he shouldn't be held accountable for it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Fortunately to the child involved, it isn't thst simple. Remember thst this isn't about the man and woman alone.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 28

For some reason some courts think it's better to force someone to pay, even if the mother herself doesn't want the child support.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why shouldn't the real father be responsible?

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Because parenthood is more than just sticking your dick in a vagina and waiting 9 months.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because sticking your dick in someone has potential consequences.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know, saying period and then putting a period (full stop in UK) is kind of redundant full stop

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

You're correct exclamation point!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Essentially he appears to be saying that he does not wish to use period as a payment for child support and frankly I concur.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you read out the full stop in every book as period.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No, ita exactly the other way around. You don't read out a full stop. Ot is the definitive ending of a sentence. So saying full stop 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then using a full stop/period kinda makes the actual symbol redundant.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You still need to use punctuation, you don’t just not end a sentence.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you sign a paper saying you don't want a child before it's born you shouldn't have to either, imho.

8 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 42

...If you sign that paper and are still fucking dumb enough to get someone pregnant you are still responsible for that life.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Condoms.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Sign and give 50% to terminating it, I'm down with that

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck yea. Male abortion ftw.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 16

Equality!

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Problem with that though is it opens the window for guys to be careless. Why would they care if she got pregnant, they can just sign off.

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 6

Which is why protection should be just an equal responsibility for both men and women. If he doesn't wear a condom, don't let him smash.

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 6

Men could sabotage the condoms. But there are female contraceptives as well. So it's not like I care.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I agree, I'm just pointing out there are potentials for it to be abused.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Condoms have a relatively high failure rate.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 25

Relative to whattt exactly?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

nope, that's stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I guess people are assuming I have an ideological bias against birth control? Not the case at all. The stats for condoms just aren't good.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*you're

8 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 22

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jan 7, 2018 7:16 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yore welcome.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Y'd'nt've'd

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

*U'r

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

R

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

'

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0