celebwiz
168794
12822
204
Our Universe is in a Black Hole!
Our universe might be so small and insignificant in the grand scheme of things, that it’s hidden inside the black hole of another universe, totally unbeknownst to theoretical sentient beings in that universe. And that means all the black holes so far found in our own universe could also contain doorways to alternate realities. This theory is based on new mathematical models of the spiraling motion of matter falling into a black hole. The matter absorbed by black holes isn’t necessarily destroyed – it could be expelled, to become the basis for new galaxies, stars, and planets. This could explain the mystery as to how the universe could have started with a singularity in the Big Bang theory – instead of just existing with no explanation, it was birthed by a white hole, the hypothetical escape hatch for matter at the other end of a black hole.
Multiverse: We Have Dopplegangers!
It’s highly unlikely that we live in the sole existing universe. We’re probably in one of many. Physicists have theorized that there could be infinite universes existing next to each other in a sort of giant patchwork quilt, that the Big Bang led to the generation of many other ‘bubble universes’ and that parallel universes hover just outside of our own. Columbia University physicist Brian Greene, author of the book ‘The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos’ says the latter theory supports the idea that we all have doppelgangers.
“The argument for doppelgangers is pretty straightforward. Assuming that space goes on infinitely far, in any finite chunk, matter can only arrange itself in a finite number of ways, like cards in a deck. You and I are just a configuration of particles, so sooner or later we’re going to repeat. Matter can almost repeat its configuration but not repeat it identically. Your physical body may repeat, but your mental configuration can be a little bit different, so there might be an evil version of you, and a version that loves skydiving.”
The Universe Is Just One Big Hologram
Maybe our universe is just one big holographic picture show projected onto a 2D surface. String theorists believe that everything we perceive as reality could be no more than the vibration of these 2D strings, and the scientists presenting the theory of a holographic universe take that one step further. Our entire existence could be a 3D projection on a 2D plane of information, but we can’t perceive that 2D surface because of its scale. (Apparently, this is what happens when you get into an argument with Stephen Hawking.)
Craig Hogan, a physicist in Illinois, is building two holometers that could prove or disprove this outlandish theory. The holometers monitor the smallest spaces in our universe to look for the smallest possible unit in the universe, called Planck units (10 billion times smaller than the width of a proton.) Initially stacked on top of each other, the holometers will scan for Planck ‘noise'; once it’s detected, they’ll be separated and the experiment will be run again. If the noise isn’t correlated between the two machines, that could indicate a limit to space-time’s resolution.
The physics community is skeptical that Hogan will actually be able to measure anything, but if he did, it would have a huge impact on fundamental physics: the first proof that space-time is quantized.
We Really Do Live in the Matrix
Could we really be living inside a computer-generated universe? The Matrix may be an outdated work of fiction, but its concept of an artificial reality still carries weight – even scientifically, perhaps, according to a team of physicists at the University of Washington. The team announced that there’s a potential test to see if we could be the creation of bored super-intelligent entities who are playing us like The Sims. It sounds totally ridiculous, and of course, causes science-minded people to bristle at terms like ‘intelligent design’ – though in this scenario, our creators aren’t exactly a bearded dude in the sky.
But some scientists and philosophers say that this theory could solve a few mysteries about the universe, like the fact that the exact conditions required to support life are so unlikely in the grand scheme of things. Small shifts in dark energy could easily have caused the universe to explode or implode a long time ago.
The UW team says that mega-computers of the far future could greatly expand the size of a theoretical Sim Universe, and that if we’re living inside such a program, there could be telltale evidence for the underlying ‘lattice quantum chromodynamics’ technique used by the computers. It could show up as a limitation in the energy of cosmic rays.
“We would have to suspect that post-humans running our simulation are themselves simulated beings; and their creators, in turn, may also be simulated beings,” says British philosopher Nick Bostrom. “Here may be room for a large number of levels of reality, and the number could be increasing over time.”
Presentism: Only The Present Is Real
The Presentism philosophy of time posits that the only things that really exist are those happening right this minute. Neither the future nor the past really exist – so basically, stop worrying about what you did or what you’re going to do and focus on what you’re doing now. It’s based on the philosophy of Heraclitus, written in 500 B.C.: “Transience is basic,a nd the present is primary. Those things which exist now do not abide. They slip into the past and non-existence, devoured by time, as all experience attests.”
How does this philosophy intersect with modern physics? It relates to a variety of theories about the passage of time, and of course the theory of relativity. Read more at Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Time is Actually Slowing Down
Why are supernova stars viewed at extreme distances moving away from us faster than those that are closer? Some scientists say dark energy is responsible or the acceleration, but others offer a different explanation: time itself is slowing down. Those galaxies only look like they’re accelerating from here, because the deep space telescopes are basically looking back in time to see them. Like the ekpyrotic scenario, it’s based on string theory, postulating that our universe is embedded in a multi-dimensional ‘brane’ (like a membrane) which is floating through a higher dimensional space that we’re unable to detect. What does that mean? Essentially, say the scientists responsible for the theory, time could come to a complete halt, freezing everything in place forever. But not to worry – even if this far-out theory is true, it won’t happen for billions of years.
The Ekpyrotic Scenario: Universes Colliding
Did our universe actually come about due to a collision of two three-dimensional worlds? The ekpyrotic scenario is a cosmological model of the origin and shape of the universe that illustrates it as a giant, stretched rubber band that could fly back into our faces at any moment. It contradicts the Big Bang theory, in which time and space began when something created a bubble of energy from nothing – a bubble that blew up into what we now know as the universe in a tiny fraction of a millisecond. Based on string theory (which suggests that once you get smaller than an atom, everything is a 2D unit called a quantum string – an attempt to marry Einstein’s theory of relativity with quantum physics), it’s highly controversial, but intriguing all the same.
In the ekpyrotic scenario, two three-dimensional worlds (branes) collide in a space with an extra (fourth) spatial dimension. It amends the earliest point of the Big Bang theory, stating that rather than beginning with nearly infinite temperature and density, the universe began cold and nearly vacuous.
“The hot expanding universe we know came as a result of a collision that brought the universe up to a large but finite temperature and density,” says Paul Steinhardt of Princeton University, who came up with the concept. “The rest of the story is as the Big Bang model would have it, but the beginning is different.”
“Quantum effects cause the incoming three-dimensional world to ripple along the extra-dimension prior to collision so that the collision occurs in some places at slightly different times than others. By the time the collision is complete, the rippling leads to small variations in temperature, which seed temperature fluctuations in the microwave background and the formation of galaxies. We have shown that the spectrum of energy density fluctuations is scale-invariant (the same amplitude on all scales). The production of a scale-invariant spectrum from hyperexpansion was one of the great triumphs of inflationary theory, and here we have repeated the feat using completely different physics.”
SpanisInquisition
#1 black holes aren't actual holes.
inb4tehlulz
But where did the white hole come from then?
cryborg
Bleach
radmelon
Most of these theories are either BS or simplified and misrepresented to the point of being unrecognizable (I'm looking at you, simulation)
bevme
Actually, you're all in my dog's movie/life. I'm a minor character, and you guys are in the "cast of thousands." Sorry. :)
bevme
Don't worry, though...we work hard to keep her alive 'cause, you know, we need the job, and we kinda' don't know what happens next...
monteZUMASrvnge
I love shit like this. Thank you
SarcasticKiwi
Neat.
TheFlattestPlaceInCanada
There is also Last Thursdayism, the idea that the universe was created last Thursday with the appearance of being billions of years old.
YouThinkThatsBad
Kind of like the character Dawn on Buffy.
theycallthewindmariah
Thank you, Dean Winchester.
Hayz09
"Aliens"
Space1255
Welp time to have an existential crisis. Thanks @OP.
Muttons1337
"Shoot for the stars. Even if you miss, you'll land umong the stars!"
Leithoa
*shoot for the moon. ..
Asaphysicist
"Shoot for the stars. Even if you miss, you'll end up in the cold empty reaches of space." :P
HopeHubris
"Shoot for the stars, if you hit you'll die a fiery death, if you miss you'll land in the infinite void of space, and die differently"
Venarti
"Shoot for the stars. Fucking stars."
TheDigitalJedi
Forgetting the fact that it's actually "shoot for the moon." >_>
Muttons1337
I wish I had some kind of witty retort but I was half asleep and thought I had written moon. Apparently I did not.
MinnesotanYoubetcha
Saved to read again when I'm high AF.
Gregster427
These are not theories. These are thought experiments. Theories must be testable, or else they are only mindless daydreaming.
supernatlove
So.... Langoliers?
u2bist
Brian Greene strangely insists that in infinite realities EVERY possible reality MUST exist. But mathematics simply does not imply this..
Namotatop
"it won’t happen for billions of years." I think I read that in a post about suns dying recently
TheLastNalbinder
The final question by Isaac Asimov
ecodude
That's still my all time favorite comic/short story. It's weirdly calming to think about.
stalewaffles
Thinking about these makes me see everything as like ominous and fake and makes me feel sick
StefanDeWynter
same, especially the simulation hypothesis feels incredible depressing to me.
factsaboutGARLIC
Garlic attracts leeches. They take 14.9 seconds to attach to a hand covered with garlic, but 44.9 seconds to suck blood from a clean one.
snowy129
sauce?
daiconrad
Garlic sauce.
daiconrad
The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
cryborg
I have a weird theory that some women get sexually aroused by science
AFelineMassofEyes
Talk nerdy to me
keroppi75
As a girl, I can confirm this theory
OSCgal
After studying myself, I have concluded that this is an observable fact.
RamBROafication
"the matrix is outdated fiction"- came out in 2000. TIL that fiction becomes outdated after 15 years. (see "the hobbit"-written 1937)
sflinn3
I just saw the Matrix again a few days ago. Still better than most the stuff that comes out now
RamBROafication
agreed. the first film was the bees knees...... BBZZZZZZZZZZZZBBBZZZZZZZZZ
Lulabel73
I wonder if there's a thin me.
PsuPepperoni
I am already evil and love skydiving
Lilshadow48
If we go by the assumption that there are infinite multiverses, there is an everything you. Even a you where you are literally Hitler.
Lulabel73
According to my husband that would be this world. :)
alymac
OP's dick is 1 planck
TheLastPunslinger
No idea why you got downvoted. Physics based appropriately used dick joke. +1
alymac
Thank you, I will accept Imgur's judgement but appreciate your vote.
therealpopkiller
Kinda makes which bathroom people use seem insignificant.
AfRoSaUcE
Seriously.
SirGigglyBits
When you think about the universe as a whole, even genocide is insignificant.
BlunterSpy
fun
mskovg
If we do live in the Matrix, dear admins, could you please rollback to snapshot from 1998-12-01. Thanks a lot.
IveSeenYourButthole
1976, so I can dodge that egg and none of this happens
mskovg
Sorry... Sudo rollback snapshot... no?
SSColonelHansLanda
I want them to roll me back to 01/06/2003
benovere
Due to *somebody's* porn collection we had to wipe all the snapshots. Your current instance is the only one. Use it well.
Wadef4
sorry
thewretchedstone
sudo make me a sandwich
reflectedsoundofundergroundspirits
I demand an upgrade to the body framework. The latest one is buggy. I prefer the older one from back in 2005.
ketochris
Yes, can we go back to my tall and lanky chassis instead of my tall with a beer gut chassis? 2006 oughta do.
grantron5000
How did you have an older body in 2005?
davehiny
Well, time is relative after all.
Frustr8dBstrd
Brain.exe stopped working
Shitposting2017
I'm gonna make a toaster strudel
FrankJ7
[CLEARING_HARD_DRIVE]
Konoton
Try something a little more relate-able: Look up the Berenst#in Bears problem.
TacticalPuke
Download more RAM http://imgur.com/IBlcKPL
marzipanius
Dry.
Darohan
Try pressing ctrl + alt + delete
logangrey123
Blow yourself
dreadlock
Good for you, I got an out of memory exception when trying to remember this..
StarscreamAndHutch
Reboot 3 times.
ghostofdragon
Never try reading in the morning... You'll hurt yourself like I did
[deleted]
[deleted]
TerraDactyl89
um... living things being able to pass through a black hole without dying isn't a pre-requisite for matter to be able to pass through.
DevonGronka
I really don't think that's the case. I'm pretty sure being stretched to an almost infinitely thin and long string would kill you. If not1/2
DevonGronka
then having almost half of your mass converted in to energy in the process surely would. And the resulting explosion certainly would.
oldarchive
Loading 99%... FATAL ERROR
mercbrit
Try turning yourself off snd on again.
DontBeNoCloudOnASunnyDay
I don't want to grow hair on my palms
mercbrit
Agh. I have caught your virus.
SHOWMETHERICE
You mean sleep
MadameBarnacle
but I can only turn myself on! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
senkuo
I'll turn you on ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
MadameBarnacle
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
senkuo
With my penis ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
tbnd
I spouted that black hole theory years ago to my friends. I may or may not have been under the influence at the time, but now vindication!
haddermeatmah
I had that conversation too. Definitely one of my favourite walk home chats.
thewretchedstone
what if the universe is bounded by the limits of the black hole it's in... but the other end of that black hole is IN our universe?
OSCgal
So, kinda like a multidimensional Klein bottle?
combatwombat0
How many dimensions does Klein bottle usually have?
OSCgal
Four, like most things. I guess I should have said "extradimensional."
alchemist12345
I dont think these are scientific theories...
andidancedancedance
Well it depends if you think of philosophy or quantum physics as sciences. It's a mix of both. In the end no one will ever know
HOLAKOOO
the philosopher knows so much about nothing at all.
tardis63
This is in many ways not quantum physics. To be science it has to be testable
andidancedancedance
Once our race dies out at the end of this world, all that will remain of us will be our own creations of artificial intelligence to remember
andidancedancedance
Us by
MrTay
I took tons of physics, but when people hate on the idea of intelligent design, science can get pretty far out there also "not religious"
TinyRocktopus
Yea most of these are probable or can be proven false. About as scientific as the flying spaghetti monster
Leithoa
That's because ID almost always includes irrational 'moral' baggage and unsubstantiated superflurous claims about the world.
thewretchedstone
imo, if we rule out I.D. on principle, it's bias against conclusions where evidence might actually lead. seems like bad science
Leithoa
Ignoring an unjustified assumption is not bad science. Then there's the fact that many things are haphazardly, even poorly designed.
Placeboy
Nothing should be ignored in science. You don't have to use it as a basis for anything, but don't forget about it.
Leithoa
There's no point assuming green pixies hold up airplanes when natural explanations account for all the observed effects.
tehwilsonator
"All life on Earth formed when an alien child dropped its cotton candy out the window of a spaceship" "All life on Earth formed when Thor(1/
tehwilsonator
sneezed and forgot to throw away his tissue." "All life on Earth formed when the gravitational pull of the planets caused a few gallons (2/
mercbrit
My toilet roll has been placed on the holder with the dangly bit at the back.
BonaFide
GTFO!
PremierPyrus
NO! THATS THE WRONG WAY!
mercbrit
Exactly. Heads should roll!
ThisGuyHere
In an alternate universe there's possibly a version of you that isn't an insane nutjob.
FrankLopez
I understand some love the dangle bit at the back. I do not.
ScientologistSeaOtter
Going by the multiverse theory it means that in an alternate universe there is a nice version of you.
igotalittlewilly
Things that are real: the struggle
ProfessorMatt
INFIDEL! BURN HIM!
Bystandr
If you dangle in front , some times you can tear it off at the top and it makes it hard to grab the next piece. If you do so at the back ➊
Bystandr
however, you will find with triple or better the frequency, that the dangly bit will leave some hanging , allowing the next tear more ease.➋
DarfnageL
There are two kinds of people in this world, the people who put the dangly but at the back, and those that are wrong.
stalewaffles
Same
DoctorGoldfish
Earlier today I realized how perfect my roommate and her visiting fiance are for each other. They just have some much in common... 1/2
DoctorGoldfish
For instance, NEITHER OF THEM KNOW HOW TO REPLACE THE FUCKING TOILET PAPER! 2/2
Tosy120
FilthyRapscallions
We will never forget.
Woppledorf
This is correct.
RootEnoch
GOOD ON YOU! STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS.
mercbrit
I was sitting down when I noticed.
WastedOpportunity
PSA: these aren't theories in the formal scientific sense of the word, eg 'theory of gravity', rather conjectures.
[deleted]
[deleted]
liquidsnakex
It's both, laws are just theories that stuck around long enough without being disproven to be considered probably true.
TinyRocktopus
Laws are the math formulas that explain what we observe. Theories explain why it happens. One can't become the other
apearthenbananas
Word
ProfessorPrimate
Models
SmoothOpawriter
I think they would have been better iff calling these "scientific hypotheses"
diabobical
Nailed it, and beat me to it.
fireeternal
One would think experts in science would shine light on this post, instead they just discuss a word.
Lapkin
I thought they are philosofical theories.
DoctorPitt
Well the time one is or at least buddhism and some other eastern religions follow that philosophy that only the now exists.
EspressoMachine
Einstein's formulas predicted black holes and white holes.
vibrantlightsaber
Hypotheses vs theory
PolarBears91
These are theories in the sense that they can't be tested
TinyRocktopus
Theories can be tested these can't
PolarBears91
Oh whoops.
ahyoussef
The holographic principle is a theory, it has a solid mathematics base. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
piratica108
More leaning towards a hypothesis than anything. It does explain and fit into our world, but not in a verified way.
sexconker
It has no evidence, it cannot be tested, it is not a theory. It's no more significant than the angsty, "deep", thoughts of a 15 year old.
DoctorWatchamacallit
kind of. It DOES have a solid mathematics base, but we aren't quite sure yet it applies to our universe. It has the status of the Higgs 1)
DoctorWatchamacallit
2) boson prior to it being discovered, pretty likely, but so are some other possibilities.
tardis63
Yep, like multiverse theory. If it's not testable, it's speculation. Interesting philosophically and maybe right but we need an experiment.
DickChaney2
honestly the bang isn't testable at all either.
tardis63
Multiverse is by definition outside the bounds of our laws of physics and our understanding of spacetime, so it isn't even observable
Aerolfoz
The Big Bang? There's evidence for it in the microwave background radiation. Matches up perfectly and all.
DickChaney2
I believe in the bang bang, but i also understand that there is a lot of holes in our understanding of physics and the big bang
tardis63
The main problem is field theory unification of gravity and once that's nailed down, inflation follows quite simply
DickChaney2
So i also believe, at this point it time that accepting it and ignoring other theories is foolish.
Aerolfoz
No real scientist ever ignores all theories in favor of one. Focusing one one because it matches up so nicely and seems right? Sure.
magnetude
They're attempting to recreate it on small scale tho, so its at least (hopefully) recreatable
tardis63
The high-energy conditions are what the LHC has tried to do. For a split second the energy breaks the protons into constituent quarks
DickChaney2
With the current theory on the universe before the big bang, it would literally be impossible. Universe had no physics yet.
tardis63
This was when the universe was under 2 minutes old and energy levels were higher than binding energy of atoms
tardis63
It's observable and we can test the components. Things like proportion of hydrogen to helium in the universe is evidence for it
DickChaney2
2. Of years for matter to even start forming. We are making educated guesses. Very well educated guesses.
DickChaney2
No, the earlist state of the universe is completely unobservable. Physics, time, everything would have broken down. It took millions
tardis63
That's completely untrue. We have an understanding of things past strong force quantum field unification, or GUT
tardis63
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~george/ay21/readings/Ryden_IntroCosmo.pdf Chapter 10, solid undergrad textbook goes over it well
tardis63
They formed protons and neutrons which gave way to ionized hydrogen, deuterium, helium, beryllium, and lithium
tardis63
Matter was created between 3 and 15 minutes during a period of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, where temp. was lower than quark binding energy
planckstorch
tl;dr Sciency pictures mixed with conjecture. Could, might, etc. All the usual: Solipsism, Last Thursdayism, etc.
[deleted]
[deleted]
theycallthewindmariah
I didn't know the Chicago Bean was sciency.
marzipanius
Which sums up a very large amount of our current science - theories that we cement as fact until we know better. Rinse, repeat.
DoctorWatchamacallit
only if you consider string theory to be all of "current science". You guys realize that they are made fun of by the rest of the physics 1)
DoctorWatchamacallit
2) community for that right? The public seems weirdly unaware that physics is doing any thing else besides what Hawking is doing.
Selerox
You must be really fun at parties. People find these interesting, they give wider scope and give inspiration to think larger things.
DoctorWatchamacallit
so does legitimately demonstrable stuff. this is speculation at best for most of these
marzipanius
Why bother pointing that out when it's obvious from how they are referred to as scientific THEORIES?
DevonGronka
Because theory has a very different meaning than conjecture or hypothesis. A theory is an explanation of a mechanism. a hypothesis is 1/2
DevonGronka
just a guess. People confuse meanings all the time and it leads to dumb statements like "evolution is just a theory; you can't prove it".
YamatoIouko
Because, in science, a theory is not a conjecture. That's a hypothesis. A scientific theory has basis and confirmation behind it.
pancrazio
Fun fact: every scientific law we know was a conjecture a some point.
pancrazio
Fun fact: my downvoted post is word for word from "Logic of scientific discovery", Karl Popper, p.23 of my italian edition.
YamatoIouko
Fun fact: they're still only pretty much established conjecture. There's very few actual physical "laws"; most are theories.
stoffo
Another fun fact: Almost every conjecture doesn't end up being a scientific fact
DevonGronka
Haha. Burn.
pancrazio
Fun fact: my downvoted post is word for word from "Logic of scientific discovery", Karl Popper, p.23 of my italian edition.
stoffo
Fun fact: Popper was probably not replying to these images on imgur when stating that.
pancrazio
Yep, they said that about Evolution too. Point is, that even fantasies play a role in scientific development.
stoffo
Yes. So what?
DevonGronka
Have you read any of Steven Gould's essays? Darwin didn't just wake up one day by himself and think "animals change". The idea that 1/2
DevonGronka
animals adapt over time had already been established for decades based on observation of fossils people knew were older. What Darwin did 2/3
stoffo
And my point is: they said that about millions of wrong ideas, as well. What makes these more promising that they deserve special attention?
DevonGronka
exactly. What makes these any more relevant to anything than, say, timecubism, or the crazy idea that planets continually expand?
Ds2k7
Did you know all dogs may actually be babies in costumes?
WDGaster
Perhaps the inverse is true. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/f3/dc/63/f3dc63dd2295df4aa5d57a975e851c29.jpg
Isexualiseeverything
I refuse to believe that hypothesis... Dogs are way too cute to be human babies.
daiconrad
Whoa, whoa, nobody said anything about *human* babies.
Isexualiseeverything
*sigh of relief*