It could be this

Jun 26, 2014 12:02 PM

Malvorlagen

Views

347464

Likes

6627

Dislikes

810

Or it could be this

but she's Canadian

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Many people agree with me, but there are people who don't. And those people are a proof that I am right. Problematic retorics.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

GENDER SHOULDN'T HAVE ANY INFLUENCE ON ANYTHING THAT IT DOESN'T PHYSICALLY HAVE TO. CAN WE ALL AGREE? DENKS.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nah, I think a sign of equality is focusing on all humans (humanism) rather than one gender.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I know feminism is as touchy as Helen Keller on Imgur, but can we at least agree that men and women should be equal?

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yes! Yes, please! tbh, this bullshit crusade is really over semantics.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You know you can believe in feminism and egalitarianism at the same time, and that the extremists are the minority, right?

11 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 12

The minorities tend to have the loudest megaphones. Plus they get more views on the news then sensible people.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hmmm...perhaps I should have rephrased this....

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In my opinion, surely if feminists actually moved away from the radical idiots and came together under the banner name "humanitarians" (1)

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Then surely it would be easier to stop any radical idiots from having anything to do with the cause

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ugh. Enough of this, please!

11 years ago | Likes 227 Dislikes 33

If both the militant feminists, and the indignant, MRA, "friendzoned" neckbeards could both fuck off I'd be happy.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I agree. I am so fucking tired of this shit. How many #NotAllMen Neckbeards are on here for godsake?

11 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 16

But... but that's a French woman in the picture. D: Seriously though, enough with the social justice crap. GIMME FUNNY PICTURES! D:<

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

There seems to be a deluge of douche lately, I concur.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

lol, because Masculism is seen as such a good word too...?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Men are cool, Women are cool, rape is bad, gays are cool, religion is cool, just shut up, live your life, be happy! It's that easy guise.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Except that people are asshats I know. Do the first step and stop spreading already known knowledge on a fun-site. Thanks.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First one is good, second one is just retarded

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 10

'Radical x is destroying y.' No. The world is more complicated than that. Radical x is just what you know about, because they're shocking.

11 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 8

When I say I'm a feminist: "so you hate when men open the door?" No, as long as I can open the door for them too. Equality.

11 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 13

You can open the door for me any time.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I would say you can, but my ancestors would rise from the grave and beat me if I let you. Not saying you can't, but I got heavy voodoo on me

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

That is some unfortunate voodoo, my friend. Better loudly announce that before I get to the door so I can help you avoid being cursed!

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Thank you Archduchess (of what I assume is awesomeness) How about we meet at a two part entrance and I open one, then you hold the other.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I love two part entrances. You get to be nice and the the person has an opportunity to reciprocate or I get to be doubly nice

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Solid plan! I like your thinking! XD

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm like dad jokes, I'm pretty good 50% of the time. The rest... you still accept because they are dad jokes.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There will always be extremists in any ideology. That doesn't negate the fact that the ideology itself is important.

11 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 14

What have feminists done about feminists in india blocking a law that would have made raping men a crime?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Nov 5, 2014 12:06 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not your babe, bae.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The difference is whether the rest of the ideology fights back agains tthem and does good, or whether the extremists have free reign.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

The answer is nothing. They condone it with silence, and then whine when held responsible for that inaction online.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

What have feminists done about the death threats, bomb threats, and felonies committed against people discussing men's issues?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

"my father was a feminist". "not your mother?". "no my father wouldnt allow that."

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

FOTC!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or we could just post some puppies and kittens and leave these arguments to sites w/o a 130 character limit.

11 years ago | Likes 306 Dislikes 13

Maybe they are using Imgur as a place to post an image so they can link it to another website. Just maybe.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NO!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, please.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You, I like you!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Begone harbinger of logic and good times!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That would be too easy

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

140

11 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Oh, well that changes everything! With 140 you can state complex arguments link to evidence and cite sources! Why we could solve this whole

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Or you could type in multiple comments, like

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

+1 for admitting the flaws in your thinking

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I like you.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I did here, which allows for more than 140 characters...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't like her use of lesbians as if they are ti blame. But there absolutely is a radical wing to midern feminism whose voice at times

11 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

has become louder than the moderates . Unfortunately this often happens with causes. As the public began to agree with environmentalists 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

in issues of littering or hunting endangered species, or deforestation, environmentalists had to turn more extreme to maintain a cuase. 3/?

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The thing is a lot of people don't think rape can exist in marriage when it can. MOst of the time no, but some yeah

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

I highly doubt that. People that believe that are in as small a minority as misandrists masquerading as feminists.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Thats not what she meant and you know it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wasn't saying that, just putting it out there because some people don't realize.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

context there is that some radical feminists believe that all hetero sex is rape on the basis of 'patriarchy' being a universal coersion.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

yeah, that is crazy. Gotta love extremists

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't understand why people keep posting this to imgur. There is no war on men on this website so can we just, i dont know, not?

11 years ago | Likes 259 Dislikes 35

Imgur gets a lot of frontpage stuff from Reddit. Reddit has a lot of MRA activity.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

I warned feminists that this would happen when they started complaining about absurd things. This is the backlash.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Are you sure about that? I've seen a shit ton of misandry here.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 16

I've been stalked and harassed for a WEEK STRAIGHT by feminists on imgur for daring to post proof men are raped in a thread ABOUT male rape.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

They're not feminists they are horrible excuses for human beings. Good on you for standing your ground, just ignore these dimwitts

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately these dimwitts are following people so powerful they have influence to rewrite the definition of rape to exclude men.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

This person is a MILD version of what I get on a routine basis:

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

well hey, legitimately i'm sorry for people like that. They make people who have good intentions like me, have a bad name.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not what does it. Compare feminism and people like this to christians and the westboro baptist church. Huge difference in response.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Westboro gets thousands of protestors and can't even get slashed tires fixed. When has anyone ever marched in the streets against misandry?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Oh dude :/ Looks like you got yourself a white knight there. Some tosspot who thinks bullying is cool if its for the right cause. Comiz.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

According to people on Imgur, feminism is obsolete. I got down voted into oblivion for stating the obvious face that women are still >>

11 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 23

Feminists in india blocked a law that would have done nothing more than make it a crime to rape men. Tell those victims they need feminism

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

oppressed all over the world. Apparently NOT true. Good news for women in Saudi Arabia!

11 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 19

and the same guys downvoting are the guys who post half-naked women, say "girls only like looks" and call themselves "nice guys"

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Here's the thing; Imgur's main target demographic and that of men's right's groups are... Nearly identical. Depressing, not shocking.

11 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 10

You could point that out, but the people who live simply to be offended by things would call you an islamophobic racist

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Feminism is obsolete in the Western.They don't care about the 3rd world, they complain about petty things and demand special treatment.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 38

20-25% of college women in the US experience attempted or completed sexual assault before they graduate. But apparently that's fine.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

False. 1 in 1870 women are sexually assaulted in college. Not one in FOUR.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Not the same stat. Attempted and completed, including estimates for unreported cases. http://www.nsvrc.org/saam/campus-resource-list

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes that's because of the Patriarchy. Women never sexually assault Men. And men never leave it unreported for fear of ridicule.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Did I say that? Rape is terrible in any circumstance. There's still tons of work to be done to prevent rape. Feminism is not obsolete.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Look at the CEO and board of directors of any company. Count the women. The balance of power sits with the swinging dicks of men

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Look at the dangerous, dirty jobs, count the Women. Where are the women campaigning for more Female miners? Equal paternity rights?

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Prostitution sounds dirty and dangerous. Countless women suffer in servitude and shitty jobs just the same as men.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Look at the HOMELESS. Count the number of men. look at workplace deaths. Count the men. Look at college dropouts. Count the men.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Many of these sound like issues of poverty, not sexism.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That's not really a valid metric because even though discrimination might play a part in that there are way to many confounding(1)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Variables that are being ignored.(2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AN IDEOLOGY IS NOT AN OBJECT IT CANNOT BECOME OBSOLETE THERE IS SAID IT.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

An idea can become obsolete. There I said it. Feminism achieved its goals back in the 70s.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

Great! I'll get on the phone with Saudi Arabia and tell them it's all good.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Lol I'm a macho man. I can't be destroyed by women. They're women for goodness sakes!

11 years ago | Likes 334 Dislikes 75

Relevant but not immediately apparently so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU_VBBp7tRs

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I gave a Jimmy Carr laugh to this.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like my men like I like beards...MANLY.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MACHO MACHO MAAAAAAN I WANT TO BE A MACHO MA-AN!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know if those are the actual song lyrics it's just what I sang as a kid

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a nacho man. So leave me alone

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

A man so macho he wear pink and yellow spandex pants

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Man walks down the street in pants like that, people know he's not afraid of anything.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

OOOOHHHHHHH YEEEEEAAAAA!!!!

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Go with the first one.

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

Yes let's go with the circular argument that literally says "If you don't 100% agree with me you're a sexist monster"

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Or you can go with the circular argument that says "If you disagree with me, you're either a lesbian or a gullible male." Your choice.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or you can be aware of the fact shes referring to specific historical feminist leaders who were political-lesbian seperatists

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

You can further be aware that she's referring to a minority that has never led the argument, being primarily used as strawmen by opponents.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can also be aware of the fact that a straw man is by definition a misrepresentation or falsehood, not a real thing that really existed.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Or you can be aware of the fact those people were literally the *LEADERS* of the feminist movement for decades.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Just to be clear, I've never met a woman who is a feminist who hates men cause feminist believe in equal rights. That's Misandry.

11 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 12

Just to be clear that's the dictionary definition of a No True Scotsman fallacy. Now go read Amanda Marcotte and Jezebel.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

You literally just said that even if you met one, you wouldn't consider them to be such! "There are no super-fast cats; those are cheetahs."

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

cuz the definition of feminism is to believe in equalrights 4 men &women. If you don't &believe women are the better sex ur not a feminist.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

The definition of a feminist is a women's rights supporter. Moving the definition to exclude the crazies is a bit intellectually dishonest.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I just had to type that really weird, but I hope you get what i'm trying to say. hahha

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You've never met a feminist who hates men is because you change the definition to misandry? I've never met a feminist who wanted equality.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

You've never met a feminist.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

This is the "No True Scotsman" fallacy. There are feminists you don't believe in equality. Those aren't feminists.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Well you met me! I love men and just wish women could be treated the same in society, economically, ect. Lets be friends now. :)

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I'd be happy to be friends but you can't exactly say that we've met yet. Do you feel they should start giving women the same jail times?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well if you commit the same crime then of course you should get the same sentence.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You would think so. But, currently less jail time for the same crime is one of many perks of being female. This word count sucks.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I come off sounding too snide because of the short messages. I'm not meaning to be hostile. I've just seen feminism do bad things.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact that she calls women hysterical in the second picture is pretty archaic to me.

11 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 14

I find women to be more emotional than me... then again most men too. Comparatively you're all (other people) hysterical.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can call people hysterical without being sexist about it, you know.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

The term "hysterical" was literally created to shut women up. Notice how psychology doesn't use it anymore, because it's kinda archaic.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

And the word gay didn't used to mean homosexual. Meanings change. Hysterical isn't a term specific to women any more. It doesn't mean (1)

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

what's part (2)? I MUST know!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"cut out her womb, it'll stop her crying" it means someone is excessively, uncontrollably emotional, regardless of gender.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

well, anyway, I get (part 1 of) what you're saying. But, different words can bear different weight. That one's not widely used, so (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

(2/2) it still carries some emotional salience.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

She's making straw man arguments. The stereotype that all american feminists are manhating, hysterical lesbians is just that. A stereotype.

11 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 64

It's not a stereotype when people can't even talk about fighting suicide with feminists committing felonies to shut the conference down.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

You're straw manning her statements. She said nothing of the sort.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 15

I always wonder who will break it to my husband (of many years) that I secretly hate him. Boy, is he going to be shocked!

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

If he got a woman to like him enough to marry him, he's probably a feminist too. I wouldn't worry too much. XD (yes I did get the joke).

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

#notallfeminists

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Sadly, there are respected feminists who say all consensual heterosexual sex is rape and men should be eliminated or mostly so.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 17

Well then let us men folk gather up our drawers and colonize Europa. We will clone the best of our lots and do as we will. Spartan Europa!!!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

By "respected feminists" do you mean "that one out of context quote by Andrea Dworkin"? Because I think you do. And that shit is weak.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

She doesn't say that. She says that Feminism was taken over by American lesbians, not that all American feminists are lesbians

11 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 55

Yes, which isn't true, hence the strawman.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

Which is also not true. So there's that.

11 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 20

Haha, yeah. Please OP, clarify! Which totally fucking wrong thing is she saying?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She then goes to make a generalization that american lesbians hate men. This is still a broad generalization that is both unfair and untrue.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She's a British Porn star. She can fuck herself. She's never lived her, I doubt she's in the USA lesbian scene. She's 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Sorry- She worked in Brussels as a sex worker.Sonia Verstappen. Nice source OP. Maybe I can find a gangster in Belgium and get life advice.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

continuing her career of faking shit to make men feel good.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

As an American lesbian, fuck off. I'm not a misandrist. I live with a straight male friend. I don't think sex is rape. I support safe BDSM.

11 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 10

Comprehensive reading: do you know how? The woman didn't say all american lesbians are man-hating feminists. Just that the movement has 1)

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 16

taken over by man-hating feminists. The reason they're lesbian is because they're misandrist, not the other way around. 2)

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

"...has been taken over by American lesbians, who don't exactly like men." I'd have to see the sauce to know if that's how she phrased it>

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

#notalllesbians

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Plus, she implies that American lesbians are all hysterical man-haters, which isn't even close to true.

11 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 21

Imgurians sure love to play fast and loose with the word "implies" when they want someone to say something that they did not.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

All of the lesbians I've met who have been public about it were completely reasonable people. The manhaters were all hetero, oddly enough.

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

#notalllesbians

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, she doesn't. "[...], who don't exactly like men." is not a statement, it's more of an adjective. Like: "American men, who are gay".

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

If anything they like straight men as friends. But its like cats and dogs between them and gay men. Some get along, some dont.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you understand what feminism actually is then you would call yourself a feminist too.

11 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 17

Unless you get called a "jackass who doesn't know what he's talking about" everytime you claim to be a feminist, just due to being a man.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

If feminism handled it's extremists the same way christians handle the WBC I wouldn't have a problem with it. Instead they enable them.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

If you understood what feminism is, you wouldn't be saying that.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Wikipedia is your friend.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I actually do, I don't think you do

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I wholeheartedly agree with the ideals of feminism, but I would never use the term to describe myself because it's being used by assholes.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Assholes would like to have you think that.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So is the name of every other group in the world. There are assholes who call themselves everything from humanist to jain to satanist.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

But most groups are a lot quicker to tell those extremists to go fuck themselves. You get regular muslims calling the Jihadists idiots (1)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

all the time, but little of that has been done against these morons, and the S.S.Feminism has taken on too much water to ever float again(2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's simply not the case. And you can't compare people spouting vile opinions to ones killing fellow humans.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you're a feminist who won't say they're a feminist because dickheads make up shit about feminists.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

*Because there are too many awful people who get away with calling themselves feminists. That and I don't like using group labels in general

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Isn't that Ellen Page's point though

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who are the awful people who say they're feminists? I hope you don't think I'm coming off as aggressive. unfortunately we can't sense tone

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A portion of tumblr is the usual example, Then there are the "eye rape" people, stuff like that. I agree it's a minority, but I just (1)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this guy!" Then regardless of the validity of your point, nobody wants to listen to someone accompanied by someone like that (4)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the "man covered in shit" argument; if you take a stand for something, then some man covered in shit steps up and says "I'm with (3)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

think that (especially with the current reputation) it's harder to get your ideas taken seriously if people group you with the bad side. (2)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(1) Oh, this shit again. Saw Ellen Page being awesome. Then I saw that that there was another picture and I KNEW it was time for Imgur's

11 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 21

(2) hourly anti-feminist strawman circlejerk. This community is so depressing.

11 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 14

Except Imgur is overwhelmingly (pro-)feminist once you get out of usersub.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

So basically... Any given day that ends in "y" lately. Obviously to combat all the extreme feminist factions here...

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

The fact that you never see them just proves how cunning they can be!

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

I'm a misandry ninja, maaan.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just a curious observation I've made. All the images that I see regarding feminism are all strawmen, but the only comments I see that are(1)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We have a surplus of entitled jerks here. The shitposting I read sometimes would get you laughed at in Cracked and banned in Somethingawful.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

The comments that then tears the image apart as fallacy(3)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You're right about the comments being definitely mostly positive. The upvote/downvote-bar still tells another story about majority opinions.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I know, it's just an interesting dynamic

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the positives are supporting feminism. So it just strikes me as odd that the community upvotes this shit images but the supports(2)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

As opposed to it's minute by minute misandrist ranting about neckbeards, betas, privilege, and MRA bashing?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

(1) We must be visiting a different Imgur then. Only the two first of those lists generate posts. We've disagreed about the neckbeard thing

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

(2) before and for the beta shit you can blame 4chan. Probably an attitude not mutually exclusive with anti-feminism.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

drawn portraying them as some kind of infectious disease to be eradicated and passed on by contact with the "untouchables".

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Neckbeard/dudebro/creeper/beta are all virginshaming slurs popularized and used most often by feminists, to the point of getting comics

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

(2) often the last two, because dudebro I've mostly seen used in gaming communities and beta is definitely 4chan trash.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(1) Neckbeard and creeper include other traits that are *actually* harmful. I'm very skeptical about feminists popularizing and using most

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When talking about feminist philosophy, please avoid ad hominem attacks regarding the composition of the feminist community and (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 9

Oh avoid ad hominem attacks like the 500 or so feminists on this post who accuse anyone disagreeing with them of being 14 year old rapists?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

When defending feminism please avoid framing every single thing as an attack with straw victimhood, and the use of no true scotsmans.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

i smell a white boy

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

stop misrepresenting arguments based on the opinions of the vocal minority. Instead be conscious of how women are still treated (2/3)

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

1the 'vocal minority' of feminism are the only ones who ever seem to act under the label, are the ones who abuse gov't funding and lobbying,

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

unequally. Be conscious of when this occurs and do your part to promote awareness and promote healthy, equal interactions. I'm a dude. 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

The fact that you have to justify your perspective with "I'm a dude" makes me sad.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I guess I didn't have to but thought it was worth pointing out to head off potentially irrational people saying I was some "bad feminist"

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 and are never called out by the 'moderate' majority, who's idea of feminism seems to be sharing articles of the 'extremists' on facebook.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Good points. I don't have an argument against this except that I am speaking of the philosophy of female equality as feminism.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

presenting some corners of tumblr as exhibit A of feminist extremism is not an ad hominem attack, sorry

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

they do a pretty great job of insulting themselves.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

but posting it on imgur promotes those opinions so my response to it is still relevant.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every time I state anything about wanting equality for ladies, all I get is a shit storm of men saying "but what about our problems!?"

11 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 37

It's almost as if feminism has done such a terrible job of promoting real equality that it's served to divide the genders even more.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Equality is nonsense anyways. It's justice you want. Imagine everyone'd treated equally, people with mental disabilities would be screwed.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Equality is nonsense. It's justice you want. Imagine if everyone was treated equally, handicapped people would be fucked in that world.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Apparently those people think it's a competition. Which is dumb.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's because we're lucky enough to live in countries where the majority of inequal atrocities against women have been eradicated (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 33

Women's issue are more important that men's issues. Do they actually think there's a greater focus on women's issues in society than men's?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

*this comment is hyperbole and sarcasm.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

"Equality for ladies" shouldn't be a thing. It should just be equality. Equality for both genders. All equal.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

It is just equality. Equality for ladies compared to men is also equality for men, that's what equality means.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you're on top, stay on top.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 30

Here's an example: Men are barely 1/3rd of college graduates. Women are NOT a majority in every single major. Which is a bigger problem?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

(2/2) when you've got the basics down, you can worry about more complex stuff, like mens rights - men feel like now is the right time.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 36

men are wrong

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

very helpful, thanks for your intelligent and constructive input.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

the right time for men has been all of human history. giving women a few decades to barely get caught up doesn't mean everythings all good.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Just send them this http://imgur.com/dLBIdgj

11 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 3

Absolutely brilliant! Saved for future use :D

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You should check out the full twitter account, it's amazing: https://twitter.com/ProBirdRights

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Feminists actively sought out and committed felonies to shut down a suicide prevention conference, purely because it would help men.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

I doubt the validity of that statement, MRA's bend the truth and by bend I mean completely twist the facts aand misuse statistics, but

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You mean like feminist researchers specifically defining rape to exclude male victims of female rapists? Or the 1 in 4 and 77cent myths?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

even if that were true, saying those feminists represent all Feminists would be like saying the WBC represents all Christians

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You guys are so quick to say "not all men" but you really have trouble grasping this concept.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Death threats, bomb threats, violent crime against people even trying to TALK about men's issues? Erasure, justification, and libel.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Feminist response to Mary Koss erasing half of all rape victims? Silence. Earl's shelter being attacked by other feminists? Silence.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Maybe just say you want equality for both men and women? I'm sure there are rights and advantages that women have and men men want, too.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

as a man I very rarely find feminist views that tackle equality without blaming/generalising men.It makes it hard for me not to be defensive

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Empty statements about wanting equality for all don't help. It's when you actually discuss the issues that the reactionaries come out.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Like not being 70-90% of the homeless, over 90% of suicides and workplace deaths, 15 times more likely to go to jail for the same time...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Of course I do, but it seems like whenever women's come up, suddenly we need to focus on men's instead. Or women's issues are marginalized.

11 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

without felonies being committed just to silence them. Men aren't even legally counted as rape victims for god's sake.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Women's issues aren't marginalized, they dominate every single aspect of our lives and media to the point men can't even meet to talk

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Wanting equality for ladeis doesn't mean you don't want improvements on men's issues too.

11 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 9

Then why do the people who most claim to want equality for women go so far out of their way to actively harm men that they commit felonies?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

I hope you find out that that's a very small minority at some stage.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The WBC is a minority. These people are a majority. They have the power to act without opposition or rebuke and even get laws passed.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Minorities, by definition, do not get away with doing things the majority opposes without a shred of opposition or rebuke.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I do want that, but it seems to me that we can't ever talk about women's issues without suddenly needing to focus on men's. So frustrating.

11 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 4

I know. The idea that the two are mutually exclusive baffles me. "I'd like pancakes" "BUT I WANT CAKE< HOW DARE YOU!" Wat.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

I mean, do you see why it's so frustrating for us/me? Every time we bring it up, it's just a shite storm. I would feel better 3

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Are completely baffled by statistics or just in general refuse to even try and understand why we feel this way. 2

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

If people used reputable sources when arguing too. Ok, hah, sorry. End rant. x 4

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Absolutely but, at the same time, it's a gender discussion and there is a lot of overlap on men's and women's issues so when women's issues1

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

things like equal pay statistics can be looked at in several ways and if you include or exclude certain factors it changes the result so 3

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

two separate but perfectly credible statisticians or organizations can come up with entirely different results.4 End rant.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

are discussed it often times involves things men care about from a different perspective, and as has been mentioned here in regards to 2

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Of course they're not. But when can women's issues be acknowledged without them being marginalized? I get a lot of men who 1

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Because women not being an overwhelming majorit of every single major is marginal compared to men barely graduating from college.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Because, to be cruelly mathematical, for every 1 woman that dies more than 10 men die.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Because women having a rude boss is marginal compared to men being 90% of the people who die just trying to put food on the table.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I don't know what we are really gaining from having these arguments about semantics over and over again.

11 years ago | Likes 790 Dislikes 47

this is the first post I've seen on the other side of the argument in a long time- so it's good in my book.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because arguing about the semantics distracts us from the real problems at hand.

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

We are all covered in semantics, aren't we.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's an endless hunt for confirmation bias. On both sides.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

A better understanding of who among us are douchebags and who are trying to make the world a better place.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We're not having to discuss the real issues which are hard and difficult to solve.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People opposed to the idea will always emphasize the extremist voices, while supporters will apply no true Scotsman to them.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Excuse me, no true Scotsperson*

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I like you

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Absolutely nothin.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what are you some kind of anti-semanticist?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you saying you're...Anti-Semantic?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guess having arguments about semantics over and over and over again is just what we do now

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

welcome to politics

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can you run for president?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

if people are arguing semantics, then maybe there is problem? I always treat everyone equal., but won't be called feminist due to extremism

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I got a copyright claim on all semantic arguments. I get a nickel every time!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i'm rich biotch

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because many feminists are insistent on using that word to label gender equal rights activists.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Because religion is not the only patent holder for the invention of tribalism.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BECAUSE you find "man" in semantics.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imgur is a great place for discussing feminism, especially when you only have one hundred and forty characters to type out your thoughts wit

11 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

I see what you did th

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not that I don't think feminism should be discussed, but it does often devolve into shitty arguments here.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No serious matter should be discussed when you have so few characters, even without limitation discussing in only text-format is terrible.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It shouldn't be discussed on a site primarily meant for funny and adorable shit either. (And sometimes creepy shit.)

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

don't be silly, its much more than semantics. this argument is the same as what separates all christians from the westboro baptist church

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The difference is the WBC can't even get slashed tires repaired. Feminists who commit felonies get defended online.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

you understand that was just a comparison to demonstrate why its important to differentiate groups right?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You understand the point is that one group tacitly condones violent criminals and then refuses to do anything about them?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

you've missed the point of even bringing up the wbc

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How far do those separations really help us? Shouldn't we be more concerned with the ideas/policies involved?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the ideas and policies get overshadowed by the extremism of the few. Remember the prejudice towards muslims after 9/11? Same concept.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This seems like a reason we should be more concerned with the ideas/policies involved rather than semantics.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the crazy man-haters have different ideas/policies than feminists, but they go by the same name & make it appear that's how they all think

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What would we gain if we shot arguments around if the semantics can't even stick in the first place? We're stuck at semantics, quite simply.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand, but there are work arounds. E.g., debating wage disparity can be done w/o the labels "feminism/humanism/etc."

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People like to define themselves. And even then when you start arguing with a new person, you have to set up the bases. It never stops.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think discussions could be a lot more productive if we didn't set up the bases, and instead just talked about the issues.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we all agreed on things that'd work. But we don't, so doing that means we get lost because we define concepts differently.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Once you bring up the term feminism it turns into a debate involving anecdotal evidence and stereotypes. It's silly really.

11 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 7

That's because you always wind up arguing with women.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 48

I can smell your butthurt from here... hot damn.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is precisely the reason that "feminism is a bad word" as Ellen said. It actually has nothing to do with patriarchs whatsoever.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes and no. One could attribute the fear to the patriarchy but then there's some chicken-egg philosophy that needs discussion.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And strawmen, don't forget strawmen.

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

*Straw women.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

*Strawperson.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Aw hell yeah, both the angry hippie feminist and the neckbearded men's rights activists. Both one-track minded asshats that mock each other.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Even the word Feminism itself is sexist. Call it humanism or simply equality if thats what youre after

11 years ago | Likes 275 Dislikes 153

"Humanism" and "equality" both fail to distinguish between sexism and racism. They're different (although similar) problems.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Feminism is a form of egalitarianism - it's not called egalitarianism because it targets the patriarchy

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 10

I think a feminist is just a humanist who has noticed the lack of gender equality.

11 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 23

There's lack of gender equality on both sides. There are a lot of women who believe empowerment comes through playing the victim.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Male rape is a real thing, yet it gets ignored. Husband abuse is a thing, yet gets ignored. What has feminism done for those issues?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fucks sake. How many times must I tell you people this? You ARE NOT important enough to change the name of a whole movement. Stop trying.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Im not important enough? Wow all for the female cause innit

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You are one person. There are a few more people involved and they don't agree with you. Simple Maths.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A lot of people do agree with me thou, and youre losing respect all over the world because of raging manhaters

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do the majority of feminists agree with you? It's not your call. Also, considering the sort of people whose "respect" is being "lost"...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Fun fact: most gays are born from heterosexual-like sex.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

What's "heterosexual-like sex"? Isn't it heterosexual or not?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's straight sex + gay sex + not sure if sex + anything content sex + adults with consent.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or instead go for justice for everyone instead. Pic says it all. http://kathyescobar.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/equality-vs-justice.jpg

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why I don't call myself a feminist or a men's rights activist/masculinist.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Feminism and egalitarianism are not mutually exclusive terms, I believe in both.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Actually, the word is Antisexism.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Right. And gay right is anti-straight. Except it's not. It's about fixing an existing inequality. It's naming the inequality.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Yes but there is no heterosexual injustice. But there IS male injustice even if the word feminism ignores that

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

Added to that a lot of specific male inequities are part and parcel of the patriarchal system feminism is working to change, so BS.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

It isnt bullshit, its just ignored, theres plenty of examples of male injustice (very often caused by feminism) in my country alone

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Aha. I see. But I'm on this planet, so that's really all I got to go on.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It doesn't ignore that. How weird to think that we must focus on everything all the time. It's an important focus.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The purpose may not, but the word feminist itself means female which makes it a bad word to use for equality

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It does not mean "female", though it is intended to point out a specific inequity. So no, it's not. No more than saying you're an LGBQ ally-

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Or maybe the point of the movement is to bring women/femininity up & treated well instead of taking men/masculinity down and treated badly.

11 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 14

Fine, but don't pretend an organization with that goal is for gender equality. It is for the promotion of women specifically.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hm, no man has ever had a feminine quality he was shamed for? No trans* person ever got hurt for mixing in femininity? Just for women. Sure.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What you just said doesn't seem to have anything to do with what we were talking about.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Women are not inferior+being feminine is not a bad thing=feminism. Some men have feminine traits, and that's fine, because femininity is OK

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Maybe we should argue semantics over the term, but rather embrace the fundamentals of the movement and try to be less fucking shitty.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

As of this comment 115 points for misusing "humanism" and being unaware of the word "egalitarianism."

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

the word isn't sexist, it's bringing women equal to men in all respects; cultural, political, economical, reproductive rights, equal pay etc

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

Equality doesn't make sense when men and women are fundamentally different. Parity makes more sense.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Ok so if we work at the same job do you think it's ok that for the last hr and a half women work for free and men get paid? I don't

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

How is that parity?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If that were true 'child' support would be banned and women would be digging ditches and working longer hours while dying younger etc. FFS.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

The presumption that the only thing that needs to be done to achieve equality is to elevate women is where the whole idea becomes sexist.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

it's not just women it's also the LGBTQ community and men. Traditional gender roles can be damaging to both sexes.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so you don't care about bringing men equal to women?

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 12

So you don't understand that men have more rights than women, yeah?

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

there are breast cancer screening programs for women, but nothing for testicular or prostate cancer. Paternity leave for men. (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

There are cancer screenings for testicular and prostate cancer. Did you think doctors were sticking their fingers up there for funsies?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(2/2) Male genital mutilation. Even tho women are more oppressed, it doesn't mean oppression against men doesn't eixst. Don't be ignorant.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

There are screenings and check ups for all cancers, all=so female genital mutilation is far more prevalent. Also some men have an issue with

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I don't believe that women are more oppressed, or oppressed at all in the west. the female equiv. of every male issue is prevented by law

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I could name dozens of situations where women are disadvantaged. There's only a few where men are treated lesser.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

other men taking leave , it happened recently when a baseball player took a game off to be new baby and commentators when nuts

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Also, I'm against circumcision and for paternity leave. (Though maternity leave is necessarily longer because of breastfeeding.)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My problem with that is it might forget the history. Also, why are we so reluctant to be associated with feminine words?

11 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 7

Straw man. We aren't. What we are reluctant to be associated with is an organization that promotes the welfare of a particular gender.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Should Muslim's change their religion title because Al Queda also calls themselves Muslims? No, because you should be able to separate the 2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We are talking about why people don't jump on board with feminism, not why feminism doesn't denounce its radical element.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i know, and most sane people understand the majority of muslims are not terrorist. just as the majority of feminists are not misandrists

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We arent but the name sounds extremely pro female, which automaticly becomes anti male.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 24

According to who? Why all the competition?

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Feminism = Feminin = Female

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

So? Why does acknowledging one, dismisses the other? I guess the bigger question is: Why are we insulted by femininity/masculinity?

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Do you think the LGBT movement is anti-heterosexual?

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

As I said before thats not relevant since there is no heterosexual injustice

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

That's because the movement started when women were treated like objects.

11 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 12

Still are

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Unlike those walking wallets we treat as cannon fodder?

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 22

Oh, you mean the men who are sent by other men to kill other men? It's just awful what those feminists are forcing everyone to do!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And you call that patriarchy? How do you feel about FGM? Most of the cutters are other women, so that's alright is it? See how that works?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

My point is that it's not the fault of feminism that men send men to war, or that men think only men are capable of fighting.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you seriously comparing how bad women had in the past to men?

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Which past are we talking about? The 99% of human history where men couldn't vote either? The 100% of female hypergamy? Grow up.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Just playing devils advocate here but

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Seeing as how they could vote, hold jobs, and own land, I think they had a few more opportunities than women.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

As a voter, do you feel powerful? Really? As a job holder, how's the power? And owning land has historically been the tiny elite, not "men"

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

women still are

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 23

Oh come off it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

PEOPLE still are.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yeah I hate the argument that it should be called egalitarianism. Until women all around the world are equal, it still needs to be "fem."

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 32

No, because while it is "fem" many women will take it as a fight for women not for equality. It was "fem" when women were oppressed hugely.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

Women are still oppressed. It is still a fight for women. Feminism exists outside of America.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 17

Women are oppressed and marginalised all over the world.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 18

TIL people don't think women are oppressed in Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am outside America, and oppression now is happening mainly in the middle east against different religious groups not bc of gender.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

it's true. in some countries, it still needs to be called feminism. but in the US I think it's about time we make a more equal term

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

Not while I can turn on my TV and see an ad for a hamburger with a half naked woman in it. As if she was just decoration. That's fucked up.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Of all the things to give a shit about.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yea basic human rights are so unnecessary.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

yea. and my point is we need to stop treating women as sexual objects but we also need to stop assuming the only way to get a man to (1)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

buy a hamburger is to put something sexual in it. there is sexism both ways, and if we focus on treating it as such, we will have both (2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The word feminism sounds like adherents don't care about racism or homophobia, just sexual equality. Probably not the intention, but still.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

The word "construction worker" sounds like they don't care about human rights issues. Probably not the intention, but still.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

If someone were to use "humanist" or "egalitarian", "feminist" would be redundant, as it's already implied.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That's like saying that just using the word "science" would make the word "physics" redundant.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

If someone is called a physicist, it is safe to assume they do not do biology professionally. Or they would call themselves something else.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's targeting a specific inequity. If I am focused on the lack of groceries, it doesn't mean I don't care about the lack of clean socks.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I know it doesn't. I was just saying; that's how it sounds. and why not target inequality in general?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It just means I've picked a specific target to work on at this moment.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Egalitarianism is the word you are looking for.

11 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 13

Last time I said that i ended up with -8 and my head on the wall of the red keep.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Egalitarianism is the bigger term for equality, though. It doesn't concern itself with gender disparity in particular.

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Sounds perfect.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Even better, because we need far more equality for race and sexual preference

11 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Nor does the word "humanism."

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Did anyone say it did? (Really, I connect "humanism" to the realm of the metaphysical, philosophical...?)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes it does.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It does, *but* *not* *in particular*. Feminism is specialised egalitarianism, so to speak.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which has negative connotations due to many disusing the term as well as entire generation of thought that is misandric in nature.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Egalitarianism concerns itself with all forms of equality, which is why it's twice more suitable for achieving gender equality than feminism

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because it's always better to go for wholesale world peace than to work on more manageable, smaller issues?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because anyone who strives for "equality" only because it's in their own interest is a hypocrite.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So why is it more important to only focus on genders, on which there has been immense progress in the west, rather than sexuality, 2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You need to look at the bigger picture when it comes to equality. If you're pro-equality, you ought to believe all humans are equals. 1)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

socio-economical situations or ethnicity, on which there has not. 3)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0