Why do people fixate on having great social skills?

Feb 4, 2018 12:49 PM

gelvis

Views

206233

Likes

4742

Dislikes

146

Evolution

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have this hanging up at my desk at work. Aerospace Engineer > Mechanical Engineer > Project Engineer. Social skills...minimal.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because humanity is a team sport.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's totally me, except without the excellent employment potential and ability to fix things around the house

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because being actively unpleasant is a good way to not get anything done.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As a Software Engineer at a major company, I have to say this doesn’t work this way...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because if they have to interact with your ass they don't want it to be awkward and/or uncomfortable.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#awkwardengineer

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Screw being overly social, I hate people. Most of them are barely tolerable in today's world.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Because otherwise you end up an unbelievable cunt like Scott Adams.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 13

Seriously. Money and stability is nice, but if you can't stand to be around your spouse, you're gonna be in for a bad time.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Scott Adams is a creepy misogynist Mens’ Rights Activist and huge Trump supporter so maybe think about that when looking at his work.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Well at least he's not a feminist, so he can't be all bad.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I’m more successful in my work with a BA than my friends who got degrees in business and engineering. Social skills are everything ♂️

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Engineer here, Its true. We have little or no social skills.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Engineer here, and I concur. I can fix your problems provided you leave me the fuck alone.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because those skills are valuable to society and surprise, society is made out of people.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck Scott Adams.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 8

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Feb 5, 2018 7:42 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Really creepy fuck as well.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I know many highly social engineers of all ages and backgrounds. Let’s not generalize... they have been some of the kindest people I’ve met.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

We HAVE to generalize, that's how language works. If I call a book one thing and you call it another name, we can't communicate. However 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We should not judge a person by they way they appear. In general the skillsets of engineering and social interaction have little overlap

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I had a partner who was hyper intelligent, with no social skills- he couldn't understand why saying cruel things was bad if they were ->

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

honest in his own opinion. He genuinely couldn't understand how saying something genuinely cruel was in any way wrong if he thought it true.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There's always a draw back to any inherent advantage, sadly. Balance is needed. I used to be surrounded by people like that. Not healthy.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Gosh, he was so intelligent, like human 2.0 intelligent. But he lacked an emotional filter... wonderful person. Just hard to be around him.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now look buddy, I’m an engineer. That means I solve problems.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Uhm, in this context? Because I'd rather have a warm loving relationship than a little more money to buy stuff I don't need.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Knowing that Scott Adams believes Trump is playing 3 demential chess (like he feels he does) and his general attitude towards women (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 11

Brings a whole different shade is meaning to these Dilbert comics. Also his house is shaped like Dilbert’s head.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

Well at least he's done something right.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It’s a multiplier. Let’s say you have some education and skill. Those are valuable on their own but add the ability to communicate and 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 4

People's killing us, introverts..

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 personality such that people WANT to listen to you and work with you and you just multiplied your ability to excel in the long term.

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

This guy/girl gets it. Thanks for a nice clarification.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being pleasant to be around is a good thing, but the lenghts some people expect you to go to fit their social expectations are totally nuts.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Such lengths as?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's people that expect you to apologize when sneezing, for example.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

:D You mean you don't?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude, why would you? When someone sneezes, I say "bless you", they don't need to apologize, they're sick already :U

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they're making loud noises and potentially spreading disease. Both apologies and bless you's are polite. Like thank you and yw.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because you need social skills for literally any social interaction to work properly, including personal relationships. essential life skill

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

It just sucks when you have to run "social interaction" like it's a software-emulated patch, rather than on efficient dedicated hardware. :\

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I can do it adequately or passably at work to seem personable on some level,but even with years of practice,it still doesn't come naturally.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it didn't come naturally to me either. i still struggle with it sometimes. each situation is a unique leaning experience.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Putting the cart before the horse, I see.

8 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 3

I sense you like to put things behind the horse

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's always horses with you, isn't it?

8 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

He tells 'em like he sees 'em. He's a horse biologist.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Like this?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Watch out, you'll give him a new fetish.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

People get too worked up about politics. Does anyone know Michelangelo's political views? Does ANYONE care? Normal Rockwell, DaVinci? etc.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

2017-2018: Having political opposite friends is not allowed while culturally opposite friendships are to be encouraged.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

secretive nature, he developed some very complex views that are of great interest to those pondering art's place in society. So yeah, (5)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes, actually. Michelangelo depicted critics being bitten on the dick by snakes for eternity, and his works were profoundly infleunced (1)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I stand corrected. Let me restate, does anyone besides art history buffs, or poly-sci buffs care about the artist's view Vs. the art?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Anyone with any care about art, how art shapes society, and how art is shaped by society.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

for Da Vinci, we have huge quantities of his journals, and they inform us a great deal of the character of the man. Despite his (4)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

which they were developed. Norman Rockwell, meanwhile, was profoundly political, painting The Problem We All Live With back in 1964. As (3)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

people know, and people care. (6)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

by the Humanist schools of thought developing in his time. His paintings cannot be fully admired without understanding the context in (2)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Unless you live in an engineering town. "I'm an engineer." "Oh, so am I, my brother, my cousin, and my aunt's neighbor's retarded niece!"

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

"Engineering town?" I didn't know they had those.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Silicon valley

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Huntsville, AL is what I think of. Big military/NASA/commercial aerospace/research presence so engineers were a dime a dozen.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ah ok, makes sense. I don't know if I've been to a place like that yet.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I lost a little love for Dilbert when I found out the writer of the comic is a huge Trump supporter and kind of an asshole.

8 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 16

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No kind of about it

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

It just seems like a waste. His comics are really smart and witty, but he's wasting all of that by being a fucking twat.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

It's important to remember there are different types of intelligence. Emotional intelligence is clearly lacking in this case.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

In his case or my case? I don't disagree, but I'm not sure there's been a show of any emotional intelligence in either case.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

His case, obviously. That would be pretty rude to be talking about you.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Have you boycotted movies when you found out it's an untamed sexual breeding ground for assault, inequality and projection as well as 1/

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 25

the Dem party for close ties to Hwood including but not limited to accepting campaign contributions and working closely with industry leads?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

Oh wow this is probably the hardest strawman I've ever heard. What an interpretation of "lost a little love". I'm not even reading the rest.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

I'm just asking a question. I mean, look @ you, not reading a hilarious, office cartoon cause of artist support to one side. Fkng infantile

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 20

Who said I didn't read it. I just said I lost a little love. That's all the info you have to go on. Take a chill pill.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

So, similar situation to Orson Scott Card and his intense homophobia?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Haha, that's news to me. Lucky for me I already hated Orson Scott Card.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It wasn't obvious he was super Catholic?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who, Card of Adams? I don't know about Adams but Orson Scott Card is super Mormon.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

*or

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fooled me, based on the series after Ender's Game

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I took Dilbert off of feedly a couple months ago when I found I was automatically reading his inane blog troll headlines and getting angry.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Haven't missed it, tbh. I can just slam through the archives every few months.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I was reading an interview between him and someone from WP I think. He was defending Trump at every turn, and when the interviewer had him >

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

> cornered, he said "well YOUR politicians aren't perfect either". What kind of intelligent rebuttal is that? He's a real dick.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Yeah, he's all about gargling Trump's cock. But I could live with that if he didn't let the cum drool out all over his comic page.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Oddly enough, social skills are the number 1 determinant of overall success... I don't get it either.

8 years ago | Likes 168 Dislikes 12

Leveraging additional humans is more productive than maximizing the potential of a given human.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Evidence that our society is still quite primitive.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because collaboration is conducive to success.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Social engineering, public speaking, making / building a connection, swaying opinion, leadership are 'soft skills' that influence & likeable

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

There's no best determinant of overall success without a definition of what success means. Different measures have different determinants.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It’s simple. If everyone in your industry likes you personally it makes success a lot easier to attain, regardless of skill set

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Social skills -> better networking. The larger your social network, the more you can benefit from nepotism.

8 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 7

And our species is a social one, so it's a form of positive feedback - a snowball effect.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

No they are not. IQ and conscientiousness are.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

IQ is irrelevant, it's a more or less meaningless number that primarily measures how good a person is at taking IQ tests

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

Sure buddy. I fell like I'll be wasting my time trying to explain it to you. Watch this instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSo5v5t4OQM

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Social skills improve your ability to communicate your ideas, coordinate a larger effort and work within a team to achieve more.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

True, but if you’re socially skilled but an idiot performance wise, whatever ideas you communicate will be garbage.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have had several bosses that were strategic idiots but capable extroverts. Seems to win out almost every time.

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

It's the worst. Taking a class called "Power and Influence", and I have decided that gfvvvujii3ewsx z]\

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't bother to carve 'aarrggh'

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My cat decided to describe my feelings as gibberish.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

In general, women prefer someone who can take care of their social needs and make them feel better when they are down. Mental well being etc

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In general, women prefer a provider and a protector for their children. Everything else is secondary.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Also, when people end up in a position to choose who they want to help/hire, they choose people who weren't dicks. I'm not a schmoozer, but

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I showed up to work every day on time and did my best to look after the interests of people I worked for. When it came time for referrals,

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

name came up with glowing reviews, and the cycle continued with relationship after relationship.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

You were lucky enough to be working for people who recognized actual good behavior more than social BSing, or had no competition from BSers.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're not wrong, but part of that luck was having people who recognized social BS'ers for what they were and who didn't do the work.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Care to share your sources? Because, while social skills may be marginally helpful, they are not a very good determinant of overall success.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Actually, I really wish I knew where I heard this fact now. If I ever come across the source, I'll let you know.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not a fact but nonsense. Women are more social than men, are they more successful on the average? Sociopaths are often successful, too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure this was talking about overall success, not just financial.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Overall is a very vague definition. But even then, there's hardly any data to corroborate the claim.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I listened to Dilbert creator (Scott Adams) on Waking Up With Sam Harris. No longer a fan of the comic.

8 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 11

All of S.Adam's talking gigs disappeared overnight because:

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

He's also a delusional lunatic. Although supporting the pumpkin in chief does kinda imply that.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I made the mistake of reading his comments on the comic's website. Fucker thinks Trump is a genius.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Probably started as a troll... Now ?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

oh no, Scott Adams brain broke real hard on 9/11.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. And I can see folks are already giving you shit for not being politically impartial. Screw that. I'm just a dude on the internet.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

That's our privilege as individuals. Conservatives hate Barbara Streisand. Sure, they say they just don't like her art. I skip the mendacity

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's just an extra step: "yeah, I hate their politics, but that's not WHY I hate their art!" Yeah it is. And that's fine.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

waking up with who now? can you elaborate on what you mean

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a name of something. Based on context I would assume podcast of some kind.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Waking Up is a podcast with the host Sam Harris. He’s a writer, philosopher, and neuroscientist.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

thank you

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

WHY? Art is art, I like Mel Gibson as an actor and a director, I hate him as an anti-semite and misogynist. Why can't u just appreciate art?

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 19

I can, but also: I don't have to. I'm not an important art critic, and I can say "this art sucks because the artist sucks" if I want to.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

These comic in this post sound a bit MRA in context of Scott as a person. “I’m smart eng, logically panties get wet.” Ew to the max.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Maybe that's the joke?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Knowing more about the artist can change the context of the art.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Because in this case, Dilbert leaks all of Adam's gross "WHY NO WOMAN WANTS ME THEY JUST BIMBOS" attitude

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

my point was in response to "No longer a fan..." Indicating that the person liked the comics, until they learned more about the artist

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's context. Like Milo and Otis after learning they recklessly endangered and killed many of the cats and dogs. Hearing Adam's attitude 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

shows Dilbert's whining is less of a loser engineer character flaw and more Adam using him as a mouthpiece about how he's right. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Because some things are tainted by association for people. Why does it matter to you what someone else does or doesn't enjoy?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

You can enjoy whatever you want. I have been told by people that I am not "SUPPOSED" to enjoy Mel Gibson's work because of his beliefs 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No one on Imgur has yet told me what I can't like, but I have been criticized in the past for such "offences" against the holy P.C. culture

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Do your own thing. I don't agree with the blogs Scott has written (stupid 'new' design, grumble) but the comics are still enjoyable. Do you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

discriminated against more than their own personal pleasure. (4)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

harmful impacts upon people. For example, supporting a sexist artist gives them a platform for spreading their noxious ideas. Many (2)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'll tell you you can't like pickles then, just so that someone has.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No-one can stop you from enjoying what you enjoy. They can, however, advise you that supporting a given artist financially can have (1)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

people choose to not fund such people, even though it denies them happiness, because they value the humanity of the people who get (3)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0