Thanks Baltimore.

May 29, 2019 12:07 AM

Cheomesh

Views

134001

Likes

5712

Dislikes

78

relevant

No one will see this, but I live in DC and our stadium cost us around 400 mil, but pulls in a little more than that every year in revenue

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ha ha, fucking Baltimore. AmIRight?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Quebec City: $370 million on stadium for NHL team. Team goes to Las Vegas. Quebecers still resent the Nordiques going to Colorado in 1995.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

stadium deals rarely are good deals. But—people get the governance they voted in.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It worked as a distraction for the Romans’ we haven’t progressed that far.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Grenfell tower tragedy could've been avoided for £293k, the cost of non flammable cladding. But no, not worth it for Kensington borough.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"You mean I have to see that ugly tower from my upscale flat? No thank you."

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

150mill sounds way too cheap. Rail cali failed to build cost way more.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

5 billion and it's still going no where

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Transit System owners have got to learn to kick back more if they want financing...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Baltimore has a subway, multiple bus lines plus the circulator but it’s not like it’s a small public transit system.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’ve taken a bus from Catonsville to middle river before. Could be worse.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A subway line, in an expensive city, can cost $100M *per mile*. The benefits here is that it has the capacity of 15+ highway lanes, and 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

has much greater benefits to the city than just moving people around. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

As a fellow Baltimoreon; Preach Hon.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The rich people don’t want to give the poor people easy access to their rich parts of town. Ask Atlanta.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Oh but the rich people will certainly move in to the poor parts of town and gentrify the shit out of it alright.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Assuming this is about the NFL, Owners and NFL brass have no business asking for tax payer money they have it.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is this Arlington, Texas for the second time in 10 years?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thank you. Thought of this immediately.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey, someone else got it too! First thing I said when I read the text. Fucking cowboys and rangers both.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

public transit doesnt help the rich stay rich

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great story on this will make you MAD tho. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/22/nfl-stadiums-cost-taxpayers-billions-of-dollars/

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Washington Times really isn't a reliable source.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Read it...it is indeed a very good read

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good read; thanks for sharing

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can't imagine it's only 150 million for comprehensive transit of Baltimore. That's easily a 15-50 billion endeavor 5-10 years.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They're giving the $1B to people who are already wealthy. They know how to manage money. Why give $150M for people who can't afford a car?/s

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 12

...and then the people are gonna want free education, and a "living" wage. C'mon, how entitled do ya get. /s

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

i laughed, and then cried, because some people say this shit seriously. point blank. and mean it. dont forget people hating on healthcare...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

But her books...her books...what about healthy Holly?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm a big fan of public transit, but $150M seems a little low.

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Yeah they wont even do that.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

that's enough to maybe turn some parking or general purpose lanes into bus lanes. Placed right plus better bus schedules is enough

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

to make the difference between a broken bus system and one fast enough to let the area get dense enough for a subway

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, that's about two L stations in Chicago, or two inches of subway in New York.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Also Nashville

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

came down to the comments to say this

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where.....where else would I say it?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

na friend. i came down here to say it, but found you had already spoken

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Word

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"$150M", more like $3B, if you're lucky.

6 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 6

Here in Portland they're always in the red, and still want to expand to places that don't need it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

CA plans on spending $20.4-billion to build the Bakersfield to Merced high speed rail

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Corruption, unions and politicians lining their and their buddies pockets. And then five years into the project, they'll ask for more $

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

And the extra negotiations of "acquiring" land if it wasn't already allocated. A lot easier to get one plot for a stadium than all over town

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Before or after overruns and kickbacks?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who’s going to want to go to a city where they can get around? Such a waste of money.

6 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 6

Georgia’s new Braves stadium.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well I already drove here...

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Nah I never drive INTO Baltimore - I pretty much always take the rail.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Like people in San Francisco... OHHHH, TRIPLE ENTENDRE

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

San Diego did it correct. Sent a team packing cause it's so called owner really can't afford a NFL team and wanted a Golden taxpayer ticket

6 years ago | Likes 356 Dislikes 2

Good! Also: https://youtu.be/fb3HcuFyDFQ

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a San Diegan, I'm mad they left but at the same time happy that we at least had the balls to not put up with the bullshit.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

SD gave the Chargers a very reasonable offer to pay for some/most/a chunk of it and they walked. Spanos wanted us to pay for ALL of it! wtf

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They wanted a new stadium and wanted the city to pay for it, They said go fuck off. so they bitched to the NFL to have the Rams share its 1/

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

new home for free and they got their way,

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seattle did the same. RIP Sonics.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure that was a result of a guy lying and saying he'd keep the team here, and then gave us the finger.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then again, I never really cared about sports and that was a long time ago.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was later. The original owner sold to this guy cause the public voted down funding for a new arena.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, and wasn't Clay fucknut supposed to help build a new one as part of the contingent for buying them?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep now we got two teams and a brand new stadium we didn’t want. But hey, they added a few more beat cops to clean up our subway.

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

pretty sure their new Stadium is privatly founded ? \

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait we have a Subway?

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

And the ground Jack Murphy Stadium stands on, will be redeveloped as a SDSU annex and earn San Diego over twice what the NFL did. Win Win

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

at least the new stadium in LA is all private money

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

For sure, one thing the fat cats got right. It’s gonna do wonders for taxes and much needed commerce in that area too but RIP 105/405/110.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My personal opinion is that the team owners should be paying the lions share for a stadium they're going to be profiting from

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Instead they get a palace paid for then they charge outrageous prices to attend the venue and eat and drink. It’s a fucking racket.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I’m a big sports fan!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only on Detroit

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

idk how it works in the USA but in most EU countries the city benefits greatly by building a stadium surrounded by hotels, shops etc.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exposure, more tourism and such, problem is that most clubs don't know how to make money and end up being a burden to the city.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh, if there's one thing our sports teams know, it's how to make money!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In that case many cities end up buying the stadiums for a symbolic amount (usually $1) and rent the stadium out to the club.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's this thing were sports teams blackmail cities in to building their stadiums. And threaten to leave unless they do.

6 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 1

So send them packing. Ideally with a mob chasing them with torches and pitchforks.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nailed it. Seattle lost the Sonics bc we didn’t build a massive arena 10 years after building an arena. Fucking racket these leagues have.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

20 years ago the Patriots tried that and Massachusetts said 'bye!' The team bluffed for months but then backed down. 1 of 2

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2 of 2 The new stadium was paid for by the team and sits in the parking lot of the old stadium.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rams, chargers, raiders in the nfl

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Rams did that here in St. Louis. I don't miss them one bit.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

One reason I love the Green Bay Packers. They turned the team into a public nonprofit corporation in the 20s and stipulated in the charter(1

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

man, next year is gonna be kinda surreal, with it also technically being the '20s' for the new millennium

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that if the team was ever sold, the profits could only be used to build a WWI memorial. It’s the only small town NFL team that survived. (2

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The bread and circuses will keep you sheeplings satisfied. I, on the other hand, need the entire block of cheese to be content

6 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 11

Steak for me, thanks.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Is that a reference?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Bread and Circuses was coined in the Roman Empire as 'things the government hopes will distract the people from the issues'

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but the "block of cheese" part is what we're wondering about.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Google it.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Top Google search result is that guy's comment. lol.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Tried it, lead me back here.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

We all know what bread and circuses are. The question was about the block of cheese.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

it's easy to make the financial case for a sports stadium when you get to plug any number in for the city's economic growth

6 years ago | Likes 310 Dislikes 9

+1 This was also my first thought.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Studies have shown that stadiums don't actually create new revenue. They just pull revenue from other areas

6 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

True, but if they pull money to a previously poor area youve just redistributed a lot of cash

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Again, statistics show that the areas around stadiums are poor and have elevated crime rate. And the money pulled in goes to people who don'

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually live in those areas, is the owners players staff. So they get their money and bring it to other places. It's a messed up system

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except the goal of the government isn't to make a profit, it's to help its citizens

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Yea the billionaire citizens who own the teams and get almost all revenue from said stadium without putting in a single dime towards making

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's bullshit. Stadiums are empty like 90% of the year. It only benefits the billionaires that get all the profits from the tickets.

6 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 6

They do serve a vital function during and after major disasters. Read We Fed an Island.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I lived near one, when not a game day it's a huge dead zone to walk through, on game day it's a huge traffic jam and crime spikes

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Where is this true? The Moda center in Portland has something happening all the time.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

i didn't say it was right. i just said it was easy to make the case.

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I wasn't saying you were bullshit. The numbers, compared to just about any other investment of that size, aren't worth it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and the mayor's cousin that gets the contract work

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

"What? He was the lowest bidder and always does quality work! But more importantly we need to crack down on those drug dealers." -Mayor

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The city gets huge amounts of taxes and permit fees from it. Obviously benefits the owner a lot but does quickly return on its investment

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

It's nothing compared to investing in businesses that are open all year as opposed to a stadium that's open a few dozen days a year.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Cities don't really invest in businesses and stadiums do actually return more. It's bigger than just the stadium space.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

There's also the money spent in the city by those attending the games/events at the stadium: food, lodging, gas, etc. All taxed.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

There's also the events that people would have scheduled in the city but didn't because they didn't want to go against a sports event.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oh, I understand. I worked against the stadiums in Seattle. I'm saying there are hundreds of better things that do the same.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Seattle loves their teams and the local gov has yet to meet a tax they don't like. Tabs for my '16 motorcycle ran $252 last renewal bc ST3

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the diff between assuming an additional 0.1% growth per year might make the difference, but it's all just a wild ass guess to a modeler

6 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

It's because stadiums have a very quick return on investment and management of that project is much easier than transit.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 21

Stadiums don't return on the investment

6 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

They do... including sales tax, permits, parking, utilities and ad revenue. It's a big deal. No ones saying they use it well.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

All of that except taxes don't go to the city. $1B loan would be fair with the stadium as collateral would make sense.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sports events, especially for a popular team, can generate big money for a city.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

No it doesn't. Part of the deals cities give stadiums is tax exemption. People spend money inside stadiums not outside stadiums.

6 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Big money but not for the city. It mostly only attracts people who already live in the area and would have found something else to 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

And then $1million for education? No money in the budget for frivolous things such as education.

6 years ago | Likes 2145 Dislikes 23

The education system needs major changes. If it did I’d invest in it personally.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I can’t upvote this enough

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'I love the poorly educated'

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8t boggles the mind that people don't understand that "bread and circuses" is still a thing.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Imagine how many jobs there would be and functional things would be if transportation and education were funded how they should be.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It would be bad for the quarterbacks paycheck. We can't have that.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

* of that 1 million, 90% goes to that new football field or basketball gym

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Needs to be spent better. They waste it on chrome books that get trashed.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Schools are one of the most highly state funded programs...

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 35

Obviously, but the needs are much higher. So a lot of money can still be not enough. Whereas frivolous spending is always too much.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Wait, was that real?

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

...I said sarcastically.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is; MD spends a lot on its schools.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It is. But why bother with facts?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Dumb people are the easiest to be ruled over.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

All the money in the world makes no difference if parents aren't involved in their children's education.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

That is so fucking untrue it's hilarious.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Baltimore spends a good bit on schooling. They also spent 100k on busses to protest the 2nd amendment in DC soo not being managed properly

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

Umm...100k isn't even enough to buy 1 new bus. https://www.liveabout.com/bus-cost-to-purchase-and-operate-2798845

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

They rented them you twat..

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Doesn't change the fact that 100k isn't much in that area, and didn't stop them from budgeting what they should've.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

So, sad story with that. At my college, we have a local highschool music teacher playing in our band. Well, in the middle of 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this year's college graduation ceremony, he got a text from his highschool's board. They're cutting his music theory class. 2/3

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn't ask him. Didn't look at the class's enrollment rates. Just cut it. I will never forget the look on his face. 3/3

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They put all the Lotto money into schools though /s

6 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 11

Rather than waste my time explaining why that is technically correct yet 100% bullshit. Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PK-netuhHA

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

6 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Same here

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Negative feedback loop. The better math education is, the fewer people will play the Lotto, the less money goes into math education.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Don’t forget all the casino money was supposed to go towards education

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It does, they just drain those budgets by the same amount the lotto puts in.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

+1. We all believed that-and it DID/DOES happen in California. What also happened was they then started reducing school budgets same amt.

6 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

So, the end result is the lottery is a major source of the school budgets in CA. It’s no longer just SUPPLEMENTAL money coming in.

6 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

The problem with the budget is that Cali can't sustain the pension program. Most money is going to teacher's pensions.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And school administration. The ratio of teachers to admin. has been shifting for years. I can’t find stats, but the ratio is definitely

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.shifting to more admin/teacher than ever before. My niece and her husband (teachers) have also told me it’s changed a lot in 30 years.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah last election cycle MD passed a requirement to treat it as supplemental.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

"requirement"

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My high school got a grant once and what they spend it on? How about making sure there's enough books to go around? Nope. Enough food 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They could just poll the students to ask what they need. But no. All children are dumber than all adults and don't know what's good for them

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They didn't even need to do that. Just look at the issues in the school. Kids went hungry regularly, teachers complained about books 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

and had to resort to photocopying books to have enough for everyone. What a mess 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(protip: most kids would very much prefer their education be as enriching as possible. Maybe seriously ask their feedback sometimes)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Asking for feedback only works when it’s acted upon. I work for a government agency who “consult” with staff; then act on none of it!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so that people in the last lunch didn't go hungry? Nope. Replacing 30 yr old books? Nope. Getting calculators for everyone? Nope. Oh I 2/3

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

know! Let's get gold coins and a stupid sign for the field hockey team for winning a game and shut school down for a day to praise them 3/4

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

and then let's also get 4 plasma TVs in the lunch room that are never on, nobody can hear anyway, and kids throw stuff at! Thatll do it 4/4

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

The system is broken, dude.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Quite a rant, there...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The US spends well over $600 billion a year on education, mostly at the state level

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

As high per student as virtually any country in the world. 90 seconds of googling proves spending is *NOT* the issue. Just a lazy argument.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You mean throwing money at a broken system won't fix it!?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Maybe if you think you have a sound understanding something after 90 seconds, you probably need to do more research.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Spending is and issue. Not always about the amount, but where it's going.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's true! But "we don't spend enough on education!" is objectively false, and the argument of the intellectually lazy.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. Throw more money at a corript system will do nothing. But the brute force approach seems to be the most popular.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0