Emergency parachute deployed after engine failure. Sint-Andries, Belgium

Jul 16, 2022 3:38 PM

funkystay

Views

148139

Likes

1882

Dislikes

13

Why does the camera man just stand there, get over then and help the pilot!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It took me a minute to realize that bit of the tail flying off wasn't some dude doing a swan dive and his parachute failing to deploy.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Hey! Hey, you can't park there!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Better keep filming instead of helping this guy who was LITERALLY just in a plane crash smh

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I feel like the parachute should trigger a loud siren so people hear it coming

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Like a glove!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ooooooohhhhh no. Ooooooohhhhh boy. Oooooooooohhhhhhh God.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Another happy landing!

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You can't park there mate!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The funny part is how the guy then trips getting out

3 years ago | Likes 212 Dislikes 12

Probably the worst injury.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's probably a bit rattled after the crash anyways. Wobbly legs.

3 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

He's not good at keeping things running, be they airplane engines or legs.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

I almost got crushed by a steel reel at work. I proceeded to turn around, trip over my own foot, and smashed my face into a safety cage....

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I passed out sick once and the sound of my face crashing into our rats' cage is what woke me up lol

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They just can't land anything right

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not a crash. It's failure to maintain adequate separation from the ground.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh, of course. Such a silly mistake.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Always laugh when people rush to put this stuff on social media for a few likes, when they could have got paid nicely by some news show.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Parachute should only be deployed in an unrecoverable spin. An engine failure should = off-field landing. Source is I'm a pilot instructor.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Holy fuck

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

v

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's not going to buff out.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love that people never offer any help

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a concept this is really cool! You don't have the plane as a projectile, you can recover it and with a plane that small, jumping out /

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

/ might actually be the more dangerous option compared to this, where you're strapped in.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Worth every penny in that person's opinion

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I did not know this was an option v

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

cirrus has had these since 1998 it's now standard for the company

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Something like this system or individual parachutes have been required for acrobatic flight for many decades.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seen 25+ years ago one was made for passenger planes but if passengers survived but were injured they'd sue. Just cheaper for them to die.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

...Wut. These are widely available for private aircraft. They've been standard on Cirrus aircraft since 1998. Before that their limited use

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

was due to their limited availability to ultra-lights due to unreliability of the design for larger aircraft.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wasn't that at all. A parachute is considered a risk more than a safety device by regulators. Also designers use it as a crutch

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Using a parachute is considered moving into a uncontrolled state which is always worse than controlled.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine explaining to the insurance company that aplane hit your van.

3 years ago | Likes 260 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Sep 20, 2022 3:20 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Nah I thought so too, is bird.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, there's literally video evidence. Insurer: I still don't believe you.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(They are paid not to believe you)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

clearly missed the van by about 3ft .

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 21

Probably why they used the word “imagine”

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

I once had my glider in tow while on the highway. Boxed up. Someone smashed into the trailer. It was a difficult task explaining to 1/

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

insurance what had happened. They just couldn't fathom a car going over 100km/hr running into a glider. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

missed the electrical transformer or whatever, by inches, no explosion

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cirrus, because chute happens.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cirrus CAPS?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Haha. My first thought but no.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dyn'Aero Bambi

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tail Number OO-E64

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That fucking moron just filming instead of checking up on the dude...

3 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 16

But you wouldn't have known he was a moron if he hadn't filmed it.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What was he supposed to do? Catch the plane in his arms?

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Yell out to gauge how the pilot is doing, if he needs help? Least you can do. If no imminent danger, go towards the pilot and help. Duh.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Was he waiting for the explosion? That would go viral!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, I'd probably gape in shock for a few moments after seeing a plane falling from the sky.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That legitimately pissed me off. If other people are moving to assist? Fine. Not good. But fine. Here though? They are clearly the nearest ~

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

~ person to the touch-down. Fucking ACT.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No no, even if you *think* you see other people helping or calling 112, ya gotta do it too. Better too many than too few/none at all.>

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you get there late and are redundant, you can always wave off then. Bystander effect and all!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Fine" as in "more understandable", not as in "good"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I got that already.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I can't believe he didn't even like yell out and ask if guy was ok!? Id be running to help Incase cockpit stick

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

I though the black thing falling off the plane was the pilot jumping out in a wingsuit. Maybe he did too!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A wingsuit, nor a parachute, wouldn't do anything at that altitude. However little crumple-zone the airplane has, at that point...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every small plane should have one. It's honestly puzzling why it hasn't been made a requirement.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Mu rights.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Trying to retrofit this to older planes would be prohibitively expensive. Unlike cars, planes tend to stick around a lot longer.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Expensive, heavy, added design complexity, not easy to retrofit - only usable under a very narrow set of circumstances.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Expensive

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A piper cub is so slow you can bearly kill you self. No need to add the extra weight. It looks like the sys takes 300ft to slow

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's a psych issue that people almost never pull the handle before it's too late. "I've got this, I'll have this..." etc.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You have a min altitude and max speed for deployment. If you're not in takeoff, landing or inspection passes, it's generally easier to make

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

An engine out landing. If you need to use the BRS, often it needs to be your first course of action before trying to dead stick it home

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Come again? For those of us who don't speak airplane?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Glide back to an airfield or wide open space. Dead stick, referring to unpowered landing.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BRS (Ballistic Recovery System) is the company that makes Cirrus's parachute recovery system.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When the engine fails your airplane conveniently turns into a glider. Much better for the environment.

3 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 13

That’s why helicopters turn into rocks when it happens to them.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Autorotation. You actually can land a helicopter after engine failure.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As a pilot friend used to say, it flies like an oven-ready turkey.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes. Parachutes, the leading cause of environmental disaster. Definitely not just virtue signaling.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Gliding is great if you are at a high altitude with high speed. Low altitude, low speed means you have very little time to glide and (1)

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

(2) find a safe landing. Also gliding with full fuel tanks just after takeoff is much more difficult. Deploying a chute and falling....

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

(3) Straight down rather than flying forward into a tree and breaking the plane up, spilling fuel everywhere, is better for the environment.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Theyre's so many factors involved that would lead someone to use the shoot instead of trying to land it upon engine failure.

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

IMO the 'chute is for structural failure or if a good weather only pilot finds himself stuck in the clouds.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

chute

3 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Ah shoot - AlwaysInTheshadows (the uncapitalized "s" bothers me >:( )

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I only use Shoot! brand chutes

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like a spin

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You better use that training to get out of the spin first else it's likely you create a situation that will kill you and others.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Usually structural issues force a chute pull. Dead stick vs chute,if there's a good landing spot, land it.Over a city,safer for all to chute

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

yea landing on the road would increase risk crashing into a moving car. wrecking the plane worse and more injuries.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There's or there are

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Emergency parachute deployed after engine failure , USA

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

And if you do that in GTA V, you get a wanted star. Because cops knows you're the one that ditched the plane 5 miles away.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Was that the asshole that faked an emergency so he could crash the plane for Facebook likes, or some shit?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yes

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"engine failure"

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Brought to you by Ridge Wallet!

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ha, yes.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This one still pisses me off. Do it with some worn out 150 that’s been in a training fleet for 50 years? Not a nice airplane?

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Sauce?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Your takeaway is that he should have faked an engine failure, risking people lives, and potentially causing a wildfire with shittier plane?

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

No? I guess it reads that way? It is idiotic, dangerous, destructive regardless of the aircraft? I hate to see destruction of classics?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's wasteful and unsustainable. If you're going to do a destructive test, why use an affordable plane that's still useful?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He wasn't performing a destructive test, he was faking an engine failure and bailing out for Youtube clicks.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That makes it worse.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's was a lot softer landing than I expected

3 years ago | Likes 764 Dislikes 0

Boop!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Parachute:

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

*boop*

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's kinda the point of the parachute :)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Planes are quite light.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, when they work correctly it's realy impressive. That plane is repairable too, so overall that's a pretty good day for that pilot.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I expected a Transformer movie kinda of explosion. Was a little disappointed.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was absolutely 100% expecting this to be a little model airplane up until the exact moment of impact, holy jeez

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wasn't expecting it to land so close

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Same here.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wonder how much it messed up the engine. Like, are all the cylinders now bent from that sudden stop on the crankshaft?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

How would the cylinders... what?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Engine was already stopped, but even if it wasn't the prop would shred before the engine was damaged.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Sudden stops are huge concerns for airplane engines; but that engine was already stopped.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, I figure the front cowling crumpled, but a lot of the force from crashing into the ground went through the driveshaft/cranksaft.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't work that way. You'd crack the block to pieces before a hit like that would do any more than swage the thrust bearing slightly

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if sized correctly and deployed in time, the chute are designed to make the crash not only survivable but leave the plane repairable.

3 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 0

No pretty sure the chute being pulled on these immediately writes off the airframe. The sudden deceleration will warp the airframe

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

Umm....aircraft carrier arrestors?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah man, not a single one of those planes was usable again. That's why Japan lost WWII. They couldn't replenish the carriers fast enough.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I doubt the tensile strength of the material attaching the parachute to the plane is superior to steel.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Airframe is aluminum, not steel, and the tensile strength doesn't matter, but they can still be repairable

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh damn lol, this is what I get for watching so much Forged in Fire

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, totally. That thing's going to need a new prop, some work on leading edges, but it'll fly again.

3 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

*complete overhaul of engine to check for damage and also see why it died in the first place.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You work as used car salesman on that truck lot he landed on, don't you?

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Ssshhhh you're blowing my cover.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Any jolt like that is going to need an engine rebuild and lots of inspections to the mounts/firewall.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

But it would be possible

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0