prncessbuttrcup
552150
17629
589
BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL!
Let's keep funding awesome science!! https://experiment.com/
DiceyBusiness
Some good signs, but I'm betting there were a lot of scientific illiteracy and "science fanboys" with more enthusiasm than facts there. 1/2
DiceyBusiness
2/2 Not trying to be a dick, but sometimes that's just the opposite end of scientific ignorance and doesn;t help much more. Looked fun tho!
MrMeems
Time to pose my favorite gif again.
LarfleezePlz
TheGreatandAlmightyNooblord
Always bothers me how horrible a font choice that is whenever I see that pic
LarfleezePlz
Yeah it is pretty crappy lol
SeanBeanDiesAlot
Anyone ever try to play a Civ game with bad science? It doesn't end well...
Tywinning
Who needs science when you can rush em early? Mongolia 4 lyf
HolyOldMackinaw
Haha, civ 4! if you could survive against the Mongolians long enough to get Iron working they were toast, that early warrior rush was brutal
CommanderBallSack
Some men just want to watch the world learn.
OhhhDrZaius
Got Polio? Me neither, thanks science lol
arnlist
DrPizzazz
Ah, I was looking for this.
imreallyjusthereforthecats
ItMightBeTheWine
I am disappointed that I haven't seen this sign. This would have been my sign.
SickSickIndividual
Bitch.
bronsonlug
Yeah but Earth's climate will change regardless of what we do and will continue to do so after we are long gone.. its in the geologic record
Nightcaste
Nowhere remotely close to the changes that have been occurring over the past 200 years.
bellaluna
MAKE AMERICA THINK AGAIN! IN PEER REVIEW WE TRUST!
bucketmouse
I've wondered about that. Just wondered. About some of the inherent flaws that come with "peer reviewed material".
bridgebrain
I really like "Make America Think Again." I want it on a tshirt
AheagoAmigo
BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL
Anglosvm
BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL
Idontlikelongusernames
BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL!
yangdriel
BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL!
Timeshifft
Yeaaaa Science!
prncessbuttrcup
Woo!!! Wish I would have gone today but I couldn't get my lazy ass out of bed.
fairybug
I'm not arguing with her, but there was once a very similar statistic to that of #2 stating the safety of lead.
DuggFunnie
I am arguing with her because that 97% number is 100% bullshit
yesiamaphysicist
Yep, closer to 99% when looking at peer-reviewed, published work.
fairybug
Well, yes, but I was worried that stating that fact would get me downvoted to oblivion.
DuggFunnie
naw man, leftists agenda was pushed too hard. they overplayed their hand and now most people are pretty much down to kill commies 'n 'shit
Mulvers
#13 did that protester just assume the Earth's Gender??
PsychopompGecko
swinglinered
The Entmoot takes a long time.
BDBones
I just don't understand how you can say "save the trees" on a sign made of cardboard.
FaceExpressionsONLY
So you'd rather write in stone?
BDBones
I was thinking maybe paint their message on their tummies. Maybe RECYCLE something into a sign. Anything. But having a tree hold a sign?
BDBones
Funny...that seems smart. "Keep killing trees and we go back to painting rocks. You want that?" That's actually a great idea.
B4dL30
They said they were going to make a demonstration for science. They got all the smart ass signs. I'm not disappointed.
brainplay
I'm still not sure what they're protesting. Narratives and agendas are all over the place at these marches.
B4dL30
If I get it correctly, the main theme of the protest is how anti-science position got so much traction in the current USA administration.
brainplay
Outside of climate change, what anti-science are you talking about?
B4dL30
Isn't that enough? To me, this position signals that they'll undermine science whenever it's ideologically convenient for them...
brainplay
Not really. Climate science is mutually exclusive from many fields and it more business related. That goes both ways for different fields.
spacexcadet
That one Sir Mixalot sign holder is gonna be mortified when she's a teenager and suddenly gets all the lyrics.
AlcoholicsAnonymousBYO
Maybe, but that song and worse play throughout the day now, kids laugh about it, it's a different era?
ToxicMolluscinity
Mortified or silently pleased? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Tauntar
I liked some of these, I cringed at some too
Camelspotting
STEM people don't usually get hired for their social skills.
Brocid3n
#6 discount nick cage?
CatBlaster5000
Bit of a stretch.
Ohmnitech
Fun fact, that's picture was taken in Denver.
Posix
yup
Badyams73
I never knew what data looked like until I saw her poster!
CatBlaster5000
I'm sorry to hear that, probably a result or your underfunded school system.
Camelspotting
Now I'm a believer.
TongueWagger
The best one was in the background: "what do we want? Evidence based science. When do we want it? After peer review."
FoxGodRecords
Ya beated me to it. Take it. TAKE IT, you magnificent bastard.
norill
but it's pretty old.
NituaRS
an oldie but a goodie
Feralkyn
I loved that one, too
worldsokayestspeler
#2 to be fair, at one time 99.99% of surgeons ridiculed the idea of having to wash their hands befor surgery
goingtogoeatworms
Yes, but when presented with evidence to the contrary, they started washing their hands.
bucketmouse
Also, anyone who works in medicine knows that what is "fact" one year can lead to poor patient outcomes the next.
bucketmouse
Science does not equal facts. Science leads to facts and the understanding there of. Equating the two is a falsity.
FiveDollars
And turns science into an almost religious faith.
thehotmageaeris
No, it just helps people to fuck up less at science
ohmegatron
But we've evolved.
bucketmouse
Was there a genetic mutation that caused us to allow us to adapt and change our way of thinking. Proof or GtFO.
ohmegatron
Maybe not genetic but psychological or social. Evolution isn't limited to dna; people also change.
DiceyBusiness
Not even remotely.
Defektd
Totally unaware of what/why this is, anyone care to inform me?
IWasInThePool
It was a nationwide march in support of science, because the Trump administration is anti-science.
GoodGameYoungLad
U kno that honestly doesn't surprise me
arewevenom
Time for me to wear my fav shirt
CatBlaster5000
I love it.
DrPizzazz
solarecreator
i have this shirt! but without his face on it.
RedStarBeograd
And with "satan" instead of "sagan", and with a pentagram instead of a atom representation.
arewevenom
Cool I would like to see it!
solarecreator
https://www.ilovesciencestore.com/media/cafepress/products/resized/image_hailsagan_black_44.png_resize_600x600.png
Exosist
Oh my! do you know if that shirt is avavible online? :)
OlanDyurai
This!^
TheSwedishStag
https://www.redbubble.com/people/normalsizeddeet/works/14155851-hail-sagan?grid_pos=4&p=t-shirt&style=mens
CantStopTheNipple
Mmmnice!
ThatSonOfaBitch
You god!
Exosist
Thanks alot! :D
firehawkcultist
The fact marches like these aren't dying down give me hope
bucketmouse
Science does not equal facts. Science leads to facts and the understanding there of. Equating the two is a falsity.
ShaunDreclin
I wonder who's paying for all these protestors, they must be pretty rich. Wait I mean poor, the protests are tiny! /s
supremebossman
I dont know if global warming is true or not but what I do know is no group of americans will ever come to a 97% agreement on anything.
supremebossman
I think I was trying to point out how divided our society is. But yea, lets argue about climate change and politics. We'll figure it out.
swinglinered
could be 47% of scientists in the US are foregners, so...
swinglinered
i
Ihavewaytoomanyfavoritestosort
You don't know if a sudden jump in CO2 emissions since the Industrial Revolution was OUR fault? Really?
LemonTable
And the statistic is not from the general population, it's from professionals that study climate change.
Badyams73
If I were a scientist being paid to support an ideal or not be paid for supporting the opposite...which would I choose?
Badyams73
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/414359/global-warming-follow-money-henry-payne
LazyJones1
False dichotomy.
Parradox87
the problem is that the sign is not real. humans dont CAUSE climate change. otherwise it wouldnt have happened before. the thing is that 1/x
Parradox87
climate change has always happened since the earths existence. humans ACCELERATE climate change, which is correct and what scientists 2/x
Parradox87
say and think. there is a big difference between causing and accelerating something. and second of all, since a few hundred years 3/x
Parradox87
the actual warm period we are in right now shouldve been over and the next ice age should come. we are long overdue for that. (4/4)
LazyJones1
Statistically overdue.
Camelspotting
Even for the internet this is the worst logic I have ever seen.
LazyJones1
Nonsense. If you want to talk semantics, "humans cause climate change" does not equate to "only humans cause climate change".
Parradox87
nope. when u get lung cancer, then start smoking and then say smoking caused ur lung cancers its just plain wrong. no semantics.
LazyJones1
False analogy fallacy. We didn't start polluting AFTER CO2 suddenly dramatically increased at an unnatural rate.
Parradox87
So... how comes co2 level 200 million years ago was a lot higher than now?
LazyJones1
Today's rate of increase is 200 times faster than the last sustained CO2 increase, in the mid to late Mesolithic.
BlindyBlindMansSonnySon
I remember in the Uk when our Doctors were protesting, the government tried to paint them as dangerous radicals. OUR FAMILY DOCTORS! 1.
DiceyBusiness
...You sure? I remember the government didn't want to give in to their demands, nobody ever thought they were radicals...
BlindyBlindMansSonnySon
I bet alot of your mainstream media does the same for your scientists 2.
S7eveDave
Does anyone care that science doesn't work by consensus?
Aesurah
Most facts don't. The consensus is the kardashians suck. Does change the facts: they are richer than most of us.
SomeCrazyNerd
Well I'd argue if most scientists agree that's a pretty compelling idea obviously. And then you read up on it. And it's makes obvious sense.
SomePeopleSayThatCucumbersTasteBetterPickled
Like geocentrism, phlogiston, and lamarckian evolution. Also, the classic example of Lysenkoism which enjoyed 100% acceptance in the CCCP.
Solusek
But, unfortunately, some of the funding for science does work by consensus, which is why it's important to have popular support. 1/2.
Solusek
Nevermind, I'm too tired to bother with the second half of my thought here. Enjoy your evening! 2/2.
80percentlegs
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus
ohmegatron
pls expln. am drunk
SomePeopleSayThatCucumbersTasteBetterPickled
as scientists, we don't determine fact based on a show of hands.
DuggFunnie
Given how much people parrot "muh 97%", I'm going to go on a limb and say no. People care about their emotions, that's about it
Tywinning
That sign kinda bothered me. Climate change in general been happening for millions of years, we just caused the most recent blip, not all.
Tywinning
That and as far as science is concerned there's always a debate to be had, even if the 97% stat were true
igivetheinternets
More like 75/77 scientists who were cherry picked believe humans cause "significant" (undefined in the survey) temperature rise. Not nearly
igivetheinternets
as impressive
Gallus1985
I think the point is that 2 or 3 percent of corporate backed researchers denying the facts that have been proven doesn't mean there's debate
DuggFunnie
Implying the 97% is valid inherently. Anon plz
BetichCro
I saw a picture just now on IG, sign said : " I can't believe I have to protest for facts."
daguq
Whose facts? I'm sure Trump has a list of facts he'd like you to get behind.
blueiverson
Then they're at the wrong march
ChronologicalMyopia
TrebuchetLaunchingFeces
How did you get so fucking ignorant to sarcasm?
CatBlaster5000
http://imgur.com/30qKJht
TrebuchetLaunchingFeces
It's obvious his comment is sarcasm. How do you not understand what I said?
blueiverson
How did everyone......
CatBlaster5000
God damn, not sure why you're being downvoted, you're right. People are dumb and don't like science. FOR SCIENCE!!!
AlcoholicsAnonymousBYO
What's an iverson?
blueiverson
What's a tungfu
shitstainer
+1 for Biglier
rockgolf
Last photo: Just a Bill up on Capitol Hill.
earlywormy
It's funny but like, he said big league...
anon4444
Biglier is bettlier.
realkiwinet
goodlier
lordofhouselurker
Coollier
cvtthekid
Awesomelier
WhatAboutThisOneThen
Big lier..
dweezy23
1) I hate Trump as much as the next semi-informed, anti-crazy human being. But if informed and not crazy is what we're claiming to be, it
dweezy23
2) should be common knowledge by now that A) bigly is a real word, and B) that's probably not what Trump was saying. There is plenty of
dweezy23
3) rancid hate-filled bile being spewed from that man's mouth every day. There's no need to use and reuse an old disproven grammar faux pas.
therealVexed
oops facts are only aloud when it lets us laugh at the baddies.
SomeGuyYourMomKnows
In a world of "on fleek", "bae" and so much more crazy slang, "biglier" just isn't that grammatically offensive to me anymore.
[deleted]
[deleted]
SteelofTomorrow
Lie vs Lay used to be a grammar error. You can't say "language evolves" and then crap on "biglier" while defending popfad slang as new words
SteelofTomorrow
Some grammar missing due to 140 character limit, don't you do it.
havealwayswonderedwethericanchangemyusernamelater
Is nobody saying something about "yuuuge"? As an non native speaker I understood it as a increasing joke. Please be gentle.
MenaceToSobriety
Donald Trump, controversial president of the USA, frequently pronounces the word "huge" as "yuge," for which he is regularly mocked.
havealwayswonderedwethericanchangemyusernamelater
Thank you for explaining!
sggoodw
I always thought he was saying 'big league', or maybe I was just hoping he wasn't dumb enough to say 'bigly' repeatedly.
ZerofaithX263
His "Fact Check" team was even called Big League Truth. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/landing/rapid-response
Renholder
No, he is that dumb.
Axewhipe
He started saying Bligly but changed it to Big League
amazingrusher
(He was. It's just funnier to pretend he wasn't.)
Vaporjack
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37483869 it is you guys that are dumb.
zindarato
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/joke
Knoldus
He says big league, the guy's a cunt but he didn't say bigly
Renholder
No, he definitely says bigly.
Knoldus
I heard a clear as day "G" after bigly both times, is he saying biglyg?
Renholder
I've never heard a g afterward. It's "bigly" and "gyna." The dude can't even spell "tap," so what do you expect?
qwertyman229
Second one doesn't make sense. Firstly, Evidence by Consensus is not Evidence. If I put out a survey asking "Are Frogs gay?" and 97% of-
qwertyman229
-answers are 'Yes' then Frogs must be gay according to the sign's logic. Secondly, Humans don't cause Climate Change. Climate Change is-
qwertyman229
a naturally occurring process that has been going on long before Humans were around. Humans have CONTRIBUTED to Climate Change, not started.
Camelspotting
If you need a cause to have an effect, then contribute = cause.
qwertyman229
Finally, Climate Change IS still a debate. The consensus that we contribute to CC is overwhelming, but not the extent to which we do.
Keairan
Quick reminder that DOW chemical is trying to get Trump and Pruitt to allow Organophosphate pesticides to be legal again. This class of (1)
nextdaynewplay
Many sheepsss; the new generation of idiots (useful ones). The most disgusting: I support science, but also shitslam.
nextdaynewplay
Without the "global warming business" many will loose their jobs. WHY not improving the transportation system (or making it free) ?
Choogie
Post source.
thatwoodguy
Organophosphates are large class of chemicals. Malthion and Diazonon are problems due to poor application. Most have been supplanted by 1/2
thatwoodguy
by Carbamates
Selerox
I'd comment about this, but I'd have to do it in other at least four languages to gather enough invective to do it justice.
ChronologicalMyopia
Thought I was done being angry at unbelievably stupid bullshit today, then I read this.
Hyippy
I know how you feel
evolve42
Many organophosphate are legal for ag uses. Are you talking about residential uses? Source?
HolyOldMackinaw
As someone who does herbicide application, Neonicatoids should be banned also. Agro industry needs to do things smarter. It's frustrating
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
CirB
As long as it's "industry", it doesn't care. All that matters is the bottom line.
UncivilizedEngie
You're making a big generalization about a lot of people when you say that. As bad as saying all Native Americans are alcoholics.
theloneponderer
I'm a native American and I'm an alcoholic.
CirB
Let's clarify a bit: mostly referring to the large corporations controlling majority of agro nowadays.
rtfm4r360
Everyone knows what you ment. Some people just can't help nitpick.
AlcoholicsAnonymousBYO
Given that modern 'industry' includes 'finance industry' and a focus on the profits first, I'd say it's a fair generalisation.
UncivilizedEngie
Lots of Native Americans I know are alcoholics too... If you say "industry" does it, that kinda makes bad behavior average.
MostlyAngryButNiceAboutIt
Neonics aren't the problem. Much like Dr. Wakefield and his bogus MMR-autism link, Chensheng Lu had his paper retracted. Link to follow (1)
RepostSadistic
Um, we are all having a science boner here. Don't kill the mood with your facts.
soGimalmostH
Idk about you, but all this friendly debate strokes my science boner. Bonus strokes for each of them backing up the arguments!
HolyOldMackinaw
To start, this problem is bigger than just honey bees. Two, the source you posted seriously twists facts to promote the author's viewpoints
HolyOldMackinaw
Honey bees are not the only bee species, field study shows many native bees are severely affected by neonics at lower exposures
HolyOldMackinaw
Neonics are not the sole cause of bee decline, but they are a significant stressor on bee populations in addition to other stressors.
rotinaj
the genetic literacy project is funded by monsanto, jon entine has no scientific backround, he's a paid shill
MostlyAngryButNiceAboutIt
Ok. What about this dude: http://scientificbeekeeping.com/a-review-of-dr-lus-paper-on-neonics-in-massachusetts/
MostlyAngryButNiceAboutIt
Last February, the government of Australia, where neonics are used extensively, reaffirmed that "honeybee populations are not in decline (2)
MostlyAngryButNiceAboutIt
despite the increased use of [neonicotinoids] in agriculture and horticulture since the mid-1990s." (3)
MostlyAngryButNiceAboutIt
https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/12/19/bee-experts-shred-harvard-neonics-colony-collapse-disorder-study-upbraid-journalists-for
Jernau
Meanwhile mycologist Paul Stamets is working on a fungal solution to replace all toxic pesticides.....
MostlyAngryButNiceAboutIt
Fungi are friend's AND food!
jaroferic
Do you want the Last of Us? Because that's how you get The Last of Us.
onlyhalfghost
Or the horrible fungaloids from whatever Whales ripped off when he made Cataclysm.
GapingHeadwound
I wish we could favourite comments.
saucemothfuckinsauce
Yeah, an uncontrolled fungal infection on insects won't have any side effects.
Jernau
He has developed a way of preventing the fungi from reproducing. It protects the crops without seeding spores.
WisdomAbreastTomfoolery
Life finds a way.gif
GradiustheFox
I'm keeping an open mind that it works but this really does sound like the beginning of a sci fi disaster movie.
Aesurah
That's what I think every time I see one of those Boston dynamics robot gifs hah.
RandomFellowImgurian
About to go research Paul Stamets. Thank you
GuckFoogle
obligatory 'monsanto is the devil' comment
CirB
Monsanto's products aren't (necessarily) the evil. That said, their way of conducting their business can't be classified as anything else
ThrowawayHBS
nevermind the massive amount of incremental food that they have helped farms produce...
Counterfit
I'm allergic to incremental food
AlcoholicsAnonymousBYO
Short term gain for long term pain ... think steroids.
Ivain
Fun fact: Europe is managing perfectly fine without highly dangerous chemicals. Ours are just moderately dangerous.
ThrowawayHBS
Europe is a net importer of food, America is the world's bread basket
Ivain
More due to land surface than pesticide use, imo. I'll look up the figures though.
Ivain
Just looked in detail, the Netherlands and belgium had around 9000 kg per hectare in 2014, which means the EU average is lowered by others
Ivain
Just looked it up. EU produces around 6000 Kg of food per hectare, Us around 7000. So that's a slight improvement, at the cost of poison.
Ivain
What I personally hope is that whatever fungal replacement is rumored to be in development requires chemicals to make that monsanto makes, 1
Ivain
There's ways to produce the same amount of food without the same poison, but those are more expensive.
SocialMediaMakesUsLessSocial
Reminder that DOW created Agent Orange which still affects Vietnamese children to this day.
katcudi
A few towns in Oregon used herbicides containing dioxin and miscarriages tripled!! FUCKING TRIPLED! 9/13 PREGNANCIES WERE MISCARRIAGES!
CondescendingCunt
Then Agent Orange entered the U.S. presidential election ー and to the great disgust and dismay of the rest of the world ー won.
katcudi
Dioxin, which is found in Agent Orange, is so toxic that it's measured in trillionth of a gram. TRILLIONTH!
TearingAway
i used to work with dioxin!! INSTANT CANCER!!!
bamblebimble
"Trillionth is huge cuz of trillion, that means it's not toxic" - trump supporter
LordCastellanCreedtheSupremeCommanderofCadia
Why is DOW(or Monsanto) to blame? The US military ordered them to manufacture it and even received a warning of the toxic contaminants. 1/2
LordCastellanCreedtheSupremeCommanderofCadia
Even the development of Agent Orange was made by US and British militaries.
RepostSadistic
Because if we blame the Govt, it will rest with JFK and LBJ. We can't have good democrats taking the blame.
olivejuiceyou2
I don't think a party is to blame as it was in development since WWII hand through several administrations.
RepostSadistic
Agreed. However, if Vietnam war had started under a GOP prez, and expanded under another, if would obviously be GOP prez's fault. 1/2
RepostSadistic
Just like Bush is to be blamed for Iraq, but 'US', instead of Truman, is responsible for Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
Keairan
pesticides inhibits human brain development and is toxic to 1800 endangered species as well. It also poisons workers.
Keairan
Source: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-dow-pesticides-trump-20170420-story.html
SEGSan
You know, that stuff that works in the same way as sarine and VX.
SaintLuciferVonAllah
But it's got what plants crave! It's got electrolytes!
SupercalifragilisticexpialidociousShenanigans
Idiocracy right?
Radix865
That movie gets scarier each year.
KrenthKH
Well isn't that what they want?? More imbeciles to support them?... I'd say they are strategically playing clever.
rtfm4r360
Along with elevated amounts of lead in the water this is a way to keep the GOP base growing.
personwhotakesfleetfootwork
tfw Trump wants his population to be dumb so he can be president forever
ledious
It's almost as if everything trump is doing is to damage and ultimately destroy the USA... Hmmm ho else wants that?
TearingAway
it would undo years of work to most bodies of water, too. RIP chesapeake bay
WaffleCopters
Well at least we know this now. Remember how fantastic DDT was? Its still used in the 3rd world.
FizzleJysics
Learned about organophosphates in my pharmacy schooling, nasty shit right there. We also learned we'd only see it in chemical warfare.
SEGSan
In a positive way, it's not carcinogenic?
GODDAMNlT
not really. But hits autonomic nervous system and can kill quickly if used as a weapon
SEGSan
VX, sarine and so on
superanth
Didn't it pretty much blow up an entire plant in India too?
GNiko
Well the chemicals used in the production did. A pesticide that explodes on contact with water might not sell.
SEGSan
No, these were other substances, organophosphates only affect the nervous system directly.
superanth
Crap, is that VX?
SEGSan
VX is an organophosphate, yeah, but it wouldn't be used as a pesticide.
Nawoi
Bophal. That was quite a while ago, but still scary. I'd rather die by MOAB.
Aesurah
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2014/12/bhopal-the-worlds-worst-industrial-disaster-30-years-later/100864/ for those interested
SpaghettiFox
Let me guess- it's cheaper.
ThePastmaster
More toxic and damaging, the cheaper it is.
Promethianfire
Oh now that's just silly.
ThePastmaster
Think about it. What requires the least amount of effort: Carpet bomb a city into ruins or drop a nuke on it?
NotYourAverageOrdinary
But... Think of all the jobs it will create! /s
CirB
The point of the pesticides is to need less workforce, thus using pesticides = less workers and more poisoned people in general :P
Peppar
...For Oncologists
ledious
Trump knows that the jobs he is creating are for the uneducated and lazy. The kind of people who will knock our country back 70 years.
ledious
And it is all part of trump and Putin's plan.
CupcakeJuice24
Think of how many jobs will open up when all the workers somehow keep dying!
Tengenstein
to be fair in the long run humans dying IS good for the enviroment
lostnortherner
Think of how much money corps will make if they insure the lives of them, hooray for dead peasants schemes!
IusedtobeapervertIstillambutIusedtobetoo
Learn how to lower the human population with this one weird trick! Scientists hate him!
itsapirateslifeforme
Brawndo... It's what plants crave. It's got electrolytes.
GNiko
Turnover turnover turnover! It's what makes business boom!
somethingsomethingrhymeswithorange
/s ... does that mean sarcastic now?
AlcoholicsAnonymousBYO
Top spot brainy fella /s
Ryebread91
Just did a quick Wiki browse, "very highly acutely toxic to bees humans and wildlife" if it's got 3 adjectives describing its toxicity 1/2
Ryebread91
In one sentence, probably shouldn't use it. 2/2
optiocenturiae
Nerve agents (G- and V-series) are organophosphates. Highly acutely toxic is a good description for them.
bamblebimble
Now now, nerve agents is harsh, people might associate it with terrorism and our farmers killing workers with it is not terrorism. /s
GNiko
Unless the words are just LIES spread by BIG... uh... PLANET!
AutomationLayer
Actually "very" is an intensifier and "highly" and "acutely" are adverbs modfying "is" so 0 adjectives. I'll see myself out.
RecurringNightmare
very is an adverb for highly, which is an adverb to acutely, which is an adverb for toxic, which is an adjective
Ryebread91
Adverb, I should've known.
SitcomTom
But 'toxic' is an adjective, so 1 adjective in that sentence
MonsantoOfficial
Very is definitely used as an adjective. There's no such thing as an intensifier.
AutomationLayer
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/adverbs-of-degree/intensifiers-very-at-all
Arginotz
Very is not an adjective. For example "This book I'm reading is very." is not a complete sentence.
RecurringNightmare
its an adverb