NY Time and economists let their elitism show.

Dec 17, 2020 10:39 AM

Lanhdanan

Views

109643

Likes

3437

Dislikes

96

You mean workers need to be able to afford to participate in the economy too? *Gasp*

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Well then the average poor person had more insight into the economy than the average economist.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The Bolsheviks are quite tame these days.

5 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 3

While we are ok money wise we bought less this year because we don't plan on meeting up for our family's covid spreader event.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rich people like: why aren't the poor buying things, we took all the money for ourselves and left nothing but I don't get it

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know how to pronounce Bourgeois, but I always end up reading it like Burr-GEE-O-is

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

One of the driving points for their predictions was the large decrease in consumer debt. They thought people would spend more on credit.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's dystopian Christmas, Charlie Brown

5 years ago | Likes 403 Dislikes 1

Its extra sad when reality is a dystopia and you (i) escape it by playing a Vg about a cyberpunk dystopia.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

War. War never changes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Many people who *think* their jobs are secure and make good money were vaguely on consumerist shopping sprees April - August. (e.g. look at

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what we did with the back yard / bathroom remodel posts). The real slowdown is those people ran out of shit to buy. I work with several, and

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they're more out of Christmas ideas than usual because with WFH they already bought every entertaining trinket they could think of.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My three priorities. Shelter. Food. Mechanical Keyboards.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I feel like they don't understand what "breaking news" means. Some people's opinions on something last month is neither breaking nor news.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 0

How is anyone broke? The government gave most of us $1200 almost a year ago! * Jonh Mulaney voice* You ALREADY SPENT IT?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Meanwhile massive American corporations "We want a gift, but only if it's MONEY"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I work by our biggest mall in our area. Traffic crazy yearly. This year the streets are quiet. Parking lots empty. It's pretty freaky.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 333 Dislikes 6

Fuck boomer mentality - the whole "i got mine now get your own" thing. Instead of trying to make a better future, they want suffering

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Boomers wonder why we aren't getting along with them when most of the elected representatives have been chosen by them.

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 2

And they continue to make the same mistakes that have been proven not to work both with science and actual physical happenings in life.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

"But I only voted in a way to make sure my home value only ever went up. Why are my children all moving far away?"

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Economists aren’t bourgeoise. They are part of the intelligentsia. God... marxists today...

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Are sales down this year or not? I heard one news station say that holiday retail sales appear to be unaffected this year. True? Not true??

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Economists sometimes help avoid the worst scenarios, but not much else. They work brilliantly in hindsight though.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's their job to predict shopping patterns. Not everything is a personal attack.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How shit are these economists that the NYT are talking too?

5 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 2

Reading the article, it seems like they thought spending would go down w/o stimulus, but it's even worse than they thought.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Almost like when the only mainstream, accepted school of economics is the Chicago school you get fucking idiots who dont understand reality.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Richard wolff out here screaming into the abyss but we can't listen to him because Marxism bad.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Kinda like the only government school of thought is reaganomics

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Hmm... I wonder how this television tastes... *MONCH* meh no good, I think I should try THIS FOOD I FUCKING BOUGHT.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why pick on the NYT. They are reporting what other people said, which is their job

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Exactly!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Uncritically reporting what someone says isn't good journalism, imo

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

They chose the people to talk to.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Choose better people to talk to. Be useful instead of giving idiots the stage. We've had enough of that over the last four years especially.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

This just says spending is below projection, not what was projected with C19. They could project a 50% decrease and reality was 60% 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

but people prefer to read it as "economists think nothing is wrong" because it feels better. They make projections - it's their job. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People in the comments are misinformed. Consumer spending actually increased this year. Houses, cars, furniture. So this is strange.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Spending was up when disposable income was up. Then stimulus dried up...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People aren’t goin on vacations, going to spas, etc, so service industry is way down, but commerce is up

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yep. My wife's online store just stopped selling in November kinda outta nowhere. Like a big group of folks ran out of money simultaneously

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Companies that have laid off millions don't understand why millions aren't buying things... Film at 11

5 years ago | Likes 318 Dislikes 2

I've literally bought like 4 shirts since lockdown and no shoes at all. There's simply no need to dress up anymore.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

I haven't bought any clothes in the last 12 months. My underwear has holes in it. Only thing I have bought is food. Other than bills that is

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I haven't bought anything in about 3 years.......

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Same

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I bought stuff in May/June. Two shirts, 1 pair each shorts and pants, 1 undershirt. I didn't wear one shirt until last month. >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The other shirt and the shorts are still unworn

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For me its literally wearing old t shirts because working from home

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know. It kinda makes me feel like a bum though. like I don't put anything "nice" on and I just feel like a blob of baggy clothes

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

By "nice" I literally just mean jeans and a top that's not an XL t-shirt

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have been wearing sweat pants a lot, and just gave in to wearing them in public.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I try to put on regular clothes 2-3 times per week to avoid that

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is it different than before? Or is it that weird to buy shoes only once a year/2years maybe?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I buy shoes about once per year, but they are cheap $10-20 dollar shoes and I run them ragged. I haven't bought a new shirt in... 8-10 years

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I only buy shoes when my old ones start falling apart.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Its nice to have ones that go with different types of clothing. High tops are useless in the summer

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Luckily shoes last more than a year when they are not used.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 2

That headline is some full blown victim blaming right there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

The cruelty is the point.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He would know.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 833 Dislikes 3

Innacurate, in the real us economy the rich guy would have a cookie pile the size of the empire state building

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes !!! The "The poor wants to steal your cookie" cult ...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/ alright. This is the third time I have commented this today under different posts.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why I have trust issues with bald guy . And if its a rich bald guy then more evil

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Classic and very accurate!

5 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 0

The pile of cookies needs to be about “insert massive number here” times bigger.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

This would be more accurate if the guy on the right had a pile of cookies larger than the house. People don't understand how unequal we are.

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

The middle man should have two. He gives one to the poor guy and then the rich guy steals the other? That would seem more accurate.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 15

That would imply that the middle class has less than the poor? That's asinine.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You know people do think that way though right? There’s an upper and lower middle class. Make enough to get by but not enough to live by.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're demonstrating that bowtie man has successfully conned you into thinking the poor are holding you back, not himself.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Guy in middle will actually ask guy on right to hold his cookie for him, and guy on right starts eating parts of it as "fee" for holding it.

5 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 0

Guy on right will give guy in middle a cookie, but only for a short time, and expects 2 cookies back in return.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

While the guy on the left so very carefully and thoughtfully sneaks a crumb for himself.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Had not anticipated such a steep decline? Really?

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Agreed—economists are weird

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Chicago school of economics is a religion devoted to the nobility of the rich, and the corporate media has a vested interest in listening

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 To be fair, Americans were buying Amazon products (and from other online shops) like wildfire over the course of the pandemic

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 but November must have been the big POOF end of the money - my wife runs an online shop, had been selling like crazy until Nov

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't say they didn't anticipate a decline, just that it was steeper than anticipated. How much of a decline would you have guessed?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

How much has the unemployment rate increased?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Off the top of my head I thought it was currently about 6% up from 3% before the pandemic. It's actually 6.7% up from 3.8%. But that >

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

> understates the impact because labor force participation has fallen more steeply, and because it's unevenly distributed. Also, new >

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

> unemployment claims have been rising recently, and have been higher than economists' projections, which could be part of the reason why >

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How are rich people so fucking dumb? If you give the people with no money extra money, they will spend more money than they normally would.

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

They’re not that dumb and they understand how it works. The question is how are they so callous and evil?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But that's not what the rich do so they don't understand us.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

They seem to be reporting the opposite here. Essentially, the poor are holding back money so they can pay rent instead of buying home goods.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 24

As stupid as that statement is, you must be rich.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There is a minimum cost of living which many are barely meeting, now more than ever. if that cost was say $900/m and you earn 1000 you arent

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Going to spend your last 100 on non essentials, you save for a rainy day. If you earned 1200 your surplus triples, you could spend 150 and

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Still put 150 away, a little over the minimum makes a huge difference. Problem is every time pay goes up companies up their prices to match

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because the poor don't have money to spend. If they gave the poor money to spend, $1200 a month or so, it gets spent immediately.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Assuming full income security. I'm saying that retail sales could be down because future assumed necessary spending is being prioritized.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I.e, current bills have been paid, but hold off on buying a new television because we don't know what the next few months will look like.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be a thing if people were making enough money to actually save some each month for "future assumed necessary spending".

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0