Who agrees?

Jul 14, 2016 6:36 PM

JuhoKarjalainen

Views

326827

Likes

3675

Dislikes

389

Who agrees?

I don't mind these super high graphics games, they are just nicer than the old ones. Nothing original in these games.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Minecraft.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If this is rule 68 I REAAAAALLY want to know what 1-67 are!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Just because it looks "retro" doesn't mean it's good.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

GAMING RULE #68b: Sacrificing graphics to prove a point won't make a better game either. Strike a balance and stay out of the uncanny valley

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Cataclysm DDA!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But it does promote 'immersion' and is usually associated with interesting, non-repetitive game play that doesn't need split second jumps...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

sure, but it doesn't make it worse either.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It does make a better game. It doesn't make it good.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about judge every game individually instead of having a prejudice about it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like having graphical limitations forced older games to have better gameplay, stories, etc.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mount & Blade anyone?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Strictly speaking, if the only difference was graphics, I would say it absolutely does. Aesthetics are VERY important.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gorgeous women are sometimes bitches and are bad in bed...still nice to look at

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

No one. No one agrees with you, OP. You're so unique. Your parents must be so proud.

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 15

People who complain about graphics are stupid, I wanna have fun, graphics are a bonus

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

I just wish consoles wouldn't hold back all the graphics. Well my pc is old and I don't have money so it's good for me right now but anyway

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Only a retard would think like that in the first place

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Undertale

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would love to see SMB remastered with todays graphics just to see what it would like.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Every "?" box would be a micro transaction and they would upscale the game to 1080p.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. But the opposite is also true

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed! But I'm a Nintendo junkie sooooo...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Define 'better'

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the amount of fun you have

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Everybody agrees. You KNOW everybody agrees...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why do you think he posted it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Stalker for example

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I laughtlat people who log 3k hours on a single player team like skyrim, then I look at my COP playtimd

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure. Modern 'pretty graphics' are ugly too. Really, fuck sepia and bluetoning everything! Fuck you, devs. Stop it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

WHAT?! ARE YOU SAYING CAUSATION DOES NOT IMPLY CORRELATION?!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Uuuh, but causation does imply correlation. Do you mean correlation doesn't imply causation?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i did, i was hasty in my caps-lock comment and wrong. thanks for the correction.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sorry to be that guy lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I consider graphics to be an important part of judging a game but only based more on what it's supposed to represent.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Graphics can have a huge impact, but it's better for the art style to be cohesive. If Super Mario Bros was realistic it would be much worse.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly, we've been trying to say for years that games are an art form, then all the hipster gamers say "Don't be a gfx whore"... Are 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ikr, it does make a better game. It doesn't make it good..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they not part of the art? Better gfx may not mean better gameplay, but great gameplay AND gfx is better than great gameplay and shit gfx 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"hipster gamers" no, it's more like angry kids trying to justify their purchases.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It was hipster gamers back around '06-'10 (that's when I remember people shouting about graphics whores all the time) when games like 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Crysis and Gears of War were coming out, the hate was unbelievable for anything that looked good for a few years after the 360 came out 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also if it looked shit like utter shit and you pointed that out? Not a valid criticism. Just streams of "gfx whore"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Kyllä!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Näin se vaa on!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aavistuksen myöhässä toi sun kommentti :D

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No ei kai se haittaa

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No ei kai.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Worse graphics also does not mean better gameplay.

9 years ago | Likes 1717 Dislikes 18

Yeah I wish Papers, Please had gotten this message. Great game, but the pixels are countable, and it kills me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Idk man last I remember Gold/silver ran at 60 fps and had shit tons of content

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Fucking indi games are starting to piss me off. Like looking for a needle in piles of 4.99 shit

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Detail makes a game better, take Limbo or Inside for example

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Take THAT Undertale

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Super Nintendo has that sweet spot smooth colorful and able to produce some detail

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea, just ask superman 64.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm playing RE 4 and am loving it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah we're to THAT point.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have to... *poorer* graphics...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But if a game is famous and has bad graphics, you know it's going to be quality.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Not... exactly...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Undertale says hi, shitty graphics and gameplay and its popular....

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

No wonder you suck at playing video games

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

0_0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless they don't put effort into gameplay, because pretty graphics are easier to sell in tv ads.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why was there even a need to say this? "Long-haired cats are often the source of allergens." "YOU CAN BE ALLERGIC TO SHORT-HAIRED CATS TOO."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But better graphics often means worse gameplay when it comes out of a framework and used in substitute of game design.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You right.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

You left.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You up

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guess it becomes my duty to say, you down.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And "Classic" or "Original" does not mean better than future instalments. I'm looking at you, melee fanboys.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whoa, whoa, whoa. New smash bros aren't even close to the original, the N64 original.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

melee definitely has some problems, but at least it doesn't punish movement (tripping in brawl) or reward making mistakes (rage in s4). 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that said, i get very bored of melee's fox/falco only. i think that the middle builds for PM was probably the closest i've seen to ideal 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Worse graphics and gameplay does not mean worse music, story and immersion...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

This doesn't make sense, does it?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What was playing in my head was more like "A game with bad graphics AND gameplay can still be amazing."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FUCKIN MINECRAFT!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

Minecraft is an amazing game. Personally It does not fit me but it's a every well made game

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I wouldn't call it "Amazing" It's good and well made but it's no legend.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It's pretty legendary. It rocked the industry for quite a while and is still kicking.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 14, 2016 10:58 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Minecraft was IMO successful because it gave it's target audience nearly exactly what they wanted in a polished work. It was simply fun.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN TETRIS THEN? But seriously, that shit is addicting.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Better graphics would not influence the gameplay in any way

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But when playing e.g. a shooter, better/worse graphics might have an impact on gameplay

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...while other games profit from simple, minimalistic graphics and therefore do not need high-res.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tetris had good graphics when it was released initially, in 1984.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Watch this: https://youtu.be/WPQFeMRXwmg?t=1h35m18s

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is whole new fucking lvl of tetris.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Have you ever played Tetris Friends by any chance?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've never even heard of this. I had a handheld Tetris in high school that I got really damn good at but that is a new name to me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tetris originally released in 1984. At the time 8-bit graphics were cutting edge.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Simple mechanics, skills change outcome, randomization.. Yep, it's addicting even on paper. That's why minecraft is addicting too!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

A lot of games are good. Toxic communities just ruin them.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like pokemon go, you have no idea how many kids teeth I've knocked in to keep the charnanders to mysrlf

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually sometimes it does. The more graphically intense a game becomes, the harder the gameplay is to actually develop.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

'The Order 1886' for example. When a game becomes so graphically advanced, more of the budget has to be assigned to art over design/prog.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whereas something like Shovel Knight, while a smaller budget, it's far cheaper to build up mechanics and levels.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone obviously has no clue how game development works.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Actually it's what I do for a living. But you can make assumptions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's what i do for living as well, and if you know what you are doing you don't couple visuals to mechanics too tightly it limits mechanics.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

more intense graphics = more expensive, slower art = smaller worlds/higher budgets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When a game's graphical quality is lower, then you can get more quantity out. Or spare more money for more focus on gameplay.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The comment is about shit games like undertale and shovelknight trying to recapture an era.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Metacritic reviews: Undertale - 92%/8.2. Shovel Knight - 90%/7.6%. Both won multiple awards. They're not shit games. You just dislike them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And you're not intelligent enough to tell the difference.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Justin Bieber makes a lot of money, still shit music :p

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I linked reviews. Both from critics and users. Money and Reviews? Two different things. COMPLETELY unrelated.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Life must be hard for you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The one thing hipster gamers dont realize...

9 years ago | Likes 298 Dislikes 8

I can't stand indie games. I get it, I really do, they're unique, sometimes have decent stories, hard work went into them..but usually awful

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

There's only been a few good AAA games in the last ten years. Several good indie games on the other hand. Some were even kickstarters.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

3 Witcher, 2 Elder Scrolls, 3 Batman, 2 Mirrors Edge, 3 Fallout, 3 Mass Effect, 3 Bioshock, 4 Far Cry etcetcetc. You argument is invalid

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're just high budget dumpster clones of the same game. Nothing quality.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

"Here's a huge generalization!" - Spookyu 2016.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

"Here's a tired imgur trope." - Hannya 2016

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I think you mean indie games, and they have "bad" graphics because they are typically made by 1 or 2 people.

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 4

No, they have "bad" graphics because they're too cheap to hire an artist, and try to pass it off as "retro!" or "16-bit!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

too cheap to hire an artist because it's a project done by a single person in their spare time or with an extremely small budget lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats a bullshit response. There are plenty of amazing looking games with decent gameplay made by 1 or 2 people. Papers Please for one.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Really... Amazing looking? I think it looks functional and it suits the game, but I would not say "amazing."

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I like pixel art..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They aren't the prettiest graphics, but they're beautiful in the sense of how well they fit the game.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you a Mops? If so....*Kommunistenfaust

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're confusing bad graphics with stylized graphics there's a difference.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's indie games which are limited because of small teams. Then there's hipster games that TRY to be "different" and lose sight of "good"

9 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

Like any interactive narrative that actually has no gameplay. Like firewatch. Interesting narrative. Boring excuse for a game.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Also not very indie

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like Fez

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

I actually loved FEZ personally (though i can see why someone wouldn't)...Shame the dev was the largest asshat the world's ever known.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Fez was an indie game. Phil Fish was a bit of a nob, but it was still an indie game.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or mighty no9

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1