why are girls so mean

May 11, 2016 2:15 AM

Jdt103

Views

270887

Likes

14682

Dislikes

675

why are girls so mean

At first i thought this was about age...

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It must be easy being under 130 when your young and your skeleton hasn't even fully developed

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That Trevor Manes is such a bitch

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Simple weight is a terrible metric here. You have to account for height too.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Judging from the size of the ankles. Those legs don't belong to the girl in the selfies.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah that's not the same chick

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

130 is banging unless you're like 4'5"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

so true

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

141 healths on the healthometer?! I've never seen so many healths

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Twitter Rule #1: You can always find 4 or more detestable tweets for any one issue

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Judgemental Fuckleberries.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is that a band?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something tells me the scales person is not the girl in the other pictures..

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

This would be the thing people focus on... yaaaaay.... *sigh*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, first of all, the message isn't a bad thing, but this string of images is just a pile of misleading bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand what you're getting at, OP, but those feet definitely don't belong to the girl in rhe pictures.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

If you're over 130 years old you should just stay dead.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Not even the same legs...look how tan the girls legs are on the bottom two photos compared to the top one.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

not to mention it says posted via android and the mirror selfie pics were taken on an iphone

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Perspective and lighting

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It's not the same person.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

NO IT'S WHITE AND GOLD

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one who immediately thought they were talking about age? Almost left the house as a 210 lbs male in leggings and belly shirt

10 years ago | Likes 678 Dislikes 4

I thought age as well

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same here. I am like you'll probably be dead before you ever reach 130 wtf are these girls talking about. Then I saw the scale

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look at the bright side - at least you are not a girl, so you are still invited to Trevor's party!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They said nothing about men not being able to wear it, already got on leggings and a belly shirt ready to start the day.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Close call bro

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hi I am also 210 lbs male let us rejoice and be friends.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude I'm a 205 and I wear leggings and crop tops almost every day

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

205lb male*

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Bitch, you rock that shit, man

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

do it assert dominance over legging and belly shirt wearing women we shall claim them as our own

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was pondering the stupidity of their rants at 125 year olds in leggings.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

phew

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the way you were going with it, thought

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless there's some medical condition that causes cankles on otherwise fit people I'm gunna call bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 14

I definitely agree.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I weigh 20 pounds less than OP but my feet/ankles always look fat in picture when I'm wearing socks because I don't have defined ankles...

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I'm like 30 lbs heavier than my skinny best friend & have slender feet/ankles and she has wide/fat feet with cankles. Happens.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I see it quite a lot. I think its pretty common to be slim but have less shapely ankles and calves.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There are conditions, but I can see why you're sceptical.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They clearly don't understand bmi or that muscle is ≈3x more dence than fat

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

https://imgur.com/ey1l7PC

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I want to test this out now...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I had a lot of exes with the same mentality. Don't just blame girls. Blame childish people.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

thank god they are exes

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My fiance is well worth the heartache I went through to find him. I learned from my exes who I wanted to spend the future with!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you're very luck to have found a nice guy, apparently they are pretty rare

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are plenty. I was attracted to people with narrow mind sets because I'm stubborn and have had low self-esteem. It's better now though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how did you get better?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

goodness.. when are you all going to convert to standard metric system?

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

As soon as the UK stops measuring people with stones.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And move away from Freedom Units? I don't think so...

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

The US, do something that makes sense? NEVER!!!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I agree with all of those girls. She shouldn't wear anything.

10 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 11, 2016 4:12 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

...wrong post bro

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Haha +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wubalubadubdub!

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

How do we know thats the same girl?

10 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 8

All white basic bitches are technically the same person.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

We don't. And it probably isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

Backwards check the image

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Image size: 794 × 3573 No other sizes of this image found. Best guess for this image: furniture. Seems legit...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol furniture. Nah there's a Twitter and Instagram linked when I searched. Don't want to spread her info though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That brought up furniture for some reason. At least for me

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ENHANCE

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It is.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

and she's vegan.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was actually about to say. That girl is very fit and the legs shown in those socks are very straight. A girl of her body type would 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

have some killer calves. The whole 'girls shouldnt wear X' is still dumb either way though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

64kg is considered fat? ... -_-

10 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

No, that's why the title specifies that the people tweeting are mean. It's 100% Mean Girl bullshit. Who cares?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you are 5'0" you are probably a bit overwieght. But not if you are 5'10"

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Depends entirely on height. if you are 200cm tall, no, if you are 100cm tall, yes.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It shouldn't be, everything depends on type of body you have. I'm 1,80 tall and have always been around 64 to 70 kilos with weight, and ...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

...everyone was making fun of me cause I looked too thin! Some girls my height have more, some less kilos, and they all look normal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 166cm tall and when I was around 62-65kg people kept asking me if I was sick because I looked too thin to be okay. O_o

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it really depends what kind of body you have. Same height and weight don't look the same on everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. :)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It shouldn't be. That girl has a decent amount of muscle mass.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

She does?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Look at her butt

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"muscle mass"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Ass mass

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you think people get those nice butts? Lots and lots of squats

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

considered fat by fucked up people maybe. its a very normal weight

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Not if you're 6yo. Just sayin.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the majority of the population is overweight, doesn't that mean that "normal weight" can also be "fat"? Just saying...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah you have a point. But even so only fucked up people would use body types to exclude people

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those feet don't even look like they would be on that girl...

10 years ago | Likes 382 Dislikes 14

Yeah, skin tones don't even come close to matching.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Those look like fat ankles. And the socks are suspicious.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those are definitely not her feet, but I enjoy the overall message.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

The socks are fun

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

why isn't this the top comment?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I have definitely seen at least a handful of girls of that body type with ankles/feet such as those. Source: I am picky about ankles/feet.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Im tiny up top like her and have cankles. I feel her.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

KANKLES!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thats cause they arent.

10 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 6

They don't, but they are. Backwards checked the image and it is her. She's got big calves and is a vegan.

10 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 6

We can cut people's feet of and attach them to other people, so you never know.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Nicolas Cage... John Travolta... in.... FOOT/OFF

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Her lack of ankles from the first photo disturb me.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 7

Fluffy socks

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats because they arent her feet.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Actually they are! Read farther up, someone reverse image searched her, and those are her feet :D

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. They arent. Trust me on that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Like I said, guy up top reverse image searched, if you still think not, then maybe try doing the same? I'm just tryna help ^^;

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well if an image is shopped to seem like this, u can understand, but trust me no one is that attractive from the knees up only. Not her feet

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cankles?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I think it's the angle of the camera.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Women put these oppressive standards on each other. Source: Mother and sister are my harshest critics.

10 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 10

Buh..but shoe0nhead says that internalized misogyny doesn't exist! /s

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And she's right

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I hate women sometimes. They are always complaining about how patriarchal society is but they are the ones who judge other women based on

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

but its because of the patriarchy, right.... right?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Weight is just a number without context. Worry more about body fat %. No one is telling this girl to lose weight.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now go explain THAT to Feminists. Like men (heterosexual men) care about what women dress. We want yall naked!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Their looks. "Look at her hair , her clothes, her skin, slut, you'll never find a boyfriend, that's not feminine...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry that they are...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My grandmother is worst than both my mother and sister combined, she tried convincing me anorexic beauty is the only true beauty.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

well is she anorexic?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She was as a teen, and she still had disordered eating but I don't know if it would be classified as anorexia nervosa currently.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My grandmother loves to say: "You can never be too skinny or too rich." I kind of agree with the latter.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Most people would probably disagree with the latter too

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would agree that other people can be too rich, and that people can be too rich in theory/general but me...? Nope. I can never be too rich.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Rules for thee but not for me"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Found the democrat *dons downdoot umbrella*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um I'm 6' and I'm 160lbs.. I wear leggings, short shorts, bikinis etc!! Fuck these bitches

10 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 13

How you doing shorty?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

the rules are different for men.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hey gurl nice genetics wana make some beautiful athletic baby's

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Sexy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

But are you a woman?

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 1

Lmao yes I'm a woman

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It took a week for you to figure it out?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No I started a new work section so I haven't been on

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

oh, you caught me

10 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

Wait, you're not the same person I asked before?

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Simple, it's because he WAIT A MINUTE, NEITHER ARE YOU

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Well, this was a trippy comment thread.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

If you weigh 160 then honestly you really probably shouldn't. /sns

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 46

Lmao I'm actually really skinny .. Most of my weight is in my boobs.. But that's cool.. You have your opinion

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At 6 feet tall, 160lbs really isn't very much, man. Granted, that would make for a tall woman, but not fat.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

I am a tall woman but I own it!!! Lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My ex was a smidge taller than I am, and she was still cute as a button. One of my lady cousins is like 6'2", so It wasn't totally foreign.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is a thing called height to weight distribution.. 160lb at 6 ft is a perfectly normal weight.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

People can wear what they want you twerp

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

I'm 6'4 and 185 but I don't think any of those would look good on me. Mainly because I'm a man, but the comments these girls made fuel it.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

6'4 185 must be bean skinny

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 190 and 6'2 and I'm pretty fuckin skinny, so yeah.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me (woman) and my 2 best guy friends have "stretchy pant parties" lmao we all wear leggings and get drunk as fuck

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6'2 220. Nah man. We kill it with our lean legs. Bitches be jealous.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I am pretty lean, but I am working on my chub and tuck currently. Gotta get into shape for summer, even if that shape is a pear.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

6'4" and 185 sounds lean as hell to me. Im 6'6" and was 195 about 10 years ago, hit the weight room and float around 270 now.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah,don't really work out much. I think I would be in way worse shape if I wasn't so tall, but being tall allows you to spread the fat

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you're over 130 years old, you probably shouldn't be wearing booty shorts, or going to Trevor's party.

10 years ago | Likes 7505 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 13, 2016 10:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yeah! Come to my party instead. Everyone except them four are invitef

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Gonna need the address again, yo

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

dude, she looks great. Stop age shaming her

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Please... Don't tempt the internet... Someone will respond.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck you, I can do whatever I want! *climbs into booty shorts* *rides zimmoframe to Trev's party*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I def thought thesewere sarcastic tweets about ages, until the last one finally mentioned pounds.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter how much you weigh. Just be over 18 years of age.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No one ever comes to my partys

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I didn't realize they were taking about weight until the last tweet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought the same. I was like, if someone's lived to 125 they can wear whatever the fuck they want.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How does Trevor do it? to find out more... https://youtu.be/6jzsr7ja-pM

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I'm over 130 I'm going to do whatever the fuck I want Cowboy. YOLO

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You probably didn't make it to 130 saying YOLO...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea I think they are just being catty bitches

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think if you're over 65 you've kind of earned the right to wear whatever the fuck you want. Honey badger don't give a shit.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is my exact thoughts...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess 130 is better than tree fiddy in this case.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Scoooter buddy!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Try and tell her that!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My comment, and it happens to be top comment. Dammit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Am I invited to trevors party

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought lbs too and had a violent image of an old grandma lady in leggings doing keg stands with kids (which kinda fun)

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

[IMAGERY VIOLENCIFIES]

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lbs is weight, not age. So why would you think of a grandmother when someone said 130 lbs?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because it wasn't specified as lbs (first). It just said 129. 129 what? Kilo? 129 kilo is roughly 284 lbs. Thats too extreme. Must be age..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I dunno, then i would find it fair to say "ummm if you're over 130kg maybe you SHOULDN'T wear spandex/leggings/short shorts"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes. Unless you are very very very tall. With dense muscle mass ;)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because I actually meant to type age and not lbs haha....this post confused my brain

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Fuck dam you killed this shit. 5k points

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still trying to decide what I'm going to do with all the profits. Private island or personal jet?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would definitely buy a cat or somethin

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh the less I know the betterrr

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My name is Trevor!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I honestly thought they were talking about age at first

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If your over 130 years old, what the hell is your secret?!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Living on Venus.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doctors hate her.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

formaldehyde

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lots of science

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This was my first and immediate thought.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm gonna ding dong ditch him and leave a mummy in booty shorts on his front porch.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ifeel

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if you're over 130 years old you're most likely gandalf.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fuck if you're over 130 years old lets meet up!...what sword? Oh THIS sword? Oh haha no it's just decorative! Nothing to do with Quickening!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yip thought was a big ageist! If you're alive at 130 wear what ever you bloody want!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless it's Melissandre. She's over 130 and she can rock whatever she damn well pleases. The night is dark and fuck off Trevor

10 years ago | Likes 337 Dislikes 0

You made me laugh out loud for the first time today. Thank you. Have a random .gif:

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So long as she promises to leave her necklace on

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

It's implied the necklace wasn't what fueled the illusion as she's been seen without it on.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ha! You made me spill my wine =)

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Hahaha! Take my +1.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Shit.. Im Trevor.

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Fuck you, Dan. And now Fuck off, Trevor. Why isn't there one for Rodney?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Rodney never gets any respect.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No respect, no respect...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We don't talk about Rodney .... not since the accident

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well then fuck off.

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

lol I thought this was a Tame Impala reference until I looked at the top again, I just completely skipped those messages to look at her.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Try your luck with heather :3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NOT THE GREATEST FEELING EVERRR

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But you dont see a lot of tame impala round here huh

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a 130 year old, you can't tell me what to do

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://twitter.com/tmanes22 Bummer I'm 185 can't make it to this wild man's party :(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

EXACTLY what I actually thought they meant.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought this

10 years ago | Likes 759 Dislikes 0

I also though this

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fourth tweet said "pounds" and I still didn't get it!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

In the beginning I was thinking about age. Then I read pounds and I thought "130 GBP? That makes no sense!"

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

SAme thoughts hEre

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ditto

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha you're not alone. Geezus

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Remember to pronounce it with a hard G, like GIF

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Well that would be why it's an improper way to spell Jesus ;-)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thems sound like fightin' words

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Relax, Gesus

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Me too. I'm from Metric city

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'd still think it was in years (even more so) if they would be referring to kg.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130 pounds = 59 kilograms

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

130 imperial years = 47 Kilodays

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm from Canada i think I'm 1005kgs??? Wait lemme do the math and get back to ya...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

i'm sorry.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've always hated Trevor.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe they meant kgs

10 years ago | Likes 3623 Dislikes 23

The could have, only one even bothered to mention pounds....

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe the first 3, but the last specifically noted pounds

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

pretty sure they ment IQ ... no!?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's 9 stone to you, pal

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You may not understand metric weights... 130kgs is about 300lbs.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the 4th person said "POUNDS" tho

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Literally says "130 pounds" in one of the tweets, haha.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Probably since this is America and quite a few people weigh that much

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Or stones

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was thinking in kg and then I saw the pictures. She'd have to be 1,90m at the very least...

10 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 8

tree fiddy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

Snoo snoo

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im 1,94 and im 73

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm 1.95 and I'm 170. I'm also a man, though, so it's probably a tiny bit less disgusting.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am also a man

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 1,70 and I'm 73, welcome to the club

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wayy more than that. I'm 180cm around 60kg and I still have some of dat fat around

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, male 193cm, 78kg currently, still stuck at that 12%.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2.50m at least.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

I'd even say almost 3m

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

40 acres and a mule?

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Which as we all know is roughly equal to 2 fortnights and a 4 barleycorn.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

84 bellyflops and 2 jaggles

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

190cm and 130kg is practically obese levels of fat, even for men.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My roommate (male) is 10-20 kg lighter than than that, is probably obese, aniway he's waaay overweight

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is he 190cm+ tall? If so it'd probably not be classified as obese.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It all depends on build, but 100 is about the upper limit for good weight when you're in 190+ territory - at least for a man.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well obviously, you won't go up to the world's strongest man and tell him he's a fatty, but for 99/100 people it's true.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am over 100kg, at 183cm. But muscle is 3x as heavy as fat, so breaking the hundy club is easy enough if you aren't a slob

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or maybe they mean upvotes. YOU ARE NOT INVITED !

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You metric motherfucker +1

10 years ago | Likes 1076 Dislikes 13

I like my bitches no more than 5 stone

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You sliperry nipple you!

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Dirty Imperial Scum

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I WANT TO FUCK METERS OF MOTHERS TOO!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MWHAHAHAHA

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 for "metric motherfucker"

10 years ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 8

+1 for +1

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Just happy about metric +1

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

Just happy for motherfucker

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just happy about +1. +1

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Just happy about 1. +1

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Just happy about motherfucker

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pam refers to herself as 110lbs or something. Shes a beautiful woman but theres no way shes 110. Its sad that over 130 is "chubby" 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It took me a while before I realized they meant lbs...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unit symbols must not use the plural.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or tons. It was gonna be a WHALE of a party

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

False it says lbs

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or stone....

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Says LB on scale and pounds in comments

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! Which renders the poor girl as, well, stupid...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah its lbs - a lot of girls have a misconception about what is "lightwieght". Hell i just watched the end of the office and at one point 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that would be legit tho

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus, I'm 1.85 m and around 80 kgs, but you'll never see me wearing leggings. 130 is pretty lenient if you ask me.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

dudes shouldn't wear leggings

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't tell me how to live my life!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an American, how many kgs would 141 lbs be?

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

As other have said 1 kg = 2.2LBS, the easy way is to say about half, its off a bit, but easy to do with out a calculator.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Google it, lazy american

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

#lazyamerican

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

About 64kgs?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1 kg equals 2.2 lbs

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

about 10 stone

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We really should get on learning the conversions. Would be good.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think we should gradually switch to the metric system. It would be much quicker to learn and help more in high school science classes

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeah but here's the thing. it starts by introducing proper conversions to existing trades and industries, and then going backwards from that

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I may be wrong, but don't most us-based international businesses already do that? Or is it just scientists, I can't remember

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

when i was 180 cm tall and 65 kg, my school nurse told me i was on the verge of being underweight... 141 lbs aint shit mayn

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

you still growing height? dayyuum XD

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

stopped 6 years ago at a lovely 196 cm B-)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

\0/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Keep in mind girls are in general lower than 180. But yes, 141lbs aint shit.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

64kg, try to google "lbs to kg" ;)

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 4

Wtf, why would anyone think 64kg is "too big to wear revealing clothes"? Is that an american thing? Sounds like those people 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

are making up arbitrary numbers. Obese people get judged here (Europe) too, but not people that are a healthy weight like 64kg.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I clock in at 1.85m and 127.2kgs/20 stone... That is 6'1" and 280lbs for my American counterparts. But I carry it well - wide frame.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for someone around 170cm (5 feet?) that's prolly underweight. Well body types are different so these statements are pretty void.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah that's insane...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They should be thankful they're not underweight, like me, at 45 kg (99.208 lbs). I am a legal adult male who can vote, that's lightweight.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

130kgs... Jesus. The cutoff should land somewhere below 300lbs+ for leggings, unless the person is 8 feet tall

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 8

not ok. Got it

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

So it's ok to be an asshole like the girls above as long as the person is actually fat. But if it's hurting the feelings thin people that's

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 9

I don't think it's okay to be an asshole about it but I also don't think it's okay to let yourself get to be over 300+ pounds

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, unless you plan on doing the exercise for me it doesn't really matter what you think.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Have fun being looked down upon, having difficulty performing basic tasks, and dying young as an alternative then!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well it's definately inappropriate and they should shut the fuck up, but i could see the point they make with 300lbs of belly hanging out.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

My point exactly. There is a certain point where some styles of clothing become a little absurd. If it still works then go for it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People will have negative opinions on how you look, only assholes make them known to the world via social media.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dress for the body you have, not the body you want. Skinny or fat, makes no difference.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Well yea.. I mean I have my opinions about bellies flopping and asscracks showing etc. but I do not voice them over. It's in my head.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130lb for any girl over 5'6" is pretty light. Either those posts are coming from anorexics or midgets.

10 years ago | Likes 1164 Dislikes 21

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 11, 2016 6:12 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

or teenagers?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:42 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I love how gifted some of you people really are I'm just saying!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's high school kids comparing their weight to freshman. and a number in high school isn't the same 10 years later. they'll figure it out

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

130 pounds and 5'6" is a BMI of 21.15. Skinny, unless you have no muscle mass whatsoever.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'1" and weight 130lb, i'm not skinny but I don't feel FAT

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm slightly heavier (133) at 5'1'm. I'm perfectly fine with my body and curves. And I'm very active. I count ran miles in terms of tacos.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

me too, kinda sucks to be "small"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or it is in kgs - now for 5'6" girl having 130 kg is serious overweight

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or cunts

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've recently met several young women over 5'4 who are upset that they are 'so tall'

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look like kids

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or idiots

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or midgets killed me

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or they're not, and they are just projecting their own body image issues.

10 years ago | Likes 293 Dislikes 6

Both I suppose

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or they are 110 years old

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or bitches

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or skinnyfats who don't have a lot of muscle mass

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to mention muscle mass

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Fuck off mate I'm five foot one and three quarters

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Or (crazy theory here, bear with me) teenagers. I've heard they can be slightly unpleasant every so often.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Isn't that the average height for women?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im a dude and I used to weigh 137 at 5'10.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Glad to hear your weight/height imbalance corrected after puberty.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope, till I was 24.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes that about the right timing for finishing up puberty and transitioning into your mature metabolism. Congrats on maturity.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or just call tall women under 130 lbs anorexic as it that isn't a huge insult to anorexics AND women. Y'know, whatever,.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ooorrrrrr assholes.

10 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 1

To be fair, it's also young women regurgitating the standards and pressure put upon them by a society that values unrealistic thinness.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

They're women, not protozoa. They make the concious effort to regurgitate that nonsense.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

As a woman, I tend to disagree. I didn't realize the negative ideas society has impressed upon me until probably after age 25. But who knows

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, I mean, there is no arguing intent. People choose to say what they do. The influenc behind the feeling expressed is a different matter

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ding-ding-ding! We have the correct answer!

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

But how about if they're 12 yrs old?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Then they're just prepubescent assholes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My wife is 5'5" (164 cm) and 115lb, that's not anorexic. But coupling weight with appearance is stupid in itself, there are hot girls >150lb

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

I'm those exact measurments!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or anorexic midgets

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 3

Racist anorexic midgets are the worst

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"If you're over 5 pounds don't wear booty shorts" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc%C3%ADa_Z%C3%A1rate

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Those midgets get so damn judgmental.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'7 and I weighed 135 when I was 22!! (I lost 30 lbs during my first trimester due to morning sickness.)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

That's how much my friend weighs. I used to be heavier than him...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My gf is exactly the same and her figure is admirable. Maybe Trevor & co. live among midgets resulting from all that inbreeding.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was underweight. I looked fantastic, (pregnancy tits), but I was NOT healthy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More likely they're 15 years old and it hasn't accorded to them yet that teenagers generally don't have normal human bodies yet.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Or they're all pre-pubescent

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

In my experience, the most vitriolic pro-anorexia bloggers/vloggers are actually goddamn fucking adults. It's horrifying.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Comparing your weight with 14 year olds is not healthy. Even if you are 14 year old. And if the fashion industry use that young models.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

My best friend used to say this kind of stuff. She's 5'4 and 90lbs, so what she pictures as 130lbs is much bigger than it actually looks.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Jesus christ, is she healthy? Because that's SUPER light for her height.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I know. She's always been really tiny. She's vegetarian and a dancer, so it's hard for her to gain weight.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'7 at 120 lbs and honestly my ideal weight is about 140 lbs. I find it incredibly hard to gain weight, though :(

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But people will still call you anorexic in order to make them feel better about their own bodies, even on imgur. smh.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. I've heard "You need to eat more burgers" more times than I can count haha

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or people that use kg.

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 7

As an American I can confirm that that no one uses that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

I was kidding guys! Damn the written word and its inability to convey sarcasm!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

In America, maybe.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was joking. Yep we're stuck with our units of measure that make absolutely no sense. I mean, 12 inches in a foot and 5280 feet in mile??

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even saying that now I'm not sure if it's correct because it's such a weird number.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, one of em says 130 pounds in all caps.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They would say 80/90 kg, not 130, + one of them actually mentions pounds

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I mean, 130kg is A LOT. Like 275lbs off the top of my head.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

You kinda start siding with them at that point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For a quick calculation, multiply by 2 to get ponds. It's closer to 2.2 in reality, but fractions take a few seconds to do on high numbers.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I fucked up, meant to say 285, I knew the conversion was 2.2lbs per kilo =)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

308ib give or take.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I actually fucked it up a bit in my head, it's more like 285 I think. 2.2lbs per kilo is the conversion I think.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

286 pounds

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I thought it was 140kg for some reason

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a fairly large, overweight guy, who's probably slightly above average height and have decent muscle mass. I weigh like 110.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

..and you shouldn't wear belly shirts or leggings. Maybe they have a point

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're goddamn right they have a point, no one likes that look :P

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So yes, for a girl, 130 probably means they're obese.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Average height for girls is~5'3" so they're probably just dumb and not taking that into account (no excuse for being mean though)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The average height for American women is about 5'5.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Dammit, all these years I thought I was average...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am a 36 year old guy, 5'9" I weigh 130 pounds. So?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

According to the ladies above, you may wear leggings, short shorts and crop tops.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So, I got that going for me.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That sounds unhealthy.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

You can't say that without seeing him. Some people just have smaller cores.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have weighed the same (130 - 140) since I was 15. I have thru hiked the AT, was an outdooor adventure instructor for 5 years, and run. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Does that sound unhealthy still?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Where you doing bath salts when doing these activities? That would be unhealthy

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Based on your age, gender, weight and level of exercise, you do seem a bit malnourished. You sound the type to get unexpected heart attacks.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you said you weighed over 140lbs at that activity level, that would be normal but 130 is concerning for a middle aged dude.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'5" I'm not sure I'd look healthy any lower than 140. My lowest I was 150 and I felt very healthy at that weight :)

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 14

Same. I don't like being stick skinny. When I was 130, I was a size 2 and had the figure of a preteen boy. Not how I want to look

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

meanwhile I am sitting here 6' 157 lb in perfect health

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, you don't look healthy unless you're overweight? Or just making excuses?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Overweight!? Hahaha at 150 I was fit, I'm lucky in that when I gain, I gain pretty much head to toe. So for ME 130 would look really thin

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now at my current weight yes I could stand to lose some, I've been struggling since I had my baby last year but I'm not unhappy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'11" and male, and once went down to 155 lbs. Not a nice look.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm 6'2" and 150 lbs, this is my normal weight, due to stress and lack of exercise I was down to 135 when I graduated college. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't quite look like a holocaust survivor, but it was pretty bad. There is quite a variety in builds, weight is not a great metric. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'10" and generally sit around 195lbs. But I play in the front row in rugby, so should really be heavier....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm just over 6'4" and have weighed under 150 pounds. Really not a nice look, unless I want to look like a meth addict.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

meanwhile I am over here 6' 157 and perfectly healthy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

wow, really? I'm 5'10, 152lbs with muscles and I still have a lot of belly fat.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some family thought I was anorexic. I really do have big bones and more than average musculature but nothing to write home about.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im 5'9" and typically weigh between 130 and 140. I also run and rock climb so I am not frail by any means. Peoples bodies are different.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Apparently those girls don't understand the concept of height effecting weight.

10 years ago | Likes 3046 Dislikes 18

Or minding their own business

10 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 1

Or just proportions in general

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

Or a penis effecting weight

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, also people are fucking cunts.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

with the kind of girls who'd make these kinds of comments I'd find it more surprising if they understood how to tie their shoes.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

those girls *and trevor

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or muscle. This girl is muscular

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or the concept of being a nice person either.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or muscle.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

or muscle

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or the difference between fat and muscle weight

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Exactly....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Girls of that maturity don't understand anything.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm 160ish and a size 4-6... I swear, all my weight is in my Peggy Hill sized feet.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yup, as long as you're 5'5" or taller then 141 isn't overweight, under 5'8" may look chubby though unless you have a lot of muscle.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 1

If I were 5'3" and weighed 141 pounds, I would dance half naked in the street until the cops came and arrested me for indecent exposure.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not saying someone can't be happy at that, just acknowledging that it is technically overweight.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only in your eyes. Age is also a factor to be considered.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does anyone know how tall she might be? That's a pretty slim look for someone who weighs that much. (No, 140 pounds isn't much but still..)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have no clue, but I'm 5'2 and no bathroom counter has ever looked that low to me. I would guess at least 5'5

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe more like 5'6 or 5'7

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

http://m.imgur.com/exxlUuK Average Aussie women

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

130 is well inside the healthy range for even average height women.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're teenagers. Do you really expect them to know anything of use?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 25, 2017 3:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

5'6" 120lb MALE and sick of being told that I'm too thin. Why is that acceptable but I can't tell an overweight person how fat they are?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry that happens, that sucks.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'10 and 139lbs, but in my best days (when I had much more time to excercise) I were around 160lbs and got only compliments.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'7 and 120lbs. Im really skinny. Whenever I tell people my weight hey think I'm lying.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or just not being cunts thats just me though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or muscle. Or the fact anybody can wear what they want (shrug emoji)

10 years ago | Likes 342 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 12, 2016 4:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What about 290 lbs? Or 227 lbs? Or 130 lbs? Where is the exact limit ? Who sets it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

or things in general

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or fuck you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or muscle compared to fat

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This comment is as bad as the post. I think the point is don't be an asshole.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or muscle weighing more than fat

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah, I knew I was gonna get it wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess I'm "that" person. Sorrybut it's *affecting

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or boobs or butt affecting weight.

10 years ago | Likes 1157 Dislikes 8

Gotta love when boobs and butt affect weight

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure they're all white skinny bitches

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 14

Oh saying that is fine. But if you said "stupid black how's" then that's not OK? Their both not OK to say

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

I think they should both be the same level of ok which means this is the Internet no on cares.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or muscle

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

I keep telling my doctor that, but he keeps telling me no sir you shouldn't have boobs, you're just fat

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

They would need to have those to know how they work. These skinny white chicks flatter than Kansas.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even the BMI doesn't take that into consideration. My sister's listed as "overweight" even though she's skinny as can be,

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pro-ana blogs/sites like SkinnyGossip seem to be of the opinion that those should be starved off as well, genetic predispositions be damned

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or brain.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Or, you know, muscle is 3 times heavier than fat because of density.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Have extremely muscular friends. BMI says they're obese....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

BMI cannot be applied to athletes.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In terms of area, yes. But that statement is garbage without describing it in terms of area occupied. 2lbs of anything is 2lbs.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Its not though, 2lbs fat and 2lb muscle is very different.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unless it's on the moon

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

so we can conclude "those girls" dont understand concept of height, having boobs,or a butt effecting weight. Their experience is their life.

10 years ago | Likes 274 Dislikes 4

So this party is being hosted by flat chested, flat assed midgets?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And with that experience they choose to be shallow, petty, and so plainly insecure that it takes trying to hurt others for them to be happy

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

And their life consists of being petty ignorant prick-picklers.

10 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 2

"Prick-pickler" now added to my dictionary.. +1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My first thought was something that rhymes with blunt, but I decided otherwise. I'm glad I did.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

probably because they don't have the booty

10 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

Yes. Butts are wonderful things.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

or Mammaries

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

I feel like it's the difference between skinny fat and fit skinny

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the fact that big asses are awesome

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but, "If you're over 20% BF" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing there is much that these idiots don't understand

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also it's somehow reversed for guys, people assume i weigh a lot more than i do just because of my height/proportions. nope i'm a measly 150

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a woman, women are women's own worst enemy. The feminazis believe men are awful when it's really women like them who are bullies

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6'4ft 90kg coz I love them jump squats ????

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

6'4" 140kg. Love powerlifting.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's awesome! Nice work! I'm a chick tho that's why my gains are sloooow

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just keep at it! That's the important part! Don't see many 6'4" girls in fitness.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's my goal! Haha looking good but mainly being fit in general :)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same except I love to shotgun pizzas

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who doesn't. On some big lifting days I will eat two large x4 cheese pizzas with other toppings and a stuffed cheese bread after.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About 7lbs per inch in height

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or muscle. 2x more dense than fat

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Stop quoting made up facts. Skeletal muscle is 1.06 g/cm^3, adipose tissue is 0.92 g/cm^3. That's 15% denser. It IS firm and shapely though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finally someone with a brain

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's not always relating to height. If a 5'2 girl is 130 of solid muscle and a good butt and chest, is the 5'10 girl same weight better?

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

That pretty much describes my wife, and she does fret about weight even though she has abs. It's all bodaciousness.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definitely not.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm a 5'2" woman, I'm quite petite, but I'm about 130 from muscle. Weight doesn't mean very much

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Are you pretty active I take it? Weight and height mean nothing if it's healthy, but even a 5't bodybuilder at 270lbs isn't always healthy

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have a very physical job. When I'm not built up i don't even hit 115, and then I'm soft

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a girl is 5'2" and weighs 130 of muscle she's the She Hulk, or a professional body builder. Either way, that's an outlier.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

That's hilarious. I'm very petite, but I'm very densely packed and 130lbs. I have no idea what women you've seen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'2 and 120 lbs and am no where near a she-hulk

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha 130lbs on a 5'2 girl isn't going to look like She-Hulk. Most female bodybuilders push 180-200lbs.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And most of them are much taller.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I remember some comment thread where someone was flipping out saying 150 lb was obese. Individuals carry that weight differently.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

although I don't really believe to its relevance for everyone 150lbs is clinically obese for someone 4'11" (I'm overweight but have <8% BF)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

150 for a 5'2" girl is pretty up there

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 24, 2016 7:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

150 lbs would make me a sickly skeleton man.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How you "carry that weight" is irrelevant in regards to obesity. 150lb IS obese for the average person (regarding activity) at 5' tall.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If you're 150 at 5'7" it's not as big a deal. I didn't specify a height, neither did the OP here. We can't judge solely on the "150" figure.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which is the point the comment you replied to was making.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But height is what matters when determining whether a certain weight is obese not how they "carry that weight".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Affecting*

10 years ago | Likes 361 Dislikes 10

No, effecting works too. Height effects weight = Height causes weight. It's fine, guys.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

maybe in Freedom-English, but not in Original-English

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Not even in freedom-english

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just like the Butterfly Affect.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

*bufferfly Affleck

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Beat me to it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Affleck*

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 5

MAAAAAAAAAAAAAATT DAAAAMON

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Benedong Cumberslang*

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Boom! Grammar nazi

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 24

Actually that's, Buum Grammer Notsi.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Boom! No

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually, effect works well here too.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 48

Added weight is the effect of height, boobs, butt... Height, boobs, and butt affect weight.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's poor usage, but it technically works.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

No. It doesn't.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It means something different, but only slightly. It's a bad way to say it, not something that you can't say based on our grammatical rules.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

http://grammarist.com/usage/affect-effect/ http://www.quickanddi">-effect/">http://grammarist.com/usage/affect-effect/ http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/affect-versus-effect?page=1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it doesn't affect is verb effect is noun. Know your shit.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

Affect and effect can both either be used as a verb or a noun, each with a different meaning. @Leithreas is correct.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Sorry you got down-voted, dude. From the OED: Cause (something) to happen; bring about: "the prime minister effected many policy changes" :)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well, crap. I meant to reply to @Leithreas :P

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Your source literally backs up the opposite argument that they aren't used interchangeably except for a couple of specific exceptions

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are correct that both can be used as verb/noun, but wrong that it works well here. Example 3 under the rules for 'Effect' in [2]

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, both are both a verb and a noun. Know your shit. Effect means "to bring about" and since increased height causes increased weight...

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 24

First up, thanks for discussing. You are arguing against people who obviously didn't take their time to double-check. BUT I believe your 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have but one upvote to give. ;_;

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Effect is brought about by a cause. The cause is affected by the variables involved. Using "effect" here would not be appropriate.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Downvoted for being right? Ah well. Affect is a noun, too. Blowing minds!

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 16