Misleading chart showing LEO deaths in 2021 (National Law Enforcement Memorial Fund)

Jan 12, 2022 8:19 AM

TransientSignal

Views

132555

Likes

1162

Dislikes

57

In this chart put out by the National Law Enforcement Memorial Fund and Museum to illustrate the number of LEOs killed in the US in 2021, it appears upon first glace that each segment of the chart is proportional to the number of deaths said segments represent.

However, it should be immediately obvious that despite COVID-19 killing nearly 2/3rds of LEOs in 2021, the segment representing said deaths is less than half.

This chart can be found on page 3 of the NLEOMF 2021 annual fatalities report here:

https://nleomf.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2021-EOY-Fatality-Report-Final-web.pdf

Measuring the image, we can approximate the number of deaths this chart is graphically depicting, as well as approximate how it compares to the actual numbers (shown in parentheses, note due to possible measurement errors these values are approximations)

Firearms-related Deaths: 105 (+69%)

Traffic-related Deaths: 100 (+72%)

Other Deaths: 48 (+29%)

COVID-19 Deaths: 201 (-49%)

As you can see, while deaths due to firearms and traffic accidents and to a lesser extent the catch-all 'other' are dramatically overstated, deaths due to COVID-19 are dramatically understated. This is a great example of casual propaganda as well as how graphs and other graphical illustrations of data can be intentionally misleading for a variety of reasons.

@OP Cops always fucking lie.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can I point out that many of these officers probably contracted covid on duty.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The COVID deaths weren't actually COVID, it was co-morbidity with firearms and traffic.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we see how many deaths are directly related to ivermectin and drinking piss? So we. can point and laugh?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How many unarmed people did the police kill in 2021? How about falsely arrest?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you look at this and your take-away is automatically that the numbers are a lie, the pixel measurements must be the truth.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because the author used size to indicate magnitude (see how "covid-19" is wider than the words "covid-19"?), but did so inconsistently.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, cops lie???

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Intentionally misleading or auto formatting to fit "Other" into its gray box...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Man Dies After Medical Incident

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aimed at what

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Fearmongering over insecurity and undermining how much of a shitty employer you've been as many employees died of a preventable disease

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Though even disregarding covid, these numbers can't be good

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As a Leo i agree!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A good rule is to never allow the appearances of scientifically displayed data represent fact. Propaganda likes charts and calm voices.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Consider how often cops lie about the cause of death I'm surprised they admitted it was Covid instead of "Man Dies After Medical Incident"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

have you noticed, how the first three bars are magically the size of the text in them with proper margins while the covid one is /1

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Intentionally made larger, to illustrate the larger number of deaths from covid related causes... These bars are not made to scale.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

They are clearly not meant as an actual representation of percentage, but as a vessel for the text only.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Possible, but that doesn't mean it isn't misleading to a single casual glance.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh. Guess I’m glad to be a Scorpio.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This report uses such obtuse language.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck the police!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I’d also be interested to know of the 301, how many were willingly unvaccinated.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Would be interesting to see a representation of any deaths from departments that went against mask mandates too.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a lot of Herman Cain Awards, we'll have to put the little Chinese kids in the trophy factory on double shifts.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And how "firearms" were actually suicides.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lies, damned lies, and statistics, its a great book everyone should read to see how stats are constantly badly done.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s cause the person who did it wanted to get all of the words on the bar and didn’t give a shit about statistics of accuracy of the pict

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

whoa whoa whoa...cops not caring about statistics or facts!? WHAT!?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

in that case, whats the point of visible bars? you could just list the numbers.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So what we really need is a banana for scale

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cops use snowflake math.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I doubt this is intentional. If it was they would have hidden the numbers.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 13

You’re an optimistic bugger aren’t you

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Well minus covid, each are as big as it takes to label the section

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

In light of that, there's also the decision to add "-related" to "Firearms" and "Traffic", which doubles each of their widths.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This isn't optimistic. Assuming malice all the time is optimistic because it hugely downplays the prevelence and ease of miscommunication

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Assuming malice is *pessimistic*, assuming all other things are equal. However, experience renders things unequal.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disagree. The presumption of malice relies on a naive optimism that things work out unless someone actively disrupts it and that isn't true

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I find "things outside your control don't care" to be far optimistic than "things outside your control are conspiring to make things worse"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's probably a graphical formatting decision

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That'd be a reasonable conclusion if "other" wasn't so small and "Covid" so large. This implies size matters while leaving deniability.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

"Firearms related" presumably also includes NDs, friendly fire,etc.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And suicide. Which was the leading cause of death for LEOs. Somehow magically not included in any graphic.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Much safer to be a Virgo.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fixed it......

4 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 1

Thank you

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doing the Lord's work. Thank you, son.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Good work. I was expecting OP to do this.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In most years, the leading cause of death for LEOs in the USA is traffic accidents (not counting murders by car).

4 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 0

Not only that, but we determined in the 1970s that police patrolling has zero effect on the rate of crime too! They just do it for the power

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They literally drive round while messaging on their car laptop. You can watch them do it on the body cam videos.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

you can watch them do it if youre not a coward who slows down whenever cops are driving nearby

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

To be fair, they have to catch them all.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something something "kings of distracted driving"

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Also, their job includes parking to block traffic.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

And then walking out of their cars, on busy roads, to stand next to someone else's car. It's really unsurprising.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Any time I get pulled over I pull into a parking lot or onto a side street. I’d hate for them to get hurt on my account.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I do when I can, but some highways don't have the option. Smartest cop I ever had walked to passenger window for safety.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a non american, what's a LEO?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Low earth orbit

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A star sign

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Law Enforcement Officer

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Law Enforcement Officer

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Ironic, given most of them had a few weeks of training and none know the actual law. That takes years & years of study.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Law enforcement officers- includes police, state troopers, park rangers, federal agents, and so on.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Low earth orbit

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an American, I also wasn’t aware. But we’re famous for being ignorant sluts.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

from same report:

4 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 10

Crazy that one year of Covid exceeds the prior 4 decades of everything

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Leaving aside the one tornado death, why does drowning and death by floodwater get two different statistics?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I assume drowning is non-freak-accident related. Don't know why acts of nature and floodwater are separated though

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Floodwater related could cover things like the flood waters dropping a big object on them. I guess?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a data analyst, I love granularity.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Im a big fan as well, but you cant apply it selectively. If youre going all the way down to 'tornado' you shouldnt have an 'other' category.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you look here you'll notice 301 is the number of COVID deaths and the 6 other categories add up to 37 deaths, which means that Tornado is

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 of 37 "Other" deaths.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Were the four beaten to death but not physically related attacked by a telekinetic?

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

It was clearly Mind-Quad!

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeah, did you not hear about that fight with the x-men? Storm even killed a dude with a tornado.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

my feeling is that maybe 'physical related' means things like heart attacks while chasing suspects?

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Everything other than the other causes stated that killed them outright. Stairway collapsing under them, fridge falling from window, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

'Physical related' sounds like they died during a routine check-up. Doctor: "Could you take a deep breath?" Officer: *dies from exertion*

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They were emotional beatings. "Sticks and stones..." and all that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...and while this gives magnitude properly, it doesn't include traffic or firearms, so it doesn't undermine OP in the way you seem to think.

4 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 8

Here you go: /a/GUWHnMx

4 years ago | Likes 260 Dislikes 1

Really makes them look dumber now.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks! This post is the first time I've seen someone calculate numbers for the bad chart instead of making a good chart. Interesting...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks dude, I was getting ready to fix it myself. I’m upvoting 10 of your posts.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doing the lord's work

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also flip it. We read left to right and it makes it easier to process going larger to smaller. We tend to judge things farther right as less

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Beat me to it. Well done.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do not assume malice where stupidity or lazy can explain. It probably not intentionally but a shitty paid government employee designer

4 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 13

Or unwitting-casualness in this sort of case, tbh. So many people will do shit like this because it "looks better" to them.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's negligence at best.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

There we go, that's the word my brain couldn't think of

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a moderately paid government employee I can say this is usually the culprit. Don’t expect greatness from mediocrity ?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an American- Dude. NO. Always ALWAYS assume malice.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That's no way to live life. Especially, also as an American, everyone is so dumb.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me, a paranoid person, "Always Assume Malice."

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

This fund is not a government organization. Stop blaming the government for everything.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Why? It's easy and usually sorta true

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup, looks like they just made it so the text fit inside.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

In other cases I might, but this just reeks of copaganda.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Naw fam, they lie.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

I bet it's probably less malicious and more a designer trying to squeeze the labels into corresponding squares Def gives the wrong vibes tho

4 years ago | Likes 421 Dislikes 46

found the cop

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Someone approved it. They know what they're doing. Remember that shameless post about "rescuing a lost child from the rioters"?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I always say that any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. This is an example.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I doubt it because police unions have been on a "our job is the most dangerous job evar" angle lately. They don't want it to scale

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I agree. Not everyone is detail minded. It drives me crazy to even acknowledge this, but so many people don't care about details like this.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oh you sweet summer child...

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 14

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

The Sacklers did the same thing with oxy data. It’s on purpose, they know people won’t notice.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

How great was Dopesick?!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They wouldn't have used such weird terminology in the report is they weren't trying to be misleading.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

If that were the case, covid should've been either small enough to just fit the text, or much larger to visualize it's significance

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

if it would be malicious, the numbers wouldn't be there but somewhere in text or a lot smaller.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

I design for a living and I can assure you people dont read anything. The proportion of the picture is more important in a graph.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If it is true for majority that is very sad and no wonder world goes to shit...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Possible of course but given the constant barage of intentional misinformation on this topic one should assume malice & distrust the source

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It was made by a cop fund and museum, so it was definitely designed maliciously.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

Thrown together in 10 minutes in Photoshop, did 1 px per fatality then just merged into one and enlarged.

4 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 1

The fact they share the n-values suggests that this was less about deception and more about maintaining a certain font size for the medium.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shrinking the font size to keep everything else accurate ratio wise doesn't always work, as it obscures what you think most important.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hey Downvoter, not everything is put on a website. Some graphics are designed first and foremost for a small portion of a sheet of paper.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you!.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're hired! Also, you're handling official government data without a contract, how dare you, you're FIRED!

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

F12! F12! SHIT FUCK... THAT'S NOT REFRESH

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Can do it in 10 with ggplot and make it reproducible for changing data. It design visualizations for clarity though and everyone wants shiny

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fellow R lover and instructor here. High five.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a statistician and this seems likely. Maybe originally made to be proportionate and then resized by a design/comms person who...

4 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 5

Pretty certain no one gets a Strategic Communications degree without knowing they lie for a living

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a marketing person and graphic designer who also understands data, I can only see this as deliberate distortion. A decision was made.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Agree 100% why bother making the bars different sizes at all if they’re not representative of the numbers they’re made to represent?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...is far less data-literate and resized the columns to fit the labels. Not an unusual occurrence (but should have been checked properly)

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

so what is your opinion on covid 19, vaccines and their government mandation?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's not a great pick-up line FYI

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why make it a graph then?

4 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 4

Nickleback fan.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"graphs are pretty" says my coworkers who don't understand data

4 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

A useless middle manager with a marketing degree wanted it.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

People like them

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a table not a graph.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Then why isn’t Covid a smaller box?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ahh... The "Single horizontal stacked bar graph" Vs table argument. The original but lesser know version of

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's more like a linear pie chart.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ah linear pie, just like grandma used to make!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're really only good when lines are in season. Linear pie with canned lines just isn't the same.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0