.

Jun 25, 2022 3:47 PM

There was never an illusion about what they were doing, this is on those that didn’t vote or threw it away

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Supreme Court is the arm of the Radical Christian Group The GQP

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Reminder: Yertle McConnell swore an oath that he would follow the precedent established by the Obama SC nomination.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"The ends justifies the means" - GOP

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And still people will vote Republican because gas costs a lot rn

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Republicans have been terrorists subverting democracy and the will of the people for decades. They are fascist scum.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yet the Dems refuse to even use the Democratic process the way it was intended. To prevent fascism.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

What conservatives have gone over the past ten years is erode norms that would have one time brought shame to they and their party.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Republicans: An underhanded win is still a win, and if that doesn't work, cheat, and if you can't cheat, buy off the refs.

3 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 2

And if you can't do that then fucking murder everyone. The Republican Party is a death cult.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

A Republican told me if you ain’t cheating you ain’t trying

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's the only way they COULD win. The honour system is unfit for politics!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't forget A LOT of people didn't show up to vote for Hillary. So, uh, how's that "Bernie or Bust" thing goin'?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, that's their slogan, right?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, RBG didn't retire when she should have and Kennedy was bought and paid for to retire in the middle of Trump's term.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The party of "traditions" loves abusing them to get what they want.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, and Democrats better start fighting just as dirty. Stop with this "noble opposition" high road bullshit.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But that's the rules, if you don't like them change them - every dickhead libertarian I've ever met

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We know. We fucking know. But how do we stop them from continuing their bullshit? That's what I want to know.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think we can. We're on the path that leads to either a fascist state or civil war now, they won't even pretend to follow rules.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Until next time kids!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don’t play by the rules cause i think the goal is to destroy our democracy anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Which is why, unfortunately, we can't simply use their tactics. They also would simply not work as well for our side anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oh, I remember.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You just got JAMMED!!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let’s not forget Democrats had a super majority in 2008-2010 and didn’t bother to pass a law protecting right to abortion. I’m pissed at all

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Never forget that most of what they do is not at the polling place, but the preparations behind it. This a example of double standards.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These religious freaks will do anything to force us to live by their laws because they think they are doing God's work. they are crazy

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh they know they're not doing gods work, it a convenient cover for their fascism.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I still can't get over our highest court got hijacked by a crazy religious minority.

3 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 2

The religious right has been working towards this since they desegregated schools. R’s vote in EVERY election. They prove voting works.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When a qualifying religious institute doesn't pay taxes, you have a shit ton of bribe money left over for the politicians

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's an extraordinarily embarrassing point in our nation's history. And these people are just getting started.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's simple. The gop wanted it and the dem let it.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All Conservatives, yes, ALL OF THEM, Are Bastards!

3 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 10

So... now AJAB...?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Solution being?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Conservatism is, By Definition, the opposition of growth, progress, and learning.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

ACYAOTAB

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

if someone said that out loud next to me I'd call the bondulance

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ack you tab!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd go for ACKY-OW-TAB

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I saw it as ACK-YOW-TAB!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's insane that any judge sides with any political alignment, I thought that would fall under judicial disqualification

3 years ago | Likes 326 Dislikes 1

You're completely right, but rules and sanity are actively disintegrating like it's too-crazy-to-be-real but yet it is.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

There are a few problems. One, language, especially in complicated structures, is not cut and dried. There is wiggle room for >

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

interpretation. The right to an abortion was pretty much attached to the right to privacy. The right to privacy is not actually a right in>

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the constitution. It was interpreted as a right because of how other rights sort of weave around it. But was never specifically listed down>

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is where interpretation comes in. You can interpret that the right to privacy exists, because it is kinda alluded to. But you don't >

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

have to. You can take a literal argument that it is not written down, and therefore it does not technically exist. You can even explain >

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If the USA required judges to either be neutral or to support a minority party (i.e. not Republican or Democrat) then they'd have no judges.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They can have preferences in private, sure, it should not affect how they rule however. Like, I'm a Christian, sosialist conservative, I can

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

still observe that a 12 week minimum is objectively better then what... 2 weeks they talk about? At 2 weeks people could get abortion out of

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

panic over the time limit. 12 weeks, with free consultation, time to think etc. would result in fewer botched abortions and broken homes.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't "support" abortions, but it should be legal, and IMO they should receive a few free sessions with a psychologist before and after.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just a reminder that both dems and repubs are responsible. Dems have had the power to persist and have instead kowtowed to repubs every time

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Kinda, but the fact is if you got rid of the Republican Party the problem would go away, if you got rid of the Dems it'd get a lot worse.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But the dems are complicit they benefit from the repub monster so they only fight it enough to get another vote even when they could stop it

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but just because they're both responsible doesn't mean they're equally responsible. Dems need to be better. Reps need to stop being.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't disagree, but I think its time we stop pretending like we can count on dems for anything, we need to take more/other action

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

1/2 think its time we stop pretending dems are a monolith. The primaries exist, use them. But don't disengage entirely because no one's

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 hanged Manchin yet. Even the worst dem is better than the best Rep, and a bad tool is still a tool until you can replace it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying don't participate but yeah they are worse than no tool at all bc dems are making ppl believe that they've done their part 1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Untrue. Congressional action is a numbers game, and Rs have always had the numbers/positions to obstruct, plain and simple. VOTE.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What about the super majority when Obama was first elected? Had it for two years. Didn’t leverage it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He put in Sotomayor (Aug. '09) and Kagan (Aug. '10) during those two years. The next opening (Scalia) was when Mitch was Senate Majority.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m talking about passing laws. Not the Supreme Court.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ACA...but that was it. I wish there had been more.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's bs repubs have pushed a ton of shit thru with the same numbers the dems have had. Dems let repubs postpone SC appointment under 1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Obama for over a YEAR! this isn't working anymore. Im not saying don't vote, I'm saying we need to do more than vote, bc it's not working 2

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Dems let Repubs"? Mitch McConnell was Senate Majority Leader at the time and simply refused to bring it to the floor, and there was no 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...measure in place to force his hand. That was 100% on Mitch alone. Don't blame Dems for shit Rs pull when they learn to game the system2/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a lame excuse. If our whole system grinds to a halt for one stubborn asshole then the system doesn't work! & if the system doesn't 1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0